RESUMEN
The objective of this study was to compare the impact of amiodarone and lidocaine on survival and neurological outcomes following cardiac arrest. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as well as cohort and cross-sectional trials was undertaken, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Potential relevant studies were searched in databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, from the beginning of databases to February 15, 2024. Outcomes assessed in this study were survival to hospital discharge, survival to hospital admission or 24 hours, favorable neurological outcomes, and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). A total of seven studies (five observational and two RCTs) were included in this meta-analysis encompassing 19,081 patients with cardiac arrest. Pooled analysis showed no difference between amiodarone and lidocaine in terms of survival to hospital discharge (odds ratio (OR): 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75 to 1.04), ROSC (OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.05, p-value: 0.25), favorable neurological outcomes (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.66 to 1.17, p-value: 0.38), and survival to 24 hours (OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.55 to 1.21, p-value: 0.31). While lidocaine demonstrated a slight survival advantage, the differences were statistically insignificant. Similarly, no significant variations were observed in ROSC incidence, neurological outcomes, or survival at 24 hours. These findings align with current guidelines but underscore the necessity for further rigorous RCTs to provide conclusive recommendations.
RESUMEN
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis, primarily due to a late diagnosis. Recent studies have focused on identifying non-invasive biomarkers for early detection, with microRNAs (miRNAs) emerging as promising candidates. This systematic review aims to evaluate the potential of circulating miRNAs as biomarkers for the early detection of PDAC, analyzing their diagnostic accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive search across PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted. Studies published from January 2013 to October 2023 focusing on miRNA biomarkers for early PDAC detection were included. Data synthesis was performed through a narrative approach due to the heterogeneity of the studies. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Key findings include the elevated levels of specific miRNAs, such as miR-18a, miR-106a, and miR-25, in early-stage PDAC patients compared to controls. The integration of miRNA profiles with traditional biomarkers like CA19-9 showed improved diagnostic performance. However, challenges in the standardization of miRNA evaluation methodologies were noted. Circulating miRNAs demonstrate significant potential as non-invasive biomarkers for early PDAC detection. Despite promising results, further research and standardization are necessary for clinical application.
RESUMEN
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) presents a complex interplay of chronic inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract and is associated with various extraintestinal manifestations, including cardiovascular complications (CVCs). IBD patients face an elevated risk of CVCs, including coronary artery disease, heart failure, arrhythmias, stroke, peripheral artery disease, venous thromboembolism, and mesenteric ischemia, necessitating comprehensive cardiovascular risk assessment and management. The intricate interplay between chronic inflammation, genetic predisposition, environmental factors, and immune dysregulation likely contributes to the development of CVCs in IBD patients. While the exact mechanisms linking IBD and CVCs remain speculative, potential pathways may involve shared inflammatory pathways, endothelial dysfunction, dysbiosis of the gut microbiome, and traditional cardiovascular risk factors exacerbated by the chronic inflammatory state. Moreover, IBD medications, particularly corticosteroids, may impact cardiovascular health by inducing hypertension, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia, further amplifying the overall CVC risk. Lifestyle factors such as smoking, obesity, and dietary habits may also exacerbate cardiovascular risks in individuals with IBD. Lifestyle modifications, including smoking cessation, adoption of a heart-healthy diet, regular exercise, and optimization of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, play a fundamental role in mitigating CVC risk. Emerging preventive strategies targeting inflammation modulation and gut microbiome interventions hold promise for future interventions, although further research is warranted to elucidate their efficacy and safety profiles in the context of IBD. Continued interdisciplinary collaboration, advanced research methodologies, and innovative interventions are essential to address the growing burden of CVCs in individuals living with IBD and to improve their long-term cardiovascular outcomes.
RESUMEN
The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation after cardiac surgery in patients requiring mechanical ventilation. This meta-analysis was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Online databases, including EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library, were comprehensively searched to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine and propofol in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and requiring mechanical ventilation. The examined outcomes included the mean length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay in hours, duration of mechanical ventilation in hours, length of hospital stay in days, and number of patients diagnosed with delirium. A total of 14 studies were included in the present meta-analysis while 1360 patients undergoing cardiac surgery were involved in these studies. Pooled results showed that the duration of mechanical ventilation was lower in the dexmedetomidine group compared to the propofol group (mean difference (MD): 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.06-1.44, p-value: 0.03). We also found a significantly low length of stay in ICU in the dexmedetomidine group compared to the propofol (MD: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.04-1.74, p-value: 0.04). The length of hospital stay was also significantly lower in patients receiving dexmedetomidine as compared to the propofol group (MD: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.32-0.70, p-value<0.001). Risk of delirium was significantly higher in patients receiving propofol compared to patients receiving dexmedetomidine (RR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.48-2.74, p-value<0.001). In conclusion, our meta-analysis provides evidence of the beneficial impacts of dexmedetomidine on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Dexmedetomidine was associated with a significant reduction in the duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital, and the risk of delirium.
RESUMEN
The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of early oral anticoagulation with delayed anticoagulant therapy in patients who have had a recent stroke and have atrial fibrillation (AF). This meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. The literature search was independently performed by two authors. We searched PubMed and Scopus using search strings that included the following terms: "stroke," "atrial fibrillation," "oral anticoagulants," "recurrent stroke," and "intracerebral hemorrhage." Our search spanned from the inception of databases to May 25, 2023. The primary outcome assessed in this study was the composite efficacy outcome (as defined by individual studies). Recurrent ischemic stroke (IS), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and death from any cause were assessed as secondary outcomes. For safety analysis, bleeding events were compared between the two study groups. We included five articles in this meta-analysis, comprising a total of 7958 patients (including 3793 in the early treatment group and 4165 in the delayed treatment group). Pooled analysis showed that the risk of composite efficacy outcome (RR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.51-0.93, p-value: 0.01) and recurrent ischemic stroke (RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.53-0.94, p-value: 0.02) were lower in the early treatment group. However, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of all-cause mortality, intracranial hemorrhage, or bleeding events. In light of the findings, healthcare professionals should carefully evaluate the risks and benefits of early versus delayed DOAC treatment in individual patients, considering factors such as stroke severity, bleeding risk, and patient preferences.
RESUMEN
The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of istaroxime in patients with heart failure. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a search was conducted on the EMBASE and Medline databases to identify articles related to the safety and efficacy of istaroxime in patients with heart failure. The search covered the period from inception to May 31st, 2023, without any restrictions on the year of publication. The search strategy utilized relevant terms such as "istaroxime," "heart failure", "efficacy," and other related terms, along with their corresponding Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms. The outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included the change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), E to A ratio (a marker of left ventricle function), cardiac index in L/min/m2, systolic blood pressure (SBP) in mmHg, left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) in ml, and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVDSV) in ml. For safety analysis, gastrointestinal events and cardiovascular events were assessed. A total of three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this meta-analysis encompassing 211 patients with heart failure. Pooled analysis showed that istaroxime was effective in increasing LVEF (MD: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.91 to 1.62, p-value: 0.001), reducing E to A ratio (MD: -0.39, 95% CI: -0.60 to -0.19, p-value: 0.001), increasing cardiac index (MD: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.25, p-value: 0.001), reducing LVESV (MD: -11.84, 95% CI: -13.91 to -9.78, p-value: 0.001), reducing LVEDV (MD: -12.25, 95% CI: -14.63 to -9.87, p-value: 0.001) and increasing SBP (MD: 8.41, 95% CI: 5.23 to 11.60, p-value: 0.001) compared to the placebo group. However, risk of gastrointestinal events was significantly higher in patients receiving istaroxime compared to the placebo group (RR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.53 to 4.57, p-value: 0.0005). These findings support the enhancement of heart function with istaroxime administration, aligning with previous clinical and experimental evidence.
RESUMEN
This meta-analysis has been conducted to compare ustekinumab and adalimumab as induction or maintenance therapy in patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD). The current meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Two investigators independently searched online databases including PubMed, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Cochrane Library for relevant articles published up to April 2023. The initial search terms were "ustekinumab," "adalimumab," and "Crohn's disease". Three studies (with a total of 612 patients) were included in the present meta-analysis. We did not find any significant difference in clinical remission (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 0.68-2.52), clinical response (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 0.39-4.91), endoscopic remission (OR: 1.56, 95% CI: 0.66-3.64), and steroid-free remission (OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.67-1.42) between patients who received ustekinumab and patients who received adalimumab. In conclusion, this meta-analysis provides valuable insights into the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab and adalimumab in the treatment of moderate to severe CD. Our findings indicate that both drugs have similar effectiveness in achieving clinical remission, clinical response, radiological remission and steroid-free remission.
RESUMEN
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) refers to the abrupt stoppage of the heart's mechanical activity, primarily triggered by coronary artery disease. OHCA represents a significant global cause of death. The aim of this study was to assess the predictors of OHCA in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This meta-analysis was conducted following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Two investigators performed a comprehensive search of online databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, from their inception to October 15, 2023. Keywords such as "predictors," "out-of-hospital cardiac arrest," and "acute coronary syndrome" were used to identify relevant articles. To enhance the search, synonyms and their corresponding Medical Subject Heading terms were included. A total of six studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was 4% (95% confidence interval, 3%-5%). The current meta-analysis reports that age, gender, having multivessel disease, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and having ST-elevation myocardial infarction were some of the significant factors associated with OHCA in patients hospitalized with ACS.
RESUMEN
The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare outcomes between sacubitril/valsartan and enalapril in patients with heart failure. We performed this meta-analysis according to the guidelines reported in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Two independent authors systematically searched online databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception till September 15, 2023. Outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and cardiovascular-related hospitalization. A total of nine studies were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled analysis showed that the risk of all-cause mortality was higher in patients receiving enalapril compared to patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan (risk ratio [RR]: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.31 to 1.04). Risk of cardiovascular mortality was significantly higher in the enalapril group compared to the sacubitril/valsartan group (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.62 to 0.91). The risk of cardiovascular hospitalization was significantly higher in the enalapril group compared to the sacubitril/valsartan group (RR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.86). In conclusion, our meta-analysis of nine studies underscores the superior clinical performance of sacubitril/valsartan compared to enalapril in managing patients with heart failure.
RESUMEN
This study was done to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term outcomes between low ligation and high ligation of the inferior mesentric artery (IMA) in sigmoid colon and rectal cancer surgery. This study was conducted following the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A literature search was performed in electronic databases including PubMed, CINAHIL, EMBASE, and Web of Science to identify studies published between January 1, 2015, and April 30, 2023. The outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included postoperative complications (anastomotic leakage, surgical site infection, and postoperative ileus), intraoperative outcomes (duration of surgery in minutes, total intraoperative blood loss in milliliters, total lymph nodes harvested, and total number of metastatic lymph nodes), recovery outcomes (time to first flatus and length of hospital stay), and long-term outcomes (five-year mortality rate and disease-free survival rate). A total of 17 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Of these, six were randomized control trials (RCTs) and 11 were retrospective cohort studies. This meta-analysis suggests that lower ligation may be associated with a lower risk of anastomotic leakage compared to higher ligation in patients undergoing colon cancer surgery. However, there was no significant difference between the two techniques in terms of surgical site infection, postoperative ileus, total lymph nodes harvested, number of metastatic lymph nodes, duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay. Time to first flatus was significantly shorter in patients who underwent lower ligation. Additionally, there were no significant differences in the five-year mortality rate and disease-free survival rate between the two techniques. The results of this study indicate that both techniques are comparable in most aspects and suggest that the choice of technique should be based on individual patient factors and surgeon preference.
RESUMEN
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a prevalent gastrointestinal disorder that impacts the lives of many individuals worldwide. We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess both the effectiveness of rifaximin in alleviating IBS symptoms and its potential adverse effects. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched from inception until August 20, 2023, for studies comparing rifaximin with placebo in the resolution of symptoms among IBS patients. Risk ratios (RRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived for all the outcomes of interest. Six RCTs were pooled in this analysis. The results showed improved abdominal distension with rifaximin over the control group. Overall symptom relief at the end of the treatment period and follow-up period was also observed in the patients receiving rifaximin. However, no significant differences were found between the rifaximin group and the control group for the outcomes of abdominal pain, nausea, headache, vomiting, diarrhea, sinusitis, bronchitis, and upper respiratory tract infection. The results of our meta-analysis support the use of rifaximin in the treatment of IBS, owing to its safety and effectiveness. Future RCTs should be conducted to assess this topic of interest more extensively.