How to assess early-onset neonatal sepsis? Comparison of three detection strategies.

INTRODUCTION: Early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) can cause significant morbidity and mortality, especially if it is not detected early. Given the decrease in its incidence in the past few decades, it is important to find a balance between reducing the use of diagnostic tests and continuing to detect affected patients. We compared 3 detection strategies in patients with risk factors (RFs) for infection: laboratory screening (S1), the Neonatal Sepsis Risk Calculator (S2) and clinical observation (S3). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study in neonates born at 34 weeks of gestation or later and with RFs or symptoms compatible with EONS. We analysed outcomes in our unit with the use of laboratory screening (S1) and compared them with the other two strategies (S2 and S3) to contemplate whether to modify our protocol. RESULTS: The study included 754 patients, and the most frequent RFs were prolonged rupture of membranes (35.5%) and maternal colonization by Streptococcus agalactiae (38.5%). Strategies S2 and S3 would decrease the performance of laboratory tests (S1, 56.8% of patients; S2, 9.9%; S3, 22.4%; P < 0.01), hospital admissions (S1, 11%; S2, 6.9%; S3, 7.9%; P < 0.01) and the use of antibiotherapy (S1, 8.6%; S2, 6.7%; S3, 6.4%; P < 0.01). Sepsis was diagnosed in 13 patients, and it would have been detected with S2 and S3 except in 1 patient who had asymptomatic bacteriemia by Enterococcus faecalis. No patient with mild and self-limited symptoms in whom antibiotherapy was not started received a diagnosis of sepsis later on. CONCLUSION: Close clinical observation seems to be a safe option and could reduce the use of diagnostic tests, hospital admission and unnecessary antibiotherapy. The watchful waiting approach in patients with mild and self-limiting symptoms in the first hours post birth does not appear to be associated with failure to identify sepsis.

Neonates Born to Mothers With COVID-19: Data From the Spanish Society of Neonatology Registry.

OBJECTIVES: To describe neonatal and maternal characteristics of the largest prospective cohort of newborns from mothers with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the data of which were prospectively collected from the nationwide registry of the Spanish Society of Neonatology. METHODS: Between March 8, 2020, and May 26, 2020, the data of 503 neonates born to 497 mothers diagnosed with COVID-19 during pregnancy or at the time of delivery were collected by 79 hospitals throughout Spain. RESULTS: Maternal symptoms were similar to that of the general population, with 5% of severe forms. In 45.8% of asymptomatic women at the time of delivery, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection was detected because of recommendations established in Spain to perform COVID-19 screening in all women admitted to the hospital for labor. The rate of preterm deliveries was 15.7% and of cesarean deliveries, 33%. The most common diagnostic test was detection of viral RNA by polymerase chain reaction of nasopharyngeal swabs at a median age of 3 hours after delivery (1-12 hours). Almost one-half of neonates were left skin-to-skin after delivery, and delayed clamping of umbilical cords was performed in 43% of neonates. Also, 62.3% of asymptomatic neonates were managed with rooming-in. Maternal milk was received by 76.5% of neonates, 204 of them as exclusive breastfeeding. CONCLUSIONS: The current study indicates that there is no need for separation of mothers from neonates, allowing delayed cord clamping and skin-to-skin contact along with maintenance of breastfeeding in a high percentage of newborns from mothers with COVID-19.

Neonatal Infection Due to SARS-CoV-2: An Epidemiological Study in Spain.

Objective: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continue to increase worldwide. Although some data from pediatric series are available, more evidence is required, especially in neonates, a group with specific characteristics that deserve special attention. This study aimed to describe general and clinical characteristics, management, and treatment of postnatal-acquired (community and nosocomial/hospital-acquired) COVID-19 neonatal cases in Spain. Methods: This was a national prospective epidemiological study that included cases from a National Registry supported by the Spanish Society of Neonatology. Neonates with postnatal SARS-CoV-2 infection were included in this study. General data and infection-related information (mode and source of transmission, age at diagnosis, clinical manifestations, need for hospitalization, admission unit, treatment administered, and complementary studies performed, hospital stay associated with the infection) were collected. Results: A total of 40 cases, 26 community-acquired and 14 nosocomial were registered. Ten were preterm newborns (2 community-acquired and 8 nosocomial COVID-19 cases). Mothers (in both groups) and healthcare workers (in nosocomial cases) were the main source of infection. Hospital admission was required in 22 community-acquired cases [18 admitted to the neonatal intermediate care unit (NIMCU) and 4 to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)]. Among nosocomial COVID-19 cases (n = 14), previously admitted for other reasons, 4 were admitted to the NIMCU and 10 to the NICU. Ten asymptomatic patients were registered (5 in each group). In the remaining cases, clinical manifestations were generally mild in both groups, including upper respiratory airways infection, febrile syndrome or acute gastroenteritis with good overall health. In both groups, most severe cases occurred in preterm neonates or neonates with concomitant pathologies. Most of the cases did not require respiratory support. Hydroxychloroquine was administered to 4 patients in the community-acquired group and to 2 patients in the nosocomial group. Follow-up after hospital discharge was performed in most patients. Conclusions: This is the largest series of COVID-19 neonatal cases in Spain published to date. Although clinical manifestations were generally mild, prevention, treatment, and management in this group are essential.

¿Cómo evaluar la sepsis neonatal de inicio precoz? Estudio comparativo de tres estrategias de detección / How to assess early-onset neonatal sepsis? Comparison of three detection strategies

Introducción: La sepsis neonatal de inicio precoz puede causar morbimortalidad importante, sobre todo si se retrasa su identificación. La disminución de su incidencia en las últimas décadas motiva que sea importante encontrar un equilibrio entre reducir las pruebas complementarias y seguir detectando los pacientes afectos. Comparamos 3 estrategias de detección en pacientes con factores de riesgo: E1. Cribado analítico; E2. Calculadora de riesgo de sepsis neonatal; E3. Observación clínica. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo, en recién nacidos con edad gestacional ≥34 semanas y con factores de riesgo o sintomatología compatible con sepsis neonatal de inicio precoz. Se analizaron los resultados de nuestra unidad con cribado analítico (E1) y se comparó con las otras 2 estrategias (E2 y E3) para valorar modificar nuestro protocolo. Resultados: Se incluyeron 754 pacientes cuyos factores de riesgo más frecuentes fueron la rotura prologada de membranas (35,5%) y la colonización materna por Streptococcus agalactiae (38,5%). Las E2 y E3 disminuirían la realización de analíticas (E1 56,8% de los pacientes; E2 9,9%; E3 22,4%; p<0,01), los ingresos hospitalarios (E1 11%; E2 6,9%; E3 7,9%; p<0,01) y la administración de antibioterapia (E1 8,6%; E2 6,7%; E3 6,4%; p<0,01). Trece pacientes se diagnosticaron de sepsis, las cuales se hubieran detectado con E2 y E3, salvo un paciente con bacteriemia asintomática por Enterococcusfaecalis. Ningún paciente con clínica leve y autolimitada en que no se inició antibioterapia, se diagnosticó posteriormente de sepsis. Conclusiones: La observación clínica estrecha parece una opción segura y podría disminuir la realización de pruebas complementarias, la tasa de hospitalización y el uso de antibioterapia innecesaria. Mantener una conducta expectante en pacientes con sintomatología leve y autolimitada en las primeras horas de vida parece no relacionarse con la no identificación de sepsis. (AU)

Introduction: Early-onset neonatal sepsis can cause significant morbidity and mortality, especially if it is not detected early. Given the decrease in its incidence in the past few decades, it is important to find a balance between reducing the use of diagnostic tests and continuing to detect affected patients. We compared 3 detection strategies in patients with risk factors (RFs) for infection: laboratory screening (S1), the neonatal sepsis risk calculator (S2) and clinical observation (S3). Patients and methods: Retrospective observational study in neonates born at 34 weeks or gestation or later and with RFs or symptoms compatible with early-onset neonatal sepsis. We analysed outcomes in our unit with the use of laboratory screening (S1) and compared them with the other two strategies (S2 and S3) to contemplate whether to modify our protocol. Results: The study included 754 patients, and the most frequent RFs were prolonged rupture of membranes (35.5%) and maternal colonization by Streptococcus agalactiae (38.5%). Strategies S2 and S3 would decrease the performance of laboratory tests (S1, 56.8% of patients; S2, 9.9%; S3, 22.4%; P<.01), hospital admissions (S1, 11%; S2, 6.9%; S3, 7.9%; P<.01) and the use of antibiotherapy (S1, 8.6%; S2, 6.7%; S3, 6.4%; P<.01). Sepsis was diagnosed in 13 patients, and it would have been detected with S2 and S3 except in 1 patient who had asymptomatic bacteriemia by Enterococcusfaecalis. No patient with mild and self-limited symptoms in whom antibiotherapy was not started received a diagnosis of sepsis later on. Conclusions: Close clinical observation seems to be a safe option and could reduce the use of diagnostic tests, hospital admission and unnecessary antibiotherapy. The watchful waiting approach in patients with mild and self-limiting symptoms in the first hours post birth does not appear to be associated with failure to identify sepsis. (AU)