Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 64
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 147(1): 6-15, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35837885

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Mortality from opioid use disorder (OUD) can be reduced for patients who receive opioid agonist treatment (OAT). In the United States (US), OATs have different requirements including nearly daily visits to a dispensing facility for methadone but weekly to monthly prescriptions for buprenorphine. Our objective was to compare mortality rates for buprenorphine and methadone treatments among a large sample of US patients with OUD. METHODS: We measured all-cause mortality, overdose mortality, and suicide mortality among US Department of Veterans Affairs patients with a diagnosis of OUD who received OAT from 2010 through 2019. We leveraged substantial and sustained regional variation in prescribing buprenorphine versus methadone as an instrumental variable (IV) and used inverse propensity of treatment weighting to balance relevant covariates across treatment groups. We compared mortality with true two-stage IV using both probit and linear probability models, as well as a reduced form IV model, adjusting for demographics and health status. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 61,997 patients with OUD who received OAT, of whom 92.7% were male with a mean age of 47.9 (SD = 14.1) years. Patients were followed for a median of 2 (IQR = 1,4) calendar years. Across regional terciles, mean methadone prescribing was 4.8%, 19.5%, and 75.1% of OAT patients. All models identified significant reductions in all-cause and suicide mortality for buprenorphine relative to methadone. For example, predicted all-cause mortality from the probit model was 169.7 per 10,000 person years (95% CI, 157.8, 179.6) in the lowest tercile of methadone prescribing compared with 206.1 (95% CI, 196.0, 216.3) in the highest tercile. No difference was identified for overdose mortality. CONCLUSION: We found significantly lower all-cause mortality and suicide mortality rates for buprenorphine compared with methadone. Our results support the less restrictive prescribing practices for buprenorphine as OAT in the US.


Asunto(s)
Buprenorfina , Sobredosis de Droga , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Buprenorfina/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos/métodos , Metadona/uso terapéutico
2.
J Nerv Ment Dis ; 210(3): 227-230, 2022 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35199662

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Mental health lacks robust measures to assess patient safety. Unplanned discharge is common in mental health populations and associated with poor outcomes. Clarifying whether unplanned discharge varies across settings may highlight the need to develop measures to reduce harms associated with this event. Unplanned discharge rates were compared across the Department of Veterans Affairs' acute inpatient and residential mental health treatment settings from 2009 to 2019. Logistic regression was used to create facility-level, adjusted unplanned discharge rates stratified by setting. Results were described using central tendency. Among 847,661 acute inpatient discharges, the mean unplanned discharge rate was 3.3% (range, 0%-18%). Among 358,117 residential discharges, the mean unplanned discharge rate was 17.9% (range, 1%-48.3%). Unplanned discharge is a marked problem in mental health, with large variation across treatment settings. Unplanned discharge should be measured as part of patient safety efforts.


Asunto(s)
Salud Mental , Alta del Paciente , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Modelos Logísticos , Readmisión del Paciente , Seguridad del Paciente
3.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 145(4): 1082-1123, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32001253

RESUMEN

Anaphylaxis is an acute, potential life-threatening systemic allergic reaction that may have a wide range of clinical manifestations. Severe anaphylaxis and/or the need for repeated doses of epinephrine to treat anaphylaxis are risk factors for biphasic anaphylaxis. Antihistamines and/or glucocorticoids are not reliable interventions to prevent biphasic anaphylaxis, although evidence supports a role for antihistamine and/or glucocorticoid premedication in specific chemotherapy protocols and rush aeroallergen immunotherapy. Evidence is lacking to support the role of antihistamines and/or glucocorticoid routine premedication in patients receiving low- or iso-osmolar contrast material to prevent recurrent radiocontrast media anaphylaxis. Epinephrine is the first-line pharmacotherapy for uniphasic and/or biphasic anaphylaxis. After diagnosis and treatment of anaphylaxis, all patients should be kept under observation until symptoms have fully resolved. All patients with anaphylaxis should receive education on anaphylaxis and risk of recurrence, trigger avoidance, self-injectable epinephrine education, referral to an allergist, and be educated about thresholds for further care.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia/prevención & control , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Epinefrina/uso terapéutico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Hipersensibilidad/diagnóstico , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/complicaciones , Hipersensibilidad/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo
4.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 30(4): 105638, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33540336

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes between two models of acute ischemic stroke care. Namely 1) "drip-and-stay", i.e. IV tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administered at a spoke hospital in a telestroke network, with the patient remaining at the spoke, versus 2) "drip-and-ship", i.e. tPA administered at a spoke hospital with subsequent patient transfer to a hub hospital, and 3) "hub", i.e. tPA and subsequent treatment at a hub hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane from inception-October 2019 included randomized control trials and observational cohort studies comparing the drip-and-stay model to hub and drip-and-ship models. Outcomes of interest were functional independence (modified Rankin Scale ≤ 1), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), mortality, and length of stay. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using a fixed-effects meta-analysis and random-effects Bayesian meta-analysis. Non-inferiority was calculated using a fixed-margin method. RESULTS: Of 2806 unique records identified, 10 studies, totaling 4,164 patients, fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis found no significant difference in functional outcomes (mRS0-1) (6 studies, RR=1.09, 95%CI 0.98-1.22, p=0.123), sICH (8 studies, RR=0.98, 95%CI 0.64-1.51, p=0.942), or 90-day mortality (5 studies, RR=0.98, 95%CI 0.73-1.32, p=0.911, respectively) between patients treated in a drip-and-stay model compared to patients treated in drip-and-ship or hub models. There was no significant heterogeneity in these outcomes. Drip-and-stay outcomes (mRS 0-1, sICH) were non-inferior when compared to the combined group. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that drip-and-stay is non-inferior to current models of drip-and-ship or hub stroke care, and may be as safe and as effective as either.


Asunto(s)
Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/terapia , Transferencia de Pacientes , Telemedicina , Terapia Trombolítica , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Hemorragias Intracraneales/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/mortalidad , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Recuperación de la Función , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Terapia Trombolítica/efectos adversos , Terapia Trombolítica/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
J Vasc Surg ; 72(3): 1122-1131, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32273226

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Patients who undergo endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) often require reintervention after the index repair. The long-term rate of reintervention and how this has changed with newer device technology are poorly understood. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature to determine long-term freedom from reintervention after EVAR and the change in reintervention rates over time. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We included randomized controlled trials and observational studies that documented the rate of reintervention after EVAR. We performed a meta-analysis of Kaplan-Meier freedom from reintervention at each year after EVAR. We used linear regression to evaluate change in reintervention rate over time with newer device technology. RESULTS: We included a total of 30 studies (randomized trials, n = 3; observational studies, n = 27) comprising 32,126 patients in this review and meta-analysis. Studies ranged in the implantation date of the EVAR device from 1996 to 2014. The probability of freedom from reintervention was 81% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77%-85%) at 5 years, 70% (95% CI, 65%-76%) at 10 years, and 64% (95% CI, 46%-79%) at 14 years. Linear regression demonstrated an improvement in freedom from reintervention when results were stratified by the year of device implantation. At 1 year, estimated freedom from reintervention improved from 90% in 1998 to 94% in 2008 (n = 26 studies; R2 = 0.11; P = .10). At three years, estimated freedom from reintervention improved from 77% in 1998 to 90% in 2008 (n = 26 studies; R2 = 0.27; P = .006). At 5 years, estimated freedom from reintervention improved from 68% in 1998 to 81% in 2008 (n = 22 studies; R2 =0.12; P = .12). At 7 years, estimated freedom from reintervention improved from 51% in 1998 to 86% in 2011 (n = 22 studies; R2 = 0.40; P = .015). CONCLUSIONS: EVAR patients remain at risk for reintervention indefinitely, and therefore lifelong surveillance is imperative. Encouragingly, reintervention rates have improved over time, with newer devices exhibiting lower rates. Reintervention rate remains an important metric for new devices and registries.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Reoperación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Reoperación/efectos adversos , Reoperación/mortalidad , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
J ECT ; 36(2): 130-136, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31913928

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The body of large-scale, epidemiological research on electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in the United States is limited. To address this gap, we assessed demographic, clinical, pharmacological, and mental health treatment history as well as 2-year mortality outcomes associated with ECT use in the largest U.S. health care system. METHODS: Among all patients who sought mental health care at Veterans Health Administration (VHA) hospitals in 2012, we used bivariate analyses to compare patients who did and not receive ECT during 2 years of follow-up. Among the population who received ECT, descriptive statistics were calculated to characterize prior mental health treatment patterns and ECT receipt. RESULTS: 0.11% (N = 1616) of all VHA mental health patients in 2012 (N = 1,457,053) received ECT in 2 years of follow-up. There was significant regional variation in provision of ECT. Those who received ECT were more likely to have diagnoses of major depressive, bipolar, and personality disorders and were significantly more likely to have had a recent mental health inpatient stay (risk ratio, 6.94). Receipt of ECT was not associated with a difference in all-cause mortality (risk ratio, 0.88). Thirty-two percent of those who received ECT had no substantial antidepressant or therapy trial in the year before index mental health encounter. CONCLUSIONS: Use of ECT in the VHA is rare. Patients who receive ECT have a complex and high-risk profile, not necessarily consistent with the most common indications for ECT.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Electroconvulsiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Trastorno Bipolar/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Salud Mental , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Pacientes , Trastornos de la Personalidad/terapia , Prevalencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veteranos , Salud de los Veteranos
7.
J Dual Diagn ; 16(2): 228-238, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31852392

RESUMEN

Objective: Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a notable concern in the United States (US) and strongly associated with mortality. There is a high prevalence of OUD in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and the mortality associated with OUD may be exacerbated in patients with PTSD. Medication-assisted treatment (MAT) for OUD has become standard of care for OUD and has been shown to reduce mortality. However, there has been little study of MAT and mortality in patients with PTSD and OUD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in U.S. veterans who had newly engaged in PTSD treatment, were diagnosed with OUD and were provided MAT for at least one day between 2004 and 2013. We assessed mortality for one year following the index diagnosis date. We calculated all-cause mortality as well as death by external cause, overdose plus suicide, overdose, and suicide rates per 100,000. We used hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to compare death rates between patients with high versus low adherence to MAT. We evaluated the impact of high versus low exposure to general substance abuse care. We considered a confidence interval that did not cross one to be significant. Results: A total of 5,901 patients met inclusion criteria. Most patients were men and the average age was 43.3 years (SD = 13.8). The all-cause mortality rate was 1,370 per 100,000 patients. High adherence to MAT resulted in a non-significant, decreased risk for death due to all-cause (HR = 0.73, 95% CI [0.47, 1.13]), external cause (HR = 0.71, 95% CI [0.38, 1.35]), and overdose or suicide (HR = 0.66, 95% CI [0.33, 1.35]). Patients with high exposure (≥ 60 days) to general substance abuse care were significantly less likely to die due to external cause (HR = 0.39, 95% CI [0.18, 0.85]) and overdose or suicide (HR = 0.31, 95% CI [0.12, 0.77]). Conclusions: In patients with PTSD and OUD, improved adherence to MAT and greater exposure to general substance abuse care may result in lower mortality. Studies with longer follow-up and larger sample sizes to assess the impact of MAT on suicide are needed to confirm our findings.


Asunto(s)
Causas de Muerte , Sobredosis de Droga/mortalidad , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/terapia , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Suicidio Completo/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Comorbilidad , Diagnóstico Dual (Psiquiatría) , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
8.
J Nerv Ment Dis ; 207(12): 1031-1038, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31688286

RESUMEN

A prior meta-analysis found that the World Health Organization Brief Intervention and Contact Program (WHO BIC) significantly reduces suicide risk. WHO BIC has not been studied in high-income countries. We piloted an adapted version of WHO BIC on an inpatient mental health unit in the United States. We assessed the feasibility and acceptability. We also evaluated changes in suicidal ideation, hopelessness, and connectedness using a repeated measures analysis of variance. Of 13 eligible patients, 9 patients enrolled. Patients experienced significant improvements in suicidal ideation, hopelessness, and connectedness at 1 and 3 months (Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation, F(2,16) = 14.96, p < 0.01; Beck Hopelessness Scale, F(2,16) = 5.88, p < 0.05; perceived burdensomeness subscale, F(2,16) = 10.97, p < 0.013; and thwarted belongingness subscale, F(2,16) = 4.77, p < 0.03). Patients were highly satisfied. An adapted version of WHO BIC may be feasible to implement in a high-resource setting, but trials need to confirm efficacy.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/tendencias , Hospitales Psiquiátricos/tendencias , Ideación Suicida , Intento de Suicidio/prevención & control , Intento de Suicidio/tendencias , Adulto , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Intento de Suicidio/psicología
9.
J Dual Diagn ; 15(4): 217-225, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31253073

RESUMEN

Objective: Substance use disorders are an important risk factor for suicide. While residential drug treatment programs improve clinical outcomes for substance use disorders, less is known about the role of related health care processes in contributing to suicide risk. These data may help to inform strategies to prevent suicide during and after residential treatment.Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on root-cause analysis (RCA) reports of suicide in veterans occurring within 3 months of discharge from a residential drug treatment program that were reported to a Veterans Affairs facility between 2001 and 2017. Demographic information such as age, gender, and psychiatric comorbidity were abstracted from each report. In addition, an established codebook was used to code root causes from each report. Root causes were grouped into categories in order to characterize the key system and organizational-level processes that may have contributed to the suicide.Results: A total of 39 RCA reports of suicide occurring within 3 months after discharge from a residential drug treatment program were identified. The majority of decedents were men and the average age was 42.9 years (SD = 11.2). The most common method of suicide was overdose (33%) followed by hanging (28%). Most suicides occurred in close proximity to discharge, with 56% (n = 22) occurring within seven days of discharge and 36% (n = 14) occurring within 48 hours of discharge. The most common substances used by decedents prior to admission were alcohol or opiates. RCA teams identified a total of 140 root causes and the majority were due to problems with suicide risk assessment (n = 32, 22.9%). Non-engagement with treatment during (n = 20, 14.3%) and after the residential stay (n = 18, 12.9%) was also highlighted as an important concern. Finally, several reports raised concerns that a discharge prior to treatment completion or a precipitous discharge due to program violation negatively impacted treatment outcomes.Conclusions: Efforts to prevent suicide in the period following discharge from a residential drug treatment program should focus on addressing suicide risk factors during admission and helping patients engage more fully in substance use disorder treatment.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Domiciliario , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Diagnóstico Dual (Psiquiatría) , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Suicidio/psicología , Veteranos/psicología
10.
Ann Surg ; 267(1): 1-10, 2018 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28463896

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the bleeding risks associated with single (aspirin) and dual (aspirin + clopidogrel) antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) versus placebo or no treatment in adults undergoing noncardiac surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The impact of antiplatelet therapy on bleeding during noncardiac surgery remains controversial. A meta-analysis was performed to examine the risk associated with single and DAPT. METHODS: A systematic review of antiplatelet therapy, noncardiac surgery, and perioperative bleeding was performed. Peer-reviewed sources and meeting abstracts from relevant societies were queried. Studies without a control group, or those that only examined patients with coronary stents, were excluded. Primary endpoints were transfusion and reintervention for bleeding. RESULTS: Of 11,592 references, 46 studies met inclusion criteria. In a meta-analysis of >30,000 patients, the relative risk (RR) of transfusion versus control was 1.14 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.26, P = 0.009] for aspirin, and 1.33 (1.15-1.55, P = 0.001) for DAPT. Clopidogrel had an elevated risk, but data were too heterogeneous to analyze. The RR of bleeding requiring reintervention was not significantly higher for any agent compared to control [RR 0.96 (0.76-1.22, P = 0.76) for aspirin, 1.84 (0.87-3.87, P = 0.11) for clopidogrel, and 1.51 (0.92-2.49, P = 0.1) for DAPT]. Subanalysis of thoracic and abdominal procedures was similar. There was no difference in RR for myocardial infarction [1.06 (0.79-1.43)], stroke [0.97 (0.71-1.33)], or mortality [0.97 (0.87-1.1)]. CONCLUSIONS: Antiplatelet therapy at the time of noncardiac surgery confers minimal bleeding risk with no difference in thrombotic complications. In many cases, it is safe to continue antiplatelet therapy in patients with important indications for their use.


Asunto(s)
Aspirina/efectos adversos , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos , Ticlopidina/análogos & derivados , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Clopidogrel , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Factores de Riesgo , Ticlopidina/administración & dosificación , Ticlopidina/efectos adversos
11.
Psychooncology ; 27(9): 2237-2244, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30019361

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Vast efforts are directed toward curing or prolonging the life of patients with cancer. However, less attention is given to mental health aspects of cancer care, and there is elevated incidence of death by suicide in this population. Evaluating Root Cause Analyses (RCAs) of cancer-related suicides may further our understanding of system-level factors that may contribute to suicide in patients with cancer and highlight strategies to mitigate this risk. METHODS: We searched the Veterans Health Administration National Center for Patient Safety RCA database for cancer-related suicides between 2002 and 2017 to evaluate the context of the suicides and identify root causes and suggested actions. These variables were coded by consensus and evaluated using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: We identified 64 RCA reports involving cancer-related suicide; 100% were males of older age. Many suicides occurred during treatment with palliative intent (44%, N = 28). Depression (59%, N = 38), medical comorbidities (59%, N = 38), and pain (47%, N = 30) were common suicide risk factors identified. Most suicides occurred within 7 days of a medical visit (67%, N = 43), especially within the first 24 hours (41%, N = 26). Root causes included a need to improve recognition of triggers for assessment and interdisciplinary communication. CONCLUSION: This analysis uncovers opportunities to mitigate risk of death by suicide among patients with cancer. Suggested actions include use of comprehensive cancer centers and development of a distress checklist using information from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines. Further studies should assess additional factors that may increase the risk of other adverse mental health outcomes in this population.


Asunto(s)
Depresión/psicología , Neoplasias/psicología , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos/psicología , Anciano , Causas de Muerte , Lista de Verificación , Bases de Datos Factuales , Depresión/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Causa Raíz , Suicidio/psicología , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos
12.
Psychosomatics ; 59(6): 561-566, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30064731

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have demonstrated that psychiatric and substance use issues in general hospital inpatients result in increased length of stay and associated costs. Additional studies have demonstrated that proactive consultation models in psychiatry can effectively address these problems. Selecting patients for proactive interventions is less well studied. OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop an automated, electronic medical record-based screening tool to select patients who might benefit from proactive psychiatric consultation. METHODS: An automated daily report was developed using information stored in electronic medical record and billing systems. Discrete data fields populating the report included diagnoses, orders, and nursing care plans. RESULTS: Over a 9-month period, the report identified 2177 patients (19% of the total nonpsychiatric adult admissions) as potentially benefitting from proactive psychiatric interventions. Of these, 367 were confirmed as likely to benefit from intervention; 139 (38%) were randomized to the proactive psychiatric consultation group. Of those patients randomized to "treatment as usual," a subset later required psychiatric consultation, which was requested an average of 4 days after the time they were flagged by the report. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an electronic medical record-based automated report is feasible to select patients for proactive psychiatric interventions on admission and throughout the hospital stay. Early identification of patients may decrease length of stay and improve patient outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
13.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 39(6): 420-429, 2018 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30401320

RESUMEN

Background: The majority of patients for elective surgery and with a history of penicillin allergy are placed on alternative prophylactic antibiotic therapies, which have been associated with the emergence of multidrug-resistant pathogens and increased morbidity and mortality rates. However, self-reporting of penicillin allergy alone may overestimate the prevalence of penicillin allergy in the population. Objective: To assess the effects of preoperative antibiotic allergy testing protocols in reducing the use of non-beta-lactam antibiotics. Methods: We searched medical literature data bases through July of 2018. Two reviewers independently extracted data from published studies and assessed the risk of bias in cohort studies by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We collected information related to study design, methodology, demographics, interventions, and outcomes. We pooled odds ratios for the rate of prescribing non-beta-lactam antibiotics by using a fixed-effects model. Results: Of 905 citations screened for eligibility, nine studies met inclusion criteria for qualitative analysis. Studies reported that the rates of non-beta-lactam use after preoperative skin testing ranged from 6 to 30%. In addition, four of the nine studies had sufficient control data to be included in a meta-analysis. These four studies found that preoperative testing protocols significantly decreased the rates of prescribing non-beta-lactam antibiotics compared with usual care (odds ratio 3.64 [95% confidence interval, 2.67-4.98]; p < 0.0001). Seven studies reported on adverse drug reactions after preoperative skin testing and found that the rate of such reactions was rare. Conclusion: Preoperative antibiotic allergy testing protocols seemed to be a safe and effective tool in reducing the use of non-beta-lactam antibiotics during surgery.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/prevención & control , Penicilinas/efectos adversos , Atención Perioperativa , Pruebas Cutáneas , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Humanos , Incidencia , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Penicilinas/uso terapéutico
14.
Br J Psychiatry ; 210(6): 396-402, 2017 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28428338

RESUMEN

BackgroundFew randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown decreases in suicide.AimsTo identify interventions for preventing suicide.MethodWe searched EMBASE and Medline from inception until 31 December 2015. We included RCTs comparing prevention strategies with control. We pooled odds ratios (ORs) for suicide using the Peto method.ResultsAmong 8647 citations, 72 RCTs and 6 pooled analyses met inclusion criteria. Three RCTs (n = 2028) found that the World Health Organization (WHO) brief intervention and contact (BIC) was associated with significantly lower odds of suicide (OR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.09-0.42). Six RCTs (n = 1040) of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) for suicide prevention and six RCTs of lithium (n = 619) yielded non-significant findings (OR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.12-1.03 and OR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.05-1.02, respectively).ConclusionsThe WHO BIC is a promising suicide prevention strategy. No other intervention showed a statistically significant effect in reducing suicide.


Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevención del Suicidio , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
15.
J Nerv Ment Dis ; 205(6): 436-442, 2017 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28511191

RESUMEN

There is a high risk for death by suicide after discharge from an inpatient mental health unit. To better understand system and organizational factors associated with postdischarge suicide, we reviewed root cause analysis reports of suicide within 7 days of discharge from across all Veterans Health Administration inpatient mental health units between 2002 and 2015. There were 141 reports of suicide within 7 days of discharge, and a large proportion (43.3%, n = 61) followed an unplanned discharge. Root causes fell into three major themes including challenges for clinicians and patients after the established process of care, awareness and communication of suicide risk, and flaws in the established process of care. Flaws in the design and execution of processes of care as well as deficits in communication may contribute to postdischarge suicide. Inpatient teams should be aware of the potentially heightened risk for suicide among patients with unplanned discharges.


Asunto(s)
Causas de Muerte , Personas con Mala Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor/epidemiología , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Psiquiatría en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Causa Raíz/métodos , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Hospitales de Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
16.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 12(7): 1005-13, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24994921

RESUMEN

This study sought to improve mental health care for patients with head and neck cancers (HNCs) through the implementation of an evidence-based process for identifying and managing psychological distress. This process in an HNC medical oncology clinic was assessed and redesigned using quality improvement (QI) methods from November 2010 through April 2012. The redesign, starting in January 2011, involved a 2-component QI intervention: the validated NCCN Distress Thermometer and an evidence-based treatment decision algorithm. Screening processes were improved through Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. Before January 2011, distress identification was based on a provider's clinical assessment. Cause-effect diagramming suggested that lack of a formalized process for distress assessment contributed to missed diagnoses. Providers were also unfamiliar with mental health resources. After implementing process changes, biweekly distress screening rates rose from 0% to 38% between January and July 2011. Furthermore, with additional PDSA cycles, these rates increased to 74% between October 2011 and April 2012. Similar to proposed benchmarks, 84% (n=47) of newly diagnosed patients (n=56) were screened. Improvement in screening was attributed to process changes and involvement of senior leadership. QI principles can be applied to the cancer setting in order to create systems of care which more reliably identify and address the needs of patients with psychological distress.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/terapia , Depresión/terapia , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/psicología , Servicios de Salud Mental , Estrés Psicológico/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/psicología , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/psicología , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Salud Mental , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Diagnosis (Berl) ; 11(1): 63-72, 2024 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38114888

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Accurate and timely diagnosis relies on close collaboration between patients/families and clinicians. Just as patients have unique insights into diagnostic breakdowns, positive patient feedback may also generate broader perspectives on what constitutes a "good" diagnostic process (DxP). METHODS: We evaluated patient/family feedback on "what's going well" as part of an online pre-visit survey designed to engage patients/families in the DxP. Patients/families living with chronic conditions with visits in three urban pediatric subspecialty clinics (site 1) and one rural adult primary care clinic (site 2) were invited to complete the survey between December 2020 and March 2022. We adapted the Healthcare Complaints Analysis Tool (HCAT) to conduct a qualitative analysis on a subset of patient/family responses with ≥20 words. RESULTS: In total, 7,075 surveys were completed before 18,129 visits (39 %) at site 1, and 460 surveys were completed prior to 706 (65 %) visits at site 2. Of all participants, 1,578 volunteered positive feedback, ranging from 1-79 words. Qualitative analysis of 272 comments with ≥20 words described: Relationships (60 %), Clinical Care (36 %), and Environment (4 %). Compared to primary care, subspecialty comments showed the same overall rankings. Within Relationships, patients/families most commonly noted: thorough and competent attention (46 %), clear communication and listening (41 %) and emotional support and human connection (39 %). Within Clinical Care, patients highlighted: timeliness (31 %), effective clinical management (30 %), and coordination of care (25 %). CONCLUSIONS: Patients/families valued relationships with clinicians above all else in the DxP, emphasizing the importance of supporting clinicians to nurture effective relationships and relationship-centered care in the DxP.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud , Pacientes , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Retroalimentación , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Comunicación
19.
Obes Rev ; 24(9): e13594, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37357149

RESUMEN

This scoping review aims to evaluate the impact of nutrition counseling on mental health and wellbeing among people affected by obesity. Depression and obesity are major sources of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The prevalence of obesity is higher in patients with severe or suboptimally managed depression. Change in dietary quality prompted by nutrition counseling may pose a unique opportunity for intervention. Of the 1745 studies identified, 26 studies (total n = 6727) met inclusion criteria. Due to the heterogeneity of methods and outcome reporting, it was not possible to perform meta-analysis. Across all included studies, 34 different scales were used to quantify mental health/wellbeing. Eleven studies (42.3%) reported statistically significant findings between intervention and control groups. Only two of these studies assessed nutrition counseling independently rather than as part of a multidisciplinary intervention. Overall, many studies have examined the role of nutrition counseling on mental health/wellbeing in individuals affected by obesity. However, due to inconsistency in study methodologies and outcome measurement tools, it is challenging to draw robust or clinically meaningful conclusions about the effects of nutrition counseling on mental health in this population.


Asunto(s)
Consejo , Depresión , Humanos , Obesidad/terapia , Bienestar Psicológico , Salud Mental
20.
Mil Med ; 188(9-10): e3173-e3181, 2023 08 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37002596

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Veteran patients have access to a broad range of health care services in the Veterans' Health Administration (VHA). There are concerns, however, that all Veteran patients may not have access to timely care. The Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks Act was passed in 2018 to ensure that eligible Veterans can receive timely, high-quality care. The Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks Act makes use of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)-contracted care to achieve its goal. There are concerns, however, that these transitions of care may, in fact, place Veterans at a higher risk of poor health outcomes. This is a particular concern with regard to suicide prevention. No study has investigated suicide-related safety events in Veteran patients who receive care in VA-contracted community care settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of root-cause analysis (RCA) reports and patient safety reports of suicide-related safety events that involved VA-contracted community care was conducted. Events that were reported to the VHA National Center for Patient Safety between January 1, 2018, and June 30, 2022, were included. A coding book was developed to abstract relevant variables from each report, for example, report type and facility and patient characteristics. Root causes reported in RCAs were also coded, and the factors that contributed to the events were described in the patient safety reports. Two reviewers independently coded 10 cases, and we then calculated a kappa. Because the kappa was greater than 80% (i.e. 89.2%), one reviewer coded the remaining cases. RESULTS: Among 139 potentially eligible reports, 88 reports were identified that met the study inclusion criteria. Of these 88 reports, 62.5% were patient safety reports and 37.5% were RCA reports. There were 129 root causes of suicide-related safety events involving VA-contracted community care. Most root causes were because of health care-related processes. Reports cited concerns around challenges with communication and deficiencies in mental health treatment. A few reports also described concerns that community care providers were not available to engage in patient safety activities. Patient safety reports voiced similar concerns but also pointed to specific issues with the safety of the environment, for example, access to methods of strangulation in community care treatment settings in an emergency room or a rehabilitation unit. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to strengthen the systems of care across VHA- and VA-contracted community care settings to reduce the risk of suicide in Veteran patients. This includes developing standardized methods to improve the safety of the clinical environment as well as implementing robust methods to facilitate communication between VHA and community care providers. In addition, Veteran patients may benefit from quality and safety activities that capitalize on the collective knowledge of VHA- and VA-contracted community care organizations.


Asunto(s)
Suicidio , Veteranos , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Atención a la Salud
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA