[Return to Work after Cancer - a Systematic Review of Predictors in Germany]. / Rückkehr in das Erwerbsleben nach Krebs ­ eine systematische Übersichtsarbeit zu Prädiktoren in Deutschland.

INTRODUCTION: More than one third of cancer survivors are of working age. Return to work (RTW) with and after cancer treatment is therefore an important issue for this group - but this is often accompanied with many challenges. The aim of this systematic review was to identify predictors of RTW after cancer from the literature specifically for Germany and to place these factors chronologically in the oncological course of treatment. METHODS: A systematic search was performed using PubMed in June 2022. Included were all papers original published in German or English between 2000 and 2022 and referring to a German sample, regardless of study design. RESULTS: From a total of 8,381 hits in the meta-database, 30 publications were finally considered in the synthesis of results. Higher age, lower education, lower socioeconomic status, higher disease stage, more progressive disease course, more severe side effects of treatment, (more severe) fatigue, higher psychological distress, worse health status, occupational status as a blue collar worker and manual labor, unemployment prior to diagnosis, more negative perceptions of the work(place) environment, and lower intention to work and lower work ability/ subjective prognosis of employability were associated with lower likelihood of RTW after cancer in the literature. Treatment type and use of rehabilitation were also found to be associated with RTW. DISCUSSION: Sociodemographic, disease-related, psychosocial, and work-related predictors of RTW after cancer in Germany were identified. The results may help to develop targeted support measures that can be applied in specific phases of treatment. The comparability of the literature on predictors for RTW is limited due to a high heterogeneity in the operationalization of RTW and methodological approaches. There is need for further standardization in this area.

Cancer-Related Cognitive Dysfunction: A Narrative Review for Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: Cancer-related cognitive dysfunction (CRCD) is a major functional disorder in patients with cancer. This central nervous dysfunction is found in up to 60% of patients after tumour therapy, often significantly limits the quality of life, and significantly impedes participation in working life. For this reason, diagnosis and treatment of CRCD are of central importance. This narrative review is intended to provide an overview and support for practical clinical care with regard to diagnostics and therapeutic options. SUMMARY: In Germany, CRCD has received insufficient attention in clinical practice due to the lack of guidelines for diagnosis and therapy. The pathophysiology is complex and cannot be explained by chemotherapeutic treatment alone. In addition to the tumour disease as such and the tumour therapy, psychological factors such as anxiety and depression as well as sleep disorders also play a significant role. Today, it is known that in addition to age, molecular genetic changes also have an effect on cognitive function. Morphologically, CRCD can be located in the frontal cortex and hippocampus. In addition to easy-to-use screening instruments such as the visual analogue scale, validated questionnaires such as the Questionnaire of Subjectively Experienced Deficits in Attention (FEDA) developed in Germany are also available. These allow the suspected diagnosis to be substantiated and the patient to be referred to further neurological, neuropsychological, or psycho-oncological diagnostics. Within the framework of further neuropsychological diagnostics, the International Cognition and Cancer Task Force (ICCTF) recommends testing learning, memory, processing speed, and executive functions. From the authors' point of view, a step-by-step diagnosis is recommended in order to avoid overdiagnosis. In clinical practice, graduation according to the "Common Terminology Criteria for Adversity Events" (CTCAE Version 5.0) is suitable for assessing the degree of severity. Cognitive training should be behaviourally oriented and include regular practice of cognitive skills to restore attention, psychomotor speed, memory, and executive functions. The best evidence is currently found for web-based training programmes that can be used by the patient at home. There is also evidence for mindfulness training and physical exercises. In particular, the combination of these three therapeutic elements currently seems to be the optimal treatment strategy for CRCD. KEY MESSAGES: Cognitive dysfunction should be given much more attention in the clinical care of cancer patients. Diagnostic tools for this purpose and evidence-based therapeutic interventions are available. In the future, networks should be created that allow for better care of patients with CRCD.

Predictive factors for return to work among cancer survivors in Europe: A systematic review.

Of the 4.4 million people diagnosed with cancer in Europe each year, around 36 % are of working age. Return-to-work rates vary across Europe. Work is important for the individual, as well as for society, and this review aims to provide an overview of the predictors for the return to work (RTW) process in European cancer survivors of working age. A systematic literature search was conducted. The present review included quantitative and qualitative study designs published since 2013. In total, the review included 85 papers examining cancer survivors with various cancer diagnoses in 18 European countries. Identified predictive factors for RTW related to the social system, treatment, disease, health behavior, the individuals' psychosocial, work, and sociodemographic situations. There is a need for a standardized definition and operationalization of RTW. Providers can use these results to identify survivors at risk and support cancer survivors in their RTW process.