RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Alternative or ectopic reservoir placement has recently gained popularity among prosthetic surgeons to avoid injury to pelvic structures during inflatable penile prosthesis implantation. However, the true incidence of complications associated with these new techniques remains under studied. We performed a 5-year multicenter, retrospective study with the aim of evaluating complications related to alternative reservoir placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the database of inflatable penile prosthesis surgery at 3 institutions from February 2011 to December 2016. The mechanism of failure and complications related to reservoir placement were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 974 inflatable penile prostheses were placed in the 5-year period by 3 surgeons, including 612 surgeries with alternative reservoir placement. Mean followup to the emergence of reservoir related complications was 20.4 months. There was no significant difference in complication rates between primary and revision cases (p = 0.72). A total of 12 cases (2.0%) required revision for reservoir related complications in the alternative reservoir placement group vs 1.3% in the space of Retzius group (p = 0.44). The most common complication in the alternative reservoir placement group was reservoir leakage, which developed in 5 patients. Three cases required revision due to abdominal muscular pain. Torsion in the tubing of 3 Conceal™ reservoirs was found which caused blockage of fluid transportation. One reservoir was incidentally found to be intraperitoneal on unrelated imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Alternative reservoir placement is a safe and mechanically reliable approach, including in men with prior pelvic surgery. However, there are associated risks, including reservoir leakage, tubing torsion, muscle discomfort and unintended reservoir malposition which may require surgical revision.
Asunto(s)
Disfunción Eréctil/cirugía , Implantación de Pene/efectos adversos , Prótesis de Pene , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diseño de Prótesis , Falla de Prótesis , Reoperación , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Optimizing outcomes with placement of inflatable penile prostheses (IPPs) can be challenging, especially in inexperienced hands. In this article, we outline Dr. Köhler's penoscrotal penile prosthesis surgical approach. We also highlight patient selection, post-operative care and complications.
RESUMEN
Relapse and neurodegeneration are two of the major therapeutic targets in alcoholism. Fortuitously, the roles of glutamate/NMDA receptors (NMDARs) in withdrawal, conditioning and neurotoxicity mean that NMDAR inhibitors are potentially valuable for both targets. Preclinical studies further suggest that inhibitory modulators that specifically reduce the co-agonist effects of polyamines on NMDARs are potential non-toxic medications. Using agmatine as a lead compound, over 1000 novel compounds based loosely on this structure were synthesized using feedback from a molecular screen. A novel series of aryliminoguanidines with appropriate NMDAR activity in the molecular screen were discovered (US patent application filed 2007). The most potent and selective aryliminoguanidine, JR 220 [4- (chlorobenzylidenamino)- guanidine hydrochloride], has now been tested in a screening hierarchy for anti-relapse and neuroprotective activity, ranging from cell-based assay, through tissue culture to animal behavior. This hierarchy has been validated using drugs with known, or potential, clinical value at these targets (acamprosate (N-acetyl homotaurine), memantine and topiramate). JR220 was non-toxic and showed excellent activity in every screen with a potency 5-200x that of the FDA-approved anti-relapse agent, acamprosate. This chapter will present a review of the background and rationale for this approach and some of the findings garnered from this approach as well as patents targeting the glutamatergic system especially the NMDAR.