Pretreatment CT and PET radiomics predicting rectal cancer patients in response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to characterize pre-treatment non-contrast computed tomography (CT) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) based radiomics signatures predictive of pathological response and clinical outcomes in rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACR T). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An exploratory analysis was performed using pre-treatment non-contrast CT and PET imaging dataset. The association of tumor regression grade (TRG) and neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score with pre-treatment CT and PET features was assessed using machine learning algorithms. Three separate predictive models were built for composite features from CT + PET. RESULTS: The patterns of pathological response were TRG 0 (n = 13; 19.7%), 1 (n = 34; 51.5%), 2 (n = 16; 24.2%), and 3 (n = 3; 4.5%). There were 20 (30.3%) patients with low, 22 (33.3%) with intermediate and 24 (36.4%) with high NAR scores. Three separate predictive models were built for composite features from CT + PET and analyzed separately for clinical endpoints. Composite features with α = 0.2 resulted in the best predictive power using logistic regression. For pathological response prediction, the signature resulted in 88.1% accuracy in predicting TRG 0 vs. TRG 1-3; 91% accuracy in predicting TRG 0-1 vs. TRG 2-3. For the surrogate of DFS and OS, it resulted in 67.7% accuracy in predicting low vs. intermediate vs. high NAR scores. CONCLUSION: The pre-treatment composite radiomics signatures were highly predictive of pathological response in rectal cancer treated with NACR T. A larger cohort is warranted for further validation.

High-dose intensity-modulated chemoradiotherapy in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: Outcome and toxicity.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate clinical outcomes, pattern of failure, and toxicity after high-dose intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for advanced vulvar cancer. METHODS: In this IRB approved retrospective study, the charts of women with histologically confirmed, non-metastatic vulvar cancer consecutively treated at our institution from 2012 to 2018 were reviewed to identify patients that received high-dose IMRT with curative intent. The treatment compliance, toxicities, and patterns of failure were investigated. Actuarial local, regional and distant recurrence and survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log rank test. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were identified, 23 were unresectable, and 3 refused surgery. Fifteen patients (58%) had inguinal node metastases; 10(38%) had pelvic node metastases. Elective surgical staging of groins was performed in 9-patients. Median tumor dose was 65.4Gy. Concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy was administered in 22(84.6%) patients. Complete response (CR) was achieved in 21/26 (80.7%) patients. Five patients had persistent disease following treatment and one sustained recurrence 5-months following radiotherapy. All persistent or recurrent disease occurred inside the irradiated volume. Median follow-up was 19 months (3-52 months). Actuarial 1-year local, regional and distant controls were 72.4%, 85.4%, and 86%, respectively. One and 2-year overall survivals were 91% and 62%, respectively. Complete response at 3-months was a strong predictor for overall survival (1-yr OS 73% vs 27%, HR 7.1 (95% CI 1.2-44); p = 0.01). Lymph node metastases adversely affected overall survival (2-yr OS 49% vs. 83%, p = 0.09). Grade 3-4 late urinary and soft-tissue toxicity was seen in 5 patients. Tumor doses >66 Gy (p = 0.03) and prior pelvic radiotherapy (p = 0.002) predicted grade 3-4 toxicity. CONCLUSION: High-dose IMRT for vulvar cancer achieves high rates of local control with acceptable dose dependent long-term toxicity.

Transarterial Radioembolization Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer Patients with Liver-Dominant Metastatic Disease Using Yttrium-90 Glass Microspheres: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90 (90Y)-labeled glass microspheres in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients with liver-dominant metastatic disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study evaluated 26 patients (12 men and 14 women; mean age, 65.5 ± 11.2 years) with liver-dominant metastatic pancreatic cancer who were treated with TARE from April 2010 to September 2017. All patients received systemic chemotherapy before TARE, and 19 received systemic therapy after embolization. Nineteen patients had extrahepatic disease at the time of TARE. Response to treatment was determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors at 3 months. RESULTS: Median overall survival (OS) from pancreatic cancer diagnosis was 33.0 months (range, 8.5-87.5 months); median OS from diagnosis of liver metastasis was 21.8 months (range, 2.0-86.2 months); and median OS from TARE treatment was 7.0 months (range, 1.0-84.1 months). Grade 1-2 clinical toxicities were noted in 21 patients (80.8%), and 24 patients (92.3%) had grade 1-2 biochemical toxicities. Four patients (15.4%) had grade 3 clinical toxicities, and 6 patients (23.1%) had grade 3 biochemical toxicities. Imaging was available in 22 patients (84.6%) and demonstrated partial response in 1 patient, stable disease in 9 patients, and progressive disease in 12 patients. Improved hepatic progression-free survival was associated in patients younger than 65 years and in those whose carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level decreased or remained stable after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: TARE with 90Y-labeled glass microspheres is safe and led to promising OS in liver-dominant metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Current Treatment of Melanoma Brain Metastasis.

OPINION STATEMENT: With greater understanding of underlying biology and development of effective BRAF-targeted therapy and immunotherapy, along with remarkable advances in local treatment such as stereotactic radiosurgery, melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) is witnessing continually improving outcome, with 1-year overall survival rate approaching 85%. Given disease complexity and myriad treatment options, all patients with MBM should ideally be evaluated in a multidisciplinary setting to allow an individualized treatment approach based on prognostic groups, molecular classification, number and size of brain metastasis, and performance status. With improving outcome, pendulum has now swayed to focus more on effective treatment modalities with minimal neurological toxicity while maintaining quality of life. Surgery is usually considered in symptomatic and large MBMs, while stereotactic radiosurgery considered in 1-4 lesions, and now also being explored for up to 15 brain metastases for improved local control. The role of whole brain radiotherapy is diminishing given its neurocognitive toxicities and is reserved for patients with diffuse brain involvement. Cytotoxic chemotherapy has largely been ineffective without evidence for survival benefit. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have become the cornerstone of management for melanoma brain metastasis with durable intracranial tumor control and excellent toxicity profile. For patients with asymptomatic MBMs, ipilimumab and nivolumab have shown intracranial response near 60% and provides comparable clinical benefit in MBMs as for extracranial metastases. For patients with driver BRAF mutation, BRAFi-/MEKi-targeted agents are proven to be effective in MBM with high rate intracranial responses (44-59%). However, the durability of intracranial responses induced by BRAFi/MEKi seems to be shorter than that of extracranial disease. Emerging data support novel combination of systemic therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery, which appears to be safe and effective; however, potential benefits and risks should be evaluated prospectively. Promising ongoing trials will further expand therapeutic evidence in MBM, and patients should be encouraged to participate in clinical trials.

The future of personalised radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Radiotherapy has long been the mainstay of treatment for patients with head and neck cancer and has traditionally involved a stage-dependent strategy whereby all patients with the same TNM stage receive the same therapy. We believe there is a substantial opportunity to improve radiotherapy delivery beyond just technological and anatomical precision. In this Series paper, we explore several new ideas that could improve understanding of the phenotypic and genotypic differences that exist between patients and their tumours. We discuss how exploiting these differences and taking advantage of precision medicine tools-such as genomics, radiomics, and mathematical modelling-could open new doors to personalised radiotherapy adaptation and treatment. We propose a new treatment shift that moves away from an era of empirical dosing and fractionation to an era focused on the development of evidence to guide personalisation and biological adaptation of radiotherapy. We believe these approaches offer the potential to improve outcomes and reduce toxicity.

Intricacies of Human-AI Interaction in Dynamic Decision-Making for Precision Oncology: A Case Study in Response-Adaptive Radiotherapy.

Background: Adaptive treatment strategies that can dynamically react to individual cancer progression can provide effective personalized care. Longitudinal multi-omics information, paired with an artificially intelligent clinical decision support system (AI-CDSS) can assist clinicians in determining optimal therapeutic options and treatment adaptations. However, AI-CDSS is not perfectly accurate, as such, clinicians' over/under reliance on AI may lead to unintended consequences, ultimately failing to develop optimal strategies. To investigate such collaborative decision-making process, we conducted a Human-AI interaction case study on response-adaptive radiotherapy (RT). Methods: We designed and conducted a two-phase study for two disease sites and two treatment modalities-adaptive RT for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and adaptive stereotactic body RT for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-in which clinicians were asked to consider mid-treatment modification of the dose per fraction for a number of retrospective cancer patients without AI-support (Unassisted Phase) and with AI-assistance (AI-assisted Phase). The AI-CDSS graphically presented trade-offs in tumor control and the likelihood of toxicity to organs at risk, provided an optimal recommendation, and associated model uncertainties. In addition, we asked for clinicians' decision confidence level and trust level in individual AI recommendations and encouraged them to provide written remarks. We enrolled 13 evaluators (radiation oncology physicians and residents) from two medical institutions located in two different states, out of which, 4 evaluators volunteered in both NSCLC and HCC studies, resulting in a total of 17 completed evaluations (9 NSCLC, and 8 HCC). To limit the evaluation time to under an hour, we selected 8 treated patients for NSCLC and 9 for HCC, resulting in a total of 144 sets of evaluations (72 from NSCLC and 72 from HCC). Evaluation for each patient consisted of 8 required inputs and 2 optional remarks, resulting in up to a total of 1440 data points. Results: AI-assistance did not homogeneously influence all experts and clinical decisions. From NSCLC cohort, 41 (57%) decisions and from HCC cohort, 34 (47%) decisions were adjusted after AI assistance. Two evaluations (12%) from the NSCLC cohort had zero decision adjustments, while the remaining 15 (88%) evaluations resulted in at least two decision adjustments. Decision adjustment level positively correlated with dissimilarity in decision-making with AI [NSCLC: ρ = 0.53 ( p < 0.001); HCC: ρ = 0.60 ( p < 0.001)] indicating that evaluators adjusted their decision closer towards AI recommendation. Agreement with AI-recommendation positively correlated with AI Trust Level [NSCLC: ρ = 0.59 ( p < 0.001); HCC: ρ = 0.7 ( p < 0.001)] indicating that evaluators followed AI's recommendation if they agreed with that recommendation. The correlation between decision confidence changes and decision adjustment level showed an opposite trend [NSCLC: ρ = -0.24 ( p = 0.045), HCC: ρ = 0.28 ( p = 0.017)] reflecting the difference in behavior due to underlying differences in disease type and treatment modality. Decision confidence positively correlated with the closeness of decisions to the standard of care (NSCLC: 2 Gy/fx; HCC: 10 Gy/fx) indicating that evaluators were generally more confident in prescribing dose fractionations more similar to those used in standard clinical practice. Inter-evaluator agreement increased with AI-assistance indicating that AI-assistance can decrease inter-physician variability. The majority of decisions were adjusted to achieve higher tumor control in NSCLC and lower normal tissue complications in HCC. Analysis of evaluators' remarks indicated concerns for organs at risk and RT outcome estimates as important decision-making factors. Conclusions: Human-AI interaction depends on the complex interrelationship between expert's prior knowledge and preferences, patient's state, disease site, treatment modality, model transparency, and AI's learned behavior and biases. The collaborative decision-making process can be summarized as follows: (i) some clinicians may not believe in an AI system, completely disregarding its recommendation, (ii) some clinicians may believe in the AI system but will critically analyze its recommendations on a case-by-case basis; (iii) when a clinician finds that the AI recommendation indicates the possibility for better outcomes they will adjust their decisions accordingly; and (iv) When a clinician finds that the AI recommendation indicate a worse possible outcome they will disregard it and seek their own alternative approach.

Novel portable apparatus for outpatient high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in penile cancer.

BACKGROUND: Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSC) is traditionally treated with surgical resection with significant morbidity. Penile sparing approaches, such as brachytherapy, require expertise, prolonged inpatient stays, poor patient convenience, and heterogenous plans with variable long-term toxicity. In this study, we describe the protocol for novel portable apparatus created for PSC, allowing outpatient hybrid interstitial/surface brachytherapy, improving homogeneity and patient convenience. METHODS: A portable brachytherapy apparatus was developed utilizing a foley catheter, prostate template, 6F interstitial catheters, 5 mm bolus, and a jock strap. The apparatus allowed for internal and external catheter placement housed in a jock strap to allow mobility and defecation without affecting the implant. High-dose-rate brachytherapy was performed as an outpatient. RESULTS: The apparatus was then used on a 62-year-old male with cT2pN0M0 (stage IIA) PSC with bilateral glans and urethral meatus involvement, who elected for definitive brachytherapy (4000cGy in 10 fractions over 5-days). Given external dwell positions, heterogeneity correction of the template was calculated (AAPM TG186) with <2% variation. Patient had minimal impact on his active lifestyle during treatment and had complete clinical response at 3-months. Grade 2 skin desquamation resolved at 2-months, with no necrosis. At 6-months, he was able to resume sexual intercourse, and at 12-months, he remained disease-free with sexual and urinary function intact. CONCLUSIONS: Novel portable implant allows for improved patient convenience, reduced inpatient stay, capable of optimizing dosimetry with hybrid brachytherapy. This outpatient treatment allows the opportunity to increase fractionation, offering high local-control and lower toxicity. Future studies utilizing this apparatus for more fractionated regimens with further lower dose-per-fraction (∼3 Gy/fraction) is recommended.

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes and Sequelae of Therapy in Early-Stage Orbital Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: Orbital mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, which are rare and indolent, often present at an early stage. We report the efficacy and safety outcomes of treatment in these patients. METHODS: We analyzed adult patients with stage IE or IIE orbital MALT lymphoma between 1999 and 2017 treated at our institute. We assessed local control (LC) rates, overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS) using Kaplan Meier method and the incidence of late toxicities. RESULTS: Seventy patients were analyzed for clinical outcomes. The median age at diagnosis was 52 years (IQR-45-62 years). Radiotherapy was offered to 97% of patients and the dose ranged from 36 to 45 Gy. Chemotherapy was administered in 5(7.1%) patients. Relapse occurred in 8 patients (local: 2, distant: 6). At a median follow-up of 101 months (IQR-47-146 months), the median OS and RFS was not reached. 8-year OS, RFS and LC rates were 96.5%, 88.5%, 96.7% respectively. Univariate analysis showed age ≤60 years and lacrimal involvement significantly correlated with better OS (P = .01 and .04, respectively). Cataract was the most common sequelae observed in 31 patients (44.3%). CONCLUSION: Moderate doses of radiotherapy are curative in early-stage orbital MALT lymphoma with favorable clinical outcomes. Lower doses of radiation can reduce the toxicity further, without compromising efficacy.

Transarterial Yttrium-90 Glass Microsphere Radioembolization of Chemotherapy-Refractory Breast Cancer Liver Metastases: Results of a Single Institution Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to retrospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of transarterial hepatic radioembolization (TARE) treatment with yttrium-90 labeled glass microspheres in patients with chemotherapy-refractory breast cancer with liver-dominant metastatic disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This retrospective single-institution study evaluated 31 female patients (mean age of 59.6 ± 13.2 years) who were treated with TARE. All patients received and progressed on systemic chemotherapy before TARE. Twenty-one patients also had extrahepatic metastases, including 13 patients who had metastases in bones only besides the liver. Survival data were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test. Imaging response to treatment was determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. RESULTS: Median overall survival (OS) from the TARE was 13 months (95% confidence interval, 9.1-16.9 months). The survival probability at 1, 2, and 3 years was 60.1%, 36.7%, and 24.5%, respectively. The median hepatic progression-free survival was 7 months (95% confidence interval, 6.1-7.9 months). There was no 30-day mortality and 3 patients (9.4%) had grade 3 toxicity. Estrogen receptor (ER) positive status predicted prolonged survival (14 months for ER+ vs 9 months for ER-; P = .028). Patients who had bone-only extrahepatic disease had higher OS than patients with extraosseous metastases (23 vs 8 months, P = .02). At the 3-month follow-up the radiographic objective response rate was 46.6% and disease control rate was 70%. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of patients with liver-dominant chemotherapy-refractory breast cancer metastases with TARE using yttrium-90 labeled glass microspheres is safe and led to promising hepatic disease control and OS especially in patients with ER+ tumors and in patients without extrahepatic extraosseous metastases.

Pretreatment CT and 18 F-FDG PET-based radiomic model predicting pathological complete response and loco-regional control following neoadjuvant chemoradiation in oesophageal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: To develop a radiomic-based model to predict pathological complete response (pCR) and outcome following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) in oesophageal cancer. METHODS: We analysed 68 patients with oesophageal cancer treated with NACRT followed by esophagectomy, who had staging 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18 F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) scans performed at our institution. An in-house data-chjmirocterization algorithm was used to extract 3D-radiomic features from the segmented primary disease. Prediction models were constructed and internally validated. Composite feature, Fc  = α * FPET  + (1 - α) * FCT , 0 ≤ α ≤ 1, was constructed for each corresponding CT and PET feature. Loco-regional control (LRC), recurrence-free survival (RFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and compared using log-rank test. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 59 months. pCR was achieved in 34 (50%) patients. Five-year RFS, LRC, MFS and OS were 67.1%, 88.5%, 75.6% and 57.6%, respectively. Tumour Regression Grade (TRG) 0-1 indicative of complete response or minimal residual disease was significantly associated with improved 5-year LRC [93.7% vs 71.8%; P = 0.020; HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.85]. Four sepjmirote pCR predictive models were built for CT alone, PET alone, CT+PET and composite. CT, PET and CT+PET models had AUC 0.73 ± 0.08, 0.66 ± 0.08 and 0.77 ± 0.07, respectively. The composite model resulted in an improvement of pCR predicting power with AUC 0.87 ± 0.06. Stratifying patients with a low versus high radiomic score showed clinically relevant improvement in 5-year LRC favouring low-score group (91.1% vs. 80%, 95% CI 0.09-1.77, P = 0.2). CONCLUSION: The composite CT/PET radiomics model was highly predictive of pCR following NACRT. Validation in larger data sets is warranted to determine whether the model can predict clinical outcomes.

Liver-directed treatments of liver-dominant metastatic leiomyosarcoma.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of liver-directed therapies in patients with unresectable metastatic leiomyosarcoma to the liver. Liver-directed therapies included in this study were transarterial chemoembolization with doxorubicin eluting beads (DEB-TACE), yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization, and percutaneous microwave ablation. METHODS: This is a single institution retrospective study of unresectable metastatic leiomyosarcoma to the liver treated with DEB-TACE, radioembolization, or microwave ablation. DEB-TACE was performed using 70-150 or 100-300 µ doxorubicin-loaded drug-eluting LC beads. Radioembolization was performed using Y90 glass microspheres. Electronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate clinical and biochemical toxicities, tumor response on imaging, overall survival (OS), and liver progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: A total of 24 patients with metastatic leiomyosarcoma to the liver who underwent liver-directed treatment were identified (8 males, 16 females; average age, 62.8±11.4 years). Of these patients, 13 underwent DEB-TACE, 6 underwent Y90, and 5 underwent ablation. Three patients received a combination of treatments: one received Y90 followed by DEB-TACE, one received ablation followed by DEB-TACE, and one received ablation followed by Y90. Of the 24 patients, 19 received prior chemotherapy. At 3-month follow-up, grade 1 or 2 lab toxicities were found in 20 patients; 3 patients had grade 3 toxicities. A grade 3 clinical toxicity was reported in one patient. MELD score was 7.5±1.89 at baseline and 8.8±4.2 at 3 months. Median OS was 59 months (95% CI, 39.8-78.2) from diagnosis, 27 months (95% CI, 22.9-31.0) from development of liver metastasis, and 9 months (95% CI, 0-21.4) from first liver-directed treatment. Median liver PFS was 9 months (95% CI, 1.4-16.6). CONCLUSION: Treatment with liver-directed therapies for patients with unresectable metastatic leiomyosarcoma to the liver is safe and can improve overall survival, with OS after liver-directed therapy being similar to patients who underwent surgical resection.

Outcome following radiotherapy for head and neck basal cell carcinoma with 'aggressive' features.

OBJECTIVES: The literature demonstrates that 'aggressive' head-and-neck basal cell carcinomas (HN-BCC) have a higher than expected relapse rate with unfavorable outcomes. We report outcomes following definitive (dRT) or post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) for these tumors. METHODS: We reviewed all HN-BCC patients with 'aggressive' features (primary lesions diameter >10mm, >2 recurrences, or extra-cutaneous extension), treated with megavoltage dRT or PORT between 1998 and 2013. Loco-regional control (LRC) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were estimated using the competing risk method, and overall survival (OS) by Kaplan-Meier method. Univariable analysis explored factors associated with relapse. RESULTS: A total of 108 histologically confirmed 'aggressive' HN-BCC patients were identified, including 38 (35%) presenting de novo and 70 (65%) treated for recurrence (rBCC). dRT was offered to 72 (66.7%) patients and PORT to 36 (33.3%). Median follow-up was 3.5years. Actuarial 3-year LRC, RFS, and OS were 87% (95% confidence interval: 77-92), 82% (72-89), and 87% (80-94), respectively. LRC rates for dRT and PORT were similar [hazard ratio (HR) 0.61 (0.17-2.23), p=0.46]. Factors associated with higher risk of relapse were: rBCC [HR 7.96 (1.03-61.71), p=0.047], 'H-zone' (mid face, eyes, and ears) location [HR 3.13 (1.07-9.19), p=0.04], tumor size [HR 1.32 (1.08-1.6), p=0.006], nodal involvement [HR 3.68 (1.11-12.2), p=0.03] and stage [HR 3.13 (1.19-8.26), p=0.02]. CONCLUSION: RT is an effective treatment for 'aggressive' HN-BCC when used as a definitive modality or as PORT. Non-surgical management with definitive radiotherapy provides an alternative effective option if surgery is not used.

Clinical impact of prostate specific antigen (PSA) inter-assay variability on management of prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the inter-assay variability of six commercially available prostate specific antigen (PSA) assays, its clinical impact in prostate cancer (PCa) and comparison of automated versus manual assays. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sera from 495 patients (425 with PCa and 70 men with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH), were measured with six different assays [three automated assays (a-PSA) and three manual ELISA based assay (m-PSA)]. Variability, agreement and bias were measured and compared among assays using Bland Altman plots and Passing and Bablok regression analysis. The possible impact of inter-assay variability on important clinical scenarios was also studied. RESULTS: All the assays were well correlated (r: 0.88-0.98); however there was significant disagreement and bias between the systems, which were more pronounced among the a-PSA assays. The Bland Altman plot showed that the variability was high between the m-PSA assays and the standard Abbott system with mean difference of 3.8-5.8ng/ml. In contrast, the a-PSA had better agreement with mean difference of 0.8-2.3ng/ml. Beckman Coulter showed the best agreement to the institutional reference (slope-1.097; 95% CI: 1.06-1.14; p<0.05, and intercept-0.20; 95% CI-0.38-0.58; p<0.05, Passing Bablok). It led to significant variability in PCa risk stratification and failure to detect biochemical failure in more than 50% cases. CONCLUSIONS: The discrepancies between the assays lead to significant clinical misinterpretation with risk group migration and detection of biochemical failure post radiotherapy. There are significant discordances between automated and ELISA based assays.

Clinical outcome and molecular characterization of pediatric glioblastoma treated with postoperative radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide: a single institutional study of 66 children.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) in children is rare. Pediatric GBM have a distinct molecular profile as compared to adult GBM. There are relatively few studies of pediatric GBMs and no standard of care on adjuvant therapy. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcome and molecular profile of pediatric GBM. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2004 and 2013, 66 consecutive children with histologically proven GBM were identified from our database. The majority of the children underwent maximal safe resection followed by focal radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. Immunohistochemical staining was performed for p53, MIB-1 labeling index, MGMT overexpression, and EGFR amplification and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH1) R132H point mutation. Survival and impact of possible prognostic factors on outcomes were analyzed. RESULT: Median survival was 15 months. The overall survival rate at 1 year was 62%, at 2 years was 30%, and at 3 years was 27%. Patients with thalamic tumors (P < .001), incompletely resected tumors (P < .00001), and tumors with MIB-1 labeling index >25% (P < .002) had poor overall survival rates. p53 was overexpressed in 74% of patients, MGMT promoter methylation was seen in 37% of patients, IDH1 mutation was seen in 4% of patients, and no patients had EGFR amplification. MGMT methylation and p53 overexpression did not impact survival. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcome of pediatric GBM is similar to that reported for adult GBM. The frequency of p53 overexpression is higher than in adult GBM, while MGMT methylation, IDH1 mutations and EGFR amplification is lower than in adult GBM. MGMT methylation and p53 expression status do not have any prognostic significance.

Radiotherapy Characteristics and Outcomes for Head and Neck Carcinoma of Unknown Primary vs T1 Base-of-Tongue Carcinoma.

Importance: Transoral robotic surgery- or transoral laser microsurgery-assisted lingual tonsillectomy may improve the identification rate of hidden base-of-tongue (BOT) carcinoma presenting as head or neck carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) site. Objective: To evaluate the potential impact of lingual tonsillectomy in CUP site by comparing differences in radiotherapy volumes, dosimetry, and clinical outcomes for CUP site and T1-category BOT carcinoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective study of 115 patients treated at a tertiary cancer center between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2013, that included patients with BOT carcinoma (category T1N1-3M0) and CUP site (category T0N1-3M0) with known p16 status. Fifty-four patients with T1-category BOT carcinoma (50 [92.6%] p16-positive) were treated with definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), including 34 (63%) who received concurrent chemotherapy. Sixty-one patients with CUP site (38 [62.3%] p16-positive) received definitive (42 [68.9%]) or postoperative (19 [31.1%]) IMRT, including 22 (36%) who received concurrent chemotherapy. Interventions: Definitive or postoperative IMRT, with or without concurrent chemotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Characteristics of mucosal clinical target volume (CTV-T), nodal CTV, and organ-at-risk dosimetry; local, regional, and distant control; cause-specific and overall survival; and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade 3 or higher late toxic effects. Results: Of 115 participants, 104 (90.4%) were male; mean (SD) age was 59 (10) years. High-dose CTV-T was prescribed in all 54 patients with BOT carcinoma and 23 (37.7%) with CUP site (effect size [Δ], 62%; 95% CI, 50%-74%). Low-dose CTV-T included mucosal pharyngeal sites outside the oropharynx in no patients with BOT carcinoma and 26 (42.6%) (95% CI, 30%-54%) with CUP site, with greater low-dose CTV-T volume in CUP site than BOT carcinoma (113 vs 84 cm3; Δ, 30 cm3; 95% CI, 10-49 cm3). Bilateral neck irradiation was used in 53 of 54 patients (98.1%) with BOT carcinoma and 46 of 61 (75.4%) with CUP site (Δ, 23%; 95% CI, 12% to 34%). Patients with BOT carcinoma received a higher maximum dose to the mandible (71 vs 67.2 Gy; Δ, 3.8 Gy; 95% CI, 1.6 to 6 Gy), with a nonsignificantly higher maximum dose (66.1 vs 62.8 Gy; 3.2 Gy; 95% CI, -0.1 to 6.5 Gy) and lower mean dose to the larynx (43.8 vs 47.1 Gy; 3.3 Gy; 95% CI, -0.3 to 6.9 Gy). There were no significant differences in local control, regional control, distant control, cause-specific survival, and overall survival between the BOT carcinoma and CUP site groups stratified by p16 status. Grade 3 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group late toxic effects occurred in 2 patients (3.3%) with CUP site (both neck fibrosis) and 5 (9.3%) with BOT carcinoma (2 neck fibrosis, 2 osteoradionecrosis, and 1 dysphagia). Conclusions and Relevance: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for CUP site or T1-category BOT carcinoma had similar clinical outcomes. Identifying hidden BOT primary carcinoma with novel approaches (eg, transoral robotic surgery and transoral laser microsurgery) may lead to changes in the radiotherapy target volume and dose prescription. Studies are needed to investigate the effect of these differences on quality of life and functional outcomes.

Acute multiple arterial thrombosis after cisplatin in base of tongue carcinoma: case report.

BACKGROUND: Arterial thromboses following cisplatin-based chemotherapy in head and neck cancers are extremely rare and devastating complication. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 54-year-old male smoker had an acute history of left lower limb pain and calf claudication 3 days following the first cycle of cisplatin-based chemotherapy given concurrently with radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the base of tongue. CT angiography showed extensive abdominal aortic thrombus along with involvement of left common iliac, saphenopopliteal, and tibeal arteries as well as moderate stenosis in the proximal segments of left anterior descending and right coronary artery. We suggest that endothelial damage and hypercoaguable state secondary to cisplatin may have induced severe arterial and coronary thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first reported case of acute multiple arterial thrombosis following cisplatin in head and neck cancer. It is a dreaded complication and has a dismal prognosis if not promptly recognized and treated.

Comparison of concomitant boost radiotherapy against concurrent chemoradiation in locally advanced oropharyngeal cancers: a phase III randomised trial.

PURPOSE: To test the toxicity and efficacy of concomitant boost radiotherapy alone against concurrent chemoradiation (conventional fractionation) in locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer in our patient population. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this open-label, randomised trial, 216 patients with histologically proven Stage III-IVA oropharyngeal cancer were randomly assigned between June 2006 and December 2010 to receive either chemoradiation (CRT) to a dose of 66 Gy in 33 fractions over 6.5 weeks with concurrent cisplatin (100 mg/m(2) on days 1, 22 and 43) or accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant boost (CBRT) to a dose of 67.5 Gy in 40 fractions over 5 weeks. The compliance, toxicity and quality of life were investigated. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) curves were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log rank test. RESULTS: The compliance to radiotherapy was superior in concomitant boost with lesser treatment interruptions (p=0.004). Expected acute toxicities were significantly higher in CRT, except for grade 3/4 mucositis which was seen more in CBRT arm (39% and 55% in CRT and CBRT, respectively; p=0.02). Late toxicities like Grade 3 xerostomia were significantly high in CRT arm than CBRT arm (33% versus 18%; p<0.0001). The quality of life was significantly poor in CRT arm at all follow up visits (p<0.0001). The rates of 2 year disease-free survival were similar with 56% in the chemoradiotherapy group and 61% in CBRT group (p=0.2; HR-0.81, 95%CI-0.53-1.2). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with nodal size >2 cm had significantly better DFS with CRT (p=0.05; HR-1.59, 95%CI-0.93-2.7). CONCLUSION: In selected patients of locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer, concomitant boost offers a better compliance, toxicity profile and quality of life with similar disease control, than chemoradiation.