Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 47
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Surg Endosc ; 35(2): 792-801, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32157405

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Many centers have reported excellent short-term efficacy of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for the treatment of achalasia. However, long-term data are limited and there are few studies comparing the efficacy of POEM versus Heller Myotomy (HM). AIMS: To compare the long-term clinical efficacy of POEM versus HM. METHODS: Using a retrospective, parallel cohort design, all cases of POEM or HM for achalasia between 2010 and 2015 were assessed. Clinical failure was defined as (a) Eckardt Score > 3 for at least 4 weeks, (b) achalasia-related hospitalization, or (c) repeat intervention. All index manometries were classified via Chicago Classification v3. Pre-procedural clinical, manometric, radiographic data, and procedural data were reviewed. RESULTS: 98 patients were identified (55 POEM, 43 Heller) with mean follow-up of 3.94 years, and 5.44 years, respectively. 83.7% of HM patients underwent associated anti-reflux wrap (Toupet or Dor). Baseline clinical, demographic, radiographic, and manometric data were similar between the groups. There was no statistical difference in overall long-term success (POEM 72.7%, HM 65.1% p = 0.417, although higher rates of success were seen in Type III Achalasia in POEM vs Heller (53.3% vs 44.4%, p < 0.05). Type III Achalasia was the only variable associated with failure on a univariate COX analysis and no covariants were identified on a multivariate Cox regression. There was no statistical difference in GERD symptoms, esophagitis, or major procedural complications. CONCLUSION: POEM and HM have similar long-term (4-year) efficacy with similar adverse event and reflux rates. POEM was associated with greater efficacy in Type III Achalasia.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía/métodos , Acalasia del Esófago/cirugía , Miotomía de Heller/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Ann Surg ; 267(1): 88-93, 2018 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27759614

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a new magnetic surgical system during reduced-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a prospective, multicenter clinical trial. BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic instrumentation coupled by magnetic fields may enhance surgeon performance by allowing for shaft-less retraction and mobilization. The movements can be performed under direct visualization, generating different angles of traction and reducing the number of trocars to perform the procedure. This may reduce well-known associated complications of trocars, including incisional pain, scarring, infection, bowel, and vascular injuries, among others. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study was performed to assess the safety and performance of a magnetic surgical system (Levita Magnetics' Surgical System). The investigational device was used during a 3-port laparoscopic technique. The primary endpoints evaluated were safety and feasibility of the device to adequately mobilize the gallbladder to achieve effective exposure of the targeted surgical site. Patients were followed for 30 days postprocedure. RESULTS: Between January 2014 and March 2015, 50 patients presenting with benign gallbladder disease were recruited. Forty-five women and 5 men with an average age of 39 years (18-59), average body mass index of 27 kg/m (20.4-34.1) and an average abdominal wall thickness of 2.6 cm (1.8-4.6). The procedures were successfully performed in all 50 patients. No device-related serious adverse events were reported. Surgeons rated as "excellent" (90%) or "sufficient" (10%) the exposure of the surgical site. CONCLUSIONS: This clinical trial shows that this new magnetic surgical system is safe and effective in reduced-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.


Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/instrumentación , Enfermedades de la Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Laparoscopios , Imanes , Adolescente , Adulto , Diseño de Equipo , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
3.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 218(6): 549-562, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29032051

RESUMEN

The most common location of extragenital endometriosis is the bowel. Medical treatment may not provide long-term improvement in patients who are symptomatic, and consequently most of these patients may require surgical intervention. Over the past century, surgeons have continued to debate the optimal surgical approach to treating bowel endometriosis, weighing the risks against the benefits. In this expert review we will describe how the recommended surgical approach depends largely on the location of disease, in addition to size and depth of the lesion. For lesions approximately 5-8 cm from the anal verge, we encourage conservative surgical management over resection to decrease the risk of short- and long-term complications.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Endometriosis/cirugía , Enfermedades Intestinales/cirugía , Canal Anal/cirugía , Tratamiento Conservador , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/uso terapéutico , Danazol/uso terapéutico , Endometriosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Endometriosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Endosonografía , Antagonistas de Estrógenos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades Intestinales/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Intestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Laparoscopía , Leuprolida/uso terapéutico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Inhibición de la Ovulación , Dolor Pélvico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Progestinas/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades del Recto/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades del Recto/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Ultrasonografía
4.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol ; 34(12): 2637-43, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25341798

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The biological mechanisms linking obesity to insulin resistance have not been fully elucidated. We have shown that insulin resistance or glucose intolerance in diet-induced obese mice is related to a shift in the ratio of pro- and anti-inflammatory T cells in adipose tissue. We sought to test the hypothesis that the balance of T-cell phenotypes would be similarly related to insulin resistance in human obesity. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Healthy overweight or obese human subjects underwent adipose-tissue biopsies and quantification of insulin-mediated glucose disposal by the modified insulin suppression test. T-cell subsets were quantified by flow cytometry in visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Results showed that CD4 and CD8 T cells infiltrate both depots, with proinflammatory T-helper (Th)-1, Th17, and CD8 T cells, significantly more frequent in VAT as compared with SAT. T-cell profiles in SAT and VAT correlated significantly with one another and with peripheral blood. Th1 frequency in SAT and VAT correlated directly, whereas Th2 frequency in VAT correlated inversely, with plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentrations. Th2 in both depots and peripheral blood was inversely associated with systemic insulin resistance. Furthermore, Th1 in SAT correlated with plasma interleukin-6. Relative expression of associated cytokines, measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction, reflected flow cytometry results. Most notably, adipose tissue expression of anti-inflammatory interleukin-10 was inversely associated with insulin resistance. CONCLUSIONS: CD4 and CD8 T cells populate human adipose tissue and the relative frequency of Th1 and Th2 are highly associated with systemic inflammation and insulin resistance. These findings point to the adaptive immune system as a potential mediator between obesity and insulin resistance or inflammation. Identification of antigenic stimuli in adipose tissue may yield novel targets for treatment of obesity-associated metabolic disease.


Asunto(s)
Tejido Adiposo/inmunología , Inflamación/inmunología , Resistencia a la Insulina/inmunología , Subgrupos de Linfocitos T/inmunología , Tejido Adiposo/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Animales , Citocinas/sangre , Citocinas/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Inflamación/genética , Inflamación/patología , Mediadores de Inflamación/sangre , Resistencia a la Insulina/genética , Grasa Intraabdominal/inmunología , Grasa Intraabdominal/patología , Masculino , Ratones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/genética , Obesidad/inmunología , Obesidad/patología , Sobrepeso/genética , Sobrepeso/inmunología , Sobrepeso/patología , Grasa Subcutánea/inmunología , Grasa Subcutánea/patología , Subgrupos de Linfocitos T/patología
5.
Surg Endosc ; 29(9): 2486-90, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25480607

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Internal herniation is a potential complication following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Previous studies have shown that closure of mesenteric defects after LRYGB may reduce the incidence of internal herniation. However, controversy remains as to whether mesenteric defect closure is necessary to decrease the incidence of internal hernias after LRYGB. This study aims to determine if jejeunal mesenteric defect closure reduces incidence of internal hernias and other complications in patients undergoing LRYGB. METHODS: 105 patients undergoing laparoscopic antecolic RYGB were randomized into two groups: closed mesenteric defect (n = 50) or open mesenteric defect (n = 55). Complication rates were obtained from the medical record. Patients were followed up to 3 years post-operatively. Patients also completed the gastrointestinal quality of life index (GI QoL) pre-operatively and 12 months post-operatively. Outcome measures included: incidence of internal hernias, complications, readmissions, reoperations, GI QoL scores, and percent excess weight loss (%EWL). RESULTS: Pre-operatively, there were no significant differences between the two groups. The closed group had a longer operative time (closed-153 min, open-138 min, p = 0.073). There was one internal hernia in the open group. There was no significant difference at 12 months for decrease in BMI (closed-15.9, open-16.3 kg/m(2), p = 0.288) or %EWL (closed-75.3%, open-69.0%, p = 0.134). There was no significant difference between the groups in incidence of internal hernias and general complications post-operatively. Both groups showed significantly improved GI QoL index scores from baseline to 12 months post-surgery, but there were no significant differences at 12 months between groups in total GI QoL (closed-108, open-112, p = 0.440). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, closure or non-closure of the jejeunal mesenteric defect following LRYGB appears to result in equivalent internal hernia and complication rates. High index of suspicion should be maintained whenever internal hernia is expected after LRYGB.


Asunto(s)
Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Hernia Abdominal/prevención & control , Laparoscopía/métodos , Mesenterio/cirugía , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Calidad de Vida , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
Ann Surg ; 260(2): 274-8, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24743608

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To calculate the public health impact and economic benefit of using ancillary health care professionals for routine postoperative care. BACKGROUND: The need for specialty surgical care far exceeds its supply, particularly in weight loss surgery. Bariatric surgery is cost-effective and the only effective long-term weight loss strategy for morbidly obese patients. Without clinically appropriate task shifting, surgeons, hospitals, and untreated patients incur a high opportunity cost. METHODS: Visit schedules, time per visit, and revenues were obtained from bariatric centers of excellence. Case-specific surgeon fees were derived from published Current Procedural Terminology data. The novel Microsoft Excel model was allowed to run until a steady state was evident (status quo). This model was compared with one in which the surgeon participates in follow-up visits beyond 3 months only if there is a complication (task shifting). Changes in operative capacity and national quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated. RESULTS: In the status quo model, per capita surgical volume capacity equilibrates at 7 surgical procedures per week, with 27% of the surgeon's time dedicated to routine long-term follow-up visits. Task shifting increases operative capacity by 38%, resulting in 143,000 to 882,000 QALYs gained annually. Per surgeon, task shifting achieves an annual increase of 95 to 588 QALYs, $5 million in facility revenue, 48 cases of cure of obstructive sleep apnea, 44 cases of remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 35 cases of cure of hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal resource allocation through task shifting is economically appealing and can achieve dramatic public health benefit by increasing access to specialty surgery.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Cuidados Posoperatorios/economía , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Asignación de Recursos , Control de Costos , Femenino , Recursos en Salud , Precios de Hospital , Humanos , Masculino
7.
Surg Endosc ; 27(9): 3182-6, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23443484

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery has been established for various procedures. Shortcomings of LESS surgery include loss of triangulation, instrument collisions, and poor ergonomics, making advanced laparoscopic tasks especially challenging. We compared a LESS system with a robotic single-site surgery platform in performance of a suturing and knot-tying task under clinically simulated conditions. METHODS: Each of five volunteer minimally invasive surgeons was tasked with suturing a 5 cm longitudinal enterotomy in porcine small intestine with square knots at either end, using a laparoendoscopic or da Vinci robotic single-site surgery platform, within a 20 min time limit. A saline leak test was then performed. Each surgeon performed the task twice using each system. The time to completion of the task and presence of a leak were noted. Fisher's exact test was used to compare the overall completion rate within the defined time limit, and a Wilcoxon rank test was used to compare the specific times to complete the task. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: All surgeons were able to complete the task on the first try within 20 min using the robot system; 60% of surgeons were able to complete it after two attempts using the LESS surgery system. Time to completion using the robot system was significantly shorter than the time using the standard LESS system (p < 0.0001). There were no leaks after closure with the robot system; the leak rate following the standard LESS system was 90%. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons demonstrated significantly better suturing and knot-tying capabilities using the robot single-site system compared to a standard LESS system. The robotic system has the potential to expand single-site surgery to more complex tasks.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Intestino Delgado/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Robótica/métodos , Técnicas de Sutura , Adulto , Animales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/instrumentación , Ergonomía/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Animales , Robótica/instrumentación , Porcinos , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas
8.
Surg Endosc ; 26(5): 1296-303, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22083331

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive techniques have become an integral part of general surgery, with recent investigation into single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC). This study presents a prospective, randomized, multicenter, single-blind trial of SILC compared with four-port cholecystectomy (4PLC) with the goal of assessing safety, feasibility, and factors predicting outcomes. METHODS: Patients with biliary colic and documented gallstones or polyps or with biliary dyskinesia were randomized to SILC or 4PLC. Data measures included operative details, adverse events, and conversion to 4PLC or laparotomy. Pain, cosmesis, and quality-of-life scores were documented. Patients were followed for 12 months. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were randomized to SILC (n = 117) or 4PLC (n = 80) (3 patients chose not to participate after randomization). Patients were similar except for body mass index (BMI), which was lower in the SILC patients (28.9 vs. 31.0, p = 0.011). One SILC patient required conversion to 4PLC. Operative time was longer for SILC (57 vs. 45 min, p < 0.0001), but outcomes, including total adverse events, were similar (34% vs. 38%, p = 0.55). Cosmesis scores favored SILC (p < 0.002), but pain scores were lower for 4PLC (1 point difference in 10-point scale, p < 0.028) despite equal analgesia use. Wound complications were greater after SILC (10% vs. 3%, p = 0.047), but hernia recurrence was equivalent for both procedures (1.3% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.65). Univariate analysis showed female gender, SILC, and younger age to be predictors for increased pain scores, while SILC was associated with improved cosmesis scores. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial of SILC versus 4PLC, SILC appears to be safe with a similar biliary complication profile. Pain scores and wound complication rates are higher for SILC; however, cosmesis scores favored SILC. For patients preferring a better cosmetic outcome and willing to accept possible increased postoperative pain, SILC offers a safe alternative to the standard 4PLC. Further follow-up is needed to detail the long-term risk of wound morbidities, including hernia recurrence.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Vías Biliares/cirugía , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Método Simple Ciego , Ombligo , Adulto Joven
9.
Surg Endosc ; 26(10): 2711-6, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22936433

RESUMEN

Many surgeons attempting Laparo-Endoscopic Single Site (LESS) cholecystectomy have found the operation difficult, which is inconsistent with our experience. This article is an attempt to promote a standardized approach that we feel surgeons with laparoscopic skills can perform safely and efficiently. This is a four-trocar approach consistent with the four incisions utilized in conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. After administration of general anesthesia, marcaine is injected at the umbilicus and a 12-mm vertical incision is made through the already existing anatomical scar of the umbilicus. A single four-trocar port is inserted. A 5-mm deflectable-tip laparoscope is placed through the trocar at the 8 o'clock position, a bariatric length rigid grasper is inserted through the trocar at the 4 o'clock position (to grasp the fundus), and a rigid bent grasper is placed through the 10-mm port (to grasp the infundibulum). This arrangement of the instruments promotes minimal internal and external instrument clashing with simultaneous optimization of the operative view. This orientation allows retraction of the gallbladder in a cephalad and lateral direction, development of a window between the gallbladder and the liver which promotes the "critical view" of the cystic duct and artery, and provides triangulation with excellent visualization of the operative field. The operation is concluded with diaphragmatic irrigation of marcaine solution to minimize postoperative pain. Standardization of LESS cholecystectomy will speed adoption, reduce intraoperative complications, and improve the efficiency and safety of the approach.


Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/instrumentación , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/normas , Humanos
10.
JMIR Med Educ ; 8(2): e34973, 2022 Apr 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35412463

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Similar to understanding how blood pressure is measured by a sphygmomanometer, physicians will soon have to understand how an artificial intelligence-based application has come to the conclusion that a patient has hypertension, diabetes, or cancer. Although there are an increasing number of use cases where artificial intelligence is or can be applied to improve medical outcomes, the extent to which medical doctors and students are ready to work and leverage this paradigm is unclear. OBJECTIVE: This research aims to capture medical students' and doctors' level of familiarity toward artificial intelligence in medicine as well as their challenges, barriers, and potential risks linked to the democratization of this new paradigm. METHODS: A web-based questionnaire comprising five dimensions-demographics, concepts and definitions, training and education, implementation, and risks-was systematically designed from a literature search. It was completed by 207 participants in total, of which 105 (50.7%) medical doctors and 102 (49.3%) medical students trained in all continents, with most of them in Europe, the Middle East, Asia, and North America. RESULTS: The results revealed no significant difference in the familiarity of artificial intelligence between medical doctors and students (P=.91), except that medical students perceived artificial intelligence in medicine to lead to higher risks for patients and the field of medicine in general (P<.001). We also identified a rather low level of familiarity with artificial intelligence (medical students=2.11/5; medical doctors=2.06/5) as well as a low attendance to education or training. Only 2.9% (3/105) of medical doctors attended a course on artificial intelligence within the previous year, compared with 9.8% (10/102) of medical students. The complexity of the field of medicine was considered one of the biggest challenges (medical doctors=3.5/5; medical students=3.8/5), whereas the reduction of physicians' skills was the most important risk (medical doctors=3.3; medical students=3.6; P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: The question is not whether artificial intelligence will be used in medicine, but when it will become a standard practice for optimizing health care. The low level of familiarity with artificial intelligence identified in this study calls for the implementation of specific education and training in medical schools and hospitals to ensure that medical professionals can leverage this new paradigm and improve health outcomes.

11.
Obes Surg ; 32(1): 3-7, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34761307

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most frequently occurring form of mesenchymal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a commonly performed bariatric operation in which a portion of the gastric body and fundus is removed and sent for pathological examination. Increasingly, bariatric surgeons have incidentally identified neoplasms in the excised portion of the stomach. The aim of this study is to explore the incidence of GIST in obese patients undergoing LSG. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a single-center, single-surgeon retrospective case series which included 305 obese patients who underwent LSG. All excised stomach specimens were sent for pathologic analysis.. In the case of pathologically verified GIST (n = 6; 1.97%), detailed analysis was performed. RESULTS: In 305 LSG procedures, six cases of GIST (1.97%) were identified. The tumors were measured between 1 and 7 mm and were all low grade with negative resection margins. The mean BMI was 46.38 ± 3.94 kg/m2 (range: 41.61-51.77). The mean age at time of surgery was 55.33 ± 12.9 years (range: 37-73 years). All cases were asymptomatic and showed no evidence of metastatic disease. CONCLUSION: The incidental rate of GIST in the excised portion of the stomach in our 305 obese patients who underwent LSG is 6/305 (1.97%). This adds relevant data to the overall goal of determining whether obesity is a risk factor for GIST. Radical surgical resection of these tumors with adequate disease-free margins performed on a low-grade malignancy serves as a definitive oncological treatment, especially when there is an intact pseudocapsule.


Asunto(s)
Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Gastrectomía/métodos , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/epidemiología , Obesidad/cirugía , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Surg Obes Relat Dis ; 17(2): 456-465, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33160876

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Postbariatric hypoglycemia (PBH) affects up to 38% of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) patients. Severe cases are refractory to diet and medications. Surgical treatments including bypass reversal and pancreatectomy are highly morbid and hypoglycemia often recurs. We have developed a highly effective method of treatment by which enteral nutrition administered through a gastrostomy (G) tube placed in the remnant stomach replaces oral diet: if done correctly this reverses hyperinsulinemia and hypoglycemia, yielding substantial health and quality of life benefits for severely affected patients. OBJECTIVES: To provide clinical guidelines for placement of a G-tube to treat postRYGB hypoglycemia, including candidate selection, preoperative evaluation, surgical considerations, and post-RYGB management. SETTING: Stanford University Hospital and Clinics. METHODS: Based on our relatively large experience with placing and managing G-tubes for PBH treatment, an interdisciplinary task force developed guidelines for practitioners. RESULTS: A team approach (endocrinologist, dietitian, surgeon, psychologist) is recommended. Appropriate candidates have a history of RYGB, severe hypoglycemia refractory to medical-nutrition therapy, and significantly affected quality of life. Preoperative requirements include education and expectation setting, determination of initial enteral feeding program, and establishing service with a home enteral provider. Close postoperative follow-up is needed to ensure success and may require adjustments in formula and mode/rate of delivery to optimize tolerance and meet nutritional goals. G-tube nutrition must fully replace oral nutrition to prevent hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: G-tube placement in the remnant stomach represents a relatively well-tolerated and effective treatment for severe, refractory hypoglycemia after RYGB.


Asunto(s)
Derivación Gástrica , Hipoglucemia , Obesidad Mórbida , Nutrición Enteral , Derivación Gástrica/efectos adversos , Gastrostomía , Humanos , Hipoglucemia/etiología , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Calidad de Vida
13.
Surg Endosc ; 24(6): 1403-12, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20035355

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Findings have shown that single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is feasible and reproducible. The authors have pioneered a two-trocar SILC technique at the University of Texas Southwestern. Their results for 100 patients are presented. METHODS: From January 2008 to March 2009, 100 patients with symptomatic gallbladder disease underwent SILC through a 1.5- to 2-cm umbilical incision using a two-port (5-mm) technique. For nearly all the patients, a 30 degrees angled scope was used. The gallbladder was retracted, with two or three sutures placed along the gallbladder. These sutures were either fixated internally or placed through the abdominal wall to obtain a critical view of Calot's triangle. The SILC procedure was performed using standard technique with 5-mm reticulating or conventional laparoscopic instruments. The cystic duct and artery were well visualized, clipped, and divided. Cholecystectomy was completed with electrocautery, and the specimen was retrieved through the umbilical incision. RESULTS: In this series, 80 women (85%) and 15 men (15%) with an average age of 33.8 years (range, 17-66 years) underwent SILC. Their mean BMI was 29.8 kg/m(2) (range, 17-42.5 kg/m(2)), and 39% of these patients had undergone previous abdominal surgery. The mean operative time was 50.8 min (range, 23-120 min). The mean estimated blood loss was 22.3 ml (range, 5-125 ml), and 5% of the patients had an intraoperative cholangiogram. There were no conversions of the SILC technique. A two-trocar technique was feasible for 87% of the patients. For the remaining patients, either a three-channel port or three individual trocars were required. A SILC technique was used for 5% of the patients to manage acute cholecystitis or gallstone pancreatitis. CONCLUSION: The SILC technique with a two-trocar technique is safe, feasible, and reproducible. The operating times are reasonable and can be lessened with experience. Even complex cases can be managed with this technique. Excellent exposure of the critical view was obtained in all cases. The SILC procedure is becoming the standard of care for most of the authors' elective patients with gallbladder disease. Clinical trials are warranted before the SILC technique is adopted universally.


Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Enfermedades de la Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Laparoscopios , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
14.
Surg Endosc ; 24(9): 2314-5, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20422429

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This video describes a modified single-incision laparoscopic approach for adjustable gastric band placement. METHOD: The patient was a 28-year-old female with a BMI of 48.75 with no prior surgery but with numerous comorbidities. With the patient placed in a split-leg position and in steep reverse Trendelenburg, a 12-mm optical trocar is placed 12 cm distal to the xiphoid process in the left paramedian location. A Nathanson liver retractor is placed through a midepigastric 5-mm incision. Two 5-mm low-profile trocars are placed next to the 12-mm trocar through separate incisions (this maintains stability of each cannula) and a 5-mm 45 ° laparoscope is used. Using an automated suturing device, a stay suture is placed high on the fundus and externalized for retraction. An articulating band passer dissects the phrenogastric attachments at the angle of His. The 12-mm port is removed and the gastric band is inserted. The GE junction fat pad is excised and the Pars Flaccida membrane is divided using conventional instruments. A second traction suture is placed to retract the lesser curve fat and right crus fat pad. A peritoneal bite is also taken in the left lateral subcostal area such that when this suture is externalized, it acts as a pulley. An articulating 5-mm grasper is used to develop the retrogastric tunnel. Then the band is fed into position and its buckle is locked. Three interrupted sutures are placed to create an anterior gastric plication and a fourth antislippage suture is placed below the band along the lesser curve. The band tubing is externalized and the port is implanted by joining the three working trocar incisions into a single 4.5-cm incision. RESULTS: The patient did well postoperatively with no complications. CONCLUSIONS: A modified single incision approach for laparoscopic gastric band placement is feasible and provides patients with improved cosmesis.


Asunto(s)
Gastroplastia/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Adulto , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Técnicas de Sutura
15.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 76: 480-483, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33207414

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Insertion of an Intra gastric Balloon (IGB) has widely been used as a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of obesity. Gastric balloons are usually inserted for a period of six months only. They have a high safety profile and one of their rare, reported, serious complications include gastric or esophageal perforation, which are usually early and require immediate operative management. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We report a 26-year-old lady who presented to the ED with signs and symptoms of acute abdomen and five-year history of endoscopic placement of Intra-gastric Balloon. Emergent endoscopic removal of the balloon revealed a large pressure ulcer at gastric incisura with central necrosis. Laparoscopy confirmed gastric perforation along lesser curvature with extensive soilage of peritoneal cavity. Extensive irrigation and drainage and Graham omental patch repair were carried out laparoscopically, and the perforation sealed satisfactorily. She recovered well from surgery and within days she was tolerating a diet. Broad spectrum IV antibiotics were given for 10 days. DISCUSSION: Gastric perforation is a rare complication reported in 0.1% of patients undergoing IGB insertion. It can ensue as early as days after placement or late at weeks to months. In our review of literature, we found the maximum time frame in which a patient presented with an IGB induced gastric perforation was at 22 months. This makes our case unique as the patient was able to tolerate it for 5 years (60 months) before presenting to the emergency with this sinister complication. CONCLUSION: Very late Gastric perforations in patients with IGB placement are rare. An upper gastrointestinal endoscopy should be arranged as soon as possible to remove the balloon and assess the stomach visualize the perforation followed by a laparoscopic approach to repair the defect if expertise is available.

16.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth ; 7(4): e13447, 2019 04 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31033451

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated that surgical safety checklists (SSCs) can significantly reduce surgical complications and mortality rates. Such lists rely on traditional posters or paper, and their contents are generic regarding the type of surgery being performed. SSC completion rates and uniformity of content have been reported as modest and widely variable. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and potential of using smart glasses in the operating room to increase the benefits of SSCs by improving usability through contextualized content and, ideally, resulting in improved completion rates. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated and compared 80 preoperative time-out events with SSCs at a major academic medical center between June 2016 and February 2017. Participants were assigned to either a conventional checklist approach (poster, memory, or both) or a smart glasses app running on Google Glass. RESULTS: Four different surgeons conducted 41 checklists using conventional methods (ie, memory or poster) and 39 using the smart glasses app. The average checklist completion rate using conventional methods was 76%. Smart glasses allowed a completion rate of up to 100% with a decrease in average checklist duration of 18%. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with alternatives such as posters, paper, and memory, smart glasses checklists are easier to use and follow. The glasses allowed surgeons to use contextualized time-out checklists, which increased the completion rate to 100% and reduced the checklist execution time and time required to prepare the equipment during surgical cases.


Asunto(s)
Lista de Verificación/métodos , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Gafas Inteligentes/normas , Lista de Verificación/normas , Lista de Verificación/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto/métodos , Seguridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigación Cualitativa , Gafas Inteligentes/psicología , Gafas Inteligentes/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirujanos/psicología , Cirujanos/normas , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Cirugía en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Cirugía en Hospital/normas , Servicio de Cirugía en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos
17.
Int J Evid Based Healthc ; 17(1): 53-57, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29847410

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Research and history have largely shown the covert billion-dollar global market of single-use medical device (SUD) reprocessing and reuse to be a safe endeavor, but awareness and perceptions of the practice both within and outside of healthcare have received limited attention. METHODS: Responses for patients, physicians, and medical practitioners were attained on both online and article-based surveys, in which attitudes and perceptions of SUD reprocessing and reuse were expressed in an assortment of closed-ended questions and partially closed-ended questions. RESULTS: Of the 214 participants, a collective 77% were unaware that the Food and Drug Administration allows SUD reprocessing and reuse. This included 65% of physicians and 84% of patients, which were significantly different proportions (P = 0.005). A significantly greater proportion of patients than physicians (92 vs. 68%) also felt that hospitals bear the responsibility of informing patients of the practice as part of their care (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is a profound lack of awareness of SUD reprocessing and reuse among all relevant stakeholders. In addition, the overwhelming desire for transparency among patients further forces the debate of whether current, covert methods should be altered, in addition to the question of who bears this responsibility. Despite research and history having shown the practice to be safe, apprehension and misconceptions remain. Survey results suggest that education may be able to subdue such patient concerns.


Asunto(s)
Equipos Desechables/normas , Equipo Reutilizado , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Desinfección/normas , Personal de Salud/psicología , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Pacientes/psicología , Médicos/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration/normas
18.
Front Psychol ; 10: 2388, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31749733

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diverse wellness-promoting mobile health technologies, including mobile apps and wearable trackers, became increasingly popular due to their ability to support patients' self-management of health conditions. However, the patient's acceptance and use depend on the perceived experience and the app appropriateness to the patient's context and needs. We have some understating of the experience and factors influencing the use of these technologies in the general public, but we have a limited understanding of these issues in patients. OBJECTIVE: By presenting results from an explorative study, this paper aims to identify implications for the design of mobile apps and wearables to effectively support patients' efforts in self-management of health with a special emphasis on support for self-efficacy of activities contributing to health. METHODS: An explorative mixed-method study involving 200 chronically ill patients of Stanford Medical Center (Stanford, CA, United States) was conducted between mid-2016 and end of 2018. Amongst these, 20 patients were involved in a 4-weeks study, in which we collected the underlying wearable device use logs (e.g., Fitbit) and subjective use experience [via an Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA)], as well as patients' momentary perception of general self-efficacy in their natural environments and different daily contexts. RESULTS: The results indicate that mobile apps for health and wearables have the potential to enable better self-management and improve patients' wellbeing but must be further refined to address different human aspects of their use. Specifically, the apps/wearables should be easier to use, more personalized and context-aware for the patient's overall routine and lifestyle choices, as well as with respect to the momentary patient state (e.g., location, type of people around) and health(care) needs. Additionally, apps and devices should be more battery efficient and accurate; providing timely, non-judgmental feedback and personalized advice to the patients anywhere-anytime-anyhow. These results are mapped on major sources of the individuals' self-efficacy. CONCLUSION: Our results show how the apps/wearables that are aimed at supporting the patients' self-management should be designed to leverage and further improve the patients' general self-efficacy and self-efficacy of activities contributing to chronic disease management.

19.
Surgery ; 165(3): 565-570, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30316577

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding all lead to substantial weight loss in obese patients. Long-term weight loss can be highly variable beyond 1-year postsurgery. This study examines and compares the frequency distribution of weight loss and lack of treatment effect rates after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. METHODS: A total of 1,331 consecutive patients at a single academic institution were reviewed from a prospectively collected database. Preoperative data collected included demographics, body mass index, and percent excess weight loss. Postoperative BMI and %EWL were collected at 12, 24, and 36 months. Percent excess weight loss was analyzed by the percentiles of excess weight lost, and the distribution of percent excess weight loss was evaluated in 10% increments. Lack of a successful treatment effect was defined as <25% excess weight loss. RESULTS: Of the 1,331 patients, 72.4% (963) underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 18.3% (243) laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, and 9.4%(125) laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Mean percent excess weight loss was greatest for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, followed by laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, and then by laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding at every time point: at 2 years mean percent excess weight loss was 77.9± 24.4 for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 50.8 ± 25.8 for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, and 40.8± 25.9 for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (P < .0001). The rates of a successful treatment effect s for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding were 0.9%, 5.2%, and 24.3% at 1 year; 0.3%, 11.1%, and 26.0% at 2 years; and 1.0%, 25.3%, and 30.2% at 3 years. At 1 year, the odds ratio of lack of a successful treatment effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was 6.305 (2.125-19.08; P = .0004), the odds ratio for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was 36.552 (15.64-95.71; P < .0001), and the odds ratio for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy was 5.791 (2.519-14.599; P < .0001). At 2 years, the odds ratio for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass increased to 70.7 (9.4-531.7; P < .0001), the odds ratio for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass increased to 128.1 (16.8-974.3; P < .0001), and the odds ratio for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy decreased to 1.8 (0.9-3.6; P = .09). CONCLUSION: This study emphasizes the existing variability in weight loss across bariatric procedures as well as in the lack of a treatment effect for each procedure. Although laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding has the greatest rate of a lack of a successful treatment effect, the rate remained stable over 3 years postoperatively. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy showed a doubling in the rate of a lack of a successful treatment effect every year reaching 25% at year 3. The rates for lack of a successful treatment effect for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass remained stable at about 1% for the first 3 years postoperatively.


Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía/métodos , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Gastroplastia/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Pérdida de Peso/fisiología , Índice de Masa Corporal , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA