Electrogram morphology recurrence guided catheter ablation for repeat ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: There are no standard mapping approaches for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF), particularly after failed prior catheter ablation (CA). In this study, we assess the feasibility of using Electrogram Morphology Recurrence (EMR) to guide ablation. METHODS: Ten patients with recurrent PeAF after prior CA underwent detailed mapping of both atria during PeAF using the PentaRay (4 mm interelectrode spacing) and 3D mapping with CARTO. At each site, 15 s recordings were made. Custom software identified each electrogram and cross-correlation was used to identify the most recurrent electrogram morphology from which the % recurrence and cycle length of the most repeatable morphology (CLR) was calculated. Sites of shortest CLR and sites within 5 ms of shortest CLR with recurrence ≥ 80% were used to inform CA strategy. RESULTS: A mean of 342.9 ± 131.9 LA and 328.6 ± 91.5 RA sites were recorded per patient. Nine had PV reconnection. Shortest CLR sites guided ablation in 6/10 patients while 1 patient failed to fulfill shortest CLR criteria, and another 3 did not undergo CA guided by shortest CLR due to operator preference. On 12-month follow-up, all 4 patients without shortest CLR guided CA had recurrent PeAF. Of the 6 patients with shortest CLR guided CA, 5 patients did not have recurrent PeAF (p = 0.048), although 1 had paroxysmal AF and 2 had atypical atrial flutter. CONCLUSION: EMR is a feasible, novel technique to guide CA in patients with PeAF. Further evaluation is needed to provide an electrogram-based method for mapping guided targeted ablation of key areas.

Electrogram Morphology Recurrence for Mapping Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Initial vs Redo Catheter Ablation.

BACKGROUND: Electrogram (EGM) morphology recurrence (EMR) mapping of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) quantifies consistency of activation and is expected to be high and rapid near AF drivers. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare EMR in left atria (LA) and right atria (RA) in patients undergoing first vs redo ablation for persistent AF. METHODS: Multisite LA/RA mapping (LA: 281 ± 176 sites/patient; RA: 239 ± 166 sites/patient) before persistent AF ablation was performed in 42 patients (30 males, age 63 ± 9 years) undergoing first (Group 1, n = 32) or redo ablation (Group 2, n = 10). After cross-correlation of each automatically detected EGM with every other EGM per recording, the most recurrent electrogram morphology was identified and its frequency (Rec%) and recurrence cycle length (CLR) were computed. RESULTS: In Groups 1 and 2, minimum CLR was 172.8 ± 26.0 milliseconds (LA: 178.2 ± 37.6 milliseconds, RA: 204.4 ± 34.0 milliseconds, P = 0.0005) and 186.5 ± 28.3 milliseconds (LA: 196.1 ± 38.1 milliseconds vs RA: 199.0 ± 30.2 milliseconds, P = 0.75), with Rec% 94.7% ± 10% and 93.8% ± 9.2%. Group 2 minimum CLR was not different from Group 1 (P = 0.20). Shortest CLR was in the LA in 84% of Group 1 and 50% of Group 2 patients (P = 0.04). Only 1 of 10 patients in Group 2 had the shortest CLR in the pulmonary veins (PVs) compared with 19 of 32 in Group 1 (P = 0.01). Most sites (77.6%) had Rec% <50%. CONCLUSIONS: EMR identified the shortest CLR sites in the PVs in 59% of patients undergoing initial persistent AF ablation, consistent with reported success rates of ∼50% for PV isolation. The majority of sites have low recurrence and may reflect bystander sites not critical for maintaining AF. EMR provides a robust new method for quantifying consistency and rapidity of activation direction at multiple atrial sites.

Flecainide Toxicity Leading to Loss of Pacemaker Capture and Cardiac Arrest.

An 86-year-old man with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation on flecainide, a class IC antiarrhythmic, presented with cardiac arrest. The patient had extremely wide QRS complexes with inconsistent pacemaker capture on electrocardiography. Due to cardiac failure and renal failure, the patient developed progressive flecainide toxicity, which led to pacemaker failure, and ultimately, death. (Level of Difficulty: Beginner.).

The CHA2DS2-VASc Score for Risk Stratification of Stroke in Heart Failure With-vs-Without Atrial Fibrillation.

A recent study suggested that the CHA2DS2-VASc score can risk stratify heart failure (HF) patients without atrial fibrillation (AF) for stroke. We performed a retrospective analysis using the national Veteran Affairs database to externally validate the findings. Crude incidence rates of end points were calculated. A Cox proportional model was used to study the association between the CHA2DS2-VASc score and outcomes. In HF patients with AF (n = 17,481) and without AF (n = 36,935), the 1 year incidence rate for ischemic stroke, thromboembolism, thromboembolism (without MI), and death were 2.7 and 2.0%; 10.3 and 7.9%; 4.1 and 3.1%; and 19.2 and 26.0%, respectively, with higher rates with increasing CHA2DS2-VASc scores both with and without AF. CHA2DS2-VASc score predicted strokes in HF patients without AF (1-year C-statistic 0.62, 95% CI 0.60-0.64; NPV 85.4%, 95% CI 83.4-87.4%) with similar predictive ability to those with AF (C-statistic 0.59, 95% CI 0.56-0.62; NPV 86.4%, 95% CI 82.6-90.2%). Among patients with HF, there was an increased risk of stroke, thromboembolism, and death with increasing CHA2DS2-VASc scores regardless of AF status. Our findings support the use of the CHA2DS2-VASc score as a prognostic tool in HF.

Atrial Myopathy Underlying Atrial Fibrillation.

While AF most often occurs in the setting of atrial disease, current assessment and treatment of patients with AF does not focus on the extent of the atrial myopathy that serves as the substrate for this arrhythmia. Atrial myopathy, in particular atrial fibrosis, may initiate a vicious cycle in which atrial myopathy leads to AF, which in turn leads to a worsening myopathy. Various techniques, including ECG, plasma biomarkers, electroanatomical voltage mapping, echocardiography, and cardiac MRI, can help to identify and quantify aspects of the atrial myopathy. Current therapies, such as catheter ablation, do not directly address the underlying atrial myopathy. There is emerging research showing that by targeting this myopathy we can help decrease the occurrence and burden of AF.

A comparative analysis of clinical outcomes and disposable costs of different catheter ablation methods for the treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is a commonly performed electrophysiology (EP) procedure. Few data exist comparing conventional (CONV) versus novel ablation strategies from both clinical and direct cost perspectives. We sought to investigate the disposable costs and clinical outcomes associated with three different ablation methodologies used in the ablation of AVNRT. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of AVNRT ablations performed at Augusta University Medical Center from 2006 to 2014. A total of 183 patients were identified. Three different ablation techniques were compared: CONV manual radiofrequency (RF) (n=60), remote magnetic navigation (RMN)-guided RF (n=67), and cryoablation (CRYO) (n=56). RESULTS: Baseline demographics did not differ between the three groups except for a higher prevalence of cardiomyopathy in the RMN group (p<0.01). The clinical end point of interest was recurrent AVNRT following the index ablation procedure. A significantly higher number of recurrent AVNRT cases occurred in the CRYO group as compared to CONV and RMN (p=0.003; OR =7.75) groups. Cost-benefit analysis showed both CONV and RMN to be dominant compared to CRYO. Cost-minimization analysis demonstrated the least expensive ablation method to be CONV (mean disposable catheter cost = CONV US$2340; CRYO US$3515; RMN US$5190). Despite comparable clinical outcomes, the incremental cost of RMN over CONV averaged US$3094 per procedure. CONCLUSION: AVNRT ablation using either CONV or RMN techniques is equally effective and associated with lower AVNRT recurrence rates than CRYO. CONV ablation carries significant disposable cost savings as compared to RMN, despite similar efficacy.

Differences Between Access to Follow-Up Care and Inappropriate Shocks Based on Insurance Status of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Recipients.

Differences in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) utilization based on insurance status have been described, but little is known about postimplant follow-up patterns associated with insurance status and outcomes. We collected demographic, clinical, and device data from 119 consecutive patients presenting with ICD shocks. Insurance status was classified as uninsured/Medicaid (uninsured) or private/Health Maintenance Organization /Medicare (insured). Shock frequencies were analyzed before and after a uniform follow-up pattern was implemented regardless of insurance profile. Uninsured patients were more likely to present with an inappropriate shock (63% vs 40%, p = 0.01), and they were more likely to present with atrial fibrillation (AF) as the shock trigger (37% vs 19%, p = 0.04). Uninsured patients had a longer interval between previous physician contact and index ICD shock (147 ± 167 vs 83 ± 124 days, p = 0.04). Patients were followed for a mean of 521 ± 458 days after being enrolled in a uniform follow-up protocol, and there were no differences in the rate of recurrent shocks based on insurance status. In conclusion, among patients presenting with an ICD shock, underinsured/uninsured patients had significantly longer intervals since previous physician contact and were more likely to present with inappropriate shocks and AF, compared to those with private/Medicare coverage. After the index shock, both groups were followed uniformly, and the differences in rates of inappropriate shocks were mitigated. This observation confirms the importance of regular postimplant follow-up as part of the overall ICD management standard.