Anabolic androgenic steroids used as performance and image enhancing drugs in professional and amateur athletes: Toxicological and psychopathological findings.

OBJECTIVE: The use of anabolic androgenic steroids (AASs) as performance and image enhancing drugs (PIEDs), once restricted to professional athletes, now includes amateurs and regular gym visitors. AAS use is associated with psychopathology, yet this relationship is complex and not fully understood. We aimed to assess the presence of AASs and other misused substances in athletes' biological samples and link toxicological to psychopathological findings. METHODS: A multicentre, cross-sectional study in fitness centres in Italy recruited 122 professional and amateur athletes training in several sports (84 men; age range = 18-45 years). Athletes completed questionnaires, interviews, and toxicology testing for AASs, other PIEDs, illicit drugs, and non-prescribed psychotropics. Toxicology was conducted in blood, urine, and hair. RESULTS: Self-reported and toxicologically detected use rates of AASs and other misused substances showed slight-to-fair agreement (Fleiss' κ = 0.104-0.375). There was slight-to-moderate agreement among the three biological samples used for AAS testing (κ = 0.112-0.436). Thirty-one athletes (25.4%) tested positive for AASs. More sport hours/week, narcissistic or antisocial personality disorders, and higher nonplanning impulsiveness scores predicted AAS use (pseudo-R2  = 0.665). AAS users did not differ significantly from non-users in major psychopathology, but their Hypomania Checklist-32 score, which also predicted AAS use, was significantly higher (p < 0.001), suggesting increased odds for cyclothymic disorder or subthreshold hypomania. CONCLUSIONS: Our results have implications for studying AAS users, as they identify a cluster of variables that may be relevant in future understanding of AAS use risks (e.g., personality disorders). Possible disagreements between AAS assessment methods should be considered when implementing harm reduction interventions, such as needle and syringe distribution, health education, and counselling, as well as surveillance programmes.

Phenomenological subtypes of severe bipolar mixed states: a factor analytic study.

OBJECTIVE: The correct identification of bipolar mixed states (MS) has important implications for clinical practice. The aim of the study was to define the multidimensional psychopathological structure of severe MS. To our knowledge, no factor analytical studies including only patients with MS, have been conducted before. METHODS: In the first week of hospitalization, we evaluated by HAM-D-17, YMRS, BPRS and CGI, 202 Bipolar I inpatients with MS according to DSM-IV criteria referred for an ECT trial. A Principal-component analysis followed by Varimax rotation was performed on the 24-item BPRS. The relationships among different symptomatological subtypes and other clinical characteristics were explored. RESULTS: Six interpretable factors were extracted: Psychotic-positive symptoms, Mania, Disorientation-Unusual Motor Behaviour, Depression, Negative Symptoms and Anxiety. On the basis of the highest z-scores, we found 6 "dominant" BPRS factor groups, that were statistically distinct and without significant overlap in the main symptomatological presentation. Only 29 (14.4%) of our patients could be described as "Dominant Manic" and 48 (23.8%) as "Dominant Depressive"; most importantly 125 (61.9%) were neither predominately-manic nor predominately-depressive. Variables including age, number of previous episodes, suicidal behavior and HAM-D and YMRS scores significantly differentiated the subtypes. CONCLUSION: At least in the most severe forms, MS appears to represent more than the superposition of affective symptoms of opposite polarity. Anxiety, perplexity, psychotic experiences, motor disturbances and grossly disorganized behavior seem to arise from protracted intra-episodic instability and presence of a drive state influencing the mood state and the emotional resonance.

Predictors of remission in 208 drug-resistant depressive patients treated with electroconvulsive therapy.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore predictors of remission to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in a sample of depressive patients resistant to pharmacological treatments. METHODS: Two hundred eight patients, 31 of whom had major depressive disorder, 101 had bipolar disorder II (BP II), and 76 had bipolar disorder I (BP I), diagnosed according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria were treated with bilateral ECT on a twice-a-week schedule. All patients included were undergoing a depressive episode, excluding patients with mixed and manic episodes. Patients were assessed before (baseline) and a week after the ECT course (final score) using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 items (HAM-D-17), the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, and the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I). RESULTS: At the end of the ECT course, 56 patients (26.9%) were considered nonresponders, and 80 patients (38.4%) were considered responders (HAM-D score of at least 50% and CGI-I subscale rating of 2, "much improved") and 72 remitters (34.6%) (HAM-D scores ≤8 and a CGI-I subscale rating of 1). On backward stepwise logistic regression length of current episode, Bipolar Disorder and baseline YMRS total mean scores were statistically significant predictors of nonresponders versus remitters. Among the YMRS items at basal evaluation 8 (thought content), 10 (appearance), and 11 (insight), the mean scores were significantly lower in the remitters than in the responders and nonresponders. CONCLUSION: Major depressive disorder, short duration of the current episode, absence of psychotic symptoms, preserved insight, and adequate personal care are associated with complete remission in our sample of drug-resistant depressive patients treated with ECT.

Different measures of impulsivity in patients with anxiety disorders: a case control study.

The relationship between anxiety and impulsivity is controversial and not well explored. The present investigation aims to compare impulsivity, measured by different rating tools, in patients with anxiety disorders vs. healthy controls. Forty-seven subjects with different anxiety disorders and 45 matched controls underwent diagnostic and symptomatological evaluations by the Mini Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I) Plus 5.0, Bech-Raphaelsen Depression and Mania Scale (BRDMS), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Hypomania Check List (HCL-32) and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI); temperamental evaluations by the Questionnaire for the Affective and Anxious Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego-Modified (TEMPS-M), the Separation Anxiety Sensitivity Index (SASI), the Interpersonal Sensitivity Symptoms Inventory (ISSI); and psychometric and a neurocognitive evaluations of impulsivity using the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11) and the Immediate and Delayed Memory Task (IMT-DMT). Subjects with anxiety disorders were more impulsive than the controls in all the explored measures, with higher scores in symptomatological and, temperamental scales. Patients with anxiety disorders but without a lifetime history of comorbid major mood episodes had greater trait and state impulsivity than controls. Further investigations are needed to assess the extent to which impulsivity might or might not be directly related to the anxiety disorder.

Comparative response to electroconvulsive therapy in medication-resistant bipolar I patients with depression and mixed state.

OBJECTIVES: We compared the response with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) of bipolar I patients resistant to pharmacological treatment, who presented depression or mixed state (MS). METHODS: Ninety-six bipolar I patients according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition were included in the study (46 with major depressive episode and 50 with MS). Bilateral ECT was delivered using a brief pulse stimulator Mecta 5000Q (Mecta Corp, Lake Oswego, Ore) on a twice-a-week schedule. The patients were evaluated before ECT (baseline) and a week after the ECT course (final score), using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), Mania Rating Scale, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), and Clinical Global Improvement (CGI). RESULTS: Global response rate (CGI

Obsessive-compulsive disorder and related disorders: a comprehensive survey.

Our aim was to present a comprehensive, updated survey on obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and obsessive-compulsive related disorders (OCRDs) and their clinical management via literature review, critical analysis and synthesis. Information on OCD and OCRD current nosography, clinical phenomenology and etiology, may lead to a better comprehension of their management. Clinicians should become familiar with the broad spectrum of OCD disorders, since it is a pivotal issue in current clinical psychiatry.

Current and emerging pharmacotherapy for the treatment of adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Introduction: ADHD is characterized by a developmentally inappropriate level of inattentiveness, impulsivity and/or hyperactivity. In adults, the disorder is frequently accompanied by Emotional Dysregulation (ED), associated to a variety of related psychiatric comorbidities, complicating its recognition and treatment management. Areas covered: This paper reviews randomized active comparator-controlled or placebo-controlled trials evaluating the use of pharmacotherapy in adults with ADHD and ED, other neurodevelopmental disorders, Bipolar Disorder (BD) and Anxiety Disorders (ADs). When controlled data are unavailable, the authors have included open-label and observational studies. Expert opinion: ED in adult patients with ADHD is a very common and impairing problem that can be treated with stimulants or atomoxetine. ADHD studies in adults with other neurodevelopment disorders are scarce; stimulants seem to be the most effective and safe drugs in treating ADHD symptoms, without worsening the core features of other neurodevelopmental disorders. In patients with ADHD and comorbid BD, the treatment of BD alone may result in residual symptoms of ADHD. Patients should be treated hierarchically: BD should be treated first, while ADHD should be treated combining ADHD medications and mood stabilizers after mood stabilization. The available evidence for treating patients with ADHD and comorbid ADs in adults supports the idea of an anti-anxiety/ADHD-specific treatment association.

Pharmacotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity (ADHD) disorder with comorbid substance-use disorder (SUD).

INTRODUCTION: Substance use disorder (SUD) is very common amongst patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The two disorders share partially overlapping features and SUD in ADHD is characterized by an early age of onset, high likelihood of poly-substance use, increased risk of suicide attempts, more hospitalizations, and scarce treatment adherence. AREAS COVERED: This paper reviews randomized active comparator-controlled or placebo-controlled trials evaluating the use of pharmacotherapy in patients with ADHD and SUD. The authors include open label and observational studies. EXPERT OPINION: Stimulant and non-stimulant treatments should be used to aid ADHD symptomatology in patients with SUD. SUD seems to be less responsive, suggesting a relative independence of the two conditions. For this reason, the association of ADHD-specific drugs and SUD-treatments should be recommended in a large proportion of patients suffering from both disorders. The rate and the quality of ADHD response to specific pharmacological treatments is highly variable, depending on the dose and the duration of the treatment, the age of the patient, and the severity and the chronicity of addiction. Further research is necessary to explore the divergences in treatment response of different ADHD subtypes in different subtypes of SUD.

Is recurrence in major depressive disorder related to bipolarity and mixed features? Results from the BRIDGE-II-Mix study.

BACKGROUND: Current classifications separate Bipolar (BD) from Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) based on polarity rather than recurrence. We aimed to determine bipolar/mixed feature frequency in a large MDD multinational sample with (High-Rec) and without (Low-Rec) >3 recurrences, comparing the two subsamples. METHODS: We measured frequency of bipolarity/hypomanic features during current depressive episodes (MDEs) in 2347 MDD patients from the BRIDGE-II-mix database, comparing High-Rec with Low-Rec. We used Bonferroni-corrected Student's t-test for continuous, and chi-squared test, for categorical variables. Logistic regression estimated the size of the association between clinical characteristics and High-Rec MDD. RESULTS: Compared to Low-Rec (n = 1084, 46.2%), High-Rec patients (n = 1263, 53.8%) were older, with earlier depressive onset, had more family history of BD, more atypical features, suicide attempts, hospitalisations, and treatment resistance and (hypo)manic switches when treated with antidepressants, higher comorbidity with borderline personality disorder, and more hypomanic symptoms during current MDE, resulting in higher rates of mixed depression according to both DSM-5 and research-based diagnostic (RBDC) criteria. Logistic regression showed age at first symptoms < 30 years, current MDE duration ≤ 1 month, hypomania/mania among first-degree relatives, past suicide attempts, treatment-resistance, antidepressant-induced swings, and atypical, mixed, or psychotic features during MDE to associate with High-Rec. LIMITATIONS: Number of MDEs for defining recurrence was arbitrary; cross-sectionality did not allow assessment of conversion from MDD to BD. CONCLUSIONS: High-Rec MDD differed from Low-Rec group for several clinical/epidemiological variables, including bipolar/mixed features. Bipolarity specifier and RBDC were more sensitive than DSM-5 criteria in detecting bipolar and mixed features in MDD.

Clinical subtypes of severe bipolar mixed states.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to identify different clinical subtypes in severe, treatment resistant bipolar mixed state (MS). METHOD: The sample comprised 202 Bipolar I patients currently in MS referred for an Electro-convulsive Therapy (ECT) trial and evaluated in the first week of hospitalization and one week after the ECT course. Principal component factor analysis (PCA) followed by Varimax rotation was performed on 21 non-overlapping items selected from Hamilton rating-scale for depression (HAMD) and from Young mania rating-scale (YMRS) at baseline evaluation. Cluster subtypes derived from the factor scores were compared in clinical variables and final HAMD, YMRS, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scores. RESULTS: The principal-component analysis extracted 6 interpretable factors explaining 55.9% of the total variance. Cluster analysis identified four groups, including respectively 63 (31.2%) subjects with Agitated-Irritable Mixed-Depression, 59 (29.2%) with Psychotic Mixed-Mania, 17 (8.5%) with Anxious-Irritable-Psychotic Mixed-Mania, and 63 (31.2%) with Retarded-Psychotic Mixed-Depression. The four clusters were statistically distinct and did not show significant overlap in the main symptomatological presentation. Cluster subtypes reported differences in number of past mood episodes, duration of the current episode, suicide attempts, lifetime comorbidity with panic and eating disorders, baseline and final rating-scale scores and rate of remission after ECT trial. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that, at least in severe treatment resistant MS, multiple depressive and manic subtypes can be observed with substantial differences in terms of clinical presentation, course, associated comorbidities and treatment response.

A case of severe oral self-injurious Tourette's syndrome alleviated by pregabalin.

Self-injurious behavior (SIB) associated with Tourette's syndrome (TS) is a severe neuropsychiatric condition that causes significant distress and can impair social functioning. The current treatment options for the condition include pharmacological, physical and psychosocial interventions. However, given the need for more effective interventions, especially for those patients who are unresponsive and/or intolerant to standard medications, further exploration of novel treatments is imperative. In this report, we present a case of SIB-TS that was successfully treated with pregabalin. The patient received 1-year of follow-up and was noted to have considerable improvement in symptoms. Although rigorous controlled studies are required, based on our case study, pregabalin may be a potential treatment option in some cases of SIB with TS.