The Development of Clinical Guidelines and Guidance Statements by the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians: Update of Methods.

The American College of Physicians (ACP) was one of the first organizations in the United States to develop evidence-based clinical guidelines and has been developing guidelines since 1981. ACP's Clinical Guidelines Committee (CGC), in collaboration with staff from the Clinical Policy department, develops clinical guidelines and guidance statements and continues to refine and enhance its methodology. This article presents an update of the CGC's 2010 paper outlining policies, methods, and presentation format of ACP's clinical guidelines and guidance statements. Updated methods include more stringent policies about disclosure of interests and conflict management; inclusion of public perspective; full adoption of GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methods; more standardized reporting formats that consider value of care, patient comorbid conditions, patient values and preferences, and costs; and further clarification of guidance statement methods.

Medicina Interna 2017 / Internal Medicine 2017

Por encargo del Dr. Eugenio Matijasevik escribo este editorial para resaltar los grandes retos que tiene la Medicina Interna en este momento histórico de nuestro país y el mundo. Las noticias son buenas tenemos: un cubrimiento de nuestro sistema general de seguridad en salud de cerca del 98% de la población, tenemos una Ley Estatutaria en Salud que resalta la salud como un derecho fundamental para todos los colombianos, pero reafirma que la relación médico paciente es la fundamental resaltando la autonomía médica como factor principal en esta relación. Para nosotros los internistas, éstos son pasos en al dirección correcta, el eje de nuestra actividad médica es el paciente y la responsabilidad de las Facultades de Medicina y los Hospitales Universitarios formar internistas íntegros con gran capacidad técnica y profesional, pero todo ésto con base en el humanismo centrado en el bienestar del paciente y su familia. Pero el panorama no es claro, debido a la dirección que ha tomado nuestro sistema de salud que crea intermediarios en la atención en salud, donde no está claro que el eje es la salud del paciente, aleja al paciente de su médico y limita la autonomía médica y por lo tanto nuestra actividad como internistas; se convierte en un deber de todos repensarnos y definir el futuro de manera grupal, pero con base en el internista individual.

[Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in Colombian surgical and medical patients: results for Colombia of the ENDORSE study]. / Profilaxis de la tromboembolia venosa en pacientes colombianos de tratamiento médico o quirúrgico: resultados para Colombia del estudio ENDORSE.

INTRODUCTION: More information is needed on the risk of venous thromboembolism in the hospital setting, and on patterns of use of thromboprophylaxis, as advocated in consensus guidelines. ENDORSE was an international study aimed at evaluating hospital venous thromboembolism prevention practices in medical and surgical patients. OBJECTIVES: The risk of venous thromboembolism was evaluated along with the use of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical and surgical subjects; these data were compared with the international sample from the ENDORSE study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participating institutions in Colombia were selected arbitrarily. The medical charts for medical and surgical patients were evaluated randomly. The 2004 American College of Chest Physician guidelines were used to evaluate risk of venous thromboembolism and adherence to recommended thromboprophylaxis regimens. RESULTS: The study included 761 subjects (218 surgical, 543 medical) located in five acute care hospitals; 49% of these subjects were considered at risk of venous thromboembolism (40% medical, 72% surgical), compared with 52% in the international sample. Prophylaxis use was higher in medical patients at risk (63.7%, n=137) than in surgical patients (48.4%, n=76; p=0.01). Compared with the international sample, the use of prophylaxis in Colombia was greater in medical patients (63.7% vs. 39.5%, p=0.003), but lower in surgical patients (48.4% vs. 58.5%, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Participating Colombian centers treat patients at risk of venous thromboembolism similarly to other participant countries, but appropriate prophylaxis was prescribed more frequently to medical patients. Greater efforts are needed, both in Colombia and around the world, to improve rates of appropriate venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in at-risk subjects.

Profilaxis de la tromboembolia venosa en pacientes colombianos de tratamiento médico o quirúrgico: resultados para Colombia del estudio ENDORSEA / Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in Colombian surgical and medical patients: Results for Colombia of the ENDORSE study

Introducción. La profilaxis en pacientes de tratamiento médico o quirúrgico con riesgo de tromboembolia venosa, requiere ser evaluada para obtener suficiente información que contribuya a mejorar estas prácticas, para que sean efectivas y eficaces, y ayudar con las medidas necesarias de prevención hospitalaria de la tromboembolia venosa. Objetivo. Evaluar el riesgo de tromboembolia venosa y de los hábitos de profilaxis en pacientes de tratamiento médico o quirúrgico hospitalizados en Colombia y compararlos con los de los centros internacionales participantes en el estudio ENDORSE. Materiales y métodos. Las instituciones fueron escogidas al azar. Se evaluaron todas las historias clínicas de pacientes de tratamiento médico o quirúrgico. Se utilizaron las guías del 2004 del American College of Chest Physicians para evaluar el riesgo de tromboembolia venosa y lo apropiado de la profilaxis. Resultados. Se evaluaron 761 pacientes: 218 de tratamiento quirúrgico y 543 de tratamiento médico, de cinco centros hospitalarios de Colombia. De esta población, 49 % se encontraba en riesgo de tromboembolia venosa (40 % de los de tratamiento médico y 72% de los de tratamiento quirúrgico), en comparación con 52 % de la muestra internacional. La profilaxis fue significativamente mayor en los pacientes de tratamiento médico en riesgo (63,7 %, n=137), que en los de tratamiento quirúrgico (48,4 %, n=76, P=0,01). En comparación con la muestra internacional, la profilaxis en los de tratamiento médico fue significativamente superior (63,7 % Vs. 39,5 %, P=0,003), a diferencia de los de tratamiento quirúrgico (48,4 % Vs. 58,5 %, P=0,02). Conclusiones. Los resultados muestran que en los centros hospitalarios de Colombia se trataron pacientes con riesgo de tromboembolia venosa en forma similar al resto de los países participantes en el estudio ENDORSE, y que se hizo más profilaxis apropiada en pacientes de tratamiento médico. Sin embargo, se requiere mejorar la utilización de profilaxis en pacientes hospitalizados.

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in Colombian surgical and medical patients: Results for Colombia of the ENDORSE study Introduction. More information is needed on the risk of venous thromboembolism in the hospital setting, and on patterns of use of thromboprophylaxis, as advocated in consensus guidelines. ENDORSE was an international study aimed at evaluating hospital venous thromboembolism prevention practices in medical and surgical patientes. Objectives. The risk of venous thromboembolism was evaluated along with the use of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical and surgical subjects; these data were compared with the international sample from the ENDORSE study. Materials and methods. Participating institutions in Colombia were selected arbitrarily. The medical charts for medical and surgical patients were evaluated randomly. The 2004 American College of Chest Physician guidelines were used to evaluate risk of venous thromboembolism and adherence to recommended thromboprophylaxis regimens. Results. The study included 761 subjects (218 surgical, 543 medical) located in five acute care hospitals; 49% of these subjects were considered at risk of venous thromboembolism (40% medical, 72% surgical), compared with 52% in the international sample. Prophylaxis use was higher in medical patients at risk (63.7%, n=137) than in surgical patients (48.4%, n=76; p=0.01). Compared with the international sample, the use of prophylaxis in Colombia was greater in medical patients (63.7% vs. 39.5%, p=0.003), but lower in surgical patients (48.4% vs. 58.5%, p=0.02). Conclusions. Participating Colombian centers treat patients at risk of venous thromboembolism similarly to other participant countries, but appropriate prophylaxis was prescribed more frequently to medical patients. Greater efforts are needed, both in Colombia and around the world, to improve rates of appropriate venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in at-risk subjects.

Determinación de la probabilidad clínica de embolia pulmonar previa a la gamagrafía pulmonar

Objetivos: determinar la probabilidad clínica preexamen del diagnóstico de embolia pulomonar