RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We explore attributes, traits, background, skills, and behavioral factors important to top clinical performance in emergency medicine (EM) residency. METHODS: We used a two-step process-an ideation survey with the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors and a modified Delphi technique-to identify: 1) factors important to top performance, 2) preresidency factors that predict it, and 3) the best ways to measure it. In the Delphi, six expert educators in emergency care assessed the presence of the factors from the ideation survey results in their top clinical performers. Consensus on important factors that were exemplified in >60% of top performers were retained in three Delphi rounds as well as predictors and measures of top performance. RESULTS: The ideation survey generated 81 responses with ideas for each factor. These were combined into 89 separate factors in seven categories: attributes, personal traits, emergency department (ED)-specific skills and behaviors, general skill set, background, preresidency predictors, and ways to measure top performance. After three Delphi rounds, the panel achieved consensus on 20 factors important to top clinical performance. This included two attributes, seven traits, one general skill set, and 10 ED-specific skills and behaviors. Interview performance was considered the sole important preresidency predictor and clinical competency committee results the sole important measure of top performance. CONCLUSION: Our expert panel identified 20 factors important to top clinical performance in EM residency. Future work is needed to further explore how individuals learn and develop these factors.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Emergency medicine residents are expected to master 6 competencies that include clinical and leadership skills. To date, studies have focused primarily on teaching strategies, for example, what attending physicians should do to help residents learn. Residents' own contributions to the learning process remain largely unexplored. The purpose of this study was to explore what emergency medicine residents believe helps them learn the skills required for practice in the emergency department. METHODS: This qualitative study used semistructured interviews with emergency medicine residents at a major academic medical center. Twelve residents participated, and 11 additional residents formed a validation group. We used phenomenologic techniques to guide the data analysis and techniques such as triangulation and member checks to ensure the validity of the findings. RESULTS: We found major differences in the strategies residents used to learn clinical versus leadership skills. Clinical skill learning was approached with rigor and involved a large number of other physicians, while leadership skill learning was unplanned and largely relied on nursing personnel. In addition, with each type of skills, different aspects of the residents' personalities, motivation, and past nonclinical experiences supported or challenged their learning process. CONCLUSION: The approaches to learning leadership skills are not well developed among emergency medicine residents and result in a narrow perspective on leadership. This may be because of the lack of formal leadership training in medical school and residency, or it may reflect assumptions regarding how leadership skills develop. Substantial opportunity exists for enhancing emergency medicine residents' learning of leadership skills as well as the teaching of these skills by the attending physicians and nurses who facilitate their learning.