Characterization of multinucleated giant cells in synovium and subchondral bone in knee osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Multinucleated giant cells have been noticed in diverse arthritic conditions since their first description in rheumatoid synovium. However, their role in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis (OA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) still remains broadly unknown. We aimed to study the presence and characteristics of multinucleated giant cells (MGC) both in synovium and in subchondral bone tissues of patients with OA or RA. METHODS: Knee synovial and subchondral bone samples were from age-matched patients undergoing total joint replacement for OA or RA, or non-arthritic post mortem (PM) controls. OA synovium was stratified by histological inflammation grade using index tissue sections. Synovitis was assessed by Krenn score. Histological studies employed specific antibodies against macrophage markers or cathepsin K, or TRAP enzymatic assay. RESULTS: Inflamed OA and RA synovia displayed more multinucleated giant cells than did non-inflamed OA and PM synovia. There was a significant association between MGC numbers and synovitis severity. A TRAP negative/cathepsin K negative Langhans-like subtype was predominant in OA, whereas both Langhans-like and TRAP-positive/cathepsin K-negative foreign-body-like subtypes were most commonly detected in RA. Plasma-like and foam-like subtypes also were observed in OA and RA synovia, and the latter was found surrounding adipocytes. TRAP positive/cathepsin K positive osteoclasts were only identified adjacent to subchondral bone surfaces. TRAP positive osteoclasts were significantly increased in subchondral bone in OA and RA compared to PM controls. CONCLUSIONS: Multinucleated giant cells are associated with synovitis severity, and subchondral osteoclast numbers are increased in OA, as well as in RA. Further research targeting multinucleated giant cells is warranted to elucidate their contributions to the symptoms and joint damage associated with arthritis.

PTH [1-34] enhances bone response around titanium implants in a rabbit model of osteoporosis.

INTRODUCTION: Dental implant osseointegration can be impaired in medical conditions with low bone mass, such as glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Intermittent human parathyroid hormone (PTH) [1-34] administration has shown relevant anabolic bone activity in various animal models of osteoporosis. Therefore, we studied the effects of intermittent PTH [1-34] on bone response around titanium implants in experimental osteoporosis induced by ovariectomy and glucocorticoid administration. METHODS: Titanium dental implants were placed in the proximal tibia metaphysis in 38 animals. Twenty-eight rabbits had undergone bilateral ovariectomy and further methylprednisolone administration for 4 weeks to induce osteoporosis. Ten healthy rabbits were used as controls. At week 8, osteoporotic rabbits started saline vehicle or intermittent PTH administration for 12 weeks. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed in peri-implant area, lumbar spine, and global and subchondral knee bone at baseline, and weeks 6 and 20. Animal sacrifice was carried out at week 21. Afterward, tibiae were removed for µCT morphometry and undecalcified sections were evaluated by light and scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: PTH increased bone-to-implant contact compared with control rabbits or vehicle administration in osteoporotic rabbits (P < 0.005). PTH-induced new bone formation around external and internal surfaces of titanium implants led to a significant increase of BMD at peri-implant area in osteoporotic rabbits at week 20, when compared with vehicle (P < 0.005). Likewise, PTH increased BMD in other analysed regions. CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent administration of PTH [1-34] enhances the bone response around titanium implants in a rabbit model of ovariectomy and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Bone mineral density and joint cartilage: four clinical settings of a complex relationship in osteoarthritis.

Experimental and clinical data support the hypothesis that both high and low bone mineral density (BMD) conditions, including osteoporosis, may induce osteoarthritis. However, these conditions do not always predispose to osteoarthritis progression. Four clinical settings could arise from this relationship, and furthermore two phenotypes may be identified whether early osteoarthritis coexists with high or low BMD.

Setting up distinctive outcome measures for each osteoarthritis phenotype.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is an evolving chronic joint disease with a huge global impact. Given the intricate nature of the etiopathogenesis and subsequent high heterogeneity in the clinical course of OA, it is crucial to discriminate between etiopathogenic endotypes and clinical phenotypes, especially in the early stages of the disease. In this sense, we propose that an OA phenotype should be properly assessed with a set of outcome measures including those specifically related to the main underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Thus, each OA phenotype can be related to different and clinically meaningful outcomes. OA phenotyping would lead to an adequate patient stratification in well-designed clinical trials and the discovery of precise therapeutic approaches. A significant effort will be required in this field in light of inconclusive results of clinical trials of tissue-targeting agents for the treatment of OA.

Targeting chronic innate inflammatory pathways, the main road to prevention of osteoarthritis progression.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic joint disease characterized by cartilage degradation, osteophyte formation, subchondral bone sclerosis, and synovitis. Systemic factors such as obesity and the components of the metabolic syndrome seem to contribute to its progression. Breakdown of cartilage ensues from an altered balance between mechanical overload and its absorption by this tissue. There is in this context a status of persistent local inflammation by means of the chronic activation of innate immunity. A broad variety of danger-associated molecular patterns inside OA joint are able to activate pattern recognition receptors, mainly TLR (toll-like receptor) 2 and 4, which are overexpressed in the OA cartilage. Chronic activation of innate immune responses in chondrocytes results in a robust production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, as well as of tissue-destructive enzymes, downstream of NF-κB and MAPK (mitogen activated protein kinase) dependent pathways. Besides, the toxic effects of an excess of glucose and/or fatty acids, which share the same pro-inflammatory intracellular signalling pathways, may add fuel to the fire. Not only high concentrations of glucose can render cells prone to inflammation, but also AGEs (advanced glycation end products) are integrated into the TLR signalling network through their own innate immune receptors. Considering these mechanisms, we argue for the control of both primary inflammation and proteolytic catabolism as a preventive strategy in OA, instead of focusing treatment on the enhancement of anabolic responses. Even though this approach would not return to normal already degraded cartilage, it nonetheless might avoid damage extension to the surrounding tissue.

Mediators and Patterns of Muscle Loss in Chronic Systemic Inflammation.

Besides its primary function in locomotion, skeletal muscle (SKM), which represents up to half of human's weight, also plays a fundamental homeostatic role. Through the secretion of soluble peptides, or myokines, SKM interacts with major organs involved in metabolic processes. In turn, metabolic cues from these organs are received by muscle cells, which adapt their response accordingly. This is done through an intricate intracellular signaling network characterized by the cross-talking between anabolic and catabolic pathways. A fine regulation of the network is required to protect the organism from an excessive energy expenditure. Systemic inflammation evokes a catabolic reaction in SKM known as sarcopenia. In turn this response comprises several mechanisms, which vary depending on the nature of the insult and its magnitude. In this regard, aging, chronic inflammatory systemic diseases, osteoarthritis and idiopathic inflammatory myopathies can lead to muscle loss. Interestingly, sarcopenia may persist despite remission of chronic inflammation, an issue which warrants further research. The Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) system stands as a major participant in muscle loss during systemic inflammation, while it is also a well-recognized orchestrator of muscle cell turnover. Herein we summarize current knowledge about models of sarcopenia, their triggers and major mediators and their effect on both protein and cell growth yields. Also, the dual action of the JAK/STAT pathway in muscle mass changes is discussed. We highlight the need to unravel the precise contribution of this system to sarcopenia in order to design targeted therapeutic strategies.

The combined therapy with chondroitin sulfate plus glucosamine sulfate or chondroitin sulfate plus glucosamine hydrochloride does not improve joint damage in an experimental model of knee osteoarthritis in rabbits.

Osteoarthritis is the most common chronic joint disorder especially during aging. Although with controversies, glucosamine, both in its forms of sulfate and hydrochloride, and chondroitin sulfate are commonly employed to treat osteoarthritis. Due to the modest improve in the symptoms observed in patients treated with these drugs alone, a formulation combining both agents has been considered. The discrepant results achieved for pain control or structural improvement in osteoarthritis patients has been attributed to the quality of chemical formulations or different bias in clinical studies. The current study has been designed to test the effects of two different combined formulations with adequate pharmaceutical grade of these drugs in osteoarthritic joints, and to explore the underlying mechanisms modulated by both formulations in different osteoarthritis target tissues. Knee osteoarthritis was surgically induced in experimental rabbits. Some animals received the combined therapy (CT)1, (chondroitin sulfate 1200mg/day + glucosamine sulfate 1500mg/day), or the CT2 ((chondroitin sulfate 1200mg/day + glucosamine hydrochloride 1500mg/day). Neither CT1 nor CT2 significantly modified the cartilage damage or the synovial inflammation observed in osteoarthritic animals. Treatments were also unable to modify the presence of pro-inflammatory mediators, and the synthesis of metalloproteinases in the cartilage or in the synovium of osteoarthritic animals. Combined therapies did not modify the decrease in the subchondral bone mineral density observed in osteoarthritic rabbits. Therapies of chondroitin sulfate plus glucosamine sulfate or chondroitin sulfate plus glucosamine hydrochloride failed to improve structural damage or to ameliorate the inflammatory profile of joint tissues during experimental osteoarthritis.

Combined Treatment With Chondroitin Sulfate and Glucosamine Sulfate Shows No Superiority Over Placebo for Reduction of Joint Pain and Functional Impairment in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Six-Month Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with chondroitin sulfate (CS) and glucosamine sulfate (GS) compared to placebo in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed in 164 patients with Kellgren/Lawrence grade 2 or grade 3 radiographic knee OA and moderate-to-severe knee pain (mean ± SD global pain score 62.1 ± 11.3 mm on a 100-mm visual analog scale [VAS]). Patients were randomized to receive either combined treatment with CS (1,200 mg) plus GS (1,500 mg) or placebo in a single oral daily dose for 6 months. The mean change from baseline in the VAS global pain score was set as the primary end point. Secondary outcomes included the mean change in the investigator's global assessment of disease activity, total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), pain and function subscale scores on the WOMAC, responder rates based on the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT)-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) 2004 response criteria, and rescue medication use. Adverse events were also recorded. A Data and Safety Monitoring Board was instituted to ensure patient safety and data accuracy. RESULTS: Intriguingly, in the modified intent­to­treat (mITT) population, CS/GS combination therapy was inferior to placebo in the reduction of joint pain (mean ± SEM change in VAS global pain score over 6 months −11.8 ± 2.4 mm [19% reduction] in patients receiving CS plus GS versus −20.5 ± 2.4 mm [33% reduction] in patients receiving placebo; peak between­group difference in global pain score at 6 months 8.7 mm [14.2%], P < 0.03), but no between­group differences were seen in the per­protocol completers. Both placebo treatment and CS/GS combination treatment improved to a similar extent the total WOMAC score as well as the pain and function WOMAC subscale scores, both in the mITT population and in the per-protocol completers. Neither the OMERACT-OARSI responder rate nor the frequency of rescue medication use differed between the treatment groups. Severe adverse events were uncommon and equally distributed. CONCLUSION: The results of this trial demonstrate a lack of superiority of CS/GS combination therapy over placebo in terms of reducing joint pain and functional impairment in patients with symptomatic knee OA over 6 months. Further research might fully elucidate the suitability of CS/GS combination therapy in patients with OA.

Clinical settings in knee osteoarthritis: Pathophysiology guides treatment.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common chronic joint disorder and its prevalence increases rapidly during midlife. Complex interactions of genetic alterations, sex hormone deficit, and aging with mechanical factors and systemic inflammation-associated metabolic syndrome lead to joint damage. Thus, the expression of a clinical phenotype in the early stages of OA relies on the main underlying pathway and predominant joint tissue involved at a given time. Moreover, OA often coexists with other morbidities in the same patient, which in turn condition the OA process. In this scenario, an appropriate identification of clinical phenotypes, especially in the early stages of the disease, may optimize the design of individualized treatments in OA. An ESCEO-EUGMS (European Union Geriatric Medicine Society) working group has recently suggested possible patient profiles in OA. Hereby, we propose the existence of 4 clinical phenotypes - biomechanical, osteoporotic, metabolic and inflammatory - whose characterization would help to properly stratify patients with OA in clinical trials or studies. Further research in this field is warranted.

An update on the up and coming therapies to treat osteoarthritis, a multifaceted disease.

INTRODUCTION: The lack of a complete understanding of the complex processes involved in the etiopathogenesis and subsequent appropriate phenotyping makes it difficult to find therapies that may be efficacious in most patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Consensus recommendations involve mainly non-pharmacological approaches. Analgesics and NSAIDs are considered second choice options due to their poor efficacy/safety ratios. To some extent, OA may be considered an orphan disease. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify effective and safe new pharmacologic modalities for treating OA. AREAS COVERED: This review is based on a Medline comprehensive literature search for published articles evaluating new formulations of current drugs and promising emerging therapies in OA. We discuss the current status of novel systemic agents in development including potent analgesic options, inhibitors of innate immunity, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), pro-inflammatory cytokines and cartilage proteases as well as bone agents. Furthermore, we also revise the potential benefit of intraarticular (IA) therapy with hyaluronic acid (HA), pro-inflammatory mediator blockers, cartilage anabolic agents, mesenchymal stem cell and gene transfer. EXPERT OPINION: Despite the renewed interest in the search of new compounds for treatment of OA, results have been limited. Novel systemic and IA administered agents are in active development. IA drug administration is particularly an attractive approach because can diminish some of the severe side effects associated with systemic drugs. Indeed, one of the most promising fields for pharmacology innovation in OA is joint injected therapy, as suggested by preliminary data from recent studies using IA sprifermin (rhFGF-18), mesenchymal stem cells or TGF-B1 transduced allogenic chondrocytes. Last, the effort to develop new drugs must be accompanied by the interest for establishing well-defined phenotypes, and only then, a more tailored therapy should be practiced in OA.

DXA in the assessment of subchondral bone mineral density in knee osteoarthritis--A semi-standardized protocol after systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Subchondral bone mineral density (sBMD) contributes to the initiation and progression of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Reliable methods to assess sBMD status may predict the response of specific OA phenotypes to targeted therapies. While dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the knee can determine sBMD, no consensus exists regarding its methodology. OBJECTIVE: Construct a semi-standardized protocol for knee DXA to measure sBMD in patients with OA of the knee by evaluating the varying methodologies present in existing literature. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of original papers published in PubMed and Web of Science from their inception to July 2014 using the following search terms: subchondral bone, osteoarthritis, and bone mineral density. RESULTS: DXA of the knee can be performed with similar reproducibility values to those proposed by the International Society for Clinical Densitometry for the hip and spine. We identified acquisition view, hip rotation, knee positioning and stabilization, ROI location and definition, and the type of analysis software as important sources of variation. A proposed knee DXA protocol was constructed taking into consideration the results of the review. CONCLUSIONS: DXA of the knee can be reliably performed in patients with knee OA. Nevertheless, we found substantial methodological variation across previous studies. Methodological standardization may provide a foundation from which to establish DXA of the knee as a valid tool for identification of SB changes and as an outcome measure in clinical trials of disease modifying osteoarthritic drugs.

Targeting subchondral bone in osteoporotic osteoarthritis.

The identification of well-defined phenotypes along the course of the disease may open new avenues for personalized management in osteoarthritis (OA). In vivo research carried out in various animal models as well as epidemiological and clinical data support the existence of a particular phenotype - osteoporotic OA. In fact, subchondral bone has become a potential therapeutic target in OA. Depending on the ratio between formation and resorption, subchondral bone remodeling can culminate in either a sclerotic or an osteoporotic phenotype. Patients with osteoporotic OA may thus achieve clinical and structural benefit from treatment with bone-targeted interventions.

An OA phenotype may obtain major benefit from bone-acting agents.

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) joints display relevant microstructure alterations associated to an increase in remodeling at subchondral bone, which supports its crucial role in OA pathogenesis. Despite this, the treatment of knee OA patients with antiresorptive drugs has given discordant results, suggesting the existence of a particular patient subset with good response to halting high subchondral remodeling. OBJECTIVE: To identify an OA phenotype that may obtain major benefit from therapy with bone-acting agents. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed by searching the Medline and PubMed databases from 1990 to April 2013 using the following keywords: subchondral bone, articular cartilage, and osteoarthritis in various combinations with bone agents, bone mineral density, and scintigraphy. RESULTS: Early animal and human studies provided the rationale for the beneficial use of bone agents on OA cartilage damage. Several bone-acting agents have reduced low back pain and likely spondylosis progression. Recently, strontium ranelate has been reported to exert both structural and clinical benefits in knee OA patients with radiological progression. However, other antiresorptives have shown divergent results. Human studies suggest that these contradictory results may be due to the lack of well-defined OA phenotypes and an accurate methodology to recruit and follow up these patients. CONCLUSIONS: A particular subset of postmenopausal patients with high remodeling and/or low subchondral bone density may benefit from the treatment with bone-acting agents hindering OA progression. This OA population could be identified with the simultaneous use of subchondral bone dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and scintigraphy.

SDF-1 signaling: a promising target in rheumatic diseases.

INTRODUCTION: Stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1) is a potent chemoattractant cytokine with various biological functions such as stem cell mobilization, inflammatory cell infiltration and angiogenesis. Therefore, it has also been implicated in several pathological processes, from ischemic conditions to cancer. Remarkably, SDF-1 and its receptors, CXCR4 and CXCR7, are also present in joint tissues, where they play a role in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA). AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes the physiological and pathological role of SDF-1 signaling and its involvement in RA and OA. That includes synovial inflammation, bone erosion, cartilage degradation and increased bone turnover. Although this cytokine could play different roles in these rheumatic diseases, specific and differentiated therapeutic targets in each process can be identified. Current therapeutic strategies to block SDF-1 signaling in several diseases and their possible use in rheumatic diseases are also discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Emerging drugs that block CXCR4 or CXCR7 in different disorders may represent promising therapies for rheumatic disease via inhibition of key pathological events involved in the progression of RA and OA.

Osteoarthritis: Osteoporotic OA: a reasonable target for bone-acting agents.

Beneficial effects of bone-acting drugs in osteoarthritis (OA) are increasingly reported, but reliable conclusions regarding their efficacy are hindered by methodological drawbacks in study design. Identifying patients with osteoporotic OA, a phenotype defined by decreased density associated with high remodelling in subchondral bone, might improve the success of bone-directed agents.

Subchondral bone as a key target for osteoarthritis treatment.

Osteoarthritis (OA), the most common form of arthritis, is a debilitating and progressive disease that has become a major cause of disability and impaired quality of life in the elderly. OA is considered an organ disease that affects the whole joint, where the subchondral bone (SB) plays a crucial role. Regardless of whether SB alterations precede cartilage damage or appear during the evolution of the disease, SB is currently recognised as a key target in OA treatment. In fact, bone abnormalities, especially increased bone turnover, have been detected in the early evolution of some forms of OA. Systemic osteoporosis (OP) and OA share a paradoxical relationship in which both high and low bone mass conditions may result in induction and/or OA progression. Recent findings suggest that some drugs may be useful in treating both processes simultaneously, at least in a subgroup of patients with OA and OP. This review focuses on the role of SB in OA pathogenesis, describing relevant underlying mechanisms involved in the process and examining the potential activity as disease-modifying anti-osteoarthritic drugs (DMOADs) of certain SB-targeting agents currently under study.