RESUMEN
We have used quantitative measures of gene expression to show that constitutional 50% decreases in expression of one adenomatous polyposis coli tumor suppressor gene (APC) allele can lead to the development of familial adenomatous polyposis.
Asunto(s)
Adenoma/genética , Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/genética , Transformación Celular Neoplásica/genética , Regulación de la Expresión Génica , Genes APC , Alelos , ADN Complementario/genética , ADN de Neoplasias/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Pérdida de Heterocigocidad , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Moldes GenéticosRESUMEN
It has been shown that bone marrow-derived stem cells can form a major fraction of the tumor endothelium in mouse tumors. To determine the role of such cells in human tumor angiogenesis, we studied six individuals who developed cancers after bone marrow transplantation with donor cells derived from individuals of the opposite sex. By performing fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with sex chromosome-specific probes in conjunction with fluorescent antibody staining, we found that such stem cells indeed contributed to tumor endothelium, but at low levels, averaging only 4.9% of the total. These results illustrate substantial differences between human tumors and many mouse models with respect to angiogenesis and have important implications for the translation of experimental antiangiogenic therapies to the clinic.
Asunto(s)
Células de la Médula Ósea/citología , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/efectos adversos , Células Endoteliales/citología , Neoplasias/irrigación sanguínea , Neovascularización Patológica , Células Madre/fisiología , Cromosomas Humanos X , Cromosomas Humanos Y , Células Endoteliales/fisiología , Femenino , Técnica del Anticuerpo Fluorescente , Humanos , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Masculino , Neoplasias/patología , Neovascularización Patológica/sangreRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Identifying families at high risk for the Lynch syndrome (ie, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) is critical for both genetic counseling and cancer prevention. Current clinical guidelines are effective but limited by applicability and cost. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a genetic counseling and risk prediction tool that estimates the probability of carrying a deleterious mutation in mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, or MSH6 and the probability of developing colorectal or endometrial cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: External validation of the MMRpro model was conducted on 279 individuals from 226 clinic-based families in the United States, Canada, and Australia (referred between 1993-2005) by comparing model predictions with results of highly sensitive germline mutation detection techniques. MMRpro models the autosomal dominant inheritance of mismatch repair mutations, with parameters based on meta-analyses of the penetrance and prevalence of mutations and of the predictive values of tumor characteristics. The model's prediction is tailored to each individual's detailed family history information on colorectal and endometrial cancer and to tumor characteristics including microsatellite instability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Ability of MMRpro to correctly predict mutation carrier status, as measured by operating characteristics, calibration, and overall accuracy. RESULTS: In the independent validation, MMRpro provided a concordance index of 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.88) and a ratio of observed to predicted cases of 0.94 (95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.05). This results in higher accuracy than existing alternatives and current clinical guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: MMRpro is a broadly applicable, accurate prediction model that can contribute to current screening and genetic counseling practices in a high-risk population. It is more sensitive and more specific than existing clinical guidelines for identifying individuals who may benefit from MMR germline testing. It is applicable to individuals for whom tumor samples are not available and to individuals in whom germline testing finds no mutation.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales Hereditarias sin Poliposis/genética , Pruebas Genéticas , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Modelos Estadísticos , Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de Señales , Adulto , Algoritmos , Proteínas Portadoras/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/genética , Neoplasias Endometriales/epidemiología , Femenino , Asesoramiento Genético , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Homólogo 1 de la Proteína MutL , Proteína 2 Homóloga a MutS/genética , Proteínas Nucleares/genética , Probabilidad , RiesgoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Expression of the PRL-3 tyrosine phosphatase is elevated in liver metastases derived from colorectal cancer (CRC). We sought to determine the cellular basis of this elevation and assess the expression of PRL-3 in metastatic lesions derived from cancers of the colon and other tissues. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We developed modifications of in situ hybridization methods that facilitated the study of paraffin-embedded sections. We also evaluated PRL-3 gene copy numbers using fluorescence in situ hybridization and developed antibodies to assess PRL-3 subcellular localization. RESULTS: PRL-3 mRNA expression was elevated in nearly all metastatic lesions derived from CRCs, regardless of the site of metastasis (liver, lung, brain, or ovary). Expression was found in neoplastic cells, although tumor endothelium also expressed the gene. In contrast, little or no PRL-3 expression was observed in normal colon, nonmetastatic primary cancers, or metastatic lesions derived from cancers other than those of the colon (pancreas, stomach, or esophagus). Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmed that gene amplification was not the major cause of PRL-3 overexpression. Immunohistochemical analysis with anti-PRL-3 antibodies showed a cell membrane localization, consistent with the predicted isoprenylation of the protein. CONCLUSIONS: These studies establish an unexpected and unprecedented specificity in metastatic gene expression profiles: PRL-3 is apparently expressed in CRC metastases to any organ but is not expressed in metastases of other cancers to the same organs or in nonmetastatic CRCs. PRL-3 is also expressed in tumor vasculature, regardless of the tumor source. These data raise intriguing questions about the role of protein phosphorylation in angiogenesis and cell-type-specific metastatic processes.