Vasopressor Therapy in Cardiac Surgery-An Experts' Consensus Statement.

Hemodynamic conditions with reduced systemic vascular resistance commonly are observed in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and may range from moderate reductions in vascular tone, as a side effect of general anesthetics, to a profound vasodilatory syndrome, often referred to as vasoplegic shock. Therapy with vasopressors is an important pillar in the treatment of these conditions. There is limited guidance on the appropriate choice of vasopressors to restore and optimize systemic vascular tone in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. A panel of experts in the field convened to develop statements and evidence-based recommendations on clinically relevant questions on the use of vasopressors in cardiac surgical patients, using a critical appraisal of the literature following the GRADE system and a modified Delphi process. The authors unanimously and strongly recommend the use of norepinephrine and/or vasopressin for restoration and maintenance of systemic perfusion pressure in cardiac surgical patients; despite that, the authors cannot recommend either of these drugs with respect to the risk of ischemic complications. The authors unanimously and strongly recommend against using dopamine for treating post-cardiac surgery vasoplegic shock and against using methylene blue for purposes other than a rescue therapy. The authors unanimously and weakly recommend that clinicians consider early addition of a second vasopressor (norepinephrine or vasopressin) if adequate vascular tone cannot be restored by a monotherapy with either norepinephrine or vasopressin and to consider using vasopressin as a first-line vasopressor or to add vasopressin to norepinephrine in cardiac surgical patients with pulmonary hypertension or right-sided heart dysfunction.

Attitudes of healthcare professionals involved in cardiology practice towards key points of contemporary guidelines on resuscitation.

Hellenic J Cardiol. 2014; 55: 378-385. At the request of the authors, the name of the second author of this Original Research article has been changed from Athanasios Patialakas to Athanasios Patialiakas.

Attitudes of healthcare professionals involved in cardiology practice towards key points of contemporary guidelines on resuscitation.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is not always executed in compliance with contemporary guidelines and the quality of CPR may differ among hospitals within the same country or among categories of healthcare providers and medical specialties. The aim of this study was to assess attitudes of cardiology healthcare professionals towards CPR guidelines. METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire was posted online during 2009. Responders were asked about their age, gender, occupation, and training/experience in CPR. Responders' attitudes towards CPR were assessed using 7 questions regarding the accuracy of their opinions about the automated external defibrillator, public defibrillation programs, CPR performance, and therapeutic hypothermia. A score (0 to 7) was formed by assigning grade 1 to answers that accorded with European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines and grade 0 to all other answers. The reliability analysis for this score yielded a Cronbach's alpha of 0.78. RESULTS: There were 544 responders (158 females), median age 34 years (30, 40). Median score was 5 (3, 6). Attending an ERC resuscitation course (beta=0.33, SE beta=0.05, p<0.001), age (beta=-0.15 SE beta=0.05, p=0.002), involvement in >10 CPRs /year (beta=0.19, SE beta=0.05, p<0.001), and being a physician (beta=0.17, SE beta=0.05, p=0.001) were all independent predictors of score. Attendance at an ERC course (OR: 2.7 [1.5 to 4.7]), being a physician (OR: 2 [1.3 to 5]) and involvement in >10 CPRs /year (OR: 1.7 [1.1 to 2.7]) were also independent predictors for attitudes that accorded with contemporary guidelines regarding therapeutic hypothermia. CONCLUSIONS: Attending an ERC resuscitation course, frequent involvement in CPR attempts, younger age, and being a physician were all independent predictors for more positive attitudes towards the guidelines. These factors, with the exception of age, were also associated with positive attitudes towards the implementation of therapeutic hypothermia.

B-type natriuretic peptide blood levels identify patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes at high risk for complications during intravenous beta-blocker infusion.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide could identify patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes at high risk for complications during beta-blocker (esmolol) infusion. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 340 consecutive patients admitted with a non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Seventy three (47 males, aged 62 ± 14 years) received esmolol up to a maximum dose of 300 µg/ kg/min until the symptoms were relieved or an adverse event occurred. RESULTS: The median infusion rate at steady state was 175 µg/kg/min (median infusion time 18 h). Infusion was halted in 14 patients. The frequency of drug discontinuation increased across admission BNP quartiles. BNP > 141 pg/ml at admission had a 95% predictive value for subsequent withdrawal of esmolol. The presence of BNP > 141 pg/ml in combination with systolic blood pressure < 130 mmHg and left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% identified a group of patients at high risk for drug interruption (interruption frequency = 83%, 95% CI: 55-95%). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, BNP measurement in combination with systolic blood pressure and 2D echocardiography may identify patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes at high risk for adverse events during esmolol infusion.