Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 51
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Med Virol ; 95(7): e28962, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37466326

RESUMEN

Air pollution may affect the clinical course of respiratory diseases, including COVID-19. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between exposure of adult patients to mean 24 h levels of particulate matter sized <10 µm (PM10 ) and <2.5 µm (PM2.5 ) and benzo(a)pyrene (B(a)P) during a week before their hospitalization due to SARS-CoV-2 infection and symptomatology, hyperinflammation, coagulopathy, the clinical course of disease, and outcome. The analyses were conducted during two pandemic waves: (i) dominated by highly pathogenic Delta variant (n = 1440) and (ii) clinically less-severe Omicron (n = 785), while the analyzed associations were adjusted for patient's age, BMI, gender, and comorbidities. The exposure to mean 24 h B(a)P exceeding the limits was associated with increased odds of fever and fatigue as early COVID-19 symptoms, hyperinflammation due to serum C-reactive protein >200 mg/L and interleukin-6 >100 pg/mL, coagulopathy due to  d-dimer >2 mg/L and fatal outcome. Elevated PM10 and PM2. 5 levels were associated with higher odds of respiratory symptoms, procalcitonin >0.25 ng/mL and interleukin >100 pg/mL, lower oxygen saturation, need for oxygen support, and death. The significant relationships between exposure to air pollutants and the course and outcomes of COVID-19 were observed during both pandemic waves. Short-term exposure to elevated PM and B(a)P levels can be associated with a worse clinical course of COVID-19 in patients requiring hospitalization and, ultimately, contribute to the health burden caused by SARS-CoV-2 variants of higher and lower clinical significance.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire , COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Contaminación del Aire/efectos adversos , Contaminación del Aire/análisis , Material Particulado/efectos adversos , Material Particulado/análisis , Progresión de la Enfermedad
2.
Alcohol Alcohol ; 55(5): 518-523, 2020 Aug 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32626893

RESUMEN

AIM: To study types and incidence of histological changes in liver of people deceased due to harmful use of alcohol. METHODS: A retrospective review of medico-legal autopsy of 236 adults who died in the years 2015-2016 due to harmful use of alcohol was done. Histopathological liver samples taken during autopsies were evaluated. Blood alcohol content was analyzed. Serological tests for hepatitis B surface antigen and anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) were performed. RESULTS: The most common liver pathology (83.1%) was steatosis, mainly mixed type (50%); 66.9% had high-grade steatosis. Liver fibrosis was detected in 39.4% of cases, with fibrosis of higher than or equal to third grade in 14%, hepatitis in 44.5% and steatohepatitis in 19.1%. Toxic hepatocyte injury features (ballooning degeneration, Mallory-Denk bodies) were found in 20.8% cases and degenerative-damage changes in 41.1%. The correlation between the grade of steatosis and fibrosis (P = 0.0005), toxic injury (0.00000101) and degenerative-traumatic changes (P = 0.00000741) was found. The correlation was found between hepatitis and higher than or equal to third grade steatosis (P = 0.037), cholestasis (P = 0.0139), toxic injury features (P = 2.58 × 10-13), degenerative-damage changes (P = 7.9 × 10-12) and presence of anti-HCV (P = 0.00723) and between progression of fibrosis and presence of toxic injury features (2.28 × 10-19), degenerative-damage changes (P = 4.25 × 10-11) and anti-HCV (P = 0.0263). CONCLUSIONS: Spectrum of histopathological liver changes is broad regardless of sex, and various traits are present in various patterns. Comorbidities have strong influence on the picture of changes in the liver. Exact evaluation how often and what histopathological changes will develop in alcohol liver disease is not possible by reason of variability of external factors.


Asunto(s)
Hígado Graso Alcohólico/patología , Hepatitis Alcohólica/patología , Cirrosis Hepática/patología , Hígado/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Autopsia , Índice de Masa Corporal , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Hepatocitos/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
3.
Neurol Neurochir Pol ; 54(1): 39-46, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31956973

RESUMEN

Neisseria meningitidis and Streptococcus pneumoniae are the most common pathogens causing cerebrospinal meningitis (CSM) in adults. The mortality rate and the number of complications remain high. In our study, retrospective evaluations were conducted on data concerning 98 adult patients with bacterial cerebrospinal meningitis caused by Neisseria meningitidis (n = 42) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 56), hospitalised at the Regional Specialistic Hospital in Wroclaw (Poland) within the period 1998-2018. Compared to the group infected with S. pneumoniae, patients infected with N. meningitidis were younger and were less often affected by an additional disease burden; they presented more frequently with haemorrhagic rashes. Compared to the S. pneumoniae group, in patients with meningococcal CSM, cytosis in cerebrospinal fluid measuring < 1,000 cells/ mL was less frequent; intravascular coagulation syndrome appeared more frequently; the hospitalisation time was shorter and the rate of mortality was lower. Meningococcal meningitis occurs more frequently among young people with no history of disease. It is characterised by the rapid development of symptoms, which results in earlier diagnosis and more favourable prognosis compared to cases of S. pneumoniae. Irrespective of the pathogen, advanced age and a level of cytosis in cerebrospinal fluid of < 1,000 cells /µl indicate an unfavourable prognosis.


Asunto(s)
Meningitis Meningocócica , Meningitis Neumocócica , Neisseria meningitidis , Humanos , Polonia , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Med Pr ; 68(1): 23-30, 2017 Feb 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28245001

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Determining the prevalence of alcohol intoxication and the level of intoxication in victims of fatal occupational accidents is necessary to improve work safety. The circumstances of the accident and the time between alcohol consumption and death are important factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 18 935 medico-legal autopsy reports and toxicological reports performed in the Department of Forensic Medicine at the Wroclaw Medical University, Poland, in the years 1991-2014. The study protocol included circumstances, time and cause of death, injuries, quantitative testing for the presence of ethyl alcohol, gender and age. RESULTS: There were 98 farm-related fatalities. There were 41.8% (N = 41) of victims who had been intoxicated - 95.1% (N = 39) of them were males aged 19-70 years old, 4,9% (N = 2) were females aged 37-65 years old. In 8 cases the blood alcohol concentration (BAC) was 50-150 mg/dl; in 15 cases it was 150-250 mg/dl and in 18 cases it was > 250 mg/dl. In 21 cases, the BAC was determined using alternative material and 76% (N = 16) victims were in the alcohol elimination phase with 19% (N = 4) victims in the alcohol absorption phase. The most common causes of death were traffic accidents, drowning and deaths resulting from being caught in or hit by moving parts of machinery or equipment. CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol consumption is a crucial risk factor in fatal agricultural accidents. In order to establish the time of alcohol consumption, all victims of agricultural accidents should be tested for alcohol concentration in their blood and urine or vitreous. Improving safety at work requires that the sobriety of employees should be monitored before and during work. Med Pr 2017;68(1):23-30.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Trabajo/mortalidad , Agricultura , Intoxicación Alcohólica/mortalidad , Etanol/sangre , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Autopsia , Biomarcadores/sangre , Causas de Muerte , Femenino , Medicina Legal , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polonia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
5.
Med Princ Pract ; 24(2): 159-64, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25501966

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the adverse events and potential risk factors in patients who develop sepsis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-five medico-legal opinion forms relating to sepsis cases issued by the Department of Forensic Medicine, Wroclaw, Poland, between 2004 and 2013 were analyzed for medical errors and risk factors for adverse events. RESULTS: The most common causes of medical errors were a lack of knowledge in recognition, diagnosis and therapy as well as ignorance of risk. The common risk factors for adverse events were deferral of a diagnostic or therapeutic decision, high-level anxiety of patients or their families about the patient's health and actively seeking for help. The most significant risk factors were communication errors, not enough medical staff, stereotype-based thinking about diseases and providing easy explanations for serious symptoms. CONCLUSION: The most common cause of adverse events related to sepsis in the Polish health-care system was a lack of knowledge about the symptoms, diagnosis and treatment as well as the ignoring of danger. A possible means of improving safety might be through spreading knowledge and creating medical management algorithms for all health-care workers, especially physicians.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Errores Médicos , Sepsis/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Masculino , Errores Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polonia/epidemiología , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Factores de Riesgo , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Adulto Joven
6.
J Clin Med ; 13(12)2024 Jun 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38930003

RESUMEN

Background/Objectives: SARS-CoV-2 continually mutates, with five identified variants. Many neurological manifestations were observed during the COVID-19 pandemic, with differences between virus variants. The aim of this study is to assess the frequency and characteristics of neurological manifestations during COVID-19 in hospitalized patients over three waves in Poland with comparison and analysis correlation with the course of infection. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 600 consecutive adults with confirmed COVID-19, hospitalized during 3 waves (pre-Delta, Delta and Omicron) in Poland. Demographic and clinical information and neurological manifestations were collected and compared across three periods. Results: The median age of the study group was 68, lower during the Delta wave. In the Omicron period, the disease severity at admission and inflammatory markers concentration were the lowest. Neurological manifestations were observed in 49%. The most common were altered mentation, headache, myalgia, mood disorder, ischemic stroke and encephalopathy. Smell and taste disturbances (STDs) were less frequent in the Omicron period. Neurological complications were predominant in the pre-Delta and Omicron periods. Ischemic stroke was observed more often in pre-Delta period. Altered mentation was related to higher severity at admission, worse lab test results, higher admission to ICU and mortality, while headache reduced mortality. Pre-existing dementia was related to higher mortality. Conclusions: Neurological manifestations of COVID-19 are frequent, with a lower rate of STDs in the Omicron period and more often cerebrovascular diseases in the pre-Delta period. Headache improves the course of COVID-19, while altered mentation, stroke and neurological comorbidities increase severity and mortality.

7.
Onkologie ; 36(1-2): 49-52, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23429332

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin is a chemotherapeutic agent that may cause acute (or chronic) organ toxicity. As there is no antidote, prevention of adverse drug events is essential for patients' safety. CASE REPORT: The authors present the case of a 33-year-old woman treated for lymphoma with the ESHAP regimen, who died of an overdose of cisplatin. The drug was administered at a rate 4 times greater than the recommended maximum dose. The first symptom of overdose - partial hearing loss - appeared after administration of the last dose of the drug on day 4 of the chemotherapy course. The initiation of intensive treatment with plasmapheresis and dialyses was ineffective. The patient died 18 days after receiving the last dose of cisplatin. The medication schedule had been prepared by an inexperienced physician. The information on cisplatin dosage had been sourced from a vague instruction in a clinical oncology manual: '100 mg/m(2) continuous i.v. infusion d.1-4'. The instruction was misinterpreted. The patient was given 100 mg/m(2) on each of the 4 days of the treatment. CONCLUSION: Special care must be taken when preparing a medication schedule; the treatment must be checked by an experienced physician and verified by the nursing staff. The patient should be monitored for symptoms of cisplatin intoxication.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/envenenamiento , Cisplatino/envenenamiento , Sobredosis de Droga/etiología , Linfoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Mediastino/tratamiento farmacológico , Errores de Medicación/efectos adversos , Adulto , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Citarabina/administración & dosificación , Citarabina/envenenamiento , Etopósido/administración & dosificación , Etopósido/envenenamiento , Resultado Fatal , Femenino , Humanos , Linfoma/complicaciones , Neoplasias del Mediastino/complicaciones , Metilprednisolona/administración & dosificación , Metilprednisolona/envenenamiento
8.
Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online) ; 67: 595-600, 2013 Jun 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23799403

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The most frequent complication of A (H1N1) influenza and the leading cause of death was pneumonia with a primary viral or mixed viral and bacterial etiology. 182 patients had died because of a pandemic influenza in Poland by 31st July 2010. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 6 fatal cases of pandemic influenza, aged 23-41, including 3 women, hospitalised between November 2009 and February 2011 in different Polish medical centres. RESULTS: We present the clinical course of 6 late diagnosed cases of A (H1N1) influenza. All patients presented typical flu-like symptoms in the beginning. 4/6 patients had severe disease risk factors: pregnancy, arthritis, Wegener granulomatosis and obesity. All patients were seen by doctors, no one had received antiviral therapy, 4/5 were treated with antibiotics before they were hospitalized. One patient had nosocomial infection. Patients were admitted to the hospital on the 3rd to 8th day of the disease. They received oseltamivir treatment on the 4th to 9th day. All patients developed pneumonia complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome. Death appeared between the 4th and 27th day after the onset of symptoms. Autopsies were performed in 5 cases and revealed haemorrhagic pneumonia in 2 patients. CONCLUSION: Delayed diagnosis and antiviral treatment initiation has a significant impact on mortality in A (H1N1) influenza. During the influenza epidemic, patients presenting typical symptoms should always be suspected of having influenza. Antiviral treatment has to be initiated immediately, especially if there are risk factors of severe disease.


Asunto(s)
Coinfección/epidemiología , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana/diagnóstico , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Pandemias/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Edad de Inicio , Anciano , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Artritis/epidemiología , Causas de Muerte , Comorbilidad , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Diagnóstico Tardío , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Hígado Graso/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Gripe Humana/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oseltamivir/uso terapéutico , Neumonía/epidemiología , Polonia/epidemiología , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
9.
Viruses ; 15(7)2023 06 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37515118

RESUMEN

In a retrospective analysis of 477 fatal COVID-19 cases hospitalised at a single medical centre during the period from 6 March 2020 to 30 June 2022, several factors defining those patients at admission were assessed, as well as the course of the hospitalisation and factors contributing to death. There was a predominance of men (59.3% (283)) burdened by comorbidities, with increased inflammation at admission. Patients aged ≥ 81 years were significantly more likely to be admitted to and die in infectious diseases units (IDU) due to respiratory failure, their hospital stays were shorter, and they were most likely not to receive specialist treatment. The most common COVID-19 complications included acute kidney injury in 31.2% (149) patients and thromboembolic complications in 23.5% (112). The course of hospitalisation was complicated by healthcare-associated infections (HAI) in 33.3% (159) of cases, more often in those treated with baricitinib (p < 0.001). The initial use of an antibiotic, although common (94.8% (452)), was unwarranted in almost half of the cases (47.6% (215)). Complications of hospitalisation (46.1% (220)) and adverse events involving staff (49.7% (237)) were found in almost half of the patients. In 88.7% (423) of the cases, death was due to respiratory failure in the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Adverse events during hospitalisation should be considered as an additional factor that, in addition to the infection itself, may have influenced the death of patients.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pandemias , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/epidemiología
10.
Viruses ; 15(5)2023 05 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37243243

RESUMEN

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is common in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and worsens the prognosis. Sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor, is approved for PAH treatment but little is known about its efficacy in cases of severe COVID-19 with PAH. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of sildenafil in patients with severe COVID-19 and PAH. Intensive care unit (ICU) patients were randomly assigned to receive sildenafil or a placebo, with 75 participants in each group. Sildenafil was administered orally at 0.25 mg/kg t.i.d. for one week in a placebo-controlled, double-blind manner as an add-on therapy alongside the patient's routine treatment. The primary endpoint was one-week mortality, and the secondary endpoints were the one-week intubation rate and duration of ICU stay. The mortality rate was 4% vs. 13.3% (p = 0.078), the intubation rate was 8% and 18.7% (p = 0.09), and the length of ICU stay was 15 vs. 19 days (p < 0.001) for the sildenafil and placebo groups, respectively. If adjusted for PAH, sildenafil treatment significantly reduced mortality and intubation risks: OR = 0.21 (95% CI: 0.05-0.89) and OR = 0.26 (95% CI: 0.08-0.86), respectively. Sildenafil demonstrated some clinical efficacy in patients with severe COVID-19 and PAH and should be considered as an add-on therapy in these patients.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Hipertensión Pulmonar , Hipertensión Arterial Pulmonar , Humanos , Citrato de Sildenafil/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión Arterial Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Viruses ; 15(1)2023 01 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36680188

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic proceeds in waves, with variable characteristics of the clinical picture resulting from the evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This study aimed to compare the epidemiological characteristics, symptomatology, and outcomes of the disease in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 during periods of different variants dominance. Comparing the periods of dominance of variants preceding the Delta variant, the Delta period was characterized by a higher share of hospitalized females, less frequent comorbidities among patients, and a different age distribution. The lowest need for oxygen therapy and mechanical ventilation was observed under Omicron dominance. The triad of classic COVID-19 symptoms, cough, fever, dyspnoea, and fatigue, were most prevalent during the Delta period, and significantly less common under the Omicron dominance. During the Omicron period, nearly twice as many patients as in the previous periods could be discharged from the hospital within 7 days; the overall 28-day mortality was significantly lower compared to that of the Delta period. It also did not differ between periods that were dominated by the BA.1 and BA.2 subvariants. The study indicates that the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant that dominated between January and June 2022 caused a disease which resembled the common cold, and was caused by seasonal alpha and beta-coronaviruses with a low pathogenicity for humans. However, one should note that this effect may not only have been related to biological features of the Omicron lineage, but may additionally have been driven by the increased levels of immunization through natural infections and vaccinations, for which we could not account for due to a lack of sufficient data.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Femenino , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Progresión de la Enfermedad
12.
J Clin Med ; 12(6)2023 Mar 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36983370

RESUMEN

Continuous evaluation of real-world treatment effectiveness of COVID-19 medicines is required due to the ongoing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 and the possible emergence of resistance. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze, in a retrospective manner, the outcomes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 during the pandemic waves dominated by Delta and Omicron variants and treated with remdesivir (RDV) (n = 762) in comparison to a demographically and clinically matched group not treated with any antivirals (n = 1060). A logistic regression analysis revealed that RDV treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of death during both Delta wave (OR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.29-0.60; p < 0.0001) and Omicron-dominated period (OR = 0.56, 95%CI: 0.35-0.92; p = 0.02). Moreover, RDV-treated groups were characterized by a lower percentage of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, but the difference was not statistically significant. This study is the first real-world evidence that RDV remains effective during the dominance of more pathogenic SARS-CoV-2 variants and those that cause a milder course of the disease, and continues to be an essential element of COVID-19 therapy.

13.
J Clin Med ; 12(17)2023 Aug 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37685639

RESUMEN

This study aimed to compare the clinical picture of COVID-19 in the initial and later period of Omicron dominance and to identify populations still at risk. A retrospective comparison of the clinical data of 965 patients hospitalized during the early period of Omicron's dominance (EO, January-June 2022) with 897 patients from a later period (LO, July 2022-April 2023) from the SARSTer database was performed. Patients hospitalized during LO, compared to EO, were older, had a better clinical condition on admission, had a lower need for oxygen and mechanical ventilation, had less frequent lung involvement in imaging, and showed much faster clinical improvement. Moreover, the overall mortality during EO was 14%, higher than that in LO-9%. Despite the milder course of the disease, mortality exceeding 15% was similar in both groups among patients with lung involvement. The accumulation of risk factors such as an age of 60+, comorbidities, lung involvement, and oxygen saturation <90% resulted in a constant need for oxygen in 98% of patients, an 8% risk of mechanical ventilation, and a 30% mortality rate in the LO period. Multiple logistic regression revealed lower odds of death during the LO phase. Despite the milder course of infections caused by the currently dominant subvariants, COVID-19 prophylaxis is necessary in people over 60 years of age, especially those with comorbidities, and in the case of pneumonia and respiratory failure.

14.
Viruses ; 15(7)2023 07 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37515199

RESUMEN

COVID-19 is an independent risk factor for pulmonary embolism (PE). Little is known about alteplase therapy in this patient group. A retrospective study analyzed 74 patients with PE and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 who were hospitalized in the intensive care unit in 2021. Patients with or without confirmed right heart thrombi (RHT) were treated with unfractionated heparin or alteplase. The mortality rate in patients with RHT treated with heparin was 100% compared to 37.9% and 55.2% in those treated with alteplase without RHT and alteplase with RHT, respectively. The risk of death in the alteplase group increased with delayed thrombolysis (p = 0.009, odds ratio (OR) = 1.73 95% CI (confidence interval) 1.14-2.62), increased D-dimer concentration (p = 0.02, OR = 1.43 95% CI 1.06-1.93), and decreased PaO2/FiO2 ratio (p = 0.001, OR = 0.56 95% CI 0.41-0.78). The receiver operating characteristic method determined that a 1-day delay in thrombolytic treatment, D-dimer concentration >5.844 mg/L, and PaO2/FiO2 <144 mmHg predicted a fatal outcome. The risk of death in patients with severe COVID-19 with ARDS and PE increases with higher D-dimer levels, decreased PaO2/FiO2, and delayed thrombolytic treatment. Thrombolysis seems to be treatment of choice in severe COVID-19 with PE and RHT. It should be carried out as soon as possible after the diagnosis is established.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Embolia Pulmonar , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Trombosis , Humanos , Heparina/efectos adversos , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/complicaciones , Enfermedad Crítica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Embolia Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombosis/inducido químicamente , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/tratamiento farmacológico
15.
Pathogens ; 11(2)2022 Feb 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35215147

RESUMEN

Post-mortem microbiological tests are one of the basic methods for diagnosing the etiology of infections in forensic pathology. One of the major groups of microorganisms abundant in various parts of the human body during life and after death is Enterococcus spp. Depending on the area of the body involved and the patient's condition, enterococci can be considered to be a microbiome, transient flora or a pathogen responsible for infection. The data used for the analysis were 12 medico-legal autopsy and microbiological reports. Enterococcus spp. was isolated in 10 out of 12 cultures of blood samples collected post-mortem. The abdominal origin of enterococci in the blood was detected in 8 cases. The non-abdominal origin of enterococci in the blood was associated with a skin and soft tissue infection, purulent pneumonia and infective endocarditis. These results suggest that enterococci may be considered a cause of severe infections and with high likelihood. Microbiological cultures are a valuable source of information for helping to confirm the cause of infection. Interpretation of the results of post-mortem examinations must be carried out on the basis of data collected before and after death with the participation of specialists from various fields.

16.
J Pers Med ; 12(7)2022 Jun 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35887519

RESUMEN

COVID-19 receives a lot of attention due to its threat to global public health. Research is ongoing to find universal methods to assess the baseline health status of a patient to determine prognosis and management strategies. This study aims to assess the predictive potential of the EASIX (Endothelial Activation and Stress Index) and two of its modifications (mEASIX and sEASIX) in terms of the need for admission to the ICU (intensive care unit), the use of IMV (invasive mechanical ventilation) and death due to COVID-19. The medical data of 370 severely ill patients hospitalised in the COVID-19 departments of the Regional Specialist Hospital in Wroclaw (Poland), including the ICU, were analysed retrospectively. The mortality rate in the group studied was 65.7% (243 cases). In the case of all three indices, EASIX, mEASIX and sEASIX, there was a statistically significant correlation between the need for admission to the ICU (p = 0.026, p = 0.019, p = 0.001, respectively) and the risk of death (p < 0.001). In terms of the risk of death, the high values of the assessed indices (EASIX ≥ 2.36, mEASIX ≥ 704.03, sEASIX ≥ 3.81) were characterised by low sensitivity (≤40%), high specificity (approximately 90%) and low NPV (negative predictive value) (approximately 40%) with high PPV (positive predictive value) (approximately 80%). Due to the ease of implementation and the low cost of performing basic laboratory tests, the above-mentioned indices can be used as an additional, but not universal tool for the initial assessment of the health condition of patients admitted to the hospital.

17.
J Pers Med ; 12(7)2022 Jul 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35887600

RESUMEN

Tocilizumab (TOC) is presumed to be an effective and safe treatment for severe COVID-19, but its usefulness has not been yet investigated for different SARS-CoV-2 variants. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of TOC on mortality in patients with severe COVID-19 caused by Delta and non-Delta SARS-CoV-2 variants. In a retrospective analysis, we compared the medical records of 78 and 224 patients with severe COVID-19 due to Delta and non-Delta variants, respectively. A total of 30 patients with Delta and 84 with non-Delta variants were treated with TOC in addition to standard therapy. There were no statistically significant differences in mortality rate when comparing Delta vs. non-Delta patients nor when comparing those treated with TOC vs. not treated with TOC in both variants. Using a logistic regression model, in the examined population as a whole, we found an increased (p < 0.05) risk of death as leukocyte and erythrocyte counts decreased and as procalcitonin increased. Increased procalcitonin was significant for mortality in the Delta group, while decreased IL-6, leukocytes, and platelets and increased fibrinogen and procalcitonin were significant in the non-Delta group. Tocilizumab efficacy in severe COVID-19 does not differ between Delta or non-Delta virus variants. The Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 does not increase mortality when compared to other virus strains.

18.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 12(2)2022 Feb 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35204605

RESUMEN

Since the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in late 2019, viral RNA has been detected in several different human tissues and organs. This study reports the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the bone marrow. Post-mortem samples were taken in a sterile manner during two forensic autopsies from the nasopharyngeal region, vitreous humor, cerebrospinal fluid, and bone marrow. SARS-CoV-2 was subsequently diagnosed via Genomtec® SARS-CoV-2 EvaGreen® RT-LAMP CE-IVD Duo Kit. In both postmortem patients, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in bone marrow samples. However, both the vitreous humor and cerebrospinal fluid from the same patients gave negative results using the same test system. The evidence of viral RNA in the bone marrow, along with other reports supports the thesis that SARS-CoV-2 infections are systemic in nature, the consequences of which would profoundly influence both the testing and survival of patients.

19.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(3)2022 Mar 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35335108

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 vaccination has been the subject of unprecedented misinformation, false news, and public concerns. This study presents a unique analysis comprising persons who were not vaccinated and became ill. It investigates reasons for not vaccinating and evaluates how the personal experience of COVID-19 affected further attitudes and decisions related to health. The study included 730 consecutive unvaccinated patients hospitalized in 12 centers in Poland during the autumn 2021 pandemic wave. The most frequent reason behind the refusal to receive the vaccine was concern over the adverse effects, disbelief that the vaccine was sufficiently tested, and one's conviction that COVID-19 will not affect a patient. Online information, friends, spouse, children/grandchildren, and other family members were most often the source of discouragement from vaccination. Most individuals regretted their decision not to receive a vaccine (66.0%), declared to promote COVID-19 vaccination after discharge (64.0%), and to receive a COVID-19 vaccine in the time recommended for convalescents (69.5%). Individuals expressing no regrets of vaccine refusal more frequently revealed conspiracy beliefs. The study shows that personal experience with severe COVID-19 can influence the perception of vaccination, but approximately one-third of unvaccinated hospitalized patients still appear to express vaccine hesitancy.

20.
Pharmacol Rep ; 74(6): 1279-1285, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36001284

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The real-world effectiveness of molnupiravir (MOL) during the dominance of Omicron SARS-CoV-2 lineage is urgently needed since the available data relate to the period of circulation of other viral variants. Therefore, this study assessed the efficacy of MOL in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in a real-world clinical practice during the wave of Omicron infections. METHODS: Among 11,822 patients hospitalized after 1 March 2020 and included in the SARSTer national database, 590 were treated between 1 January and 30 April 2022, a period of dominance of the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant. MOL was administered to 203 patients, whereas 387 did not receive any antiviral regimen. Both groups were similar in terms of sex, BMI and age allowing for direct comparisons. RESULTS: Patients who did not receive antiviral therapy significantly more often required the use of Dexamethasone and Baricitinib. Treatment with MOL resulted in a statistically significant reduction in mortality during the 28-day follow-up (9.9 vs. 16.3%), which was particularly evident in the population of patients over 80 years of age treated in the first 5 days of the disease (14.6 vs. 35.2%). MOL therapy did not affect the frequency of the need for mechanical ventilation, but patients treated with MOL required oxygen supplementation less frequently than those without antivirals (31.7 vs. 49.2%). The time of hospitalization did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of molnupiravir in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 during the dominance of Omicron variant reduced mortality. This effect is particularly evident in patients over 80 years of age.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Hidroxilaminas , Antivirales/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA