Molecular background of novel silent RHCE alleles.

BACKGROUND: The absence of expression of C/c and E/e antigens has been associated with rare variant RHCE alleles, referred to as silent RHCE alleles, classically identified among individuals with a rare D- - or Rhnull phenotype. This work reports on different molecular mechanisms identified in three novel silent RHCE alleles. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Samples from D- - or Rhnull individuals and their family members, from families for whom Rh phenotype and/or serologic data were unexplained by inheritance of conventional RH alleles, were analyzed. Genomic DNA and transcripts were tested by sequencing analysis. RESULTS: The first silent allele was a RHCE*cE allele carrying an intronic IVS3+5G>A mutation. The second was a RHCE*ce allele carrying an intronic IVS7-2A>G mutation, whereas the third was a silent RHCE*ce allele carrying a 5-bp deletion (Nucleotides 679-683) in Exon 5. CONCLUSION: In addition to hybrid alleles and nucleotide deletion, intronic mutations may be associated with the nonexpression of RhCE antigens. Regarding the RH system, silent alleles may not be investigated among D- - or Rhnull individuals only. Rh phenotype and/or serologic data unexplained by inheritance of conventional RH alleles should lead to molecular investigations.

RHD*DOL1 and RHD*DOL2 encode a partial D antigen and are in cis with the rare RHCE*ceBI allele in people of African descent.

BACKGROUND: Several studies showed in people of African descent the existence of a genetic linkage between RHD alleles encoding a variant D antigen and a given altered RHCE*ce allele. RHCE*ceBI is a rare allele encountered in people of African descent, that encodes a Hr- hr(S) - Rhce protein. Our study shows that RHCE*ceBI appears to be genetically linked to two very similar variant RHD alleles, RHD*DOL1 and RHD*DOL2, and demonstrates for the first time that DOL-2 is a partial D antigen. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: After finding out an individual with both RHCE*ceBI and RHD*DOL presumed to be in cis, we hypothesized a genetic linkage between those two genes. All individuals (n = 7) known to carry RHCE*ceBI in our laboratory, including the index case, were fully investigated at the serologic and molecular level. RESULTS: One individual with alloanti-D, being homozygous for RHCE*ceBI and RHD*DOL2, allowed us to confirm the genetic linkage between those two genes, as well as the partial D status of DOL-2. In the six RHCE*ceBI remaining individuals, three were found with RHD*DOL2 and 3 with RHD*DOL1, likely in cis. Three of them made an alloanti-D; one was DOL-1 and two were DOL-2. CONCLUSION: The rare RHCE*ceBI allele appears to be in cis either with RHD*DOL1 or with RHD*DOL2 in people of African descent. DOL-1 and DOL-2 must be considered as partial D antigens. We recommend a systematic search for RHD*DOL1 and RHD*DOL2 in people found to carry RHCE*ceBI and vice versa, especially in patients with sickle cell disease.

Anti-U-like as an alloantibody in S-s-U- and S-s-U+(var) black people.

BACKGROUND: S, s, and U antigens belong to the MNS system. They are carried by glycophorin B (GPB), encoded by GYPB. Black people with the low-prevalence S-s- phenotype, either U- or U+(var), can make a clinically significant anti-U. Anti-U-like, a cold immunoglobulin G autoantibody quite commonly observed in S-s+U+ black persons, was previously described to be nonreactive with ficin-, α-chymotrypsin-, and pronase-treated red blood cells (RBCs); nonreactive or weakly reactive with papain-treated RBCs; and reactive with trypsin-treated RBCs. Here we describe, in S-s- people from different molecular backgrounds, an alloantibody to a high-prevalence GPB antigen, which presents the same pattern of reactivity with proteases as autoanti-U-like. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Four S-s- patients with an alloantibody to a high-prevalence GPB antigen were investigated by serologic and molecular methods. RESULTS: An alloantibody was observed in two S-s-U-/Del GYPB, one S-s-U+(var)/GYPB(P2), and one S-s-U+(var)/GYPB(NY) patients. As this alloantibody showed the same pattern of reactivity with proteases as autoanti-U-like, we decided to name it "anti-U-like." Anti-U-like made by the two S-s-U- patients was reactive with the S-s-U+(var) RBCs of the two other patients. CONCLUSION: S-s-U-/Del GYPB, S-s-U+(var)/GYPB(P2), and S-s-U+(var)/GYPB(NY) patients can make an alloanti-U-like. Anti-U-like made by S-s-U- people appears reactive with GYPB(P2) and GYPB(NY) RBCs, which both express a weak and partial U-like reactivity. We recommend transfusing S-s-U- RBCs in S-s-U- patients showing alloanti-U-like. Our study contributes to a better understanding of alloimmunization to GPB in black people and confirms importance of genotyping in S-s- patients, especially those with sickle cell disease to be frequently transfused.

Antibodies to co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim and/or sulfamethoxazole) related to the presence of the drug in a commercial low-ionic-strength solution.

BACKGROUND: Drug-dependent antibodies have been associated with approximately 10% of acquired immune hemolytic anemia cases. These antibodies are a rare cause of interference in pretransfusion red blood cell (RBC) serologic testing. The aim of this work was to report three cases of subjects developing antibodies against co-trimoxazole, a combination of trimethoprim (TMP) and sulfamethoxazole (SMX). CASE REPORT AND METHODS: Blood samples of donor/patients were referred to our laboratory for the exploration of a positive antibody detection test. There was no recent history of drug taking. Antibody identification was performed by gel test using an indirect antiglobulin test, with reagent RBCs in low-ionic-strength solutions (LISS) containing co-trimoxazole or not. RESULTS: All three sera showed positive reactions when RBCs were resuspended in LISS containing co-trimoxazole, but negative reactions when RBCs were resuspended in LISS without antibiotic. We detected antibodies against co-trimoxazole showing three different antibody patterns: anti-TMP plus anti-SMX, anti-TMP alone, or anti-SMX alone. Anti-TMP showed an apparent anti-Ku specificity in the two cases where it was present. Anti-SMX showed an apparent anti-H specificity in one of the two cases described. The drug-dependent antibodies were not associated with acquired hemolytic anemia or other pathologies. CONCLUSION: Antibodies against co-trimoxazole may only be detected when using a diluent for reagent RBCs containing the drug in question. Antibody pattern (anti-TMP and/or anti-SMX) may vary according to individuals' immune response. Drug-dependent antibodies may react as antibodies against a high-prevalence antigen, supporting the hypothesis of antibodies to drug and membrane components. Drug-dependent antibodies such as anti-co-trimoxazole may be a serologic finding without clinical features.

Analysis of RhCE variants among 806 individuals in France: considerations for transfusion safety, with emphasis on patients with sickle cell disease.

BACKGROUND: DNA testing has enabled the documenting of numerous variants of RHCE alleles, especially in individuals of African origin. The risk for production of clinically significant alloantibodies to Rh antigens of patients carrying variant RHCE alleles has led us to analyze the different RhCE variants investigated by molecular biology. Alloimmunization was analyzed regarding the RHCE genetic profile. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Samples from 806 individuals with altered expression of RhCE antigens and/or producing anti-RhCE in the presence of the corresponding antigen were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 572 individuals were shown to express RhCE variants. Variant RHCE*ce alleles and RH haplotypes were identified in 83% of cases, the most frequent ones being the R(N) haplotype, the ceMO allele, the (C)ce(s) haplotype/ce(s) 1006 allele, and the ceAR allele identified in 36, 23, 20, and 17% of the tested samples, respectively. The absence of a high-prevalence Rh antigen was documented in 93 individuals. Partial C and partial e were expressed by 53% of individuals with RhCE variants. Rh antibodies were identified in 127 (20%) of 623 patients. They were found to be alloantibodies in 48 (38%) of these 127 patients. Alloimmunization against a high-prevalence Rh antigen was detected in 25% of cases. CONCLUSION: The challenge in clinical red blood cell (RBC) transfusion of patients with sickle cell disease, notably, would be to provide not only phenotypically matched, but also genetically matched, RBC units regarding RhCE variants.

Blood group genotyping by high-throughput DNA analysis applied to 356 reagent red blood cell samples.

BACKGROUND: DNA analysis for the prediction of blood group antigen expression has broad implications in transfusion medicine. It may be of particular interest especially to detect variants, when antigen expression is weak or altered. The use of high-throughput DNA analysis has never been applied to donors whose red blood cells (RBCs) are selected for reagent RBCs. The aim of this study was to analyze the concordance between the serologic phenotype and that predicted from DNA analysis in panel donors, to determine the benefit of the use of DNA analysis in reagent RBC selection strategy. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The "Panel National de Référence du Centre National de Référence sur les Groupes Sanguins" is a reference reagent mainly used for antibody identification. DNA genotyping of 356 panel donors was performed with BeadChips (human erythrocyte antigen v1.2 BeadChips, BioArray Solutions). The comparison between serologic phenotype and that predicted from DNA analysis held on 8876 paired results obtained from 10 blood group systems and 25 antigens. RESULTS: A 99.95% concordance was observed. Discrepancies in four cases (RH, KEL, LU, and DO systems) were analyzed. Genotyping precisions on the Duffy system were of particular interest. No new rare blood group was observed. CONCLUSION: Systematic DNA analysis of panel donors should unquestionably change the management of reagent RBC selection. The notion of "antigens in double dose" should evolve regarding data obtained from DNA analysis, allowing an improved quality of reagent RBCs for antibody screening and identification.

Anti-D investigations in individuals expressing weak D Type 1 or weak D Type 2: allo- or autoantibodies?

BACKGROUND: Whether anti-D produced by individuals with a weak D phenotype are allo- or autoantibodies remains a matter of debate even though blood transfusion practice is impacted. The aim of our study was to determine the serologic features of anti-D in individuals expressing the most frequent weak D type in Caucasians that are weak D Type 1 or weak D Type 2, to assess whether anti-D were allo- or autoantibodies. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Serologic D typing and molecular analysis enabled the including of 121 weak D Type 1 individuals and 99 weak D Type 2 individuals in our study. Serologic features of anti-D included autologous controls, direct antiglobulin test, elution, and titration of anti-D before and after adsorption of serum on autologous red blood cells (RBCs). RESULTS: Serologic D typing showed a variable reactivity of RBCs expressing weak D Type 1 or weak D Type 2 (4+ to 0). Anti-D was identified in six weak D Type 1 and six weak D Type 2 individuals, respectively. The serologic data were in favor of autoantibodies. CONCLUSION: A complete anti-D investigation in individuals with a D variant (weak D or partial D identified by molecular analysis) should be systematically performed before any valid conclusion on the nature of the antibody. Transfusing weak D Type 1 or weak D Type 2 patients with D+ RBC units should be recommended. Weak D Type 1 or weak D Type 2 pregnant women do not need anti-D immunoprophylaxis.

Analysis of complement receptor type 1 expression on red blood cells in negative phenotypes of the Knops blood group system, according to CR1 gene allotype polymorphisms.

BACKGROUND: The KN blood group system, which consists of nine antigen specificities, is located on complement receptor Type 1 (CR1/CD35). CR1, a complement regulatory protein, acts as a vehicle for immune complex clearance. CR1 exhibits a red blood cell (RBC) density polymorphism. CR1 sites on RBCs in normal individuals range from 150 to 1200 molecules per cell. CR1 density polymorphism is regulated by HindIII restriction fragment length polymorphism and Q981H and P1786R polymorphisms in Caucasians. Yet, the role of the different polymorphisms in determining the CR1 density on RBCs remains unknown. The "null" serologic KN phenotype, known as Helgeson phenotype, was reported to be related with a very low CR1 density, less than 150 molecules per cell. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The aim of this work was to investigate whether the KN-negative phenotype displayed by 60 individuals was related to the CR1 density by performing the phenotypic and genetic analysis of CR1 and to investigate the molecular background associated with the KN system. RESULTS: We showed that the Helgeson-like phenotype had a prevalence of 12% in this population. The overall genotype/phenotype concordance was 90%. Among individuals with a KN-negative phenotype, the prevalences of Kn(a-), McC(a-), Sl1-negative, Sl3-negative, and KCAM-negative deduced phenotype were 37, 12, 29, 7, and 24%, respectively. CONCLUSION: From our data, we suggest that the definition of the Helgeson phenotype must be revised, since the latter may be due not only to a very low CR1 density on RBCs, but also to the absence of expression of a high-prevalence KN antigen.

Alloanti-c (RH4) revealing that the (C)ce s haplotype encodes a partial c antigen.

BACKGROUND: In the Rh blood group system, published observations showed that the c antigen has the fewest variant forms of the principal antigens in this system. The partial nature of the c antigen was only reported in c+ Rh:-26 persons and to be associated with the ce(s)(340) allele. This study reports the first case of alloanti-c related to a (C)ce(s) haplotype. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Serologic and genetic studies were performed on blood samples of a multitransfused 40-year-old African patient with sickle cell disease displaying a DCcee phenotype. RESULTS: Red blood cells (RBCs) of the patient displayed normal expression of C, c, e, ce antigens either with routine reagents or with monoclonal antibodies. Analyses of DNA and Rh transcripts showed that the patient carried a (C)ce(s)/DCe genotype. The patient's serum contained anti-D, anti-c, anti-E, anti-e, anti-V, anti-Js(a), and anti-S. Anti-c was isolated from the mixture of antibodies by using absorption and adsorption-elution techniques. Anti-c provided consistent reactions with c+ RBCs. Reactions were stronger with c+ ce+ RBCs than with c+ ce- RBCs. No agglutination of RBCs from individuals carrying a homozygous (C)ce(s) genotype was observed. CONCLUSION: These data provide the evidence that anti-c in our patient was an alloanti-c and, consequently, that (C)ce(s) haplotype encodes a partial c antigen. The clinical significance of anti-c related to this haplotype should be evaluated in the future.

Heterogeneous molecular background of the weak C, VS+, hr B-, Hr B- phenotype in black persons.

BACKGROUND: The rare Hr(B)- phenotype is encoded by the (C)ce(s) haplotype when present at the homozygous state. This haplotype contains two altered genes: a hybrid RHD-CE-D(s) gene segregated with a ce(s) allele of RHCE (733C>G and 1006G>T substitutions in Exon 5 and Exon 7 respectively). The aim of this study was to further investigate the molecular background of the (C)ce(s) haplotype. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twelve individuals with depressed C and/or depressed e phenotype were selected from their genomic DNA analysis showing both 733C>G and 1006G>T substitutions. Phenotypic expression of low- and high-prevalence Rh antigens was studied. Complete sequences of RHD and RHCE transcripts were analyzed when obtained. RESULTS: A new hybrid RHD-CE-D(s) gene (Exons 1 and 2; complete Exon 3; Exons 8, 9, and 10 from RHD; and Exons 4 through 7 from RHCE) segregated with a ce(s) allele, which genomic organization was almost identical to that of the classical (C)ce(s) haplotype, is described. The two different (C)ce(s) haplotypes encoded two different patterns of Rh antigen expression. Although both encoded weak e, VS, and did not produce D, V, hr(B), or Hr(B) antigens, the new haplotype encoded a much weaker C antigen and red blood cells lacked expression of Rh42, in contrast to the classic (C)ce(s) haplotype. CONCLUSION: The study showed the heterogeneity of the molecular background of the weak C, VS+, hr(B)-, Hr(B)- phenotype in the black population. The screening of blood donors in this population for hr(B)- or Hr(B)- phenotype should implement the molecular characterization of Rh genes.

Alloanti-c/ce in a c+ceAR/Ce patient suggests that the rare RHCE ceAR allele (ceAR) encodes a partial c antigen.

BACKGROUND: ceAR (RHCE ceAR) is a rare RH allele encountered in people of African/Caribbean ancestry, known to encode a partial e antigen. The homozygous ceAR/ceAR genotype encodes the rare blood group Hr-. This study describes alloanti-c/ce in a ceAR/Ce patient, suggesting that ceAR also encodes a partial c antigen. CASE REPORT: A 21-year-old patient suffering from intermediate beta-thalassemia, with transfusion history, was hospitalized for severe anemia. Blood samples were referred to the National Reference Laboratory for suspicion of a mixture of alloantibodies or an alloantibody to a high-prevalence antigen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standard hemagglutination methods were performed to investigate the patient's RBCs and serum. A molecular analysis of RHD and RHCE was carried out by allele-specific polymerase chain reaction and DNA sequencing. RESULTS: Blood type performed by the referring laboratory was B, D+C+E-c+e+, K-. Several antibodies were identified: anti-c/ce, anti-Fy(b), anti-Jk(a), and anti-S. Full serologic investigations showed that anti-c/ce could be very likely considered as an alloantibody. The patient's genotype was ceAR/Ce. Anti-c/ce reacted with ceAR/ceEK, ceEK/ceEK, and ceAR/ceBI but not with ceAR/ceAR, ceMO/ceMO, and ce(s)(340)/ce(s)(340) RBCs. CONCLUSION: This is the first case of alloanti-c/ce related to ceAR, suggesting that this rare RHCE allele encodes a partial c antigen. The presence of the C antigen in the patient allowed for the partial expression of the c antigen encoded by ceAR. The c antigen encoded by ceAR appeared to be different than that encoded by ceEK and ceBI and may share common lacking epitopes with the c antigens encoded by ceMO and ce(s)(340).

Anti-HrB and anti-hrb revisited.

BACKGROUND: Since their description in the 1970s, anti-Hr(B) (antibody against a high-prevalence Rh antigen) and anti-hr(B) (anti-e-like antibody) are still a subject of debate about representing two aspects of a global immune response or being two independent antibodies. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the immune response against the antigens of Rh system of 30 individuals presenting a hr(B)(RH31)- phenotype. Genomic analysis of RH genes was performed in all individuals. RESULTS: Among the 30 individuals, 27 had a Hr(B)(RH34)- phenotype. No immunization against Rh antigens was found in 16 individuals. Three individuals made anti-D only, whereas six individuals made anti-Hr(B) (four with anti-hr(B) and two without anti-hr(B)) and two individuals made anti-hr(B) without anti-Hr(B). Among the 30 individuals, three had a Hr(B)+ phenotype. No immunization against Rh antigens was found in one individual, whereas two individuals made anti-hr(B); the genomic analysis of selected individuals showed the presence of a (C)ce(s) haplotype, either Type 1 or Type 2, and a DIII Type 5 ce(s) haplotype, in the homozygous state, in compound heterozygosity with each other or in heterozygosity with a DcE haplotype. Genomic data were in accordance with serologic data. CONCLUSION: Our data provide the evidence that anti-Hr(B) and anti-hr(B) are independent antibodies, defining two different specificities. These antibodies may be produced by individuals expressing variants of RhCE protein. Serologic and molecular data indicate that e antigen encoded by the (C)ce(s) haplotype is a partial antigen. In individuals carrying a (C)ce(s) haplotype, the risk and the type of alloimmunization to Rh antigens are related to the second Rh haplotype.

Fatal hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn associated with anti-Jr.

BACKGROUND: Jr(a) is a high-prevalence red cell (RBC) antigen. The clinical significance of anti-Jr(a) is controversial. When hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) occurred, most reported cases were clinically mild. We report the first case of fatal HDFN due to anti-Jr(a). CASE REPORT: A 28-year-old Caucasian woman with transfusion history was monitored at the 29th week of pregnancy (G4P1). An ultrasound scan showed fetal cardiomegaly and hepatomegaly. An antibody directed against a high-prevalence antigen was detected, but without conclusive identification. An emergency cesarean section was performed at the 36th week. The newborn was hydropic and showed severe anemia. Death occurred 30 hours after birth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serologic methods were performed to investigate the mother's RBCs and serum. An in vitro functional cellular assay and semiquantitative measurement of anti-Jr(a) were used to determine the clinical significance of the antibody. RESULTS: Anti-Jr(a) was identified in the serum and Jr(a-) phenotype was confirmed. The anti-Jr(a) titer was 1024, with predominant immunoglobulin (Ig)G1 and minor IgG4 subclasses. The functional cellular assay was consistent with an antibody unlikely to cause HDFN. Semiquantitative measurement of anti-Jr(a) showed a reactivity equivalent to a 25 IU per mL (5 microg/mL) concentration of anti-D, a value associated with a significant risk of HDFN. CONCLUSION: This is the first documented case of fatal HDFN due to anti-Jr(a). Therefore, we recommend close monitoring of pregnant women with a high-titer anti-Jr(a), especially those with an incompatible transfusion history and/or multiple pregnancies. This case report provides new arguments about the clinical significance of anti-Jr(a) in the transfusion setting.

[Evaluation of the professional practices of physicians in transfusion technology and medicine]. / L'évaluation des pratiques professionnelles des médecins en technologie et médecine transfusionnelles.

The evaluation of the professional practices (EPP) is obligatory for all the physicians since July 1, 2005 for a first five-year period. It represents one of the components of the continuous medical training (CMT). The French Society of Blood Transfusion and National Institute of Blood Transfusion are the promoters of the EPP in transfusion technology and medicine. Initially, the programs of EPP will be conceived and controlled by experts and will relate to their basic activities. During a five years cycle, the physician taking part in a program must validate a specific action and take part in a rolling programme. At the end of the programme, the physician will receive a certificate issued by National Institute of Blood Transfusion and will have to submit it to a committee placed under the responsibility of the regional physicians' committee.

[Blood transfusion in the European Union: current status and future challenges]. / Bilan et evolution de la transfusion sanguine dans l'Union Européenne.

Blood transfusion is developing rapidly in the European Union. Though a compromise between technocrats, lobbies and blood transfusion professionals, the new specific EU directive (2002/98/EC) was a major step forward. In the future, blood transfusion in the EU must be centered on medical, scientific and social criteria, within a sound ethical and non commercial framework. Attention must be paid to the needs of patients and blood donors alike. The EuroNet-TMS survey is highly informative in this respect. National transfusion systems are extremely heterogeneous, ranging from public services to profit-oriented organizations. The approach to donors varies from one country and culture to another Some member states prescribe 2.5 times more blood products than others. Likewise, prevention and haemovigilance strategies are highly variable, with no attempt at harmonization.

Risk management in transfusion after the HIV blood contamination crisis in France: the impact of the precautionary principle.

The importance of the precautionary principle in public health was highlighted in France after the HIV contamination of blood products used for transfusion. However, the definition of this principle, its objectives, the way in which it should be applied, and its consequences had not been considered previously. The question as to whether the application of the precautionary principle is appropriate remains unanswered. The aim of this study was to analyze the interpretations of the application of the precautionary principle to determine its consequences in terms of risk management and patient rights. This was accomplished by interviewing persons involved in transfusion medicine. We conducted 33 interviews and describe the issues enunciated for and against the application of the precautionary principle. The precautionary principle concept was confusing to the respondents. A major issue emerging from the interviews was that the precautionary principle was perceived more as a means of protecting the decision maker than as a means of protecting the patient. Taken to its extreme, the use of the precautionary principle could prejudice sound medical decision making. However, it was felt that it also can lead to the introduction of measures that update and gradually reduce risks associated with transfusion.

[Informing the transfused patient of the possible transmission of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease by blood transfusion]. / L'obligation d'information du patient transfusé sur le risque potentiel de transmission de la variante de la maladie de Creutzfeldt-Jakob.

TRUE RISKS AND THEORETICAL RISKS: The texts ruling the obligation of the physician to inform the patient appears not to include theoretical risks in their application. In France however, the field of blood transfusions extends this obligation to the theoretical risk of potential transmission through the blood of the infectious agent responsible for Creutzfeldt-Jakob's disease. UNANSWERED QUESTIONS: From an ethical point of view, is information on the theoretical risk of transmission founded? From a formal point of view, the means used for such an extension (i.e.,a bulletin) is debatable; was this an adequate measure? THE RETURN OF COMMON SENSE: If we look at the earlier texts, the principle of an obligation to inform the patient of the theoretical risks does not appear widespread or even confirmed. Do these text simply the return of "common sense"? And if so, to what extent does it encourage the illusion of a zero risk...?