Validation of a Nutritional Screening Tool for Ambulatory Use in Pediatrics.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics (STAMP) in a primary health care clinic in the community and to assess the impact of its use on medical staff's awareness of nutritional status. METHODS: STAMP scoring system was tested as is and with modifications in the ambulatory setting. Nutritional risk according to STAMP was compared with a detailed nutritional assessment performed by a registered dietitian. Recording of nutrition-related data and anthropometric measurements in medical files were compared prior and post implementation. RESULTS: Sixty children were included (31 girls, 52%), ages between 1 and 6 years, mean age 2.8 ±â€Š1.5 (mean ±â€ŠSD). STAMP scores yielded a fair agreement between STAMP and the dietitian's nutritional assessment: κ = 0.47 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24-0.7), sensitivity of 47.62% (95% CI 28.34-67.63). Modified STAMP yielded more substantial agreement: κ = 0.57 (95% CI 0.35-0.79), sensitivity of 76.19% (95% CI 54.91-89.37), specificity of 82.05% (95% CI 67.33-91.02). The use of STAMP resulted in an increase in recording of appetite, dietary intake, and anthropometric measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Modification of the STAMP improved nutritional risk evaluation in community setting. The use of STAMP in a primary health care clinic raised clinician's awareness to nutritional status. Further work will identify whether this could be translated into lower malnutrition rates and better child care.

Validation and impact of paediatric malnutrition screening tool in hospitalised children on awareness of medical staff and health-related outcomes.

AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the use of the Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Paediatrics (STAMP) among children admitted in a paediatric hospital, and assess its impact on the nutritional status awareness among the medical staff and on health outcomes at discharge. METHODS: STAMP performed by nurses on admission was compared with full nutritional assessment performed by a dietitian. Area under the receiving operating characteristic (AUROC) curve was used to evaluate validity of the tool. To assess how the tool affected awareness among the staff, information on nutritional status was compared prior to and following the intervention period. Therewith, health outcomes at discharge were compared for the children who had been screened by STAMP and the children who had not. RESULTS: The analysis was performed for a total of 60 children (38 boys, 63%). The mean age was 7.8 ± 4.7 years. Malnutrition was found in 16% of patients, segregating equally between acute and chronic malnutrition. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 95.7% (95% confidence interval, CI = 85.75-98.83%), 76.9% (95% CI = 49.74-91.82%), 93.7 and 83.3, respectively. AUROC was 0.863 (95% CI = 0.72-1). There was no difference either in malnutrition awareness among the medical staff before and after the intervention period or in health outcomes at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: STAMP is a valid tool for malnutrition screening in hospitalised children; however, its use does not influence admitted patients' nutritional status awareness among the medical staff nor their outcomes at discharge.