Antiphospholipid antibody carriers and patients with quiescent antiphospholipid syndrome show persistent subclinical complement activation.

OBJECTIVES: Complement activation has been advocated as one mechanism by which antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) can induce thrombosis. In patients with catastrophic aPL syndrome or re-thrombosis, enhanced complement activation was shown, even in quiescent phase of the disease. We aimed to assess complement activation and to investigate its association to clinical variables in aPL positive patients with a favorable disease course. METHODS: Subjects with at least two consecutive positive aPL antibody results obtained ≥12 weeks apart were enrolled. They were subjects without history of thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity (aPL carriers), patients with pregnancy morbidity alone (OAPS), and/or with arterial, venous, or small-vessel thrombosis (TAPS); all patients should have been free of symptoms for ≥2 years. Patients affected with systemic autoimmune diseases were excluded. Healthy age and sex-matched subjects were included as controls. Plasma C5a and C5b-9 levels were assessed by commercially available ELISA assays. Non-parametric Mann-Whitney test and Spearman's correlation were applied. RESULTS: Thirty-seven OAPS, 38 TAPS, 42 aPL carriers, and 30 healthy subjects were enrolled. Median C5a and C5b-9 levels were significantly higher in quiescent aPL positive patients (OAPS, TAPS, aPL carriers) compared with controls: C5a ng/ml 10.61 (IQR 6.87-15.46) vs 4.06 (2.66-7.35), p< 0.001; C5b-9 ng/ml 283.95 (175.8-439.40) vs 165.90 (124.23-236.8), p< 0.001. Similar C5a and C5b-9 levels were observed in OAPS and TAPS patients and aPL carriers. A positive correlation between C5b-9 median levels and the number of aPL positive tests was found (p= 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The persistence of aPL antibodies is associated to a persistent subclinical activation of the complement cascade.

High plasma C5a and C5b-9 levels during quiescent phases are associated to severe antiphospholipid syndrome subsets.

OBJECTIVES: High plasma C5a and C5b-9 levels are considered a clear sign of complement activation. We aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of these two complement activation products during quiescent phases of thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) by comparing their plasma levels in the different clinical subsets and relating them to the clinical characteristics and antiphospholipid antibody profile of the patients. METHODS: The three patient subsets studied were: i) thrombotic patients responsive to anti-vitamin K therapy (TAPS); ii) patients with refractory to vitamin K antagonists recurrent thrombosis (RAPS); iii) patients diagnosed with catastrophic APS (CAPS). Plasma C5a and C5b-9 levels were assessed using commercial ELISA assays. RESULYTS: Sixty-two quiescent APS patients were recruited: 40 were affected by TAPS, 13 by RAPS and 9 by CAPS. Data analysis showed that the TAPS patients had significantly lower levels of both complement activation products with respect to the RAPS and CAPS patients. In addition, C5a and/or C5b-9 significantly prevailed in the patients with small-vessel thrombosis, just as C5b-9 did in the triple antiphospholipid antibody positive patients. The ROC curve showed that the best cut-offs for C5a and C5b-9 levels had a higher sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratio in the CAPS and RAPS groups than they did in the TAPS subset. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the persistence of high plasma C5b-9 and C5a levels during quiescent phases identifies APS patients with more severe disease who may develop rethrombosis and benefit from complement inhibition treatment during an acute disease phase.

The first thrombotic event in purely obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome patients and in antiphospholipid antibody carriers: comparison of incidence and characteristics.

PURPOSE: The long-term risk of thrombosis after pregnancy in women with purely obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS) is not well defined. The current study's primary outcome was to evaluate the incidence and characteristics of the first thrombotic event in OAPS, identifying the risk factors for thrombosis in OAPS was its secondary one. METHODS: Patients with purely OAPS were consecutively enrolled between September 1999 and September 2019. Subjects without a history of pregnancy morbidity or thrombosis but with persistent positivity for one or more antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL carriers) made up the control group. The study groups included 94 OAPS patients and 124 aPL carriers who were matched for clinical and laboratory parameters. RESULTS: An event rate of 0.49/100 patient years was registered in OAPS patients during a mean follow-up of 8.7 years ± 5.5 SD. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that the cumulative incidence of thromboembolic events was not significantly different in OAPS patients vs aPL carriers. Arterial thrombosis and cerebrovascular events were the more frequent types of vascular involvement in the two groups. As far as risk factors for thrombosis were concerned, the presence of lupus anticoagulant significantly prevailed in both thrombotic OAPS patients and thrombotic aPL carriers with respect to purely OAPS patients and aPL carriers who did not develop thrombosis (p = 0.01 and p = 0.00, respectively). CONCLUSION: Just as for aPL carriers, closer monitoring and possibly, a pharmacological prophylaxis should be reserved for OAPS patients at highest risk of developing the first thrombotic event.

Bleeding and antithrombotic therapy during pregnancy in women with poor aPL-related obstetric outcomes: A survey of 1075 cases from EUROAPS registry∗.

BACKGROUND: The combination of low-dose aspirin (LDA) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) until the end of gestation are the currently the accepted standard of care for the treatment of antiphospholipid-related obstetric disorders. In refractory cases, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) can be added to this standard of care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the haemostatic safety of LDA and LMWH (medium to high prophylactic doses) during pregnancy and the puerperium in women with both full-blown obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS) (Sydney criteria) and noncriteria - incomplete - OAPS. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective/prospective multicentre observational study. Obstetric background, laboratory categories, delivery mode, antithrombotic regimens and bleeding complications were compared. SETTING: A total of 30 tertiary European hospitals. PATIENTS: Mainly, Caucasian/Arian pregnant women were included. Other ethnicities were minimally present. Women were controlled throughout pregnancy and puerperium. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end-point was to evaluate the number of major and minor haemorrhagic complications in this cohort of women. Neuraxial anaesthetic bleeding complications were particularly assessed. Secondly, we aimed to compare local/general bleeding events between groups. RESULTS: We studied 1650 women, of whom 1000 fulfilled the Sydney criteria of the OAPS and 650 did not (noncriteria OAPS). Data on antithrombotic-related complications were available in 1075 cases (65.15%). Overall, 53 (4.93%) women had bleeding complications, with 34 being considered minor (3.16%) and 19 major (1.76%). Neither obstetric complications nor laboratory categories were bleeding-related. Assisted vaginal delivery and caesarean section were related to local haemorrhage. Heparin doses and platelet count were not associated with major bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: LDA and medium to high prophylactic LMWH during pregnancy in women with full-blown OAPS/noncriteria OAPS are safe. A slight increase in bleeding risk was noted in instrumental deliveries. No women who underwent spinal or epidural anaesthesia suffered bleeding complications. No haemorrhage was observed in cases where HCQ was added to standard therapy.

Comparative study of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS) and non-criteria obstetric APS (NC-OAPS): report of 1640 cases from the EUROAPS registry.

OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical features, laboratory data and fetal-maternal outcomes between 1000 women with obstetric APS (OAPS) and 640 with aPL-related obstetric complications not fulfilling Sydney criteria (non-criteria OAPS, NC-OAPS). METHODS: This was a retrospective and prospective multicentre study from the European Registry on Obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome. RESULTS: A total of 1650 women with 5251 episodes, 3601 of which were historical and 1650 latest episodes, were included. Altogether, 1000 cases (OAPS group) fulfilled the Sydney classification criteria and 650 (NC-OAPS group) did not. Ten NC-OAPS cases were excluded for presenting thrombosis during follow-up. All cases were classified as category I (triple positivity or double positivity for aPL) or category II (simple positivity). Overall, aPL laboratory categories showed significant differences: 29.20% in OAPS vs 17.96% in NC-OAPS (P < 0.0001) for category I, and 70.8% in OAPS vs 82% in NC-OAPS (P < 0.0001) for category II. Significant differences were observed when current obstetric complications were compared (P < 0.001). However, major differences between groups were not observed in treatment rates, livebirths and thrombotic complications. In the NC-OAPS group, 176/640 (27.5%) did not fulfil Sydney clinical criteria (subgroup A), 175/640 (27.34%) had a low titre and/or non-persistent aPL positivity but did meet the clinical criteria (subgroup B) and 289/640 (45.15%) had a high aPL titre but did not fulfil Sydney clinical criteria (subgroup C). CONCLUSION: Significant clinical and laboratory differences were found between groups. Fetal-maternal outcomes were similar in both groups when treated. These results suggest that we could improve our clinical practice with better understanding of NC-OAPS patients.

Rivaroxaban vs warfarin in high-risk patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.

Rivaroxaban is an effective and safe alternative to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. We tested the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in high-risk patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome. This is a randomized open-label multicenter noninferiority study with blinded end point adjudication. Rivaroxaban, 20 mg once daily (15 mg once daily based on kidney function) was compared with warfarin (international normalized ratio target 2.5) for the prevention of thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and vascular death in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. Only high-risk patients triple positive for lupus anticoagulant, anti-cardiolipin, and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I antibodies of the same isotype (triple positivity) were included in the study. The trial was terminated prematurely after the enrollment of 120 patients (59 randomized to rivaroxaban and 61 to warfarin) because of an excess of events among patients in the rivaroxaban arm. Mean follow-up was 569 days. There were 11 (19%) events in the rivaroxaban group, and 2 (3%) events in the warfarin group. Thromboembolic events occurred in 7 (12%) patients randomized to rivaroxaban (4 ischemic stroke and 3 myocardial infarction), whereas no event was recorded in those randomized to warfarin. Major bleeding occurred in 6 patients: 4 (7%) in the rivaroxaban group and 2 (3%) in the warfarin group. No death was reported. The use of rivaroxaban in high-risk patients with antiphospholipid syndrome was associated with an increased rate of events compared with warfarin, thus showing no benefit and excess risk. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02157272.

Fluorinated steroids are not superior to any treatment to ameliorate the outcome of autoimmune mediated congenital heart block: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Fluorinated steroids are largely the therapeutic approach of autoimmune mediated congenital heart block (CHB). We performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of fluorinated steroids for the treatment of CHB. METHODS: Studies evaluating the efficacy of fluorinated steroids versus no treatment in CHB patients were identified in electronic databases. Random-effects model was used to pool odds ratio (OR) (with 95% CI) of live births as the primary outcome. ORs of CHB progression, pacemaker implantation and extranodal disease were the secondary outcome. Subgroup analysis according to CHB grade and study type was performed. RESULTS: Data from nine studies involving 747 patients were analysed. The overall live birth rates were 86.8% and 86.7%, respectively, in the fluorinated steroids exposed foetuses and in the non-exposed ones. Fluorinated steroids did not ameliorate overall survival in CHB (OR 1.02; 95% CI: 0.65-1.61) with any significant statistical heterogeneity between studies (I2 0%, p=0.45). No significant differences for the progression of CHB, the pacing and the presence of extranodal disease were observed. Subgroup analysis revealed a significant protective role of fluorinated steroids for survival in 3rd degree CHB and for pacing in monocentric studies, OR 4.07; 95% CI: 1.10-15.08 and OR 0.15; 95% CI: 0.02-0.99, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows that fluorinated steroids are not superior to any treatment in patients with CHB in terms of live birth, prevention of progression of incomplete CHB, pacemaker implantation and extranodal disease. Thus, considering their side effects, their use in CHB patients should be discouraged.

Therapeutic apheresis during pregnancy: A single center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic apheresis (TA) represents a treatment option for pre-existing conditions or diseases occurring during gestation. Although pregnancy is not a contraindication per se, due to the lack of evidence-based guidelines and presumed risk of maternal/fetal adverse events there is a general resistance to its application. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 2005 and August 2017, at the Apheresis Unit of the University Hospital of Padua 936 TA procedures were performed during 57 pregnancies in 48 patients: 813 Plasma Exchange sessions, 119 Immunoadsorptions, 4 Red Blood Cell exchanges. The treated disease were as follows: antiphospholipid syndrome (18 patients), autoimmune congenital heart block (18), myasthenia gravis (3), Rh alloimmunization (2), systemic sclerosis (1), suspected autoimmune encephalitis (1), severe hypertriglyceridaemia (1), post partum hemolytic-uremic syndrome (1), sickle cell disease (1), lupus nephritis (1) and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (1). RESULTS: In the time period considered the apheresis sessions applied to pregnant women were 7.1% of the total (n = 13.251). The median age at the first treatment was 33 years. The median week of gestation (WG) at the beginning of treatments was 21. Twenty (2.1%) sessions were complicated by adverse events, none requiring or prolonging hospitalization. There were 50 live births, 5 spontaneous abortions and 2 voluntary terminations of pregnancy. Median WG at delivery was 35 and caesarean section was performed in 46 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that TA in pregnancy is well tolerated. Close collaboration between clinician, obstetrician and TA specialist is crucial to ensure a good outcome of high-risk pregnancies.

The treatment of anti-phospholipid syndrome: A comprehensive clinical approach.

Anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired pro-thrombotic autoimmune disease that predisposes to thrombotic events and/or obstetric complications, in the persistent presence of anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL). Life long moderate-intensity anticoagulation is the option of choice for aPL-positive patients with a previous thrombosis; critical issues concern the management of those with a history of arterial event due to the high rate of recurrence. Alternatives comprise anti-platelet agents and high-intensity anticoagulation. Low dose aspirin (LDASA) and low molecular weight heparin provide the mainstay of the treatment of obstetric APS, allowing a birth rate in 70% of cases. The management of refractory APS, thrombotic as well as obstetric, is highly debated, but an increasing burden of evidence points towards the beneficial effects of multiple treatments. Similarly, a management envisaging multiple drugs (anticoagulation, steroids, plasma exchange and/or intravenous immunoglobulins) is the most effective approach in catastrophic APS. Asymptomatic aPL carriers are at higher risk of thrombotic and obstetric complications compared to the general population, thus potentially benefitting of a pharmacological intervention. LDASA and hydroxychloroquine can be considered as options, in particular in case of high risk aPL profile, concomitant cardiovascular risk factors or associated autoimmune disease. APS is apparently a simple condition, but its multifaceted nature requires a complex and tailored treatment.

Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome: Lessons from 14 cases successfully treated in a single center. A narrative report.

The study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of laboratory findings in patients with catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) and to report the effects of a well-defined treatment protocol in 14 consecutive cases. Thirteen patients (12 presenting one and one presenting two episodes of CAPS) were consecutively treated and monitored between 1986 and 2017. Antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) characteristics of the patients were compared with those of 64 matched controls (45 antiphospholipid syndrome patients and 19 aPL carriers) who did not develop CAPS during the same mean follow-up period (12 years ±â€¯9.9 SD). Triple aPL positivity (IgG/IgM anticardiolipin + IgG/IgM anti-ß2Glycoprotein I + lupus anticoagulants) significantly prevailed in the CAPS patients with respect to the controls (p = 0.003). IgG anticardiolipin and IgG anti-ß2Glycoprotein I mean antibody titers of the CAPS patients were significantly higher than those of the controls (p = 0.0018 and p = 0.003, respectively). Triple therapy (anticoagulation + plasma exchange + steroids) was administered to all the CAPS cases except for one. Beginning in 2009, intravenous immunoglobulin infusion has also been included in the triple therapy protocol (six patients). All the patients recovered from CAPS; five showed renal failure and one a I-II class New York Heart Association (NYHA) dilated cardiomyopathy. Long-term outcomes of CAPS included a gradual worsening of renal failure in one patient who required hemodialysis 30 years after the acute episode. Renal function improved in the other four patients. The patient affected with dilated cardiomyopathy worsened to a II class NYHA over a five year period. Currently all the patients are alive. A specific antiphospholipid antibody profile could be considered a risk factor associated to CAPS. Early use of a defined treatment protocol based on triple therapy either or not associated with IVIG was associated with recovery in all CAPS patients.

Beyond thrombosis: Anti-ß2GPI domain 1 antibodies identify late pregnancy morbidity in anti-phospholipid syndrome.

Antibodies against ß2 glycoprotein I (anti-ß2GPI) have been identified as the main pathogenic autoantibody subset in anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS); the most relevant epitope is a cryptic and conformation-dependent structure on ß2GPI domain (D) 1. Anti-ß2GPI domain profiling has been investigated in thrombotic APS, leading to the identification of antibodies targeting D1 as the main subpopulation. In contrast, scarce attention has been paid to obstetric APS, hence this study aimed at characterizing the domain reactivity with regards to pregnancy morbidity (PM). To this end, 135 women with persistently positive, medium/high titre anti-ß2GPI IgG, without any associated systemic autoimmune diseases and at least one previous pregnancy were included: 27 asymptomatic carriers; 53 women with obstetric APS; 20 women with thrombotic APS; and 35 women with both thrombotic and obstetric complications. Anti-D1 and anti-D4/5 antibodies were tested using a chemiluminescent immunoassay and a research ELISA assay, respectively (QUANTA Flash® ß2GPI Domain 1 IgG and QUANTA Lite® ß2GPI D4/5 IgG, Inova Diagnostics). Positivity for anti-D1 antibodies, but not anti-D4/5 antibodies, was differently distributed across the 4 subgroups of patients (p < 0.0001) and significantly correlated with thrombosis (χ2 = 17.28, p < 0.0001) and PM (χ2 = 4.28, p = 0.039). Patients with triple positivity for anti-phospholipid antibodies displayed higher anti-D1 titres and lower anti-D4/5 titres compared to women with one or two positive tests (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.005, respectively). Reactivity against D1 was identified as a predictor for PM (OR 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-5.0, p = 0.017); in particular, anti-D1 antibodies were predictive of late PM, conveying an odds ratio of 7.3 (95% CI 2.1-25.5, p = 0.022). Positivity for anti-D1 antibodies was not associated with early pregnancy loss. Anti-D4/5 antibodies were not associated with clinical APS manifestations. As a whole, our data suggest that anti-D1 antibodies are significantly associated not only with thrombosis, but also with late PM, while positive anti-D4/5 antibodies are not predictive of thrombosis or PM.

Detection of autoantibodies to the p200-epitope of SSA/Ro52 antigen. A comparison of two laboratory assays.

BACKGROUND: Anti-p200 antibodies have been receiving growing interest in view of findings associating their presence to risk of fetal autoimmune congenital heart block (CHB). The study compares and evaluates the performance of two assays currently being used for their detection. METHODS: One hundred and sixteen pregnant women positive for anti-SSA/Ro52 antibodies were considered as the study population. Fifty women negative for anti-SSA/Ro52 antibodies were considered as the control population. Anti-p200 antibodies were analyzed using two home-made ELISA assays: one with biotinylated antigen and the other with free antigen. RESULTS: The specificity of the p200-free assay was significantly higher with respect to that of the p200-biotin assay (p=0.023). Both methods showed a high area under curve (AUC), thus, a good accuracy. There was a significant prevalence of anti-p200 antibodies when the p200-free assay was used to analyze the sera of the pregnant women with CHB fetuses (p=0.007). Cohen's κ and Spearman's ρ coefficients showed a good concordance (0.71) and a high correlation (0.93), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The p200-free assay with respect to the biotin-based method was more specific in detecting p200 antibodies in women positive for anti-SSA/Ro52 antibodies. In addition, only the p200-free method significantly found p200 antibodies in patients with fetal CHB.

Antiphospholipid antibody profile based obstetric outcomes of primary antiphospholipid syndrome: the PREGNANTS study.

BACKGROUND: Antiphospholipid syndrome is an autoimmune, hypercoagulable state that is caused by antiphospholipid antibodies. Anticardiolipin antibodies, anti-ß2 glycoprotein-I, and lupus anticoagulant are the main autoantibodies found in antiphospholipid syndrome. Despite the amassed body of clinical knowledge, the risk of obstetric complications that are associated with specific antibody profile has not been well-established. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the risk of obstetric complications in women with primary antiphospholipid syndrome that is associated with specific antibody profile. STUDY DESIGN: The Pregnancy In Women With Antiphospholipid Syndrome study is a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study. Diagnosis and classification of antiphospholipid syndrome were based on the 2006 International revised criteria. All women included in the study had at least 1 clinical criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome, were positive for at least 1 antiphospholipid antibody (anticardiolipin antibodies, anti-ß2 glycoprotein-I, and/or lupus anticoagulant), and were treated with low-dose aspirin and prophylactic low molecular weight heparin from the first trimester. Only singleton pregnancies with primary antiphospholipid syndrome were included. The primary outcome was live birth, defined as any delivery of a live infant after 22 weeks gestation. The secondary outcomes were preeclampsia with and without severe features, intrauterine growth restriction, and stillbirth. We planned to assess the outcomes that are associated with the various antibody profile (test result for lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, and anti-ß2 glycoprotein-I). RESULTS: There were 750 singleton pregnancies with primary antiphospholipid syndrome in the study cohort: 54 (7.2%) were positive for lupus anticoagulant only; 458 (61.0%) were positive for anticardiolipin antibodies only; 128 (17.1%) were positive for anti-ß2 glycoprotein-I only; 90 (12.0%) were double positive and lupus anticoagulant negative, and 20 (2.7%) were triple positive. The incidence of live birth in each of these categories was 79.6%, 56.3%, 47.7%, 43.3%, and 30.0%, respectively. Compared with women with only 1 antibody positive test results, women with multiple antibody positive results had a significantly lower live birth rate (40.9% vs 56.6%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.90). Also, they were at increased risk of preeclampsia without (54.5% vs 34.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.95) and with severe features (22.7% vs 13.8%, adjusted odds ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-2.49), of intrauterine growth restriction (53.6% vs 40.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.61) and of stillbirth (36.4% vs 21.7%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-2.94). In women with only 1 positive test result, women with anti-ß2 glycoprotein-I positivity present alone had a significantly lower live birth rate (47.7% vs 56.3% vs 79.6%; P<.01) and a significantly higher incidence of preeclampsia without (47.7% vs 34.1% vs 11.1%; P<.01) and with severe features (17.2% vs 14.4% vs 0%; P=.02), intrauterine growth restriction (48.4% vs 40.1% vs 25.9%; P<.01), and stillbirth (29.7% vs 21.2% vs 7.4%; P<.01) compared with women with anticardiolipin antibodies and with women with lupus anticoagulant present alone, respectively. In the group of women with >1 antibody positivity, triple-positive women had a lower live birth rate (30% vs 43.3%; adjusted odds ratio,0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.91) and a higher incidence of intrauterine growth restriction (70.0% vs 50.0%; adjusted odds ratio,2.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-2.99) compared with double positive and lupus anticoagulant negative women. CONCLUSION: In singleton pregnancies with primary antiphospholipid syndrome, anticardiolipin antibody is the most common sole antiphospholipid antibody present, but anti-ß2 glycoprotein-I is the one associated with the lowest live birth rate and highest incidence of preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, and stillbirth, compared with the presence of anticardiolipin antibodies or lupus anticoagulant alone. Women with primary antiphospholipid syndrome have an increased risk of obstetric complications and lower live birth rate when <1 antiphospholipid antibody is present. Despite therapy with low-dose aspirin and prophylactic low molecular weight heparin, the chance of a liveborn neonate is only 30% for triple-positive women.

Antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies as biomarkers to identify severe primary antiphospholipid syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies have begun to be considered potentional biomarkers for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). This cohort study investigate the role of aPS/PT antibodies as a risk factor for severe APS by evaluating the association between those antibodies and clinical/laboratory profiles of APS. METHODS: Plasma/serum samples from 197 APS patients, 100 healthy subjects and 106 patients with autoimmune diseases were collected. IgG/IgM aPS/PT antibodies were assayed using commercial ELISA kit. RESULTS: Prevalences of IgG and IgM aPS/PT (p<0.0001 and p=0.0009, respectively) and their titres (p<0.0001 and p=0.0002, respectively) were significantly higher in thrombosis/pregnancy group with respect to pregnancy morbidity alone. Prevalences of IgG and IgM aPS/PT (p<0.0001 and p=0.0004, respectively) and their mean levels (p=0.0001 for both) were significantly higher in the prematurity linked to life-threatening obstetric complications group with respect to miscarriage group. There was a significant relationship between IgG and IgM aPS/PT (p=0.001 and p=0.0002) and their mean levels were higher (p=0.0004 and p=0.0002, respectively) in the thrombotic microangiopathy group, considered a milestone manifestation of catastrophic APS. The relationship between IgG and IgM aPS/PT was significant and mean levels were higher in triple positive antiphospholipid antibody patients than in double and single positivity ones (p<0.0001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: APS/PT antibodies were associated to severe thrombosis, severe pregnancy complications inducing prematurity, and vascular microangiopathy, all generally associated to high risk APS forms requiring strong therapy.

Plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulins and bethametasone - a combined protocol to treat autoimmune congenital heart block: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: At the moment there are no standard guidelines for the treatment of autoimmune congenital heart block (CHB). We set out to carry out a prospective cohort study to evaluate the benefits, limits, and safety of a combined therapy protocol to treat antibody-related CHB. METHODS: Twelve consecutive pregnant patients positive to anti-SSA/Ro ± anti-SSB/La antibodies in whom CHB was detected were prospectively evaluated from 2009 to 2014. The treatment protocol consisted of: weekly plasmapheresis, fortnightly intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), and daily 4 mg betamethasone from CHB detection until delivery; IVIG was administered to the neonates soon after birth. RESULTS: At the time CHB was detected, six of the foetuses presented atrioventricular blocks of 2(nd) degree type and six of 3(rd) degree type. Two of the foetuses with a 2(nd) degree block reverted to a 1st degree block and one to a normal atrioventricular conduction. The condition was stable throughout the pregnancy in the other three cases of 2(nd) degree block. All six 3(rd) degree blocks were stable during pregnancy and confirmed at birth. After a mean of 37.6 months ± 19.6 SD post-birth, the infants with 1st, normal sinus rhythm, and 2(nd) degree blocks at birth were all found to be stable. During the follow-up (29 months ± 19.8 SD), pacemakers were implanted in three of the six infants with 3(rd) degree blocks. CONCLUSIONS: This combined therapy seems to be effective and safe in treating 2(nd) degree CHB, while its efficacy in treating 3rd degree CHB remains to be established.

The efficacy of adalimumab in psoriatic arthritis concomitant to overlapping primary biliary cholangitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The overlap syndrome of primary biliary cholangitis (formerly called primary biliary cirrhosis) and primary sclerosing cholangitis is an extremely rare condition that has never been described in association with other immune-mediated diseases, including psoriatic arthritis. While treatment with anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α) agents has proved to be effective in inflammatory arthropathies such as psoriatic arthritis, they have been employed in only a limited number of patients with autoimmune hepatitis, and their effectiveness is unclear. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 51-year-old female affected with psoriatic arthritis concomitant to overlapping primary biliary cholangitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis in whom 28 months of adalimumab treatment improved the symptoms of the inflammatory arthropathy as well as those of both cholangiopathies. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that further studies examining the therapeutic role of this particular TNF-α blocker are warranted in cholestatic autoimmune hepatitis patients, and in particular in those individuals in whom the disease is associated with inflammatory arthropathies.

Plasma exchange effectively removes 52- and 60-kDa anti-Ro/SSA and anti-La/SSB antibodies in pregnant women with congenital heart block.

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women positive for 52- and 60-kDa anti-Ro/SSA and anti-La/SSB antibodies can suffer from congenital heart block (CHB), a passively acquired autoimmune disease. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We evaluated the efficacy of plasma exchange (PE) in removing 52- and 60-kDa anti-Ro/SSA and anti-La/SSB antibodies in pregnant women with CHB treated with a combined therapy including PE, intravenous immunoglobulins, and steroids. Antibody levels were monitored in 10 consecutive pregnant women diagnosed with CHB and prospectively followed between 2009 and 2013. Assaying was performed using a homemade enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test on blood samples collected immediately before and after PE sessions. RESULTS: A significant decrease in mean post-PE antibody levels was noted in all the cases examined. An analysis of antibody level trends in the samples collected before PE sessions showed that there was a steady, significant decrease in 90% of the patients with 52-kDa anti-Ro/SSA, in 80% of those with 60-kDa anti-Ro/SSA antibodies, and in 100% of those with anti-La/SSB antibodies. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that PE is effective in removing antibodies linked to the pathogenesis of CHB. PE treatment was found to have a long-term efficacy in all the women positive for anti-La/SSB antibodies and in most of the women positive for 52- and 60-kDa anti-Ro/SSA antibodies. It is interesting that the significant, immediate, and long-term fall in antibody levels that was observed in these patients took place in all the women whose CHB was reversed. This finding could give PE an important role in the treatment of CHB.

Relationship between antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin and conventional antiphospholipid antibodies in primary antiphospholipid syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin complex (aPS/PT) antibodies are emerging as an important marker for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). We aimed to compare their performance with that of conventional antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) such as lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL), and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (anti-ß2GPI) in APS and to assess their frequency in APS-negative (APS-ne) patients. METHODS: We considered 160 APS patients and 128 APS-ne patients with clinical criteria for APS but tested negative for conventional aPL. Immunoglobulin (Ig)G/IgM aPS/PT, IgG/IgM aCL, and IgG/IgM anti-ß2GPI were detected using ELISA assay and LA with a series of coagulation tests. RESULTS: IgG aPS/PT were significantly associated with IgG aCL, IgG anti-ß2GPI, and LA (p<0.0001 for all). IgM aPS/PT were significantly associated only with LA (p<0.0001) instead. There was a significant correlation between IgG aPS/PT and both IgG aCL and IgG anti-ß2GPI levels (ρ=0.42 and ρ=0.40, respectively). Both IgG aPS/PT and IgM aPS/PT positivity significantly correlated with LA (ρ=0.44 and ρ=0.5, respectively). IgG and IgM aPS/PT were significantly more frequent in triple than in double and in single positivity (p<0.0001). According to multivariate analysis, IgG and/or IgM aPS/PT were independent risk factors for LA. APS/PT antibodies were found in 9.4% of the APS-ne patients vs. 2% of healthy control (p=0.043); those antibodies were significantly more frequent in the thrombosis with respect to the pregnancy morbidity subset (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our data attribute a clinical relevance to both IgG and IgM aPS/PT antibodies. In particular, the significant prevalence of aPS/PT in APS-ne patients suggests including them as additional laboratory criterion for APS.