Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 31(2): 161-6, 1981 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6970019

RESUMEN

Heparin anticoagulation and its neutralization were monitored by three different techniques: a manual protamine titration, an automated activated coagulation time, and an automated protamine titration. All three techniques provided satisfactory information. The decision of which to use must be based on other considerations such as available manpower and cost of equipment. The effect of using the automated protamine titration test on heparin and protamine requirements, and on blood loss measured intraoperatively after bypass and in overnight chest bottle drainage in two groups of comparable patients undergoing coronary artery bypass operation was studied. The heparin requirements were similar (24,420 +/- 584 units, control group; 23,550 +/- 849 units, treatment group), but the protamine requirements were markedly different (429 +/- 14.7 mg, control; 258 +/- 10.4 mg, treatment; p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in intraoperative blood loss or overnight chest bottle drainage.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas de Coagulación Sanguínea/métodos , Heparina/sangre , Protaminas/sangre , Autoanálisis , Niño , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Cardiopatías Congénitas/cirugía , Hemorragia/diagnóstico , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tiempo de Coagulación de la Sangre Total
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA