Efficacy of Therapy for Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Real-World Practice.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Topical steroids, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and dietary interventions are recommended first- and second-line therapies for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We investigated differences in their effectiveness in a real-world, clinical practice cohort of patients with EoE. METHODS: We collected data on the efficacy of different therapies for EoE (ability to induce clinical and histologic remission) from the multicenter EoE CONNECT database-a database of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of EoE in Europe that began in 2016. We obtained data from 589 patients, treated at 11 centers, on sex, age, time of diagnosis, starting date of any therapy, response to therapy, treatment end dates, alternative treatments, and findings from endoscopy. The baseline endoscopy was used for diagnosis of EoE; second endoscopy was performed to evaluate response to first-line therapies. After changes in treatment, generally because lack of efficacy, a last endoscopy was performed. The time elapsed between endoscopies depended on the criteria of attending physicians. Clinical remission was defined by a decrease of more than 50% in Dysphagia Symptom Score; improvement in symptoms by less than 50% from baseline was considered as clinical response. Histologic remission was defined as a peak eosinophil count below 5 eosinophils/hpf. A peak eosinophil count between 5 and 14 eosinophils/hpf was considered histologic response. We identified factors associated with therapy selection and effectiveness using χ2 and multinomial logistic regression analyses RESULTS: PPIs were the first-line treatment for 76.4% of patients, followed by topical steroids (for 10.5%) and elimination diets (for 7.8%). Topical steroids were most effective in inducing clinical and histologic remission or response (in 67.7% of patients), followed by empiric elimination diets (in 52.0%), and PPIs (in 50.2%). Among the 344 patients who switched to a second-line therapy, dietary interventions were selected for 47.1% of patients, followed by PPIs (for 29.1%) and topical steroids (for 18.6%). Clinical and histologic remission or response was achieved by 80.7% of patients treated with topical steroids, 69.2% of patients given PPIs, and 41.7% of patients on empiric elimination diets. Multivariate analyses found the stricturing phenotype of EoE to be associated with selection of topical steroids over PPIs as the first-line therapy; lack of fibrotic features at initial endoscopy was associated with selection of elimination diets over topical steroids as a second-line therapy. The recruiting center was significantly associated with therapy choice; second-line treatment with topical steroids or PPIs were the only variables associated with clinical and histologic remission. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of data from a large cohort of patients with EoE in Europe, we found topical steroids to be the most effective at inducing clinical and histologic remission, but PPIs to be the most frequently prescribed. Treatment approaches vary with institution and presence of fibrosis or strictures.

Comparison of a new rapid method for the determination of adalimumab serum levels with two established ELISA kits.

Background Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of adalimumab (ADA) in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) has gained increased attention since several studies showed a correlation between drug levels and mucosal healing. The limitations of routine usage of enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA) kits for measuring serum ADA concentrations have prompted the development of rapid methods, such as Quantum Blue (QB). We evaluated the interchangeability and agreement between the QB method and two established ELISA kits, Promonitor (PM) and Lisa-Tracker (LT). Methods Fifty samples from patients with IBD were included. Quantitative analysis was performed using the ANOVA test for repeated measures, Deming regression and the Bland-Altman plot. Clinical implications were evaluated by concordance in classifying patients into therapeutic windows according to the proposed cut-off levels for subtherapeutic (either <5 or <7.5 µg/mL) and supratherapeutic (>12 µg/mL) ranges. Results Statistical differences were detected between the QB method and the two ELISA kits, with QB overestimating ADA serum values compared to them. A lack of interchangeability was observed between methods, with greater differences as ADA levels increased. An analysis of a sub-set of samples with ADA values below 9 µg/mL (n = 25) showed that QB fulfilled the criteria to be interchangeable with the LT assay. Concordance for patient classification into ADA therapeutic windows was better for QB vs. LT than for QB vs. PM, with high agreement (>75%) for subtherapeutic levels among the three methods. Conclusions Although quantitative differences existed between the rapid method and ELISA kits that hampered their interchangeability, the agreement for identifying patients with subtherapeutic values of ADA was high.

Exploring candidate biomarkers for rheumatoid arthritis through cardiovascular and cardiometabolic serum proteome profiling.

Introduction: RA patients are at higher risk of cardiovascular disease, influenced by therapies. Studying their cardiovascular and cardiometabolic proteome can unveil biomarkers and insights into related biological pathways. Methods: This study included two cohorts of RA patients: newly diagnosed individuals (n=25) and those with established RA (disease duration >25 years, n=25). Both cohorts were age and sex-matched with a control group (n=25). Additionally, a longitudinal investigation was conducted on a cohort of 25 RA patients treated with methotrexate and another cohort of 25 RA patients treated with tofacitinib for 6 months. Clinical and analytical variables were recorded, and serum profiling of 184 proteins was performed using the Olink technology platform. Results: RA patients exhibited elevated levels of 75 proteins that might be associated with cardiovascular disease. In addition, 24 proteins were increased in RA patients with established disease. Twenty proteins were commonly altered in both cohorts of RA patients. Among these, elevated levels of CTSL1, SORT1, SAA4, TNFRSF10A, ST6GAL1 and CCL18 discriminated RA patients and HDs with high specificity and sensitivity. Methotrexate treatment significantly reduced the levels of 13 proteins, while tofacitinib therapy modulated the expression of 10 proteins. These reductions were associated with a decrease in DAS28. Baseline levels of SAA4 and high levels of BNP were associated to the non-response to methotrexate. Changes in IL6 levels were specifically linked to the response to methotrexate. Regarding tofacitinib, differences in baseline levels of LOX1 and CNDP1 were noted between non-responder and responder RA patients. In addition, response to tofacitinib correlated with changes in SAA4 and TIMD4 levels. Conclusion: In summary, this study pinpoints molecular changes linked to cardiovascular disease in RA and proposes candidate protein biomarkers for distinguishing RA patients from healthy individuals. It also highlights how methotrexate and tofacitinib impact these proteins, with distinct alterations corresponding to each drug's response, identifying potential candidates, as SAA4, for the response to these therapies.

Characterization of the inflammatory proteome of synovial fluid from patients with psoriatic arthritis: Potential treatment targets.

Objectives: 1) To characterize the inflammatory proteome of synovial fluid (SF) from patients with Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) using a high-quality throughput proteomic platform, and 2) to evaluate its potential to stratify patients according to clinical features. Methods: Inflammatory proteome profile of SF from thirteen PsA patients with active knee arthritis were analyzed using proximity extension assay (PEA) technology (Olink Target 96 Inflammation panel). Four patients with OA were included as control group. Results: Seventy-nine inflammation-related proteins were detected in SF from PsA patients (SF-PsA). Unsupervised analyzes of the molecular proteome profile in SF-PsA identified two specific phenotypes characterized by higher or lower levels of inflammation-related proteins. Clinically, SF-PsA with higher levels of inflammatory proteins also showed increased systemic inflammation and altered glucose and lipid metabolisms. Besides, SF from PsA patients showed 39 out of 79 proteins significantly altered compared to SF-OA specifically related to cell migration and inflammatory response. Among these, molecules such as TNFα, IL-17A, IL-6, IL-10, IL-8, ENRAGE, CCL20, TNFSF-14, OSM, IFNγ, MCP-3, CXCL-11, MCP4, CASP-8, CXCL-6, CD-6, ADA, CXCL-10, TNFß and IL-7 showed the most significantly change. Conclusion: This is the first study that characterizes the inflammatory landscape of synovial fluid of PsA patients by analyzing a panel of 92 inflammatory proteins using PEA technology. Novel SF proteins have been described as potential pathogenic molecules involved in the pathogenesis of PsA. Despite the flare, inflammatory proteome could distinguish two different phenotypes related to systemic inflammation and lipid and glucose alterations.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in inflammatory arthritis: Relationship with cardiovascular risk.

Liver disease is one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide whose prevalence is dramatically increasing. The first sign of hepatic damage is inflammation which could be accompanied by the accumulation of fat called non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), causing damage in the hepatocytes. This stage can progress to fibrosis where the accumulation of fibrotic tissue replaces healthy tissue reducing liver function. The next stage is cirrhosis, a late phase of fibrosis where a high percentage of liver tissue has been replaced by fibrotic tissue and liver functionality is substantially impaired. There is a close interplay of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and hepatic alterations, where different mechanisms mediating this relation between the liver and systemic vasculature have been described. In chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), in which the CVD risk is high, hepatic alterations seem to be more prevalent compared to the general population and other rheumatic disorders. The pathogenic mechanisms involved in the development of this comorbidity are still unraveled, although chronic inflammation, autoimmunity, treatments, and metabolic deregulation seem to have an important role. In this review, we will discuss the involvement of liver disease in the cardiovascular risk associated with inflammatory arthritis, the pathogenic mechanisms, and the recognized factors involved. Likewise, monitoring of the liver disease risk in routine clinical practice through both, classical and novel techniques and indexes will be exposed. Finally, we will examine the latest controversies that have been raised about the effects of the current therapies used to control the inflammation in RA and PsA, in the liver damage of those patients, such as methotrexate, leflunomide or biologics.

Pathogenic mechanisms involving the interplay between adipose tissue and auto-antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis.

We aimed to evaluate the association between adipose tissue (AT) dysfunction, autoimmunity, and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A cross-sectional study including 150 RA patients and 50 healthy donors and longitudinal study with 122 RA patients treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, anti-interleukin 6 receptor (IL6R) or anti-CD20 therapies for 6 months were carried out. In vitro experiments with human AT and adipocyte and macrophage cell lines were performed. A collagen-induced arthritis mouse model was developed. The insulin resistance and the altered adipocytokine profile were associated with disease activity, the presence of anti-citrullinated proteins anti-bodies (ACPAs), and worse response to therapy in RA. AT in the context of arthritis is characterized by an inflammatory state alongside the infiltration of macrophages and B/plasmatic cells, where ACPAs can have a direct impact, inducing inflammation and insulin resistance in macrophages and promoting a defective adipocyte differentiation, partially restored by biologicals.

Molecular Changes in the Adipose Tissue Induced by Rheumatoid Arthritis: Effects of Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs.

Disease severity, progression and response to therapy might be worse in obese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, but paradoxically, obesity also might protect from radiographic joint damage. Thus, the intricate relationship between obesity and RA needs urgent clarification. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of obesity on the onset and development of RA and to determine whether arthritis could modify the adipose tissue biology and whether conventional Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (cDMARDs) can modulate these alterations. Two strategies were followed: (1) clinical profiling of two cohorts of RA: non-obese and obese patients; and (2) mechanistic studies carried out in both a collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) in an obese mouse model and 3T3-L1 adipocytes treated with cDMARDs (leflunomide, methotrexate, and hydroxychloroquine). In our cohort of RA patients with low-moderate disease activity, the presence of obesity was not related to a higher activity of the disease; actually, disease activity score 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) was reduced in the obese RA patients. However, the induction of arthritis promoted transcriptomic changes in the adipose tissue under obesity condition in the obese CIA model. Treatment with hydroxychloroquine reduced weight and insulin resistance, accompanied by beneficial metabolic effects in the adipose tissue. These molecular changes in adipose tissue were also observed after methotrexate administration. In sum, arthritis might affect directly the inflammatory burden and metabolic alterations associated with obesity in adipose tissue. Clinicians should be cautious measuring the activity of the disease in obesity and managing the best therapeutic options for the metabolic comorbidities of these patients, where the combination of hydroxychloroquine and methotrexate should be considered to improve adipose tissue dysfunction in obese RA.

Esophageal perforation in eosinophilic esophagitis: A systematic review on clinical presentation, management and outcomes.

There is evidence of an increased fragility in the inflamed esophagus of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We performed a systematic review on presentation, management and outcomes of and surgical interventions for esophageal perforation in these patients, by searching in the MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus databases. Of the 599 references identified, 41 full-papers and 9 abstract met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 76 esophageal perforation episodes in 70 individual patients aged between 9 and 65 years were reported. 51 patients had not been diagnosed with EoE at the time of perforation; 14 patients had an untreated disease and the remaining were non responsive to therapy. Acute or progressive pain after long-lasting dysphagia and food impaction was the most common symptom leading to diagnosis in 42 patients who presented with Boerhaave syndrome. Pushing impacted food into the stomach led to perforation in 5 cases. Eight episodes appeared after dilation. CT scans demonstrated perforation in 82.4% of patients. Conservative management (including esophageal stenting) was used in 67.1% patients. The 25 remaining patients underwent surgery. Recovery was uneventful in the vast majority of patients. No death was reported. Active inflammation due to undiagnosed or untreated EoE was present in most cases of esophageal perforation. Conservative treatment of perforation should always be considered in EoE.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: the growing incidence and prevalence of eosinophilic oesophagitis in children and adults in population-based studies.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) occurrence is escalating. Current diagnostic criteria recently proposed for the disease, determine that previous estimates of incidence and prevalence are outdated. AIM: To gauge the current incidence and prevalence of EoE by performing a systematic review of population-based studies. METHODS: Three electronic databases were searched from their inception dates to September 2018. A total of 2386 documents were screened; 29 studies reported on the prevalence and incidence of EoE in the general population. RESULTS: The pooled prevalence of EoE was 34.4 cases per 100 000 inhabitants (95% CI, 23.1-47.5), and was higher for adults (42.2; 95% CI, 31.1-55) than for children (34; 95% CI, 22.3-49.2). The pooled EoE incidence rates were 6.6/100 000 person-years (95% CI, 3-11.7) in children and 7.7/100 000 (95% CI, 1.8-17.8) in adults. No differences were found between North American and European studies using varied sources of data (insurance and administrative databases compared to hospital-bases case series). Subgroup analysis according to risk of bias did not change results significantly. A steady rise in EoE incidence and prevalence rates was observed over time, comparing studies conducted under subsequent definitions for EoE. No significant publication bias was found. CONCLUSIONS: In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found a sharp increase, higher than previous estimates, in the incidence and prevalence of EoE in population based studies. Results from studies carried out in developed countries show broad consistency and provide evidence of increasing pooled prevalence and incidence of EoE rates over time.