A randomised, phase II trial of the DNA-hypomethylating agent 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (decitabine) in combination with carboplatin vs carboplatin alone in patients with recurrent, partially platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Our previous laboratory and clinical data suggested that one mechanism underlying the development of platinum resistance in ovarian cancer is the acquisition of DNA methylation. We therefore tested the hypothesis that the DNA hypomethylating agent 5-aza-2'-deoxycytodine (decitabine) can reverse resistance to carboplatin in women with relapsed ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients progressing 6-12 months after previous platinum therapy were randomised to decitabine on day 1 and carboplatin (AUC 6) on day 8, every 28 days or carboplatin alone. The primary objective was response rate in patients with methylated hMLH1 tumour DNA in plasma. RESULTS: After a pre-defined interim analysis, the study closed due to lack of efficacy and poor treatment deliverability in 15 patients treated with the combination. Responses by GCIG criteria were 9 out of 14 vs 3 out of 15 and by RECIST were 6 out of 13 vs 1 out of 12 for carboplatin and carboplatin/decitabine, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was more common with the combination (60% vs 15.4%) as was G2/3 carboplatin hypersensitivity (47% vs 21%). CONCLUSIONS: With this schedule, the addition of decitabine appears to reduce rather than increase the efficacy of carboplatin in partially platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer and is difficult to deliver. Patient-selection strategies, different schedules and other demethylating agents should be considered in future combination studies.

Follow-up with CA125 after primary therapy of advanced ovarian cancer has major implications for treatment outcome and trial performances and should not be routinely performed.

BACKGROUND: Only one randomized trial has examined the value of performing routine CA125 measurements during follow-up of ovarian cancer. The results of this trial and implications of frequent CA125 measurements are examined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Medical Research Council OV05/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 55955 trial enrolled 1442 patients with a CA125 level within the normal range following platinum-based chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer. If CA125 levels rose to more than twice the upper limit of normal, patients were randomized to immediate or delayed chemotherapy. RESULTS: Those randomized in the early arm started chemotherapy a median of 4.8 months earlier than those on the delayed arm. There was no difference in survival between the early and delayed arms. CONCLUSIONS: Women should be advised not to have routine CA125 measurements, providing they are well and have no symptoms suggesting relapse. In asymptomatic patients with a rising CA125 level, chemotherapy can be delayed. Earlier stopping of maintenance therapy just because of rising CA125 might deny patients continuing benefit from that therapy. Use of CA125 to define progression could result in platinum-sensitive patients being falsely classified as platinum resistant.

Phase II trial of combretastatin A4 phosphate, carboplatin, and paclitaxel in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: A previous dose-escalation trial of the vascular disrupting agent combretastatin A4 phosphate (CA4P) given before carboplatin, paclitaxel, or both showed responses in 7 of 18 patients with relapsed ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with ovarian cancer that had relapsed and who could start trial therapy within 6 months of their last platinum chemotherapy were given CA4P 63 mg/m(2) minimum 18 h before paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC (area under the concentration curve) 5, repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Five of the first 18 patients' disease responded, so the study was extended and closed after 44 patients were recruited. Grade ≥2 toxic effects were neutropenia in 75% and thrombocytopenia in 9% of patients (weekly blood counts), tumour pain, fatigue, and neuropathy, with one patient with rapidly reversible ataxia. Hypertension (23% of patients) was controlled by glyceryl trinitrate or prophylactic amlodipine. The response rate by RECIST was 13.5% and by Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup CA 125 criteria 34%. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of CA4P to paclitaxel and carboplatin is well tolerated and appears to produce a higher response rate in this patient population than if the chemotherapy was given without CA4P. A planned randomised trial will test this hypothesis.

Cediranib in addition to chemotherapy for women with relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (ICON6): overall survival results of a phase III randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Cediranib, an oral anti-angiogenic VEGFR 1-3 inhibitor, was studied at a daily dose of 20 mg in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy and as maintenance in a randomised trial in patients with first relapse of 'platinum-sensitive' ovarian cancer and has been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: ICON6 (NCT00532194) was an international three-arm, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial. Between December 2007 and December 2011, 456 women were randomised, using stratification, to receive either chemotherapy with placebo throughout (arm A, reference); chemotherapy with concurrent cediranib, followed by maintenance placebo (arm B, concurrent); or chemotherapy with concurrent cediranib, followed by maintenance cediranib (arm C, maintenance). Due to an enforced redesign of the trial in September 2011, the primary endpoint became PFS between arms A and C which we have previously published, and the overall survival (OS) was defined as a secondary endpoint, which is reported here. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 25.6 months, strong evidence of an effect of concurrent plus maintenance cediranib on PFS was observed [hazard ratio (HR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.72, P < 0.0001]. In this final update of the survival analysis, 90% of patients have died. There was a 7.4-month difference in median survival and an HR of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.67-1.11, P = 0.24) in favour of arm C. There was strong evidence of a departure from the assumption of non-proportionality using the Grambsch-Therneau test (P = 0.0031), making the HR difficult to interpret. Consequently, the restricted mean survival time (RMST) was used and the estimated difference over 6 years by the RMST was 4.8 months (95% CI: -0.09 to 9.74 months). CONCLUSIONS: Although a statistically significant difference in time to progression was seen, the enforced curtailment in recruitment meant that the secondary analysis of OS was underpowered. The relative reduction in the risk of death of 14% risk of death was not conventionally statistically significant, but this improvement and the increase in the mean survival time in this analysis suggest that cediranib may have worthwhile activity in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer and that further research should be undertaken.

A Phase Ib trial of CA4P (combretastatin A-4 phosphate), carboplatin, and paclitaxel in patients with advanced cancer.

BACKGROUND: The vascular disrupting agent combretastatin A4 phosphate (CA4P) causes major regression of animal tumours when given as combination therapy. METHODS: Patients with advanced cancer refractory to standard therapy were treated with CA4P as a 10-min infusion, 20 h before carboplatin, paclitaxel, or paclitaxel, followed by carboplatin. RESULTS: Combretastatin A4 phosphate was escalated from 36 to 54 mg m(-2) with the carboplatin area under the concentration curve (AUC) 4-5, from 27 to 54 mg m(-2) with paclitaxel 135-175 mg m(-2), and from 54 to 72 mg m(-2) with carboplatin AUC 5 and paclitaxel 175 mg m(-2). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was seen in 17%, and thrombocytopenia only in 4% of 46 patients. Grade 1-3 hypertension (26% of patients) and grade 1-3 tumour pain (65% of patients) were the most typical non-haematological toxicities. Dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 hypertension or grade 3 ataxia was seen in two patients at 72 mg m(-2). Responses were seen in 10 of 46 (22%) patients with ovarian, oesophageal, small-cell lung cancer, and melanoma. CONCLUSION: The combination of CA4P with carboplatin and paclitaxel was well tolerated in the majority of patients with adequate premedication and had antitumour activity in patients who were heavily pretreated.

A review of the close surveillance policy for stage I female germ cell tumors of the ovary and other sites.

Ovarian germ cell tumors are rare but very curable at all stages of disease. There is good evidence that surveillance for stage I dysgerminomas is a safe option although many centers worldwide still advocate adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IA nondysgerminomatous tumors, despite the significant risk of developing long-term treatment side effects. Here, we review the safety of our ongoing surveillance program of all stage IA female germ cell tumors. Thirty-seven patients (median age 26, range 14-48 years) with stage I disease were referred to Mount Vernon and Charing Cross Hospitals between 1981 and 2003. Patients underwent surgery and staging followed by intense surveillance, which included regular tumor markers and imaging. The median period of follow-up was 6 years. Relapse rates for stage IA nondysgerminomatous tumors and dysgerminomas were 8 of 22 (36%) and 2 of 9 (22%), respectively, plus one patient with mature teratoma and glial implants also relapsed; 10 of these 11 patients (91%) were successfully cured with platinum-based chemotherapy. Only one patient died from chemoresistant disease. All relapses occurred within 13 months of initial surgery. The overall disease-specific survival of malignant ovarian germ cell tumors was 94%. Over 50% of patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery went on to have successful pregnancies. We have confirmed again that surveillance of all stage IA ovarian germ cell tumors is very safe and that the outcome is comparable with testicular tumors. We question the need for potentially toxic adjuvant chemotherapy in nondysgerminoma patients who have greater than 90% chance of being salvaged with chemotherapy if they relapse later.

Vascular damaging agents.

To provide a comprehensive overview on vascular targeting agents and the application of radiobiological principles in pre-clinical and clinical studies, we completed a comprehensive review of published medical studies on vascular targeting agents using Pub Med. Vascular targeting agents are now divided into vascular disrupting agents (VDAs), which target the pre-existing tumour vasculature, and angiogenesis inhibitors (AIs), which prevent the formation of new blood vessels. Modest success has been seen when VDAs and AIs are used as single agents and therefore combination therapies that can work in a complimentary and synergistic manner, targeting both the tumour cells and endothelial cells, are needed. Radiobiological principles have been used to increase our understanding of these agents, and can explain the increased efficacy of combination treatments. In particular, the alteration of the tumour microenvironment by AIs and VDAs can lead to enhanced efficacy when combined with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, with phase II/III trials showing encouraging results. The optimal use and scheduling of AIs and VDAs remains to be determined. Further understanding of the mechanisms of action of these potentially very exciting anti-neoplastic agents is urgently required.

Radiotherapy versus single-dose carboplatin in adjuvant treatment of stage I seminoma: a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant radiotherapy is effective treatment for stage I seminoma, but is associated with a risk of late non-germ-cell cancer and cardiovascular events. After good results in initial studies with one injection of carboplatin, we undertook a large randomised trial to compare the approaches of radiotherapy with chemotherapy in seminoma treatment. METHODS: Between 1996 and 2001, 1477 patients from 70 hospitals in 14 countries were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy (para-aortic strip or dog-leg field; n=904) or one injection of carboplatin (n=573; dose based on the formula 7x[glomerular filtration rate+25] mg), at two trial centres in the UK and Belgium. The primary outcome measure was the relapse-free rate, with the trial powered to exclude absolute differences in 2-year rates of more than 3%. Analysis was by intention to treat and per protocol. This trial has been assigned the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number ISRCTN27163214. FINDINGS: 885 and 560 patients received radiotherapy and carboplatin, respectively. With a median follow-up of 4 years (IQR 3.0-4.9), relapse-free survival rates for radiotherapy and carboplatin were similar (96.7% [95% CI 95.3-97.7] vs 97.7% [96.0-98.6] at 2 years; 95.9% [94.4-97.1] vs 94.8% [92.5-96.4] at 3 years, respectively; hazard ratio 1.28 [90% CI 0.85-1.93], p=0.32). At 2 years' follow-up, the absolute differences in relapse-free rates (radiotherapy-chemotherapy) were -1.0% (90% CI -2.5 to 0.5) by direct comparison of proportions, and 0.9% (-0.5 to 3.0) by a hazard-ratio-based approach. Patients given carboplatin were less lethargic and less likely to take time off work than those given radiotherapy. New, second primary testicular germ-cell tumours were reported in ten patients allocated irradiation (all after para-aortic strip field) and two allocated carboplatin (5-year event rate 1.96% [95% CI 1.0-3.8] vs 0.54% [0.1-2.1], p=0.04). One seminoma-related death occurred after radiotherapy and none after carboplatin. INTERPRETATION: This trial has shown the non-inferiority of carboplatin to radiotherapy in the treatment of stage I seminoma. Although the absence of disease-related deaths and preliminary data indicating fewer second primary testicular germ-cell tumours favour carboplatin use, these findings need to be confirmed beyond 4 years' follow-up.

Phase I trial of temozolomide using an extended continuous oral schedule.

Temozolomide, a methylating imidazotetrazinone, has antitumor activity against gliomas, malignant melanoma, and mycosis fungoides and is presently administered as a 5-day oral schedule every 4 weeks. This Phase I study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of temozolomide administered as a single oral daily dose for a continuous 6- or 7-week period, evaluate the plasma pharmacokinetics on this schedule, and compare total plasma exposure over 7 weeks with the conventional 5-day regimen. Twenty-four patients with varying tumor types (17 of 24 gliomas) received temozolomide. All had clinically evaluable, refractory disease; normal renal, hepatic, and bone marrow function; and WHO performance status < or = 2. Temozolomide was administered at 50 mg/m2/day, increasing by 25 mg/m2/day/cohort until at 100 mg/m2/day grade 4 myelotoxicity forced dose reductions to 85 mg/m2/day, then 75 mg/m2/day. At 75 mg/m2/day the regimen was extended to 7 weeks, allowing the future potential combination with irradiation for primary gliomas. Patient responses (standard Union International Contre Cancer criteria; for gliomas objective response) and toxicity were assessed. Temozolomide plasma pharmacokinetics were determined on day 1 and at the beginning of the final week of administration (n = 5). The most frequent toxicities were myelosuppression and grades 1 and 2 nausea and vomiting. Grade 4 leucopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in one of four patients receiving 100 mg/m2/day temozolomide and in one of seven patients receiving 85 mg/m2/day. These hematological toxicities did not exceed grade 2 in 10 patients receiving 75 mg/m2/day temozolomide. One of 4 malignant melanoma patients and 7 of 17 glioma patients (41%) demonstrated tumor responses. The overall response rate for this prolonged schedule was 33% (objective response, 7 of 24 patients; partial response, 1 of 24 patients); also, 6 of 17 glioma patients maintained SD. Peak plasma temozolomide concentrations were obtained 30-90 min after oral administration. Elimination in plasma was best described by a monoexponential equation with an elimination half-life of 96 +/- 16 min. No plasma accumulation of temozolomide occurred. Toxicity was greatest in higher dose cohorts, with a resultant maximum tolerated dose of 85 mg/m2/day, whereas lower dose cohorts tolerated the schedule well. The area under the temozolomide plasma versus time curve was noncumulative between the first and last week of the schedule. Temozolomide administration of 75 mg/m2/day over a 7-week period permits a 2.1-fold greater drug exposure/4 weeks in comparison with the 5-day schedule of 200 mg/m2/day repeated every 28 days. The overall response rate was 33% (glioma patients, 41% and a further 25% SD). Temozolomide (75 mg/m2/day) for 7 weeks is the recommended starting dose for further assessment of this schedule.

Use of CA-125 to define progression of ovarian cancer in patients with persistently elevated levels.

PURPOSE: To determine an accurate definition for progression of ovarian cancer in patients with a persistently elevated serum CA-125. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 300 patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma with at least one measurement of CA-125. The date of progression according to clinical or radiologic criteria was ascertained in the 88 patients with persistently elevated CA-125 levels (> 23 U/mL). This was compared with the date of progression according to CA-125, defined as the date on which the CA-125 level first increased to >or= twice its nadir level, confirmed by a second sample also >or= twice the nadir. RESULTS: Eighty of the 88 patients had evidence of progression by both standard and CA-125 criteria, giving a sensitivity of 94%. In six of these patients, no sample was taken to confirm CA-125 doubling. In 13 patients, CA-125 doubling occurred after the date of clinical progression. Only one patient had a false-positive prediction of progression according to CA-125; the patient died as a result of a myocardial infarct before evidence of clinical progression. CONCLUSION: In patients whose CA-125 level decreases to normal after chemotherapy, a doubling from the upper limit of normal has been shown to predict progression. In those with persistently elevated levels, doubling of CA-125 from its nadir level has now been shown to accurately define progression. If confirmed, these CA-125 criteria should be used as additional end points in clinical trials.

A randomized trial comparing single-agent carboplatin with carboplatin followed by radiotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: a North Thames Ovary Group study.

PURPOSE: To determine in a randomized trial of advanced ovarian carcinoma whether consolidation therapy with whole-abdominal radiotherapy (RT) after chemotherapy improves survival and disease-free survival compared with the continued chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred fifty-four patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (stages IIB to IV) were entered onto a study of five monthly courses of 400 mg/m2 of carboplatin. One hundred seventeen patients with residual disease of 2 cm or less at second-look laparotomy or laparoscopy were then randomized to receive consolidation therapy, either five further courses of carboplatin at the same dosage or whole-abdominal RT (24 Gy). There was no control arm. RESULTS: Chemotherapy was well tolerated and was usually administered on an outpatient basis. Myelosuppression that was sufficient to delay chemotherapy occurred in only 3% of 1,418 courses analyzed. The main toxicity of carboplatin was nausea and vomiting, but this was easier to control than that with cisplatin. Although RT was well tolerated in the majority of the 58 patients, one patient who had been found to have multiple adhesions at second-look surgery developed fecal fistulae post-RT that resulted in the patient's death from peritonitis. Median survival for the whole group from date of surgery was 25 months. No statistical difference was found in either survival or disease-free survival between those patients who received consolidation chemotherapy and those who were treated with abdominal RT. Prognostic factors used to assess survival were stage, histology, amount of residual disease after primary surgery, and presence of tumor at second-look surgery. CONCLUSION: There seems to be no significant advantage for consolidation whole-abdominal RT compared with the continuation of the same chemotherapy in the management of advanced epithelial carcinoma of the ovary, even when no macroscopic residual disease is apparent at second-look surgery.

Weekly alternating etoposide, methotrexate, and actinomycin/vincristine and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for the treatment of CNS metastases of choriocarcinoma.

Twenty-five patients with CNS metastases of choriocarcinoma were treated with a regimen incorporating etoposide, methotrexate, and actinomycin (EMA) alternating weekly with vincristine and cyclophosphamide (CO). The dose of methotrexate was increased to 1 g/m2. Eighteen patients presented with CNS metastases, or developed them on inappropriate treatment started elsewhere. Following EMA/CO chemotherapy, three patients died within the first 3 weeks, one is alive with active disease, one died with drug resistance, and 13 (72%) patients are surviving disease-free. Two of seven patients (29%) who developed CNS metastases on treatment with EMA/CO or relapsed after EMA/CO are disease-free after additional chemotherapy and surgery. The contribution toward survival of the craniotomy in six of 18 patients treated initially or early with EMA/CO remains unclear, but was crucial to those patients with drug resistance.

Etoposide and cisplatin/etoposide, methotrexate, and actinomycin D (EMA) chemotherapy for patients with high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumors refractory to EMA/cyclophosphamide and vincristine chemotherapy and patients presenting with metastatic placental site trophoblastic tumors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of etoposide, cisplatin/etoposide, methotrexate, and actinomycin D (EP/EMA) chemotherapy in patients with gestational trophoblastic tumors (GTTs), who have relapsed after or who have become refractory to EMA/cyclophosphamide and vincristine (CO) chemotherapy, and in patients presenting with metastatic placental site trophoblastic tumors (PSTTs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have treated a total of 34 patients with GTT and eight patients with metastatic PSTT with the EP/EMA chemotherapy schedule. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients received EP/EMA because of apparent drug resistance to EMA/CO, and because the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) was near normal, they were not assessable for response. Twenty-one of these patients (95%) are alive and in remission. In the group where the hCG was high enough to confirm a response (greater than one log fall in hCG) to EP/EMA, all 12 patients responded and nine of these patients (75%) are alive and in remission. We have treated three patients with PSTT where the interval from antecedent pregnancy was less than 2 years, and all patients (100%) are alive and in remission. We have treated five patients where the interval from antecedent pregnancy was greater than 2 years and one fifth (20%) remain in remission. The survival for patients with GTT is 30 (88%) out of 34 patients and four (50%) out of eight patients for PSTT, giving an overall survival for these two cohorts of 34 (81%) out of 42 patients. The toxicity of this schedule is significant, with grade 3 or 4 toxicity (National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria) recorded in hemoglobin (21%), WBC (68%), and platelets (40%). The role of surgery in this group of patients is important and contributed to sustained remission in five patients (23%) and possibly helped an additional seven patients (32%). CONCLUSION: EP/EMA is an effective but moderately toxic regimen for patients with high-risk GTT who become refractory to or relapse from EMA/CO chemotherapy. Also, EP/EMA clearly has activity in patients with metastatic PSTT.

Surveillance policy for stage I ovarian germ cell tumors.

PURPOSE: Surveillance for stage I male germ cell tumors (GCT) is well established as a standard practice; however, such a policy has not been evaluated for women with equivalent tumors. This study was designed to evaluate the management of grade II or higher stage Ia tumors by close surveillance to minimize treatment, while reserving chemotherapy for patients with residual or recurrent disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1973 and 1995, 24 patients with malignant stage Ia ovarian GCT were enrolled onto a surveillance program. The group consisted of nine patients with dysgerminoma, nine with pure immature teratoma, and six with endodermal sinus tumor (with or without immature teratoma). Treatment consisted of surgical resection without adjuvant chemotherapy, followed by a surveillance program of clinical, serologic, and radiologic review, and included a second-look procedure for patients enrolled after 1982. RESULTS: All but one patient are alive and in remission after a median follow-up of 6.8 years. The 5-year overall survival is 95%, and the 5-year disease-free survival is 68%. Eight patients have required chemotherapy for recurrent disease or second primary ovarian GCT. This includes three patients with grade II immature teratoma and three patients with dysgerminoma, and a further two women with dysgerminoma who developed contralateral (presumed second primary) dysgerminoma 4.5 and 5.2 years after their first tumor. All but one, who died of a pulmonary embolus, have been successfully salvaged with chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Our experience emphasizes that patients with true stage Ia ovarian GCT are adequately managed by surgical resection followed by careful clinical, radiologic, and serologic surveillance. These patients do not require adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy, thus avoiding the potential complications of secondary leukemia and infertility.

Selection of active drugs for ovarian cancer based on CA-125 and standard response rates in phase II trials.

PURPOSE: To determine whether precise definitions of response based on serial CA-125 levels can predict the activity of drugs in phase II trials for ovarian cancer as accurately as standard criteria. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen different drugs for relapsed ovarian cancer were analyzed in 25 treatment groups in 19 clinical trials. Response rates were estimated in 1,457 assessable patients according to standard criteria and in 1,092 assessable patients according to CA-125. For each drug trial, the observed response rates acted as the input data for an evaluation of how the two criteria would perform in a hypothetical Gehan two-stage phase II trial, accepting a target drug efficacy rate of 20% and a rejection error of 5%. RESULTS: CA-125 and clinical response criteria were concordant in 20 of the 25 groups, with less than 5% chance of rejecting the drug in nine groups and greater than 5% in 11 groups. In four groups, the drug had less than 5% chance of being rejected by CA-125 but greater than 5% chance of being rejected by standard criteria. The difference in the classification of drugs by the standard and CA-125 response criteria was not statistically significant (P =.38, McNemar's test). CA-125 response rates were slightly higher than standard response rates by a factor of 1.11. CONCLUSION: Definitions based on a 50% or 75% decrease of CA-125 levels accurately predicted which drugs in phase II trials for relapsed ovarian cancer were active and justified further investigation.

Use of CA-125 to predict survival of patients with ovarian carcinoma. North Thames Cooperative Group.

The prognostic value of serum CA-125 measurements was assessed in 54 patients with advanced ovarian adenocarcinoma. All patients received a minimum of two courses of carboplatin as part of the North Thames Cooperative Group trial. With a minimum follow-up of 6 months, 37 patients (69%) have clinical evidence of progressive disease and 28 have died. The absolute prechemotherapy level of CA-125 was of no value in predicting which patients would develop progressive disease. However, the change in CA-125 levels from before chemotherapy to 1 month later, after one course of carboplatin, could be used to divide patients into different prognostic groups. The best discrimination was found by dividing the patients into those who showed a greater than sevenfold decrease in CA-125 levels and those who showed a smaller change. Eight of 14 (58%) patients with a greater than sevenfold decrease in CA-125 levels remain disease-free compared with three of 36 (9%) patients with a lesser fall (P = .0005). The change in CA-125 levels during the first month of chemotherapy may indicate which patients should be offered alternative or symptomatic therapy and which should continue with the currently available toxic chemotherapy.

EMA/CO for high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumors: results from a cohort of 272 patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of etoposide, methotrexate, and dactinomycin alternating with cyclophosphamide and vincristine (EMA/CO) chemotherapy in women with high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumors (GTT) and to document the middle- and long-term toxicity of the regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 272 consecutive women with high-risk GTT, including 121 previously treated patients, were treated with weekly EMA/CO. The median follow-up duration is 4.5 years (range, 1 to 16). RESULTS: The cumulative 5-year survival rate is 86.2% (95% confidence interval, 81.9% to 90.5%). No deaths from GTT have occurred later than 2 years after the end [corrected] of EMA/CO. In a multivariate model, adverse prognostic factors were the presence of liver metastases (P < .0001), interval from antecedent pregnancy (P < .0001), brain metastases (P = .0008), and term delivery of antecedent pregnancy (P = .045). There were 11 (4%) early deaths, while 213 patients (78%) achieved a complete remission. Forty-seven (17%) developed drug resistance to EMA/CO, of whom 33 (70%) were salvaged by further cisplatin-based chemotherapy and surgery. Two women developed acute myeloid leukemia, two cervical malignancy, and one gastric adenocarcinoma after EMA/CO. More than half (56%) of the women who had fertility-conserving surgery and who have been in remission at least 2 years have become pregnant since the completion of EMA/CO, with 112 live births, including three infants with congenital abnormalities. CONCLUSION: EMA/CO is an effective and well-tolerated regimen for high-risk GTT. More than half of the women will retain their fertility; however, there is a small but significant risk of second malignancy.

Defining response of ovarian carcinoma to initial chemotherapy according to serum CA 125.

PURPOSE: To produce definitions based on serial CA 125 levels to measure response of ovarian carcinoma in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Definitions were derived from analysis of 277 patients in North Thames Ovary Trial 3. Patient data were then incorporated into a computer program and tested against 254 patients in North Thames Ovary Trial 4 and 458 patients in Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) protocol 97. For optimum detection of response, three response definitions have been combined into a computer program. The precise definitions use mathematic logic and take account of factors such as intervening samples. Response to a specific treatment has occurred if after two samples there has been a 50% decrease, confirmed by a fourth sample (50% response), or a serial decrease over three samples of greater than 75% (75% response). The final sample has to be at least 28 days after the previous sample. RESULTS: Six hundred twenty of 989 patients were considered assessable for response according to CA 125 level. Only two patients (0.3%) had a CA 125 response at the time of clinical progression. The CA 125 response rate was 62% and 54% in the North Thames trials. In the GOG trial, it was 66% in all 317 patients assessable for CA 125 and 67% in 221 patients whose CA 125 level was not measurable according to GOG criteria, compared with a GOG-defined response rate of 62%. The sensitivity for detecting GOG-defined response was at least 68%. CONCLUSION: Definitions based on a 50% or 75% decrease of CA 125 levels have been shown reliably to define partial response of ovarian cancer in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy. These definitions should be used in addition to or instead of standard response criteria.

Phase II trial of oral altretamine for relapsed ovarian carcinoma: evaluation of defining response by serum CA125.

PURPOSE: A phase II study was performed of oral altretamine in 71 patients with ovarian carcinoma who entered clinical complete remission with CA125 levels less than 35 U/mL after initial or second-line chemotherapy, and relapsed more than 6 months later. Response was compared between standard and CA125-based criteria. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Altretamine 260 mg/m2 was given in divided doses daily for 14 days per month. Response was evaluated according to European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria in 45 of 66 eligible patients. Response was assessed according to precise CA125 criteria in 51 patients based on either a confirmed > or = 50% or > or = 75% decrease in CA125 levels. RESULTS: A combination of domperidone, dexamethasona, and chlorpromazine at night controlled toxicity in most patients, which was mainly nausea (National Cancer Institute criteria grade 2 or 3 in 27), vomiting (grade 2 or 3 in 19, grade 4 in one), and tiredness (grade 2 or 3 in 15). Responses (complete plus partial) were seen in 18 (40%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 25.4% to 54.6%) of those evaluated according to EORTC criteria and in 20 (39%; 95% CI, 25.5% to 52.9%) of those evaluated according to CA125 level. The overall response rate was 26 of 57 (45.6%) and was related to treatment-free interval: 6 to 12 months, 35%; 12 to 24 months, 52%; and greater than 24 months, 67%. The medium duration of response was 8 months. CONCLUSION: Oral altretamine is a useful agent in patients-who relapse after previously responsive ovarian cancer. Response evaluation by a strict CA125 definition gave a similar estimate of the efficacy of altretamine as EORTC criteria.