A real-world observational study assessing relationships between excessive daytime sleepiness and patient satisfaction in obstructive sleep apnea.

OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND: To estimate prevalence and severity of excessive daytime sleepiness among patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who were prescribed treatment; assess perception and satisfaction of OSA-related care; describe relationships between excessive daytime sleepiness, treatment adherence, and patient satisfaction. PATIENTS/METHODS: A national population-based cross-sectional sample of US adults with clinician-diagnosed OSA was surveyed in January 2021 via Evidation Health's Achievement App. Patients completed the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, rated satisfaction with healthcare provider and overall OSA care, and reported treatment adherence. Covariates affecting excessive daytime sleepiness (average weekly sleep duration, treatment adherence, sleepiness-inducing medications, age, sex, body mass index, nasal congestion, smoking status, and comorbidities) were adjusted in multivariate regression models. RESULTS: In 2289 participants (50.3 % women; 44.8 ± 11.1 years), EDS was highly prevalent (42 %), and was experienced by 36 % of patients with high positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy adherence. Each additional hour of nightly PAP use was associated with improved sleepiness (a 0.28-point lower Epworth score; p < 0.001). Excessive daytime sleepiness was associated with lower patient satisfaction with healthcare providers and overall care (OR [95 % CI] 0.62 [0.48-0.80] and 0.50 [0.39-0.64], respectively; p < 0.0001), whereas PAP adherence was associated with higher patient satisfaction (OR [95 % CI] 2.37 [1.64-3.43] and 2.91 [2.03-4.17]; p < 0.0001), after adjusting for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world population-based study of patients with OSA, excessive daytime sleepiness was highly prevalent and associated with poor patient satisfaction ratings. Better patient-centered care among patients with OSA may require interventions aimed at addressing excessive daytime sleepiness and treatment adherence.

Health-related impact of illness associated with excessive daytime sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

OBJECTIVES: This real-world study aimed to characterize the impact of illness of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who are adherent to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). METHODS: This cross-sectional study surveyed participants in Evidation Health's Achievement app (November 2020-January 2021), a mobile consumer platform that encourages users to develop healthy habits and provides incentives to participate in research. Participants were US-resident adults who self-reported a physician diagnosis of OSA and adherence to CPAP (≥4 hours/night, ≥5 nights/week) for≥6 months. The survey included the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire-Short Version (FOSQ-10), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and questions regarding comorbidities, CPAP use, caffeine consumption, and physical activity. EDS was defined as ESS score >10. There were more female than male participants; therefore, data were reported separately for females/males. RESULTS: In total, 476 participants (female, n = 283 [59%]; mean [SD] age, 49.7 [10.8] years; obese, 74.4%) completed the survey; 209 had EDS (mean [SD] ESS, 13.8 [2.5]) and 267 did not (mean [SD] ESS, 6.3 [2.5]). Self-reported duration of CPAP use was consistent between the EDS/no EDS cohorts, with most participants using CPAP for 7 to 9 hours/night, 7 nights/week. Participants with EDS commonly reported anxiety ([EDS/no EDS] males: 31.5%/20.0%; females: 53.7%/39.5%), depression (males: 35.6%/24.2%; females: 55.9%/44.9%), and insomnia (males: 19.2%/6.7%; females: 25.7%/12.9%) and showed impairment on the FOSQ-10 ([EDS/no EDS] males: 80.8%/35.0%; females: 91.9%/53.1%). Participants with EDS reported that sleepiness 'very often' prevented physical activity and influenced dietary choices. CONCLUSION: EDS influences choices related to physical activity, caffeine consumption, and diet in patients who are adherent with CPAP. More research is needed to understand the association between EDS and choices of CPAP-adherent patients. Future research should explore the health-related consequences of residual EDS associated with OSA and whether they can be mitigated by improving EDS.

Approximately 1 billion people worldwide have a sleep disorder called obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). People with OSA experience a blockage in their upper airway during sleep, which can lead to snoring, gasping for air, difficulty breathing, and disturbed sleep. As a result, 50%­80% of people with OSA experience excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) ­ the irresistible need to sleep during the daytime. Many people (9%­22%) who are treated for OSA using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) still experience EDS. Previous studies have described the negative impact EDS has on people, such as decreased work productivity and increased risk of motor vehicle accidents. However, it is unclear if EDS impacts health, behavioral choices, and lifestyle in the real world. This study surveyed people with OSA and collected their Fitbit data using Evidation's Achievement app. People with OSA and EDS reported having anxiety, depression, insomnia, and other health problems more often than people with OSA without EDS. Also, people with OSA and EDS reported having more impairments in daytime functioning than people with OSA without EDS. Furthermore, people with OSA and EDS reported that sleepiness 'very often' prevented them from engaging in physical activity. Women with OSA and EDS said that sleepiness 'very often' influenced their food choices. People with OSA and EDS also used caffeine and 'sometimes' used physical activity to stay awake during the daytime. Findings from this study show people with OSA alter their lifestyle and behavioral choices because of EDS.

Cardiovascular Burden of Narcolepsy Disease (CV-BOND): a real-world evidence study.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Narcolepsy is associated with cardiovascular risk factors; however, the risk of new-onset cardiovascular events in this population is unknown. This real-world study evaluated the excess risk of new-onset cardiovascular events in U.S. adults with narcolepsy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using IBM MarketScan administrative claims data (2014-2019) was conducted. A narcolepsy cohort, comprising adults (≥18 years) with at least two outpatient claims containing a narcolepsy diagnosis, of which at least one was non-diagnostic, was matched to a non-narcolepsy control cohort (1:3) based on cohort entry date, age, sex, geographic region, and insurance type. The relative risk of new-onset cardiovascular events was estimated using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model to compute adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: The narcolepsy and matched non-narcolepsy control cohorts included 12 816 and 38 441 individuals, respectively. At baseline, cohort demographics were generally similar; however, patients with narcolepsy had more comorbidities. In adjusted analyses, the risk of new-onset cardiovascular events was higher in the narcolepsy cohort compared with the control cohort: any stroke (HR [95% CI], 1.71 [1.24, 2.34]); heart failure (1.35 [1.03, 1.76]); ischemic stroke (1.67 [1.19, 2.34]); major adverse cardiac event (1.45 [1.20, 1.74]); grouped instances of stroke, atrial fibrillation, or edema (1.48 [1.25, 1.74]); and cardiovascular disease (1.30 [1.08, 1.56]). CONCLUSION: Individuals with narcolepsy are at increased risk of new-onset cardiovascular events compared with individuals without narcolepsy. Physicians should consider cardiovascular risk in patients with narcolepsy when weighing treatment options.