Preparing Patients to Communicate with Their Doctors About Clinical Trials as a Treatment Option: Impact of a Novel Video Intervention for Patients with a Blood Cancer and Their Caregivers.

Cancer clinical trials (CCTs) are imperative for advancing cancer treatment and providing treatment options for patients; however, many barriers exist to offering and enrolling interested and eligible patients. It is crucial to equip patients and caregivers with communication skills that help them initiate and navigate conversations about the option of receiving treatment within a CCT. The aim was to assess the acceptability and impact of a novel video training for patients and caregivers that models strategies for patient-provider communication using the PACES method of healthcare communication and provides information about CCTs. The three-module training was implemented among blood cancer patients and caregivers. Using a single-arm pre-post study design, self-report surveys assessed changes in knowledge, confidence in using the PACES method, and perceived importance of, confidence in, and behavioral intention related to talking with doctors about CCTs. The Patient Report of Communication Behavior (PRCB) scale was administered. Among 192 participants, post-intervention knowledge gains were evident (p < 0.001). Confidence, importance, and likelihood to communicate about CCTs and confidence about using PACES also increased (p < 0.001); females who had never previously spoken to a provider about CCTs demonstrated greater impact (p = 0.045) than other genders. PRCB mean scores increased among patients 65+ who had never spoken to a provider about CCTs, with greater change than patients <65 (p = 0.001). This educational intervention for patients and caregivers increased knowledge about CCTs, skills in communicating with doctors about care and CCTs, and readiness to initiate conversations about CCTs as a potential treatment option.

Community Evaluation of the National Diabetes Education Program's Diabetes HealthSense Website.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of Diabetes HealthSense on knowledge, attitudes, and behavior changes that prevent, delay, or manage diabetes among people at risk (PAR) for diabetes and people with diabetes (PWD). Methods Using a 2-group pretest-posttest design, 15 community sites were randomly assigned to either an intervention or comparison group. Intervention participants attended a group education session with a diabetes educator, followed by 4 weeks of independent use of the Diabetes HealthSense website. The comparison group received no intervention. A total of 311 adults (n = 135 intervention, n = 176 comparison) completed both a pretest and posttest. Outcome measures examined changes in self-reported knowledge, self-efficacy, and behaviors that support diabetes prevention or management. Results Statistically significant within-group pretest to posttest changes were found for almost all outcome measures in the intervention group, with no significant changes in the comparison group. Significant between-group differences were also found for almost all outcome measures at posttest, with the intervention group having more positive outcomes than the comparison group. Conclusions Patient referral to online tools is considered one key component of initial and ongoing diabetes self-management education and support (DSME/S) and is recommended as a way to enhance and extend the reach of in-person diabetes education. Positive outcomes were found for PWD/PAR who used Diabetes HealthSense following a guided education session. Study results suggested that with guided exploration, Diabetes HealthSense provided a valuable tool for educators to use with patients to support and extend the reach of DSME/S.

Hiring relatives as caregivers in two states: developing an education and research agenda for policy makers.

Meeting the long-term care needs of the growing aging population is a priority policy issue in the United States. Yet, hiring relatives as caregivers remains a controversial policy issue. This two-state case study reports findings about views from policy experts regarding a policy option to hire family caregivers in home- and community-based long-term care programs. Policy makers also discussed information needed by other states considering this option and effective approaches to disseminate findings about this option from the Cash and Counseling Demonstration Evaluation. Based on the study results, we present an education and research agenda to communicate these findings to policy makers.

High prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors in women considered low risk by traditional risk assessment.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in women in the United States. The purpose of this study was to characterize the prevalence and awareness of traditional CVD risk factors, obesity, and coronary heart disease (CHD) risk classification using the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) among women attending the 2006 Sister to Sister National Woman's Heart Day event. RESULTS: A total of 8936 participants (mean age 49 +/- 14 years) were evaluated. There was a modest prevalence of traditional risk factors on screening, including non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) >160 mg/dL (27%), HDL-C <40 mg/dL (16%), random glucose level >140 mg/dL (6%), uncontrolled blood pressure > or =140/90 mm Hg (12%), current smoking (6%), and a positive family history of CHD (21%). There was a high prevalence of overweight (39%) or obese individuals (35%) (body mass index [BMI] 25-30 and > or =30 kg/m(2), respectively), as well as those with high waist circumference (> or =35 inches) (55%). Women were classified by FRS as low (85%), intermediate (6%), and high risk (9%). When cardiometabolic risk analyses included waist circumference in addition to the FRS, 59% of low-risk and 50% of intermediate-risk women had 1 or 2 risk factors, and 19% and 41% had > or =3 risk factors, respectively. Women were often unaware of risk factors on screening; among women without a previous diagnosis of dyslipidemia or hypertension, 48% and 7%, respectively, were given new diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: Women participating in the 2006 Sister to Sister National Woman's Heart Day event have a high prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors, especially dyslipidemia, obesity, and high central adiposity, that place them at higher risk for the development of CVD and other comorbidities. The newly identified multiple risk factors in this population support the value of community health screening in women.