Impact of percent body fat on oral glucose tolerance testing: a cross-sectional study in 1512 obese children.

BACKGROUND: Although an association between insulin resistance (IR) and body adiposity has been reported in obese children, this relationship has not been studied as thoroughly as in adults. AIM: We evaluated the association between oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) and percent body fat (PBF) in a sample of 1512 obese children followed at a Pediatric Obesity Clinic. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Six hundred and twenty-eight male and 884 female obese children aged 6 to 18 yr were consecutively enrolled into the study. OGTT was performed with administration of 1.75 g of glucose per kg of body weight (up to 75 g). PBF was estimated through bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) using a population- specific formula recently published by our group. Multivariable median regression was used to evaluate the association between 4 outcomes [glucose area under the curve (AUC), insulin AUC, insulin sensitivity index (ISI), and insulinogenic index (IGI)] and gender, age or pubertal status and PBF. RESULTS: Median PBF was 52% (range 26 to 70%). After correction for age and gender, a 10% increase of PBF was associated with a decrease of -0.50 [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.65 to -0.35] units of ISI and an increase of 0.15 units of IGI (95%CI 0.07 to 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: In obese children, PBF is inversely associated with IR and directly associated to ß-cell response as detected by OGTT.

Prediction of basal metabolic rate in obese children and adolescents considering pubertal stages and anthropometric characteristics or body composition.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To develop and crossvalidate new equations for predicting basal metabolic rate (BMR) in obese children and adolescents in relation to pubertal stages, anthropometric characteristics or body composition. SUBJECTS/METHODS: A total of 1696 obese Caucasian children and adolescents (mean body mass index z-score: 3.5±0.8) participated in this study. BMR was determined by indirect calorimetry and fat-free mass (FFM) and fat mass (FM) by bioelectrical impedance analysis. Equations were derived by stepwise multiple regression analysis using a calibration cohort of 848 subjects, and the equations were crossvalidated with a Bland and Altman method in the remaining 848 subjects. RESULTS: Two new specific equations based on gender (1: males; 0: females), pubertal stages (from 1 to 5, assessed according Marshall & Tanner methods) and body weight (BW, kg), stature (m) or body composition (kg) were generated as follows: (1) BMR=(BW × 0.044)+(stature × 2.836)-(pubertal stage × 0.148)+(gender × 0.781)-0.551 (adjusted coefficient of determination (R(2)adj)= 0.69 and root mean squared error (RMSE)=0.954 MJ); (2) BMR=(FFM × 0.082)+(FM × 0.037)-(pubertal stage × 0.125)+(gender × 0.706)+2.528 (R(2)adj= 0.70 and RMSE=0.943 MJ). In the crossvalidation group, mean-predicted BMR was not significantly different from the mean-measured BMR (MBMR) for all children and adolescents, as well as for boys and girls (difference<2 %), and the limits of agreement (±2 s.d.) were +1.95 and -1.98 MJ/d, (P=NS). BMR was predicted accurately (90-110% of MBMR) in 67% of subjects. CONCLUSION: The new prediction equations considering the pubertal stages allow an accurate and more appropriate (vs equations using chronological age) estimation of BMR in obese children and adolescents.

Oxygen uptake and cardiac performance in obese and normal subjects during exercise.

Work capacity and cardiopulmonary performance were studied in a group of 11 young obese subjects (BMI 39.9 kg/m2) and a group of 10 young normal subjects (BMI 22 kg/m2). First of all they underwent an incremental cycle ergometer test up to exhaustion. Subsequently, every subject of the two groups performed a constant work rate test at different work loads to estimate cardiac output (Q) below anaerobic threshold (AT) by a 20-second CO2 rebreathing method. Obese subjects had a significantly lower AT (79 vs. 109 W). The ratio between oxygen uptake and heart rate (VO2/HR) (O2 pulse) was higher in the obese group; nevertheless, this variable became significantly lower if we took into consideration the ratio between O2 pulse and kilogram fat-free body mass or kilogram body weight. Both these observations suggest that their reduced work tolerance is linked with a reduced oxygen supply to the muscles in activity. Q increased in similar ways in obese and normal subjects at the preset work rates. The ratio Q/body surface (cardiac index; CI) that we considered in order to try to minimize the differences in body sizes between the two groups, increased less in response to increasing work rates in our obese subjects than in normal subjects. As a whole, these data appear to be in line with a relatively less efficient cardiac performance during progressive work rates in obese subjects.