Autoimmune retinopathy: clinical, electrophysiological, and immunological features in nine patients with long-term follow-up.

PURPOSE: We aim to report on the clinical, imaging, immunological, and electrophysiological features of patients with autoimmune retinopathy (AIR) with long-term follow-up. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective study of a consecutive group of AIR patients treated in a tertiary academic medical center. RESULTS: Included were nine patients with a mean ± SD age at presentation of 65 ± 13 years and a median follow-up of 63 months (range 18-120). Five patients were known to have cancer. Median interval between onset of ocular symptoms and diagnosis of AIR was 36 months. Mean baseline and final LogMAR visual acuity were 0.72 ± 0.9 and 1.1 ± 1.2, respectively (p = 0.17). The most common funduscopic findings included optic atrophy and bone-spicule-like pigmentation. Thinning of the nerve fiber layer was the most frequent optical coherence tomographic abnormality. Electroretinographic (ERG) recordings demonstrated variably reduced cone- and rod-derived amplitudes in the majority of eyes at presentation. The most commonly detected anti-retinal antibody was anti-α-enolase. Treatment included immunomodulatory therapy and plasmapheresis. ERG tests showed stability in 64% of eyes throughout the treatment period. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion of AIR, particularly in late middle-aged and elderly patients with "unexplained" visual loss, in light of the non-specific posterior segment signs and the inconsistency of the routinely used ancillary tests.

Outcomes of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair among young adult patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the functional and anatomical outcomes of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair in young adults. METHODS: A retrospective, comparative case series study. Patients between the ages of 18 and 40 years who underwent surgical repair of primary RRD between the years 2006 and 2013 were included. Patients were divided into three groups according to the surgical technique used: scleral buckle (SB), pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) or combined surgery (SB-PPV). RESULTS: Ninety eyes (90 patients) were included. The mean age (SD) was 31.5 ± 5.1 years (range 22-40). Sixty-seven patients underwent SB, 10 had PPV and 13 had SB-PPV. Anatomical success rates were similar between the three groups (87%, 90% and 85% for SB, PPV and SB-PPV groups, respectively; p-value = 0.9). Mean (SD) preoperative LogMAR visual acuity (VA) was 0.46 ± 0.6, 1.73 ± 1.1, 1.1 ± 1.1 for SB, PPV and SB-PPV groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). The VA improved at last follow-up to 0.23 ± 0.4, 0.7 ± 1.5 and 1.09 ± 1.08 in SB, PPV and SB-PPV groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). Macula-off was diagnosed in 19.4% of SB, 80% of PPV and 53.9% of SB-PPV groups (p < 0.0001). In the SB group one phakic patient (1.5%) needed cataract extraction, while following PPV, all phakic eyes (100%) underwent cataract extraction eventually (p-value < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The study emphasizes the efficacy of SB as a primary procedure for the repair of retinal detachment in young adults in terms of anatomical and functional success. Furthermore, preservation of the lens as a result of using SB rather than PPV when possible is of great importance in this age group.

Hybrid Telehealth Medical Retina Clinic Due to Provider Exposure and Quarantine During COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To present our hybrid telehealth medical retina clinic service with intravitreal injections (IVI) treatment as a safe alternative to in-person visits and examination during COVID-19 pandemic disease. METHODS: Due to exposure to a COVID-19 positive retina fellow, our retina service, in quarantine, evaluated patients' medical files and retinal scans using a telemedicine approach. A different protocol for patients coming for IVI during the COVID-19 pandemic was established for IVI administration. RESULTS: During the 14-day quarantine period (between March 18th and March 31st 2020), the hybrid telehealth medical retina clinic performed 523 IVI to 394 patients with a mean age ± SD 70.96 ± 14.4 years. IVI were administered for neovascular age-related macular degeneration in 50.5% of the cases (199 patients), diabetic macular edema in 21.3% (84 patients), retinal vein occlusion in 17.5% (69 patients), and 10.7% for other retinal pathologies (42 patients). No ocular or systemic complications were observed. CONCLUSION: During disasters and pandemics, IVI can be provided safely using a hybrid telehealth medical retina clinic approach but only in the appropriate patient and health care system.

Ophthalmology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To present an established practice protocol for safe and effective hospital-setting ophthalmic practice during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Literature was reviewed to identify articles relevant to COVID-19 pandemic and ophthalmology. The following keywords were used: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 and telemedicine, combined with eye, ophthalmology, conjunctivitis and tears. Data were extracted from the identified manuscripts and discussed among subspecialists to obtain consensus evidence-based practice. RESULTS: A protocol for ophthalmic practice in the era of COVID-19 pandemic was established. The protocol covered patient screening, clinic flow, required personal protective equipment and modifications of ophthalmic equipment for improved safety. CONCLUSION: Important literature emerged with respect to the practice of ophthalmology in the era of COVID-19. An evidence-based ophthalmic practice protocol was established and should be modified in the future to accommodate new insights on the COVID-19 pandemic.