Screening using the fifth vital sign in the electronic medical recording system.

PURPOSE: To investigate the usefulness of screening for patient symptoms as the fifth vital sign using an electronic medical recording system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the electronic medical recording system, all admitted patients received routine nurse-based assessment of discomfort (defined as any physical symptom) at every vital sign check regarding item 2 of the Support Team Assessment Schedule Japanese version (STAS-J). All cancer patients admitted to oncology units were screened at 1-week intervals. Screening-positive was defined when patients had a STAS-J score of 2 or more at least two times in a week. For all screening-positive patients, the palliative care team reviewed each patient's medical records, and provided written recommendations as needed. The primary outcomes were the proportion of screening-positive patient, and the proportion of patients deemed to need additional palliative treatment in the screening-positive patients. RESULTS: Of 2427 patients screened, 223 (9.1%; 95% confidence interval, 8-10%) met the screening-positive criterion. A total of 12 (5.4%; 95% confidence interval, 3-9%) of them were deemed to need additional palliative care, including six patients referred to the PCT within 1 week. In the remaining 211 screening-positive patients, 100 had received adequate palliative care, 68 had already been referred to the palliative care team and 43 had self-limiting transient discomfort. CONCLUSION: This screening system was feasible but the majority of screening-positive patients did not require additional palliative care interventions.

A Japanese region-wide survey of the knowledge, difficulties and self-reported palliative care practices among nurses.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated palliative care knowledge, difficulty and self-reported practice among a region-wide sample of nurses who cared for cancer patients in Japan. METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was distributed to 9 designated cancer centers, 17 community hospitals and 73 district nurse services across 4 regions in 2008. We used the Palliative Care Knowledge Test, the Palliative Care Difficulty Scale (five-point Likert scale) and the Palliative Care Self-Reported Practices Scale (five-point Likert scale). RESULTS: In total, 2378 out of 3008 nurses (79%) responded. The knowledge, difficulty and self-reported practice scores were 51 ± 20%, 3.2 ± 0.7 and 3.7 ± 0.6, respectively. In the knowledge test, philosophy scored highest (88 ± 26%) and psychiatric problems scored lowest (37 ± 29%). In the difficulty test, alleviating symptoms scored most difficult (3.5 ± 0.8) and providing expert support scored least difficult (2.9 ± 1.3). In the self-reported practice questionnaire, pain and delirium relief were most frequently (4.0 ± 0.8) and least frequently (3.1 ± 0.9) provided, respectively. Knowledge was significantly poorer in community hospitals (P = 0.035); difficulty scores were significantly higher in community hospitals (P < 0.001) and district nurse services (P = 0.013); and self-reported practice scores were significantly poorer in community hospitals (P < 0.001) but superior in district nurse services (P < 0.001) than in designated cancer centers. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge, difficulty and self-reported practice for symptom management, particularly psychological symptoms, were insufficient, particularly in community hospitals. Education, expert support and adequate clinical experiences would help provide quality palliative care.

Successful Management of Terminal Delirium With Transdermal Blonanserin Patch in a Terminally Ill Cancer Patient.

Delirium is a distressing condition in terminally ill cancer patients, often treated with antipsychotics. Administering them orally, subcutaneously, or intravenously can be challenging in severely agitated patients. Transdermal antipsychotic patches offer an alternative, but their use for terminal delirium remains underexplored. We present the case of a 73-year-old man with advanced diffuse large B cell lymphoma who developed severe mixed delirium during third-line chemotherapy. Nonpharmacological interventions and oral risperidone plus intravenous haloperidol failed to improve his condition. Subsequently, a transdermal blonanserin patch was applied, resulting in the resolution of hallucinations on day 1 and agitation on day 3, allowing improved communication. The patch was easily applied daily without notable adverse events. However, he deteriorated a week later with an estimated survival of days, ultimately requiring continuous midazolam for refractory agitation. This case underscores the potential of transdermal blonanserin patches for delirium in terminally ill cancer patients, emphasizing the need for future prospective studies.

Longitudinal follow-up study using the distress and impact thermometer in an outpatient chemotherapy setting.

CONTEXT: Although the combined use of the Impact Thermometer (IT) with the Distress Thermometer (DT), DIT, is reported to be a validated screening tool for clinically significant psychological distress in cancer patients, its longitudinal changes in the outpatient chemotherapy setting have not been examined. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to clarify the longitudinal changes in distress evaluated by the DIT and effects of coexisting physical symptoms in an outpatient chemotherapy setting. METHODS: A total of 297 patients who underwent chemotherapy for any malignancy on an outpatient basis were included. All the participants completed a questionnaire that included the DIT and intensities of seven physical symptoms (pain, somnolence, fatigue, dyspnea, appetite loss, abdominal distention, and nausea) at the initial and follow-up visit. RESULTS: Although 109 patients had moderate or severe distress (the DT ≥4 and IT ≥3) at the initial visit, 46.8% of these patients improved their distress (DIT score below the cutoff of moderate distress) at their follow-up visit. Also, 85 patients had severe distress (DT ≥5 and IT ≥4) at the initial visit, and 43.5% of these patients improved their distress (DIT score below the cutoff of severe distress) at their follow-up visit. In a subgroup of patients who had no severe physical symptoms at the initial visit, 69.0% and 68.4% of the patients with moderate or severe distress and severe distress at the initial visit, respectively, improved their distress (DIT scores below the cutoff of moderate and severe distress) at the follow-up visit. CONCLUSION: The distress evaluated by DIT can change on sequential measurements within short time intervals. Further study is needed to determine the appropriate use of the DIT for the screening and monitoring of psychological distress in an outpatient chemotherapy setting.