RESUMEN
Despite rising melanoma incidence in recent decades, there is a trend towards overall decreased mortality, reflecting multiple factors including improved treatment options for metastatic disease. While local treatments are the mainstay for early-stage melanoma, metastatic disease necessitates systemic treatment, with oncolytic virotherapy emerging as a promising option. For this review, articles were retrieved from PubMed from 1964 through 2024. We conducted title, abstract and full-text screening in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify articles describing the use of coxsackievirus A21 (V937), either as monotherapy or as part of combination therapy for malignant melanoma. Fifteen articles met inclusion criteria, offering preclinical and clinical data on V937's efficacy in reducing tumour burden. In addition to reporting manageable safety profiles, clinical trial data examining intratumoral V937 combination therapy with pembrolizumab and ipilimumab also endorsed favourable objective response rates compared to immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy (47% vs. 38% and 21% vs. 10%, respectively). In contrast, intravenous V937 monotherapy failed to yield additional benefit in a cohort of patients with Stage IIIC/IV melanoma (n = 3) despite achieving detectable levels in tumour tissue (1 × 109 TCID50). Although small subsets of patients experienced severe adverse effects and study design limitations imposed constraints on collected data, evidence for the efficacy of V937 remains encouraging. With few clinical trials evaluating V937 in melanoma, additional data is required before routine usage in standard treatment for metastatic lesions.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Melanoma , Viroterapia Oncolítica , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Melanoma/terapia , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Enterovirus , Ipilimumab/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Virus OncolíticosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Vitiligo can be challenging to treat and exhibit an unpredictable clinical course. Phototherapy in the form of visible light can achieve both repigmentation and depigmentation outcomes in vitiligo, with minimal associated adverse events. This review focuses on the mechanistic understandings and clinical outcomes of visible light-based treatments for vitiligo. METHODS: Articles were retrieved from PubMed starting from May 1965 until August 2023, yielding 496 unique articles. We conducted title, abstract, and full-text screening to identify articles describing the use of visible light (380-750 nm), either as part of combination therapy or as monotherapy, for repigmentation or depigmentation treatment in vitiligo. RESULTS: Twenty-seven articles met inclusion criteria, offering preclinical and clinical data regarding the utilization of helium-neon laser (red light) and blue light-emitting diodes (LEDs) as methods of repigmentation therapy in vitiligo. Preclinical and clinical data on the utilization of Q-switched ruby laser (694 nm) and frequency-doubled (FD) Nd:YAG laser (532 nm) for vitiligo depigmentation therapy were also identified. CONCLUSION: While limited by small studies and a lack of standardized administration of phototherapy, the evidence for visible light's effectiveness in managing vitiligo is encouraging. Red light therapy using He-Ne lasers and blue light therapy via LEDs can stimulate repigmentation in patients with vitiligo with minimal adverse events. Q-switched ruby and FD Nd:YAG lasers provide viable, visible light depigmentation options, either alone or with topical agents. With limited clinical data, larger studies are needed to validate the efficacy of visible light therapy in treating vitiligo and to better understand its long-term outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Láseres de Gas , Láseres de Estado Sólido , Vitíligo , Humanos , Vitíligo/terapia , Fototerapia/métodos , Láseres de Estado Sólido/uso terapéutico , Luz , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Dermatología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Humanos , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Creatinina , RiñónRESUMEN
New advancements in medicine have paved the way for targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which have become mainstays of cancer therapy. Targeted therapies work by pinpointing specific molecules in cancer pathways and inhibiting their function, while ICIs target irregularities in the immune system and DNA repair, participating in the induction of cell death. Although these agents have demonstrated great efficacy in treating a diverse set of cancers, they can frequently provoke serious dermatologic adverse effects. The side effects caused by an ICI are classified as immune-related adverse events since ICIs are immunomodulating, while the cutaneous side effects of targeted therapies are known as dermatologic adverse effects. Multiple studies have reported psoriasis and psoriasiform eruptions among the side effects observed in neoplastic patients receiving targeted therapies or ICIs. Psoriasis is an immune-mediated disease characterized by overactive T-cells and keratinocytes. To conduct this review, we retrieved 1363 studies from the PubMed database published between 2008 and 2023 using the terms "psoriasis" AND "cancer treatment." Many of these studies aimed to understand how patients with cancer receiving treatment may develop or even achieve psoriasis remission. Given that cancer and psoriasis involve a delicate balance between immune activation and suppression, ICIs and targeted therapies might produce varying effects. The aim of this review was to explore the relationship between psoriasis and cancer therapeutics while also highlighting the need to prioritize proper management of cutaneous side effects in neoplastic patients.