RESUMEN
AIMS: To evaluate whether the addition of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) to intravenous furosemide is a safe and effective strategy for improving diuretic response in acute heart failure (AHF). METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, including patients with AHF randomized to receive HCTZ or placebo in addition to an intravenous furosemide regimen. The coprimary endpoints were changes in body weight and patient-reported dyspnoea 72 h after randomization. Secondary outcomes included metrics of diuretic response and mortality/rehospitalizations at 30 and 90 days. Safety outcomes (changes in renal function and/or electrolytes) were also assessed. Two hundred and thirty patients (48 women, 83 years) were randomized. Patients assigned to HCTZ were more likely to lose weight at 72 h than those assigned to placebo [2.3 vs. 1.5 kg; adjusted estimated difference (notionally 95 confidence interval) 1.14 (1.84 to 0.42); P 0.002], but there were no significant differences in patient-reported dyspnoea (area under the curve for visual analogue scale: 960 vs. 720; P 0.497). These results were similar 96 h after randomization. Patients allocated to HCTZ showed greater 24 h diuresis (1775 vs. 1400 mL; P 0.05) and weight loss for each 40 mg of furosemide (at 72 and at 96 h) (P 0.001). Patients assigned to HCTZ more frequently presented impaired renal function (increase in creatinine 26.5 moL/L or decrease in eGFR 50; 46.5 vs. 17.2; P 0.001), but hypokalaemia and hypokalaemia were similar between groups. There were no differences in mortality or rehospitalizations. CONCLUSION: The addition of HCTZ to loop diuretic therapy improved diuretic response in patients with AHF.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Hipopotasemia , Humanos , Femenino , Furosemida/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de los Simportadores del Cloruro de Sodio/uso terapéutico , Hipopotasemia/inducido químicamente , Hipopotasemia/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Diuréticos/uso terapéutico , Diuréticos/efectos adversos , Hidroclorotiazida/uso terapéutico , DisneaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The addition of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) to furosemide in the CLOROTIC (Combining Loop with Thiazide Diuretics for Decompensated Heart Failure) trial improved the diuretic response in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). OBJECTIVES: This work aimed to evaluate if these results differ across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS: This post hoc analysis of the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled CLOROTIC trial enrolled 230 patients with AHF to receive either HCTZ or a placebo in addition to an intravenous furosemide regimen. The influence of LVEF on primary and secondary outcomes was evaluated. RESULTS: The median LVEF was 55%: 166 (72%) patients had LVEF >40%, and 64 (28%) had LVEF ≤40%. Patients with a lower LVEF were younger, more likely to be male, had a higher prevalence of ischemic heart disease, and had higher natriuretic peptide levels. The addition of HCTZ to furosemide was associated with the greatest weight loss at 72 of 96 hours, better metrics of diuretic response, and greater 24-hour diuresis compared with placebo, with no significant differences according to the LVEF category (using 2 LVEF cutoff points: 40% and 50%) or LVEF as a continuous variable (all P values were insignificant). There were no significant differences observed with the addition of HCTZ in terms of mortality, rehospitalizations, or safety endpoints (impaired renal function, hyponatremia, and hypokalemia) among the 2 LVEF groups (all P values were insignificant). CONCLUSIONS: Adding HCTZ to intravenous furosemide seems to be effective strategy for improving diuretic response in AHF without treatment effect modification according to baseline LVEF. (Combining Loop with Thiazide Diuretics for Decompensated Heart Failure [CLOROTIC], NCT01647932; Randomized, double blinded, multicenter study, to asses Safety and Efficacy of the Combination of Loop With Thiazide-type Diuretics vs Loop diuretics with placebo in Patients With Decompensated, EudraCT Number 2013-001852-36).
RESUMEN
AIMS: To determine the prevalence and the impact on prognosis of metabolic alkalosis (MA) in patients admitted for acute heart failure (AHF). METHODS AND RESULTS: The ALCALOTIC is a multicenter, observational cohort study that prospectively included patients admitted for AHF. Patients were classified into four groups according to their acid-base status on admission: acidosis, MA, respiratory alkalosis, and normal pH (reference group for comparison). Primary endpoint was all-cause in-hospital mortality, and secondary endpoints included 30/90-day all-cause mortality, all-cause readmission, and readmission for HF. Associations between endpoints and acid-base alterations were estimated in a multivariate Cox regression model including sex, age, comorbidities, and Barthel index and expressed as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Six hundred sixty-five patients were included (84 years and 57% women), and 40% had acid-base alterations on admission: 188 (28%) acidosis and 78 (12%) alkalosis. The prevalence (95% CI) of MA was 9% (6.8-11.2%). Patients with MA were more women; had fewer comorbidities, better renal function, and higher left ventricle ejection fraction values; and received more treatment with oral acetazolamide during hospitalization and at discharge. MA was not associated with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality and 30/90-day all-cause mortality or readmissions but was associated with a significant increase in readmissions for HF at 30 and 90 days (adjusted HR [95% CI] 3.294 [1.397-7.767], p = 0.006 and 2.314 [1.075-4.978], p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of MA in patients admitted for AHF was 9%, and its presence was associated with more readmissions for HF but not with all-cause mortality.
Asunto(s)
Alcalosis , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Readmisión del Paciente , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Alcalosis/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Anciano , Enfermedad Aguda , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Alemania/epidemiología , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The role of comorbidities in heart failure (HF) outcome has been previously investigated, although mostly individually. We investigated the individual effect of 13 comorbidities on HF prognosis and looked for differences according to left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), classified as reduced (HFrEF), mildly-reduced (HFmrEF) and preserved (HFpEF). METHODS: We included patients from the EAHFE and RICA registries and analysed the following comorbidities: hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes mellitus (DM), atrial fibrillation (AF), coronary artery disease (CAD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart valve disease (HVD), cerebrovascular disease (CVD), neoplasia, peripheral artery disease (PAD), dementia and liver cirrhosis (LC). Association of each comorbidity with all-cause mortality was assessed by an adjusted Cox regression analysis that included the 13 comorbidities, age, sex, Barthel index, New York Heart Association functional class and LVEF and expressed as adjusted Hazard Ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). RESULTS: We analysed 8,336 patients (82 years-old; 53% women; 66% with HFpEF). Mean follow-up was 1.0 years. Respect to HFrEF, mortality was lower in HFmrEF (HR:0.74;0.64-0.86) and HFpEF (HR:0.75;0.68-0.84). Considering patients all together, eight comorbidities were associated with mortality: LC (HR:1.85;1.42-2.42), HVD (HR:1.63;1.48-1.80), CKD (HR:1.39;1.28-1.52), PAD (HR:1.37;1.21-1.54), neoplasia (HR:1.29;1.15-1.44), DM (HR:1.26;1.15-1.37), dementia (HR:1.17;1.01-1.36) and COPD (HR:1.17;1.06-1.29). Associations were similar in the three LVEF subgroups, with LC, HVD, CKD and DM remaining significant in the three subgroups. CONCLUSION: HF comorbidities are associated differently with mortality, LC being the most associated with mortality. For some comorbidities, this association can be significantly different according to the LVEF.
Asunto(s)
Demencia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Masculino , Volumen Sistólico , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Pronóstico , Comorbilidad , Sistema de Registros , Cirrosis Hepática , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Demencia/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
AIM: Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are one of the most used drugs to control symptoms in patients with acute heart failure (HF). However, the evidence on its safety is inconclusive. The objective was to describe the characteristics of patients admitted for HF and treated with BZDs and to assess the relationship of this treatment and mortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional, multicentre (74 Spanish hospitals), cohort study. Patients admitted for HF were divided depending on whether they were treated with BZDs or not. Propensity score analysis matched patients in both groups in a 1:1 manner according to different factors. The primary outcome was mortality at day 7. Secondary outcomes were mortality at days 30 and 180, as well as readmissions and emergency room visits at 180 days. RESULTS: We included 1855 patients: 639 (34.4%) had prescribed BZDs treatment versus 1216 (65.6%) who had not been treated. Patients receiving BZDs had advanced heart disease, severe symptoms, need more HF intensive treatment and higher mortality. After propensity matching 381 balanced paired cases were included in each group. Treatment with BZDs was not associated with greater risk of mortality at day 7 of index hospitalization (7.6% vs 5.2%, adjusted OR 1.49, 95% CI 0.83-2.68, p = 0.186). There were also no differences between groups in terms of mortality at day 30 and 180, readmissions or visits to the emergency room. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support that benzodiazepines could be safely used for improving symptoms. in patients admitted for acute HF in terms of short-medium term mortality.
Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Benzodiazepinas/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Transversales , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Aim: To estimate the projected effectiveness of dapagliflozin in subjects with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction in clinical practice in Spain. Materials & methods: This multicenter cohort study included subjects aged 50 years or older consecutively hospitalized for HF in internal medicine departments in Spain. The projected clinical benefits of dapagliflozin were estimated based on results from the DAPA-HF trial. Results: A total of 1595 patients were enrolled, of whom 1199 (75.2%) were eligible for dapagliflozin. Within 1 year after discharge, 21.6% of patients eligible for dapagliflozin were rehospitalized for HF and 20.5% died. Full implementation of dapagliflozin led to an absolute risk reduction of 3.5% for mortality (number needed to treat = 28) and 6.5% (number needed to treat = 15) for HF readmission. Conclusion: Treatment with dapagliflozin in clinical practice may markedly reduce mortality and readmissions for HF.
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction is a severe disease with a high risk of hospitalization and mortality. With this condition, the heart muscle cannot pump properly. This means that not enough blood is pumped from the heart, reducing the amount of oxygen to the body. Fortunately, there are treatments that reduce this risk, in patients with heart failure. SGLT2 inhibitors, including dapagliflozin, are among the first therapies given to patients with heart failure. In this study, we investigated the potential benefits of adding dapagliflozin to the treatment of patients admitted to the hospital in Spain for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Our data showed that dapagliflozin was able to reduce the risk of further events (e.g., heart attack) in these patients.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda , Humanos , Volumen Sistólico , Estudios de Cohortes , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos de Bencidrilo/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
AIMS: In patients with acute heart failure (AHF), the addition of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) to furosemide improved diuretic response in the CLOROTIC trial. This work aimed to evaluate if these effects differ across the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) spectrum. METHODS AND RESULTS: This post-hoc analysis of the CLOROTIC trial analysed 230 patients with AHF and explored the influence of eGFR on primary and secondary endpoints. The median eGFR was 43 ml/min/1.73 m2 (range 14-109) and 23% had eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (group 1), 24% from 45 to 59 ml/min/1.73 m2 (group 2), and 53% <45 ml/min/1.73 m2 (group 3). Patients treated with HCTZ had greatest weight loss at 72 h in all three groups, but patients in group 1 had a significantly greater response (-2.1 kg [-3.0 to 0.5]), compared to patients in groups 2 (-1.3 kg [-2.3 to 0.2]) and 3 (-0.1 kg [-1.3 to 0.4]) (p-value for interaction = 0.246). At 96 h, the differences in weight were -1.8 kg (-3.0 to -0.3), -1.4 kg (-2.6 to 0.3), and -0.5 kg (-1.3 to -0.1) in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p-value for interaction = 0.256). There were no significant differences observed with the addition of HCTZ in terms of diuretic response, mortality or rehospitalizations, or safety endpoints (impaired renal function, hyponatraemia, and hypokalaemia) among the three eGFR groups (all p-values for interaction were no significant). CONCLUSION: The addition of eGFR-adjusted doses of oral HCTZ to loop diuretics in patients with AHF improved diuretic response across the eGFR spectrum. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01647932; EudraCT number: 2013-001852-36.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Diuréticos/uso terapéutico , Furosemida/uso terapéutico , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Hidroclorotiazida/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de los Simportadores del Cloruro de Sodio/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) could be a common cause of heart failure (HF). The objective of the study was to estimate the prevalence of CA in patients with HF. METHODS: Observational, prospective, and multicenter study involving 30 Spanish hospitals. A total of 453 patients ≥ 65 years with HF and an interventricular septum or posterior wall thickness > 12 mm were included. All patients underwent a 99mTc-DPD/PYP/HMDP scintigraphy and monoclonal bands were studied, following the current criteria for non-invasive diagnosis. In inconclusive cases, biopsies were performed. RESULTS: The vast majority of CA were diagnosed non-invasively. The prevalence was 20.1%. Most of the CA were transthyretin (ATTR-CM, 84.6%), with a minority of cardiac light-chain amyloidosis (AL-CM, 2.2%). The remaining (13.2%) was untyped. The prevalence was significantly higher in men (60.1% vs 39.9%, p = 0.019). Of the patients with CA, 26.5% had a left ventricular ejection fraction less than 50%. CONCLUSIONS: CA was the cause of HF in one out of five patients and should be screened in the elderly with HF and myocardial thickening, regardless of sex and LVEF. Few transthyretin-gene-sequencing studies were performed in older patients. In many patients, it was not possible to determine the amyloid subtype.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: There are few data in the Spanish population about the causes of death in patients admitted to internal medicine departments for heart failure. Their study according to left ventricular ejection fraction (reduced: rEF, mid-range: mEF, and preserved: pEF) could improve the knowledge of patients and their prognosis. METHODS: Prospective multicentre cohort study of 4144 patients admitted with heart failure to internal medicine departments. Their clinical characteristics, mortality rate and causes were classified according to pEF (≥ 50%), mEF (40%-49%) and rEF (<40%). Patients were followed-up for a median of one year. RESULTS: There were 1198 deaths (29%). The cause of death was cardiovascular (CV) in 833 patients (69.5%), mainly heart failure (50%) and sudden cardiac death (7.5%). Non-cardiovascular (NoCV) causes were responsible for 365 deaths (30.5%). The most common NoCV causes were infections (13%). The most frequent and early cause in all groups was heart failure. Patients with pEF, compared to the other groups, had lower risk of sudden cardiac death and higher risk of infections (P <.05). The causes of death in patients with mrEF were closer to those with pEF. CONCLUSIONS: The causes of death in patients with heart failure were different depending on ejection fraction strata. Patients with mEF and pEF, due to their high comorbidity and higher frequency of NoCV death, would require comprehensive management by internal medicine.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Causas de Muerte , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Medicina Interna , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Volumen SistólicoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Heart failure (HF) and cancer are currently the leading causes of death worldwide, with an increasing incidence with age. Little is known about the treatment received and the prognosis of patients with acute HF and a prior cancer diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: to determine the clinical characteristics, palliative treatment received, and prognostic impact of patients with acute HF and a history of solid tumor. METHODS: The EPICTER study ("Epidemiological survey of advanced heart failure") is a cross-sectional, multicenter project that consecutively collected patients admitted for acute HF in 74 Spanish hospitals. Patients were classified into two groups according to whether they met criteria for acute HF with and without solid cancer, and the groups were subsequently compared. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted, using the forward stepwise method. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of solid tumor on prognosis in patients with acute HF. RESULTS: A total of 3127 patients were included, of which 394 patients (13%) had a prior diagnosis of some type of solid cancer. Patients with a history of cancer presented a greater frequency of weight loss at admission: 18% vs. 12% (p = 0.030). In the cancer group, functional impairment was noted more frequently: 43% vs. 35%, p = 0.039). Patients with a history of solid cancer more frequently presented with acute HF with preserved ejection fraction (65% vs. 58%, p = 0.048) than reduced or mildly reduced. In-hospital and 6-month follow-up mortality was 31% (110/357) in patients with solid cancer vs. 26% (637/2466), p = 0.046. CONCLUSION: Our investigation demonstrates that in-hospital mortality and mortality during 6-month follow-up in patients with acute HF were higher in those subjects with a history of concomitant solid tumor cancer diagnosis.
RESUMEN
Introduction: There are studies that evaluate the association between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure (HF) but there is little evidence regarding the prognosis of this comorbidity in older patients admitted for acute HF. In addition, little attention has been given to the extracardiac and extrapulmonary symptoms presented by patients with HF and COPD in more advanced stages. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of COPD on mortality in elderly patients with acute and advanced HF and the clinical manifestations and management from a palliative point of view. Methods: The EPICTER study ("Epidemiological survey of advanced heart failure") is a cross-sectional, multicenter project that consecutively collected patients admitted for HF in 74 Spanish hospitals. Demographic, clinical, treatment, organ-dependent terminal criteria (NYHA III-IV, LVEF <20%, intractable angina, HF despite optimal treatment), and general terminal criteria (estimated survival <6 months, patient/family acceptance of palliative approach, and one of the following: evidence of HF progression, multiple Emergency Room visits or admissions in the last six months, 10% weight loss in the last six months, and functional impairment) were collected. Terminal HF was considered if the patient met at least one organ-dependent criterion and all the general criteria. Both groups (HF with COPD and without COPD) were compared. A Kaplan−Meier survival analysis was performed to evaluate the presence of COPD on the vital prognosis of patients with HF. Results: A total of 3100 patients were included of which 812 had COPD. In the COPD group, dyspnea and anxiety were more frequently observed (86.2% vs. 75.3%, p = 0.001 and 35.4% vs. 31.2%, p = 0.043, respectively). In patients with a history of COPD, presentation of HF was in the form of acute pulmonary edema (21% vs. 14.4% in patients without COPD, p = 0.0001). Patients with COPD more frequently suffered from advanced HF (28.9% vs. 19.4%; p < 0.001). Consultation with the hospital palliative care service during admission was more frequent when patients with HF presented with associated COPD (94% vs. 6.8%; p = 0.036). In-hospital and six-month follow-up mortality was 36.5% in patients with COPD vs. 30.7% in patients without COPD, p = 0.005. The mean number of hospital admissions during follow-up was higher in patients with HF and COPD than in those with isolated HF (0.63 ± 0.98 vs. 0.51 ± 0.84; p < 0.002). Survival analysis showed that patients with a history of COPD had fewer survival days during follow-up than those without COPD (log Rank chi-squared 4.895 and p = 0.027). Conclusions: patients with HF and COPD had more severe symptoms (dyspnea and anxiety) and also a worse prognosis than patients without COPD. However, the prognosis of patients admitted to our setting is poor and many patients with HF and COPD may not receive the assessment and palliative care support they need. Palliative care is necessary in chronic non-oncologic diseases, especially in multipathologic and symptom-intensive patients. This is a clinical care aspect to be improved and evaluated in future research studies.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) has emerged as a new biomarker in heart failure. The objective of the study is to determine whether serum CA125 levels predict total mortality and readmissions at one year in patients >70 years old with acute heart failure (AHF) and preserved ejection fraction (PEF). METHODS: Multicenter prospective observational study, which included 359 patients (mean age 81.5 years). The primary endpoint was total all-cause mortality and total readmissions for AHF at 1 year. A negative binomial regression technique was used to evaluate the association between CA125 and both endpoints. RESULTS: At one year of follow-up, 87 deaths (24.2%) were registered. The patients in the lower quartile of CA125 had a lower crude mortality rate (14.4%, 26.7, 26.7, 29.2; p=0.09). After multivariate analysis, the CA125 value was positively associated with a higher risk (p=0.009). Such association was also positive but borderline significant for the risk of readmissions (p=0.089). CONCLUSIONS: In a population older than 70 years hospitalized for AHF with PEF, elevated levels of CA125 are associated with an increased risk of death at one year of follow-up. The association with readmission for AHF was more uncertain. Low levels of CA125 identifies a subgroup at low-risk.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antígeno Ca-125 , Carbohidratos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Humanos , Pronóstico , Volumen SistólicoRESUMEN
Modes of death in patients with heart failure (HF) have been well characterized in randomized studies, but data from real-life are scarce, especially in the elderly, women and in HF with mid-range or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Our purpose was to examine modes of death in HF patients according to age, sex and LVEF. We analysed the mode of death of HF patients from two prospective multicentre contemporary Spanish registries conducted by cardiologists (REDINSCOR, n = 2150) and by internists (RICA, n = 1396). Mode of death was pre-specified. Out of 3546 patients, 485 (13.7%) died during the 9-month follow-up. Cardiovascular (CV) causes were the most frequent, regardless of the age, sex and LVEF. More than half of patients died due to worsening HF in both groups of patients, followed by other non-CV causes in those attended by internists, and sudden cardiac death in those cared by cardiologists. Stroke was more common among elderly patients, women and HF with preserved LVEF. Non-CV causes, particularly infectious diseases, accounted for a remarkable proportion of deaths, especially in the elderly and in HF patients with preserved LVEF. Functional class, age and anaemia had a strong influence on both CV and non-CV death. CV death due to refractory HF was the most prevalent among our population, irrespective of age, sex or LVEF. However, a significant proportion of HF patients died from non-CV causes, particularly elderly with mid-range and preserved LVEF. These patients could benefit significantly from a multidisciplinary follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Causas de Muerte , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Factores Sexuales , España/epidemiología , Volumen Sistólico , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Palliative care in patients with advanced heart failure is strongly recommended by Clinical Practice Guidelines. We aimed to calculate the prevalence of advanced heart failure in admitted patients, to describe their management, and to analyse the factors that influence their referral to specialised palliative care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional, multicentre study that consecutively included patients admitted for heart failure in 74 Spanish hospitals. If they met criteria for advanced heart failure, their treatment, complications and procedures were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 3153 patients were included. Of them, 739 (23%) met criteria for advanced heart failure. They were more likely to be women, older and to have a history of anaemia, chronic kidney disease and cognitive impairment. For their management, furosemide infusions (30%) and vasodilators (21%) were used. Refractory symptoms were treated with opioids (47%) and benzodiazepines (44%). Palliative care was only provided in the last hours of life in 48% of them. A multidisciplinary approach, involving palliative care specialists was sought in 15% of these patients. Treatment with furosemide infusions, an advanced New York Heart Association functional class, to meet advanced HF criteria and the presence of cancer were associated with the referral to specialised palliative care. CONCLUSIONS: Almost one in four patients admitted with HF met criteria of advanced disease. They were older and had more comorbidities. Specialist palliative care services were involved in only a minority of patients, mainly those who were highly symptomatic or had cancer.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Cuidados Paliativos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Hospitalización , Humanos , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
AIM: To improve the knowledge on characteristics, treatment and prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF) and mid-range ejection fraction discharged after an acute HF episode. METHODS: We prospectively included and followed 2753 patients admitted with HF to Internal Medicine units. Patients were classified according to ejection fraction (EF) into three strata: reduced, EF <40% (HFrEF); mid-range EF 40-49% (HFmrEF); and preserved EF ≥50% (HFpEF). Clinical, echocardiographic, laboratory data and treatment at discharge were recorded and the groups were compared. A multivariable analysis was performed to evaluate the association of EF with outcomes in these three groups. RESULTS: A total of 10.2% of patients had HFmrEF. They were more likely to be men and to have a history of chronic kidney disease and higher levels of NT-proBNP than those with HFpEF. Compared to patients with HFrEF, these patients had less frequently ischaemic aetiology and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and a higher proportion of atrial fibrillation and hypertension. In HFmrEF, the use of beta-blockers, aldosterone antagonists and antiplatelet drugs was lower than in HFrEF, but the use of calcium channel blockers and anticoagulants was higher. There were no differences between groups in 30-day and 1-year readmission rates. However, patients with HFrEF had significantly higher 1-year mortality (28%) than patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF (20% and 22%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical characteristics and treatment among patients with HF differ depending on EF strata. Prognosis of patients with HFmrEF is closer to that of HFpEF, being medium term survival better than in HFrEF.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Medicina Interna/tendencias , Admisión del Paciente/tendencias , Sistema de Registros , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Mortalidad/tendencias , Estudios Prospectivos , España/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The specialty treating patients with heart failure (HF) has a prognostic impact in the hospital setting but this issue remains under debate in the ambulatory environment. We aimed to compare the clinical profile and outcomes of outpatients with HF treated by cardiologists or internists. METHODS: We analyzed the clinical, electrocardiogram, laboratory, and echocardiographic data of 2 prospective multicenter Spanish cohorts of outpatients with HF treated by cardiologists (REDINSCOR, n=2150) or by internists (RICA, n=1396). Propensity score matching analysis was used to test the influence of physician specialty on outcome. RESULTS: Cardiologist-treated patients were often men, were younger, and had ischemic etiology and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Patients followed up by internists were predominantly women, were older, and a higher percentage had preserved LVEF and associated comorbidities. The 9-month mortality was lower in the REDINSCOR cohort (11.6% vs 16.9%; P<.001), but the 9-month HF-readmission rates were similar (15.7% vs 16.9%; P=.349). The propensity matching analysis selected 558 pairs of comparable patients and continued to show significantly lower 9-month mortality in the cardiology cohort (12.0% vs 18.8%; RR, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 0.48-0.85; P=.002), with no relevant differences in the 9-month HF-readmission rate (18.1% vs 17.2%; RR, 0.95; 95%CI, 0.74-1.22; P=.695). CONCLUSIONS: Age, sex, LVEF and comorbidities were major determinants of specialty-related referral in HF outpatients. An in-depth propensity matched analysis showed significantly lower 9-month mortality in the cardiologist cohort.
Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Cardiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Internado y Residencia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Puntaje de Propensión , Derivación y Consulta , Sistema de Registros , EspañaRESUMEN
AIM: To evaluate precipitating factors (PF) of exacerbation in heart failure (HF) and their relationship with age, preserved vs. reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and short-term prognosis. METHODS: We included and followed 2962 patients admitted with acute HF to Internal Medicine Units. Several PF were identified. Differences in PF according to preserved vs. reduced LVEF and age (patients≥80years vs. younger) were analyzed. Primary endpoints were readmission due to worsening HF and all-cause mortality at 3months follow-up. Multivariable Cox models were conducted to identify the independent predictors of 3-months mortality and readmission. RESULTS: More than half of the patients were 80years and over, 47% were women and 61% had preserved LVEF. Atrial fibrillation (AF) and myocardial ischemia were the more common cause of decompensation among octogenarians. It was more frequent to find myocardial ischemia or non-adherence to treatment as precipitants in patients with systolic dysfunction. However, respiratory infections, AF and poor control of blood pressure were more usual in patients with preserved LVEF compared to those with LVEF <50%. Patients admitted for HF precipitated by myocardial ischemia had a higher risk of readmission at 3months (HR 1.49; CI 95%: 1.12-1.99, p=0.006) and the longest hospital stay (12days). PF showed no predictive value for mortality. CONCLUSION: Myocardial ischemia as a PF was an independent marker for HF readmissions at 3-months follow-up. Precipitants are different depending on the age and LVEF of patients. Their identification could improve risk stratification and prevention strategies.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/sangre , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Admisión del Paciente/tendencias , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Función Ventricular Izquierda/fisiología , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad/tendencias , Factores Desencadenantes , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether osteoprotegerin - an emerging inflammatory biomarker in cardiovascular diseases - predicts outcomes in patients with acute heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. METHODS: We measured urea, creatinine, hemoglobin, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and osteoprotegerin on admission in 177 patients admitted with decompensated heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction at least 45%. The population was divided according to the median values of osteoprotegerin (158.6âng/l). Primary and secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality and death/readmission at 1-year follow-up, respectively. Multivariable Cox models were generated for osteoprotegerin and common risk factors. We also evaluated the reclassification of patients into risk categories after adding this biomarker to the model. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients died during the follow-up and 84 had a combined event. Kaplan-Meier curves showed significantly increased primary and secondary endpoints according to the median of osteoprotegerin (log-rank, Pâ<â0.0001 and 0.001, respectively). After adjustment for age, estimated glomerular filtration rate, hemoglobin, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, BMI and New York Heart Association III-IV, osteoprotegerin was a significant predictor of primary endpoint evaluated as continuous and categorized variable (relative risk 2.49, 95% confidence interval 1.18-5.24, Pâ=â0.016 and relative risk 2.35, 95% confidence interval 1.11-4.96, Pâ=â0.025, respectively). The clinical prediction model with osteoprotegerin evaluated with Net Reclassification Index was not significant. CONCLUSION: Osteoprotegerin is independently associated with all-cause mortality in patients hospitalized for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. However, adding this biomarker into a risk model does not improve its prediction value.