Biochemical evaluation and ligand binding studies on glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterase from Staphylococcus aureus using STD-NMR spectroscopy and molecular docking analysis.

Glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterase (GDPD) is a highly conserved enzyme in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms. It catalyses the hydrolysis of various glycerophosphodiesters into glycerol-3-phosphate and corresponding alcohols, which serve as building blocks in several biosynthetic pathways. This enzyme is a well-known virulence factor in many pathogenic bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus, and is thus considered a potential drug target. In this study, competent E. coli BL21(DE3)pLysS expression cells were used to express the GDPD enzyme from vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA), which was then purified using size exclusion and anion exchange chromatography. The hydrolytic activity of GDPD was evaluated on the non-physiological substrate bis(p-nitrophenyl) phosphate (BpNPP), which indicated functional activity of the enzyme. 79 drugs were evaluated for their inhibitory potential against GDPD enzyme by the colorimetric assay. Out of 79 drugs, 13 drugs, including tenofovir (1), adenosine (2), clioquinol (11), bromazepam (12), lamotrigine (13), sulfadiazine (14), azathioprine (15), nicotine (16), sitagliptin PO4 (17), doxofylline (18), clindamycin phosphate (19), gentamycin sulphate (20), and ceftriaxone sodium (21) revealed varying degrees of inhibitory potential with IC50 values in the range of 400 ± 0.007-951 ± 0.016 µM. All drugs were also evaluated for their binding interactions with the target enzyme by saturation transfer difference (STD-NMR) spectroscopy. 10 drugs demonstrated STD interactions and hence, showed binding affinity with the enzyme. Exceptionally, tenofovir (1) was identified to be a better inhibitor with an IC50 value of 400 ± 0.007 µM, as compared to the standard EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) (IC50 = 470 ± 0.008 µM). Moreover, molecular docking studies have identified key interactions of the ligand (tenofovir) with the binding site residues of the enzyme.

Rhodanine-benzamides as potential hits for α-amylase enzyme inhibitors and radical (DPPH and ABTS) scavengers.

A series of 3-substituted and 3,5-disubstituted rhodanine-based derivatives were synthesized from 3-aminorhodanine and examined for α-amylase inhibitory, DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) and ABTS (2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) radical scavenging activities in vitro. These derivatives displayed significant α-amylase inhibitory potential with IC50 values of 11.01-56.04 µM in comparison to standard acarbose (IC50 = 9.08 ± 0.07 µM). Especially, compounds 7 (IC50 = 11.01 ± 0.07 µM) and 8 (IC50 = 12.01 ± 0.07 µM) showed highest α-amylase inhibitory activities among the whole series. In addition to α-amylase inhibitory activity, all compounds also demonstrated significant scavenging activities against DPPH and ABTS radicals, with IC50 values ranging from 12.24 to 57.33 and 13.29-59.09 µM, respectively, as compared to the standard ascorbic acid (IC50 = 15.08 ± 0.03 µM for DPPH; IC50 = 16.09 ± 0.17 µM for ABTS). These findings reveal that the nature and position of the substituents on the phenyl ring(s) are crucial for variation in the activities. The structure-activity relationship (SAR) revealed that the compounds bearing an electron-withdrawing group (EWG) at para substitution possessed the highest activity. In kinetic studies, only the km value was changed, with no observed changes in Vmax, indicating a competitive inhibition. Molecular docking studies revealed important interactions between compounds and the α-amylase active pocket. Further advanced research needs to perform on the identified compounds in order to obtain potential antidiabetic agents.

Imidazole-thiadiazole hybrids: A multitarget de novo drug design approach, in vitro evaluation, ADME/T, and in silico studies.

A library of imidazole-thiadiazole compounds (1-24) was synthesized to explore their therapeutic applications. The compounds were subjected to meticulous in vitro evaluation against α-glucosidase, α-amylase, acetylcholinesterase (AChE), and butylcholinesterase (BChE) enzymes. Compounds were also investigated for antioxidant activities using cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assays. Derivatives 5-7, 9-11, 18, and 19 displayed potent inhibitory activities with IC50 values of 1.4 ± 0.01 to 13.6 ± 0.01 and 0.9 ± 0.01 to 12.8 ± 0.02 µM against α-glucosidase, and α-amylase enzymes, respectively, compared to the standard acarbose (IC50 = 14.8 ± 0.01 µM). Compounds 11-13, 16, 20, and 21 exhibited potent activity IC50 = 8.6 ± 0.02 to 34.7 ± 0.03 µM against AChE enzyme, compared to donepezil chloride (IC50 = 39.2 ± 0.05 µM). Compound 21 demonstrated comparable inhibition IC50 = 45.1 ± 0.09 µM against BChE, compared to donepezil chloride (IC50 = 44.2 ± 0.05 µM). All compounds also demonstrated excellent antioxidant activities via CUPRAC, FRAP, and DPPH methods. Complementing the experimental studies, extensive kinetics, ADME/T, and molecular docking analysis were also conducted to unravel the pharmacokinetics and safety profiles of the designed compounds. These studies supported the experimental findings and facilitated the prioritization of hit candidates for subsequent stages of drug development.

Syntheses, in vitro, and in silico studies of rhodanine-based schiff bases as potential α-amylase inhibitors and radicals (DPPH and ABTS) scavengers.

A two-step reaction method was used to synthesize a series of rhodanine-based Schiff bases (2-33) that were characterized using spectroscopic techniques. All compounds were assessed for α-amylase inhibitory and radical scavenging (DPPH and ABTS) activities. In comparison to the standard acarbose (IC50 = 9.08 ± 0.07 µM), all compounds demonstrated good to moderate α-amylase inhibitory activity (IC50 = 10.91 ± 0.08-61.89 ± 0.102 µM). Compounds also demonstrated significantly higher DPPH (IC50 = 10.33 ± 0.02-96.65 ± 0.03 µM) and ABTS (IC50 = 12.01 ± 0.12-97.47 ± 0.13 µM) radical scavenging activities than ascorbic acid (DPPH, IC50 = 15.08 ± 0.03 µM; ABTS, IC50 = 16.09 ± 0.17 µM). The limited structure-activity relationship (SAR) suggests that the position and nature of the substituted groups on the phenyl ring have a vital role in varying inhibitory potential. Among the series, compounds with an electron-withdrawing group at the para position showed the highest potency. Kinetic studies revealed that the compounds followed a competitive mode of inhibition. Molecular docking results are found to agree with experimental findings, showing that compounds reside in the active pocket due to the main rhodanine moiety.

Bioevaluation of synthetic pyridones as dual inhibitors of α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes and potential antioxidants.

Herein, a library of novel pyridone derivatives 1-34 was designed, synthesized, and evaluated for α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitory as well as antioxidant activities. Pyridone derivatives 1-34 were synthesized via a one-pot multi-component reaction of variously substituted aromatic aldehydes, acetophenone, ethyl cyanoacetate, and ammonium acetate in absolute ethanol. Synthetic compounds 1-34 were structurally characterized by different spectroscopic techniques. Most of the tested compounds showed more promising inhibition potential than the standard acarbose (IC50 = 14.87 ± 0.16 µM) but compounds 13 and 12 were found to be the most potent compounds with IC50 values of 9.20 ± 0.14 µM and 3.05 ± 0.18 µM against α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes, respectively. Compounds 1-34 also displayed moderate antioxidant potential in the range of IC50 = 96.50 ± 0.45 to 189.98 ± 1.00 µM in comparison to the control butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) (IC50 = 66.50 ± 0.36 µM), in DPPH radical scavenging activities. Additionally, all synthetic derivatives were subjected to a molecular docking study to investigate the interaction details of compounds 1-34 (ligands) with the active site of enzymes (receptors). These results indicate that the newly synthesized pyridone class may serve as promising lead candidates for controlling diabetes mellitus and as antioxidants.

Multitargeted inhibition of key enzymes associated with diabetes and Alzheimer's disease by 1,3,4-oxadiazole derivatives: Synthesis, in vitro screening, and computational studies.

A library of 22 derivatives of 1,3,4-oxadiazole-2-thiol was synthesized, structurally characterized, and assessed for its potential to inhibit α-amylase, α-glucosidase, acetylcholinesterase (AChE), butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), and antioxidant activities. Most of the tested compounds demonstrated good to moderate inhibition potential; however, their activity was lower than that of the standard acarbose. Significantly, compound 3f exhibited the highest inhibition potential against α-glucosidase and α-amylase enzymes, with IC50 values of 18.52 ± 0.09 and 20.25 ± 1.05 µM, respectively, in comparison to the standard acarbose (12.29 ± 0.26; 15.98 ± 0.14 µM). Compounds also demonstrated varying degrees of inhibitory potential against AChE (IC50 = 9.25 ± 0.19 to 36.15 ± 0.12 µM) and BChE (IC50 = 10.06 ± 0.43 to 35.13 ± 0.12 µM) enzymes compared to the standard donepezil (IC50 = 2.01 ± 0.12; 3.12 ± 0.06 µM), as well as DPPH (IC50 = 20.98 ± 0.06 to 52.83 ± 0.12 µM) and ABTS radical scavenging activities (IC50 = 22.29 ± 0.18 to 47.98 ± 0.03 µM) in comparison to the standard ascorbic acid (IC50 = 18.12 ± 0.15; 19.19 ± 0.72). The kinetic investigations have demonstrated that the compounds exhibit competitive-type inhibition for α-amylase, noncompetitive-type inhibition for α-glucosidase and AChE, and mixed-type inhibition for BChE. Additionally, a molecular docking study was performed on all synthetic oxadiazoles to explore the interaction details of these compounds with the active sites of the enzymes.

Dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-one derivatives as novel and potential leads for diabetic management.

A variety of dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-one derivatives (1-37) were synthesized via "one-pot" three-component reaction scheme by treating aniline and different aromatic aldehydes with isatoic anhydride in the presence of acetic acid. Chemical structures of compounds were deduced by different spectroscopic techniques including EI-MS, HREI-MS, 1H-, and 13C-NMR. Compounds were subjected to α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities. A number of derivatives exhibited significant to moderate inhibition potential against α-amylase (IC50 = 23.33 ± 0.02-88.65 ± 0.23 µM) and α-glucosidase (IC50 = 25.01 ± 0.12-89.99 ± 0.09 µM) enzymes, respectively. Results were compared with the standard acarbose (IC50 = 17.08 ± 0.07 µM for α-amylase and IC50 = 17.67 ± 0.09 µM for α-glucosidase). Structure-activity relationship (SAR) was rationalized by analyzing the substituents effects on inhibitory potential. Kinetic studies were implemented to find the mode of inhibition by compounds which revealed competitive inhibition for α-amylase and non-competitive inhibition for α-glucosidase. However, in silico study identified several important binding interactions of ligands (synthetic analogues) with the active site of both enzymes.

Biology-oriented drug synthesis and evaluation of secnidazole esters as novel enzyme inhibitors.

The identification of novel compounds that can inhibit physiologically and metabolically important drug targets or enzymes has prime importance in medicinal chemistry. With this aim, a range of secnidazole esters 1-30 were synthesized under the heading of biology-oriented drug synthesis by the 1,1'-carbonyldiimidazole-mediated coupling reaction between secnidazole and varyingly benzoic acid derivatives. All compounds were screened for inhibitory activity against human carbonic anhydrase (hCA) I and II, acetylcholinesterase (AChE), butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), and α-glucosidase. The results indicate that all the synthesized compounds showed potent inhibitory activities against all targets, as compared to the standard inhibitors, revealed by IC50 values. Ki values of the secnidazole derivatives 1-30 for hCA I, hCA II, AChE, BChE, and α-glucosidase enzymes were obtained in the ranges of 47.37-190.74, 44.38-198.21, 12.14-68.37, 8.04-61.53, and 7.78-45.91 nM, respectively. To assess the enzyme-ligand interactions, the optimized most active compounds 2, 3, 8, 9, 14, 17, and 23 were subjected to molecular docking studies with modeled AChE, BChE, hCA I, hCA II, and α-glucosidase enzymes, where several important and key interactions were monitored with amino acid residues of each target enzyme.

3-substituted coumarin derivatives over-activate the HslV protease: A potential drug target for antibacterial activity.

The bacterial HslVU complex consists of two different proteins, i.e., the HslV protease and the HslU ATPase. The functional HslVU enzyme complex forms only when the HslU c-terminal helix is inserted into the cavity located between two adjacent HslV monomers in order to allosterically activate the HslV protease. Based on its essential role in maintaining microbial proteostasis as well its absence from human beings, it is considered a promising therapeutic target for designing antibacterial agents. The goal of the present study was to find out potential drug candidates that could over-activate the HslV protease and produce aberrant proteolysis in pathogenic bacteria. Derivatives of 3-substituted coumarin have been identified as potential HslV protease activators based on their highest docking scores, ideal interaction patterns, and significant in-vitro HslV activation potential. Their ED50 values were in the sub-micromolar range, i.e., 0.4-0.48µM. The conformational stability of the contacts between the HslV dimer and the active compounds was further confirmed by molecular dynamics studies. Correspondingly, the ADMET characteristics of these lead molecules considerably demonstrated their significant non-toxic drug-like abilities. This research not only identified small non-peptidic HslV protease activators but also improved the understanding of the mode of action of 3-substituted coumarin derivatives as antibacterials.

Biology-oriented drug synthesis (BIODS), in vitro urease inhibitory activity, and in silico studies on ibuprofen derivatives.

Novel ibuprofen derivatives 1-19 including ibuprofen hydrazide 1, and substituted thiourea derivatives 2-19 were synthesized and characterized by EI-MS, FAB-MS, HREI-MS, HRFAB-MS, 1H-, and 13C-NMR spectroscopic techniques. The synthetic molecules 1-19 were examined for their in vitro urease inhibition and were found to display a diversified degree of inhibitory potential in the range of IC50 = 2.96-178 µM as compared to the standard thiourea (IC50 = 21.32 ± 0.22 µM). Out of nineteen, thirteen derivatives 2-4, 6, 7, 9, 11-15, 17, and 18 demonstrated remarkable inhibitory activity with IC50 values of 2.96 ± 1.11 to 16.1 ± 1.07 µM, compound 5 exhibited moderate inhibition with IC50 value of 37.3 ± 0.41 µM, whereas, compounds 1, 8, and 10 demonstrated weak inhibition against urease enzyme. Almost all structural features are participating in the activity; however, limited structure-activity relationship was discussed on the basis of different structural features, i.e., different functional groups and their positions at aryl part. In addition, molecular docking study was performed in order to understand the ligands binding interactions with the active site of urease enzyme.

4-Oxycoumarinyl linked acetohydrazide Schiff bases as potent urease inhibitors.

Urease enzyme is responsible to catalyze the hydrolysis of urea into carbamate and ammonia. Then carbamate hydrolyzed to ammonia and carbon dioxide. Excess release of ammonia leads to increase pH in stomach that actually encourages the survival of Helicobacter pylori. H. pylori involves in various disorders most commonly peptic ulcer, pyelonephritis, hepatic coma, kidney stone formation, urolithiasis, and encephalopathy. Apart from many pharmacological properties, coumarin and Schiff bases are known to possess urease inhibitory activity. Therefore, these two pharmacologically important scaffolds are combined into single hybrid molecules to assess their potential as urease inhibitors. For this aim, N'-benzylidene-2-((2-oxo-2H-chromen-4-yl)oxy)acetohydrazide Schiff base derivatives 3-27 were synthesized by following a three step reaction strategy. Structures of all synthetic molecules were characterized by EI-MS, 1H-, and 13C NMR spectroscopic techniques. All molecules were assessed for urease inhibitory activity and found to possess a varying degree of inhibitory potential in the range of IC50 = 12.3 ± 0.69 to 88.8 ± 0.04 µM. Amongst the active analogs, compounds 7 (IC50 = 16.2 ± 0.11 µM), 9 (IC50 = 15.2 ± 0.14 µM), 10 (IC50 = 12.3 ± 0.69 µM), 12 (IC50 = 16.3 ± 0.45 µM), and 15 (IC50 = 17.6 ± 0.28 µM) were identified as potent inhibitors compared to standard urea (IC50 = 21.5 ± 0.47 µM). It is conferred from structure-activity relationship (SAR) that variation in inhibitory activity is due to different substitutions pattern on aryl ring. Moreover, molecular docking studies were carried out to understand the interactions of ligand with the active pocket of urease enzyme.

Potent α-amylase inhibitors and radical (DPPH and ABTS) scavengers based on benzofuran-2-yl(phenyl)methanone derivatives: Syntheses, in vitro, kinetics, and in silico studies.

Thirty benzofuran-2-yl(phenyl)methanones 1-30 were synthesized and characterized their structures by spectroscopic techniques. Substituted phenacyl bromide and different derivatives of 2-hydroxy-benzaldehyde treated in the presence of anhydrous K2CO3 in acetonitrile at room temperature to afford the desired benzofurans 1-30. All compounds were screened for their in vitro α-amylase inhibitory and radical scavenging (DPPH and ABTS) activities. Results revealed that para substituted compounds were found to be more active than the others with IC50 values ranges for α-amylase inhibition (IC50 = 18.04-48.33 µM), DPPH (IC50 = 16.04-32.33 µM) and ABTS (IC50 = 16.99-33.01 µM) radical scavenging activities. Activities results were compared with the standards acarbose (IC50 = 16.08 ± 0.07 µM) for α-amylase, ascorbic acid (IC50 = 15.08 ± 0.03 and 15.09 ± 0.17 µM) for DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging activities, respectively. Kinetic studies predicted that all compounds followed non-competitive mechanism of inhibition. Molecular docking results showed good protein-ligand interactions profile against the corresponding target. To the best of our knowledge, out of thirty molecules, ten compounds 18-20, 22, and 25-30 were structurally new.

Synthesis, in vitro and in silico screening of 2-amino-4-aryl-6-(phenylthio) pyridine-3,5-dicarbonitriles as novel α-glucosidase inhibitors.

Inhibition of α-glucosidase enzyme is of prime importance for the treatment of diabetes mellitus (DM). Apart of many organic scaffolds, pyridine based compounds have previously been reported for wide range of bioactivities. The current study reports a series of pyridine based synthetic analogues for their α-glucosidase inhibitory potential assessed by in vitro, kinetics and in silico studies. For this purpose, 2-amino-4-aryl-6-(phenylthio)pyridine-3,5-dicarbonitriles 1-28 were synthesized and subjected to in vitro screening. Several analogs, including 1-3, 7, 9, 11-14, and 16 showed many folds increased inhibitory potential in comparison to the standard acarbose (IC50 = 750 ± 10 µM). Interestingly, compound 7 (IC50 = 55.6 ± 0.3 µM) exhibited thirteen-folds greater inhibition strength than the standard acarbose. Kinetic studies on most potent molecule 7 revealed a competitive type inhibitory mechanism. In silico studies have been performed to examine the binding mode of ligand (compound 7) with the active site residues of α-glucosidase enzyme.

Synthesis and screening of (E)-3-(2-benzylidenehydrazinyl)-5,6-diphenyl-1,2,4-triazine analogs as novel dual inhibitors of α-amylase and α-glucosidase.

(E)-3-(2-Benzylidenehydrazinyl)-5,6-diphenyl-1,2,4-triazines analogs 1-27 were synthesized by multi-step reaction scheme and subjected to in vitro inhibitory screening against α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes. Out of these twenty-seven synthetic analogs, ten compounds 14-17, 19, and 21-25 are structurally new. All compounds exhibited good to moderate inhibitory potential in terms of IC50 values ranging (IC50 = 13.02 ± 0.04-46.90 ± 0.05 µM) and (IC50 = 13.09 ± 0.08-46.44 ± 0.24 µM) in comparison to standard acarbose (IC50 = 12.94 ± 0.27 µM and 10.95 ± 0.08 µM), for α-amylase and α-glucosidase, respectively. Structure-activity relationship indicated that analogs with halogen substitution(s) were found more active as compared to compounds bearing other substituents. Kinetic studies on most active α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitors 5, 7, 9, 15, 24, and 27, suggested non-competitive and competitive types of inhibition mechanism for α-amylase and α-glucosidase, respectively. Molecular docking studies predicted the good protein-ligand interaction (PLI) profile with key interactions such as arene-arene, H-<, <-<, and <-H etc., against the corresponding targets.

Atenolol thiourea hybrid as potent urease inhibitors: Design, biology-oriented drug synthesis, inhibitory activity screening, and molecular docking studies.

Current research deals with the biology-oriented drug synthesis (BIODS) of twenty-three new thiourea analogs of pharmacologically important drug atenolol which is a well-known medicine to treat hypertension as well as cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Structural characterization of all compounds was done by various spectroscopic techniques. Compounds 1-23 were subjected for urease inhibitory activity in vitro. Screening results revealed that whole library was found to be active having IC50 ranges from 11.73 ±â€¯0.28 to 212.24 ±â€¯0.42 µM. It is noteworthy that several derivatives including 3 (IC50 = 21.65 ±â€¯0.31 µM), 8 (IC50 = 19.26 ±â€¯0.42 µM), 9 (IC50 = 21.27 ±â€¯0.25 µM), 12 (IC50 = 21.52 ±â€¯0.42 µM), 17 (IC50 = 19.26 ±â€¯0.42 µM), 20 (IC50 = 16.78 ±â€¯0.34 µM), and 22 (IC50 = 11.73 ±â€¯0.28 µM) showed excellent inhibitory potential than parent atenolol (IC50 = 64.36 ±â€¯0.19 µM) and standard thiourea (IC50 = 21.74 ±â€¯1.76 µM). A most probable structure-activity relationship (SAR) was anticipated by observing varying degree of inhibitory potential given by compounds. However, molecular insights regarding the binding mode of atenolol thiourea analogs within the active pocket of urease enzyme was rationalized by molecular docking studies.

Synthesis, in vitro α-amylase inhibitory, and radicals (DPPH & ABTS) scavenging potentials of new N-sulfonohydrazide substituted indazoles.

Over-expression of α-amylase enzyme causes hyperglycemia which lead to many physiological complications including oxidative stress, one of the most commonly associated problem with diabetes mellitus. Marketed α-amylase inhibitors such as acarbose, voglibose, and miglitol used to treat type-II diabetes mellitus, but also linked to several harmful effects. Therefore, it is essential to explore new and nontoxic antidiabetic agents with additional antioxidant properties. In this connection, a series of new N-sulfonohydrazide substituted indazoles 1-19 were synthesized by multistep reaction scheme and assessed for in vitro α-amylase inhibitory and radical (DPPH and ABTS) scavenging properties. All compounds were fully characterized by different spectroscopic techniques including 1H, 13C NMR, EI-MS, HREI-MS, ESI-MS, and HRESI-MS. Compounds showed promising α-amylase inhibitory activities (IC50 = 1.23 ±â€¯0.06-4.5 ±â€¯0.03 µM) as compared to the standard acarbose (IC50 1.20 ±â€¯0.09 µM). In addition to that all derivatives were found good to moderate scavengers of DPPH (IC50 2.01 ±â€¯0.13-5.3 ±â€¯0.11) and ABTS (IC50 = 2.34 ±â€¯0.07-5.5 ±â€¯0.07 µM) radicals, in comparison with standard ascorbic acid having scavenging activities with IC50 = 1.99 ±â€¯0.09 µM, and IC50 2.03 ±â€¯0.11 µM for DPPH and ABTS radicals. In silico molecular docking study was conducted to rationalize the binding interaction of α-amylase enzyme with ligands. Compounds were observed as mixed type inhibitors in enzyme kinetic characterization.

Bis-coumarins; non-cytotoxic selective urease inhibitors and antiglycation agents.

The current study is concerned with the identification of lead molecules based on the bis-coumarin scaffold having selective urease inhibitory and antiglycation activities. For that purpose, bis-coumarins (1-44) were synthesized and structurally characterized by different spectroscopic techniques. Eight derivatives 4, 8-10, 14, 17, 34, and 40 demonstrated urease inhibition in the range of IC50 = 4.4 ±â€¯0.21-115.6 ±â€¯2.13 µM, as compared to standard thiourea (IC50 = 21.3 ±â€¯1.3 µM). Especially, compound 17 (IC50 = 4.4 ±â€¯0.21 µM) was found to be five-fold more potent than the standard. Kinetic studies were also performed on compound 17 in order to identify the mechanism of inhibition. Kinetic studies revealed that compound 17 is a competitive inhibitor. Antiglycation activity was evaluated using glycation of bovine serum albumin by methylglyoxal in vitro. Compounds 2, 11-13, 16, 17, 19-22, 35, 37, and 42 showed good to moderate antiglycation activities with IC50 values of 333.63-919.72 µM, as compared to the standard rutin (IC50 = 294.46 ±â€¯1.5 µM). Results of both assays showed that the compounds with urease inhibitory activity did not show any antiglycation potential, and vice versa. Only compound 17 showed dual inhibition potential. All compounds were also evaluated for cytotoxicity. Compounds 17, 19, and 37 showed a weak toxicity towards 3 T3 mouse fibroblast cell line. All other compounds were found to be non-cytotoxic. Urease inhibition is an approach to treat infections caused by ureolytic bacteria whereas inhibition of glycation of proteins is a strategy to avoid late diabetic complications. Therefore, these compounds may serve as leads for further research.

Biology-oriented drug synthesis (BIODS), in vitro urease inhibitory activity, and in silico study of S-naproxen derivatives.

Current study is based on the biology-oriented drug synthesis (BIODS) of S-naproxen (NSAID) derivatives and the evaluation of their urease inhibitory potential. In this regard, a variety of S-naproxen derivatives 2-39 including hydrazide 1, Schiff bases 2-21, aroyl substituted hydrazides 22-24, sulfohydrazides 25-34, 2-mercapto oxadiazole 35, phenacyl substituted 2-mercapto oxadiazoles 36-39 were synthesized under the umbrella of BIODS by simple chemical transformation of its pharmacophoric carboxylic group. Compounds 1-39 were evaluated for in vitro urease inhibitory activity and most of them showed good to moderate inhibitory potential in the range of IC50 = 14.01 ±â€¯0.23-76.43 ±â€¯0.8 µM as compared to standard acetohydroxamic acid (IC50 = 27.0 ±â€¯0.5 µM). Limited structure-activity relationship (SAR) was established in order to rationalize the participation of varying groups (R) in the inhibitory potential of compounds. Molecular docking study on all active compounds was also carried out to decipher the interactions detail of the ligand with the receptors of active site of enzyme.

Schiff bases of tryptamine as potent inhibitors of nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolases (NTPDases): Structure-activity relationship.

Overexpression of NTPDases leads to a number of pathological situations such as thrombosis, and cancer. Thus, effective inhibitors are required to combat these pathological situations. Different classes of NTPDase inhibitors are reported so far including nucleotides and their derivatives, sulfonated dyes such as reactive blue 2, suramin and its derivatives, and polyoxomatalates (POMs). Suramin is a well-known and potent NTPDase inhibitor, nonetheless, a range of side effects are also associated with it. Reactive blue 2 also had non-specific side effects that become apparent at high concentrations. In addition, most of the NTPDase inhibitors are high molecular weight compounds, always required tedious chemical steps to synthesize. Hence, there is still need to explore novel, low molecular weight, easy to synthesize, and potent NTPDase inhibitors. Keeping in mind the known NTPDase inhibitors with imine functionality and nitrogen heterocycles, Schiff bases of tryptamine, 1-26, were synthesized and characterized by spectroscopic techniques such as EI-MS, HREI-MS, 1H-, and 13C NMR. All the synthetic compounds were evaluated for the inhibitory avidity against activities of three major isoforms of NTPDases: NTPDase-1, NTPDase-3, and NTPDase-8. Cumulatively, eighteen compounds were found to show potent inhibition (Ki = 0.0200-0.350 µM) of NTPDase-1, twelve (Ki = 0.071-1.060 µM) of NTPDase-3, and fifteen compounds inhibited (Ki = 0.0700-4.03 µM) NTPDase-8 activity. As a comparison, the Kis of the standard inhibitor suramin were 1.260 ±â€¯0.007, 6.39 ±â€¯0.89 and 1.180 ±â€¯0.002 µM, respectively. Kinetic studies were performed on lead compounds (6, 5, and 21) with human (h-) NTPDase-1, -3, and -8, and Lineweaver-Burk plot analysis showed that they were all competitive inhibitors. In silico study was conducted on compound 6 that showed the highest level of inhibition of NTPDase-1 to understand the binding mode in the active site of the enzyme.

Benzylidine indane-1,3-diones: As novel urease inhibitors; synthesis, in vitro, and in silico studies.

Current study deals with the evaluation of indane-1,3-dione based compounds as new class of urease inhibitors. For that purpose, benzylidine indane-1,3-diones (1-30) were synthesized and fully characterized by different spectroscopic techniques including EI-MS, HREI-MS, 1H, and 13C NMR. All synthetic molecules 1-30 were evaluated for urease inhibitory activity and showed good to moderate inhibitory potential within the range of (IC50 = 11.60 ±â€¯0.3-257.05 ±â€¯0.7 µM) as compared to the standard acetohydroxamic acid (IC50 = 27.0 ±â€¯0.5 µM). Compound 1 (IC50 = 11.60 ±â€¯0.3 µM) was found to be most potent inhibitor amongst all derivatives. The key binding interactions of most active compounds within the enzyme pocket were evaluated through in silico studies.