MBL2 gene polymorphisms and its relation to infection in Brazilian systemic lupus erythematosus patients: A 10-years follow-up study.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multifactorial disease and MBL2 genetic variants, which are associated to differential peripheral MBL levels, potentially affect its etiology and increase infection risk in this population. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential association of MBL2 polymorphisms of the coding and promoter gene region and haplotypes on hospitalization, number of admission and days of admission for major infection causes in Brazilian SLE patients. Methods: 325 SLE patients from a southern Brazilian outpatient SLE clinic were genotyped in 2006 for MBL2 gene polymorphisms from coding and promoter region (rs1800450, rs1800451, rs5030737, rs11003125, and rs7096206) and followed until 2016. Clinical and laboratory data from each patient were obtained and information regarding the need for hospitalization, the number of admissions and number of days admitted for infection treatment were compiled and compared with MBL2 gene polymorphisms and haplotypes. A linear regression analysis was constructed considering the variables of bivariate which demonstrated an association (p<0.05) and variables which had a theoretical basement. RESULTS: No difference was found in polymorphism prevalence when comparing the group that was admitted for infection treatment and the group who did not. Allele C, and haplotypes LY and HY correlated with more infection hospitalizations [wild-type homozygosis for C: 2 (IQR 1-3), heterozygosis for C: 3 (IQR 2-6) p=0.038; LY 2 (IQR 1-3) p=0.049; HY 2 (IQR 1-3) p=0.005] and haplotype HY carriers stayed fewer days in hospital for infection treatment: 18 (IQR 10-38) p=0.041. When linear regression was applied HY associated with shorter admission time for infections (-18.11 days, p=0.021) and HY (-1.52 admission, p 0.001) carriers with older age at diagnosis had less admissions for infection (HY regression model: -0.42, p=0.006; LY regression model -0.04, p=0.010; -0.04, p=0.013). CONCLUSION: The presence of the HY promoter haplotype associated to fewer in hospital care for infection treatment probably due to higher MBL plasma levels. Also, HY haplotype and older age at SLE diagnosis is related to less admissions for infection. This factor should be taken into consideration, since infection is a very import cause of mortality in SLE patients being also related to aggressive immunosuppressive treatment.

Survival analysis of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in a tertiary hospital in southern Brazil.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) treatments progress over the years. However, the mortality remains higher than in the general population. Few studies have examined SLE patients' survival in Brazil. This study aims to identify the main characteristics and risk factors to predict mortality and recognize the main causes of death in Brazilian patients with SLE. We retrospectively assessed clinical, demographic, and serological characteristics from 600 patients followed since 2001 in SLE outpatient clinic from Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. Risk factors for mortality were examined by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. A p < 0.05 was considered significant. There were 527 survivors (87.83%). The main causes of death were cardiovascular disease (17%), infection (17%), and infection and SLE activity (17%). Risk factors for death were age at diagnosis (HR 1.065, CI 95% 1.039-10.092), SLICC damage index (HR 1.299, CI 95% 1.076-1569), antiphospholip syndrome (HR 3.021, CI 95% 1.307-6.985), and metilprednisolone pulse (HR 2.628, CI 95% 1.283-5.383). Antimalarials was a protective factor for death (HR 0.191, CI 95% 0.064-0.570). Cardiovascular disease, infection, and SLE activity associated with infection were the main known causes of deaths in our SLE patients. Secondary antiphospolipid syndrome, highest score in SLICC damage index, advanced age at diagnosis, and high dose of corticosteroids were risk factors for mortality. Antimalarials was an important protective factor.