Remote versus early corticosteroid wean outcomes in heart transplant recipients in the contemporary era.

PURPOSE: The risks and benefits of remote corticosteroid weaning in heart transplant recipients more than 2 years post-transplant are unknown. We compared outcomes in patients undergoing early and remote steroid weaning after heart transplantation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study (range 09, 1991-04, 2017). Primary outcomes included short-term and long-term mortality, allograft dysfunction, and burden of rejection. Secondary outcomes included impact on hemoglobin A1c, lipid panel, bone scan T-score, and body mass index. RESULTS: 63 patients underwent corticosteroid weaning between 2012 and 2017. Outcomes of patients weaned early (n = 34; median time from transplant = 1.1 years) were compared with those weaned late (n = 29; median time from transplant = 4.4 years). 52 (82.5%) patients were successfully weaned off corticosteroids. No statistically significant difference in outcomes was found between the early and late weaning groups (p = .20). There were no differences in allograft function (p-value = .16), incidence of rejection (p = .46), or mortality (p = .15). Improvement in metabolic profile was seen in both groups but was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: In heart transplant recipients, remote vs early weaning of corticosteroids is not associated with significant differences in graft function or the incidence of rejection after 1-year follow-up. Moreover, there were no significant differences in survival up to 3 years between the two groups.

Two-dimensional strain echocardiography-derived left ventricular ejection fraction, volumes, and global systolic dyssynchrony index: Comparison with three-dimensional echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography is the most accurate echocardiographic method for ventricular chamber quantification. It is unclear how two-dimensional (2D) techniques perform against 3D technology and whether 2D methods can be extrapolated to obtain 3D data. METHODS: Retrospective review of transthoracic echocardiography was performed, with comparison of ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and 2D strain-derived global longitudinal strain (GLS) and synchrony index. RESULTS: One-hundred patients were identified. Using 3D echocardiography as reference standard, good correlation was noted with 2D strain-derived EF (r = 0.89, P < 0.01) and with 2D standard biplane EF (r = 0.90, P < 0.01) and similarly for EDV (r = 0.84 and r = 0.81, respectively, both P < 0.01). Two-dimensional strain-derived EDV by 8% and 2D biplane-derived EDV underestimated by 8% (P < 0.01). In relation to 3D EF, 2D strain underestimated by 2% and 2D standard biplane overestimated by 2% (P < 0.01). There was a negative correlation between GLS and 3D EF (r = 0.84, P = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, 3D EF could be derived from 2D strain [3D EF = 34.345 + (0.125 * EDV) + (-0.289 * ESV) + (-1.141 * GLS)]. Three-dimensional echocardiography-derived synchrony parameter (ie, standard deviation from mean time to minimum systolic volume from 16 subvolumes) did not correlate with 2D strain-derived synchrony index (r = 0.171). CONCLUSIONS: Two-dimensional standard biplane and 2D strain EF and EDV strongly correlate with 3D EF and EDV. Although 2D methods are predictive of 3D findings, over- and underestimations may occur. Three-dimensional echocardiography should be used when available.

A Brief Report: Effectiveness of a One Time Health Promotion Intervention in Sustaining Knowledge About Cardiovascular Diseases Among Latino/Hispanic Women.

 Health promotion programs are effective at reducing cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). One-time health promotion programs are effective at increasing immediate knowledge gain about CVDs. It is unknown if such interventions translate into sustained knowledge gain or actual behavior modifications. We surveyed a group of mostly Latino/Hispanic women who previously participated in a Por Tu Corazon even to determine if knowledge gain were sustained after two years and risk reduction behaviors were implemented. Of 125, participants, 56% returned two years later. There was no difference between the knowledge score of the initial post-event survey and the subsequent pre-event survey (78.85 ± 22.55 vs. 75.2 ± 24.01, p = 0.34). Of the 70 participants who returned two years later, 63% reported implementing at least one risk modification. Sustained knowledge gain about CVDs and implementation of risk modifications can be achieved after a single health promotion intervention in a highly motivated group of Latino/Hispanic women.

Physiological Concepts of Cardiogenic Shock Using Pressure-Volume Loop Simulations: A Case-Based Review.

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex syndrome of end-organ hypoperfusion that requires timely and thorough decision making. While many pathophysiologic and technical principles have been delineated in this issue, the purpose of this case-based report is to reflect upon some of these principles in the context of real-life scenarios. Given the obvious lacuna of evidence-based recommendations in CS, the authors provide a rationale for their decision-making process. The first case is a young post-heart-transplant patient with graft failure who was in a state of biventricular failure and restrictive physiology and required acute mechanical circulatory support (MCS). The second case is a patient who suffered a mechanical complication after experiencing an acute myocardial infarction that required MCS.

Pacing for Vasovagal Syncope.

Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is due to a common autonomic reflex involving the cardiovascular system. It is associated with bradycardia (cardioinhibitory response) and/or hypotension (vasodepressor response), likely mediated by parasympathetic activation and sympathetic inhibition. While generally a situational, isolated and/or self-limited event, for some, VVS is recurrent, unpredictable and debilitating. Conservative, non-pharmacological management may help, but no specific medical therapy has been proven widely effective. Permanent pacing may have specific benefit, but its value has been debated. The temporal causative association of bradycardia with syncope in those with VVS may help identify which patient could benefit from pacing but the timing and type of pacing in lieu of blood pressure changes may be critical. The mode, rate, pacing algorithm and time to initiate dual-chamber pacing preferentially with respect to the vasovagal reflex may be important to prevent or ameliorate the faint but completely convincing data are not yet available. Based on available data, DDD pacing with the closed loop stimulation algorithm appears a viable, if not the best, alternative presently to prevent recurrent VVS episodes. While several knowledge gaps remain, permanent pacing appears to have a role in managing select patients with VVS.