RESUMEN
There is great evidence to support improved maternal and neonatal outcomes when a patient delivers in a center that is suited to the needs of both the birthing person and the fetus. As rural centers have closed, access remains challenging. This manuscript examines The Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) challenges, needs of rural hospitals including education, and elaborates further upon the need to expand maternal transport in rural areas to improve outcomes in the future.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Hospitales Rurales , Transferencia de Pacientes , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Población Rural , Transporte de Pacientes , Servicios de Salud Materno-InfantilRESUMEN
Blood pressure is the key vital sign to detecting hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. The importance of taking blood pressure properly was recently underscored by the publication of updated ACC/AHA guidelines for measuring blood pressure in patients. However, the recommended position of seating with arms and back supported is not always feasible to achieve clinically, especially for inpatient women who are pregnant. Therefore, it is clinically important to understand the effects of alternative patient positioning on blood pressure measurements. We conducted a review of studies which considered patient position on the effect of blood pressure in pregnancy. This review demonstrates that clinically significant differences may occur based on patient positioning. Despite the small number of primary studies that include pregnant women, notable reductions in blood pressure measurements have been observed in the left lateral recumbent position, a common position during labor or during monitoring, in comparison to measurements taken in the supported seated position. Ultimately, these differences could affect the clinical management of patients and care should be taken to document and consider the position in which the reading was taken.