In Search of Nodular Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia: A Distinct Entity or Simply Hyperplastic Polyps Arising in Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia?

CONTEXT.­: Nodular gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is a reported phenotype of GAVE that has histologic features overlapping with gastric hyperplastic polyps (GHPs), with additional features often seen in flat mucosa of GAVE. OBJECTIVE.­: To determine if nodular GAVE and GHPs are distinct lesions by evaluating the prevalence of features reported in nodular GAVE in GHPs with or without associated GAVE. DESIGN.­: A review of all lesions diagnosed as GHPs between 2014 and 2017 was performed. Slides were analyzed for a number of features including established histologic features of GAVE without knowledge of clinical or endoscopic features. RESULTS.­: A total of 90 polyps were analyzed including 18 from patients with GAVE (20%). GAVE polyps were larger than non-GAVE polyps (average size, 1.3 cm versus 0.68 cm; P < .001), with more common extensive ulceration and associated granulation tissue (61.11% [n = 11] versus 4.17% [n = 3]; P = .004), fibrin thrombi (50% [n = 9] versus 15% [n = 11]; P = .003), moderate to marked vascular ectasia (83% [n = 15] versus 35% [n = 11]; P = .001), and fibrohyalinosis (72% [n = 13] versus 28% [n = 20]; P = .001). All polyps showed foveolar hyperplasia and smooth muscle proliferation. There were no features that were exclusively found in GAVE or non-GAVE cases. CONCLUSIONS.­: Nodular GAVE appears to represent GHPs arising in a background of GAVE, with superimposed features found in flat mucosa of GAVE stomachs. The presence of fibrin thrombi, marked vascular ectasia, fibrohyalinosis, and/or ulceration in a GHP is suggestive but not diagnostic of GAVE, and the absence of these features does not rule out GAVE.

Don't SUMP it! Utility of PLAG1 immunocytochemistry in basaloid SUMP subcategory.

BACKGROUND: Basaloid salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (B-SUMP) is an indeterminate diagnostic subcategory, with pleomorphic adenoma (PA) representing the most common benign neoplasm. Pleomorphic adenoma gene 1 (PLAG1) staining is frequently seen in PAs and could aid in distinguishing them from other basaloid neoplasms. The authors evaluated the utility of PLAG1 immunocytochemistry (ICC) in differentiating PAs from other basaloid neoplasms in smears and liquid-based cytology (LBC) specimens. METHODS: In total, 45 B-SUMP cytology aspirates and corresponding surgical excision specimens were identified. PLAG1 immunostaining was performed in all aspirates and surgical excision specimens and was scored as positive (strong/diffuse), equivocal (focal/weak), or negative. RESULTS: PLAG1 ICC was performed directly on 38 smears and seven LBC specimens. PLAG1 was positive in 29 of 45 cases (64%), whereas six of 45 (13%) were equivocal, and 10 of 45 (22%) were negative. PLAG1-positive aspirates included 26 (90%) PAs, two (7%) basal cell adenomas (BCAs), and one (3%) carcinoma ex-PA. PLAG1-equivocal aspirates included four (67%) PAs and two (33%) BCAs, whereas negative aspirates included five (50%) BCAs, four (40%) adenoid cystic carcinomas, and one (10%) metastatic adenosquamous carcinoma. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values were 87%, 86%, 93%, and 75%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy was 87%. CONCLUSIONS: PLAG1 ICC is useful when positive (strong/diffuse) and can be reliably performed on smears and LBC specimens. PLAG1 was positive in most PAs and in a small subset of BCAs. Therefore, in the absence of atypical cytologic features, PLAG1-positive tumors could be diagnosed as benign, with a note favoring PA versus BCA. In contrast, PLAG1-negative/equivocal tumors should remain in the B-SUMP category.

Utility of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology in fine needle aspiration cytology of minor salivary gland lesions.

INTRODUCTION: Salivary gland lesions are routinely evaluated by fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) preoperatively. The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) has standardized salivary gland FNAC reporting. Its application in major salivary glands (MSGs) has been well-established; however, its utility in minor salivary glands (MiSGs) is not well-known. We studied the utility of MSRSGC in MiSG FNAC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective search of MiSG FNACs from 2 academic institutions (2006-2023) was performed. FNACs were classified using the MSRSGC. Histologic data were reviewed and recorded. The risk of malignancy (ROM), risk of neoplasia (RON), diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. RESULTS: The series included 43 MiSG FNAC (24 males and 18 females), with a mean age of 55 years (range 10-92). Aspirated sites included the following: palate, buccal space, floor of mouth, lip, tongue, and maxillary sinus. FNACs were classified as nondiagnostic (1), nonneoplastic (3), atypia of undetermined significance (6), benign neoplasm (9), salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (15), suspicious for malignancy, (2) and malignant (7). The risk of neoplasia and risk of malignancy were 87% and 39%. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology offers valuable information for stratifying MiSG lesions. However, the distribution and the range of diagnostic entities encountered differ somewhat from those in MSGs. For instance, mucinous cyst contents may warrant unique consideration in MiSG; while an atypical classification is recommended in MSGs, the high prevalence of mucoceles in MiSG may tilt this group toward benignity.

Atypia of undetermined significance and ThyroSeq v3-positive call rates as quality control metrics for cytology laboratory performance.

BACKGROUND: The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) recommends an upper limit of 10% for atypia of undetermined significance (AUS). Recent data suggest that this category might be overused when the rate of cases with molecular positive results is low. As a quality metric, the AUS and positive call rates for this facility's cytology laboratory and each cytopathologist (CP) were calculated. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all thyroid cytology cases in a 4.5-year period was performed. Cases were stratified by TBSRTC, and molecular testing results were collected for indeterminate categories. The AUS rate was calculated for each CP and the laboratory. The molecular positive call rate (PCR) was calculated with and without the addition of currently negative to the positive results obtained from the ThyroSeq report. RESULTS: A total of 7535 cases were classified as nondiagnostic, 7.6%; benign, 69%; AUS, 17.5%; follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm, 1.4%; suspicious for malignancy, 0.7%; and malignant, 3.8%. The AUS rate for each CP ranged from 9.9% to 36.8%. The overall PCR was 24% (range, 13%-35.6% per CP). When including cases with currently negative results, the PCR increased to 35.5% for the cytology laboratory (range, 13%-42.6% per CP). Comparison analysis indicates a combination of overcalling benign cases and, less frequently, undercalling of higher TBSRTC category cases. CONCLUSIONS: The AUS rate in the context of PCR is a useful metric to assess cytology laboratory and cytopathologists' performance. Continuous feedback on this metric could help improve the overall quality of reporting thyroid cytology.

Optimization of Immunophenotypic Panel to Differentiate Upper From Lower Gastrointestinal Adenocarcinomas: Analysis of New and Traditional Markers.

Adenocarcinomas of the esophagus (EAC), stomach [gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC)], and colorectal carcinoma (CRC) frequently show similar morphology because upper gastrointestinal tumors (GITs) usually evolve from pathologies involving intestinal metaplasia. Upper and lower GIT may also show overlapping immunophenotypes when using the traditional CK7, CK20, and CDX2 panel, which in patients presenting with metastatic disease of unknown origin may lead to misdirected diagnostic workup and/or therapy. We compared the phenotype of upper and lower GIT using an expanded immunohistochemical panel that included the traditional and newer gastrointestinal markers: SATB2, DcR3, MUC5AC, and MUC6. The panel was applied to resection specimens from 40 CRC, 40 GAC, and 40 EAC. A panel using SATB2, CK7, and CDX2 provided the best discriminating power for separating upper from lower GIT and was applied to 101 biopsies including 17 EAC, 17 GAC, 19 CRC, 18 pancreatic adenocarcinomas, 15 cholangiocarcinomas, and 15 lung adenocarcinomas. The phenotype CK7/CDX2/SATB2 was moderately sensitive and highly specific of upper GIT, the phenotype CK7/CDX2/SATB2 was highly sensitive and specific for lower GIT, the phenotypes CK7/CDX2/SATB2 and CK7/CDX2/SATB2 favored pancreatobiliary or lung primaries. Less frequent phenotypes showed substantial overlap. Although strong diffuse expression of SATB2 was characteristic of CRC, weak and/or focal expression was present in one third or more of upper gastrointestinal, cholangiocarcinomas, and lung adenocarcinomas. DcR3, MUC5AC, and MUC6 improved specificity, but showed poor sensitivity, suggesting they should be used as second tier markers.

Health Care Provider Adherence to Surgical Guidelines for Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate health care provider adherence to the surgical protocol endorsed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists at the time of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and compare adherence between gynecologic oncologists and obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns). METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, women were included if they had a pathogenic BRCA mutation and underwent risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy between 2011 and 2017. Adherence was defined as completing all of the following: collection of washings, complete resection of the fallopian tube, and performing the Sectioning and Extensively Examining the Fimbriated End (SEE-FIM) pathologic protocol. RESULTS: Of 290 patients who met inclusion criteria, 160 patients were treated by 18 gynecologic oncologists and 130 patients by 75 ob-gyns. Surgery was performed at 10 different hospitals throughout a single metropolitan area. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups. Overall, 199 cases (69%) were adherent to the surgical protocol. Gynecologic oncologists were more than twice as likely to fully adhere to the full surgical protocol as ob-gyns (91% vs 41%, P<.01). Specifically, gynecologic oncologists were more likely to resect the entire tube (99% vs 95%, P=.03), to have followed the SEE-FIM protocol (98% vs 82%, P<.01), and collect washings (94% vs 49%, P<.01). Complication rates did not differ between groups. Occult neoplasia was diagnosed in 11 patients (3.8%). The incidence of occult neoplasia was 6.3% in gynecologic oncology patients and 0.8% in obstetrics and gynecology patients (P=.03). CONCLUSION: Despite clear surgical guidelines, only two thirds of all health care providers were fully adherent to guidelines. Gynecologic oncologists were more likely to follow surgical guidelines compared with general ob-gyns and more likely to diagnose occult neoplasia despite similar patient populations. Rates of risk-reducing surgery will likely continue to increase as genetic testing becomes more widespread, highlighting the importance of health care provider education for this procedure. Centralized care or referral to subspecialists for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy may be warranted.

IgG4-Related Autoimmune Prostatitis: Is It an Unusual or Underdiagnosed Manifestation of IgG4-Related Disease?

IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) encompasses a wide range of extrapancreatic manifestations. Albeit some are relatively well known, others such as autoimmune prostatitis remain poorly described. We present a 61-year-old Latin-American male with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) who presented with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), normal prostate specific antigen (PSA) test, and prostate enlargement attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). He underwent a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) after which symptoms were resolved. On histopathology, prostatic stroma had a dense inflammatory infiltrate rich in plasma cells and lymphocytes; immunohistochemical morphometric assessment showed >10 IgG4-positive plasma cells/high power field (HPF). The diagnosis of IgG4-related prostatitis was postoperatively. We compared the patient characteristics with those of previous reports on Asian patients. Shared findings included prostate enlargement, LUTS (symptoms that can be confused with BPH), and PSA within normal limits or mild elevations. IgG4-related prostatitis is rarely considered as a preprocedural diagnosis, even in patients with evidence of IgG4-RD. Involved prostate zones include mainly central and transitional zones and less frequently the peripheral. Currently, there is insufficient data about the natural history and outcome. Whether steroids, transurethral resection, or both are the treatment of choice needs to be elucidated.