Evaluating a Novel Prehospital Emergency Trauma Care Assessment Tool (PETCAT) for Low- and Middle-Income Countries in Sierra Leone.

BACKGROUND: WHO recommends training lay first responders (LFRs) as the first step toward formal emergency medical services development, yet no tool exists to evaluate LFR programs. METHODS: We developed Prehospital Emergency Trauma Care Assessment Tool (PETCAT), a seven-question survey administered to first-line hospital-based healthcare providers, to independently assess LFR prehospital intervention frequency and quality. PETCAT surveys were administered one month pre-LFR program launch (June 2019) in Makeni, Sierra Leone and again 14 months post-launch (August 2020). Using a difference-in-differences approach, PETCAT was also administered in a control city (Kenema) with no LFR training intervention during the study period at the same intervals to control for secular trends. PETCAT measured change in both the experimental and control locations. Cronbach's alpha, point bi-serial correlation, and inter-rater reliability using Cohen's Kappa assessed PETCAT reliability. RESULTS: PETCAT administration to 90 first-line, hospital-based healthcare providers found baseline prehospital intervention were rare in Makeni and Kenema prior to LFR program launch (1.2/10 vs. 1.8/10). Fourteen months post-LFR program implementation, PETCAT demonstrated prehospital interventions increased in Makeni with LFRs (5.2/10, p < 0.0001) and not in Kenema (1.2/10) by an adjusted difference of + 4.6 points/10 (p < 0.0001) ("never/rarely" to "half the time"), indicating negligible change due to secular trends. PETCAT demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.93, Cohen's K = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: PETCAT measures changes in rates of prehospital care delivery by LFRs in a resource-limited African setting and may serve as a robust tool for independent EMS quality assessment.

Evaluating feasibility of a novel mobile emergency medical dispatch tool for lay first responder prehospital response coordination in Sierra Leone: A simulation-based study.

INTRODUCTION: The global injury burden, driven by road traffic injuries, disproportionately affects low- and middle-income countries, which lack robust emergency medical services (EMS) to address injury. The WHO recommends training lay first responders (LFRs) as the first step toward formal EMS development. Emergency medical dispatch (EMD) systems are the recognized next step but whether small groups of LFRs equipped with mobile dispatch infrastructure can efficiently respond to geographically-dispersed emergencies in a timely fashion and the quality of prehospital care provided is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We piloted an EMD system utilizing a mobile phone application in Sierra Leone. Ten LFRs were randomly selected from a pool of 61 highly-active LFRs trained in 2019 and recruited to participate in an emergency simulation-based study. Ten simulation scenarios were created matching proportions of injury conditions across 1,850 previous incidents (June-December 2019). Fifty total simulations were launched in randomized order over 3 months, randomized along 10 km of highway in Makeni. Replicating real-world conditions, highly-active LFR participants were blinded to randomized dispatch timing/scenario to assess response time and skill performance under direct observation with a checklist using standardized patient actors. We used novel cost data tracked during EMD pilot implementation to inform the calculation of a new cost-effectiveness ratio ($USD cost per disability-adjusted life year averted (DALY)) for LFR programs equipped with dispatch, following WHOCHOICE guidelines, which state cost-effectiveness ratios less than gross domestic product (GDP) per capita are considered "very cost-effective." RESULTS: Median total response interval (notification to arrival) was 5 min 39 s (IQR:0:03:51, 0:09:18). LFRs initially trained with a 5-hour curriculum and refresher training provide high-quality prehospital care during simulated emergencies. Median first aid skill checklist completion was 89% (IQR: 78%, 90%). Cost-effectiveness equals $179.02USD per DALY averted per 100,000 people, less than Sierra Leonean GDP per capita ($484.52USD). CONCLUSION: LFRs equipped with mobile dispatch demonstrate appropriate response times and effective basic initial management of simulated emergencies. Training smaller cohorts of highly-active LFRs equipped with mobile dispatch appears highly cost-effective and may be a feasible model to facilitate efficient dispatch to expand emergency coverage while conserving valuable training resources in resource-limited settings.

Evaluation of a Lay First Responder Program in Sierra Leone as a Scalable Model for Prehospital Trauma Care.

INTRODUCTION: Few countries in Sub-Saharan Africa have robust emergency medical services (EMS). The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends scaling-up lay first responder programs as the first step toward formal EMS development. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We trained and equipped 4,529 lay first responders (LFRs) between June-December 2019 in Bombali District, Sierra Leone, with a 5-hour hands-on, contextually-adapted prehospital trauma course to cover 535,000 people. Instructors trained 1,029 LFRs and 50 local trainers in a training-of-trainers (TOT) model, who then trained an additional 3,500 LFRs. A validated, 23-question pre-/post-test measured knowledge improvement, while six- and nine-month follow-up tests measured knowledge retention. Incident reports tracked patient encounters to assess longitudinal impact. RESULTS: Median pre-/post-test scores improved by 43.5 percentage points (34.8% vs. 78.3%, p<0.0001). Knowledge retention was assessed at six months, with median score dropping to 60.9%, while at nine months, median score dropped to 43.5%. Lay first responders participating in courses led by TOT trainers had a pre-/post-test median score improvement of 30.4 percentage points (21.7% vs. 52.2%, p<0.0001). LFRs treated 1,850 patients over six months, most frequently utilizing hemorrhage control skills in 61.2% of encounters (1,133/1,850). The plurality of patients were young adult males (36.8%) and 48.7% of encounters were motorcycle injury-related. CONCLUSION: A 5-hour first responder course targeting laypeople demonstrates significant emergency care knowledge improvement and retention. By training networks of transportation providers, lay first responder programs represent a robust and scalable prehospital emergency care alternative for low-resource settings.