Impact of Colonoscopy Insertion Techniques on Adenoma Detection.

BACKGROUND: Low adenoma detection rate (ADR) predicts development of interval cancers, found mainly in the right (cecum-ascending) colon, where poor bowel preparation is an associated factor. Single-site studies reported increased detection of adenomas in the proximal colon segments by water exchange (WE). Data about colon cleansing revealed that WE had the greatest impact in the right colon. AIMS: To test the hypothesis that WE had the greatest impact on ADR in colon segments with the most favorable bowel cleanliness scores, namely the right colon. METHODS: We pooled right colon and overall ADR data of three similarly designed colonoscopy trials that compared WE, water immersion (WI) and insufflation of air or carbon dioxide (AICD) in a mixed gender European population. RESULTS: In this study, 1200 (704 males) subjects and were included. 288 were screening cases. Demographic and procedural data were comparable. Water exchange achieved significantly higher right colon <10 mm ADR (11.9 %, vs WI 6.9 %, p = 0.016; vs AICD 7.2 %, p = 0.025). Water exchange achieved the lowest proportions of poor bowel preparation and the highest right colon and overall Boston bowel preparation scale scores (p range 0.003, <0.0005). In patients with right colon excellent bowel cleanliness, water exchange was the only method significantly associated with right colon adenoma detection. One of the limitations is unblinded colonoscopists. CONCLUSIONS: In a mixed gender European population, water exchange is confirmed to be a superior insertion technique showing a significant increase in <10 mm right colon adenoma detection, achieving the cleanest colon and lowest proportions of poor bowel preparation requiring repeat procedures. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV NO: NCT01781650, 01954862, 01780818.

Safety and Diagnostic Yield of Transbronchial Lung Cryobiopsy in Diffuse Parenchymal Lung Diseases: A Comparative Study versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lung Biopsy and a Systematic Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: A diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) may include surgical lung biopsy (SLB), which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and also appreciable costs. Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) is adopting an important role. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic yield (DY) and safety of TBLC and SLB in a large cohort of patients and to perform a systematic review of the literature as well as a meta-analysis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 447 cases with ILD undergoing TBLC and/or SLB and a systematic review of the literature (MEDLINE and Embase for all original articles on the DY and safety of TBLC in ILDs up to July 2015). RESULTS: A total of 150 patients underwent SLB and 297 underwent TBLC. The median time of hospitalization was 6.1 days (SLB) and 2.6 days (TBLC; p < 0.0001). Mortality due to adverse events was observed for 2.7% (SLB) and 0.3% (TBLC) of the patients. Pneumothorax was the most common complication after TBLC (20.2%). No severe bleeding was observed. TBLC was diagnostic for 246 patients (82.8%), SLB for 148 patients (98.7%, p = 0.013). A meta-analysis of 15 investigations including 781 patients revealed an overall DY of 0.81 (0.75-0.87); the overall pooled probability of developing a pneumothorax, as retrieved from 15 studies including 994 patients, was 0.06 (95% CI 0.02-0.11). CONCLUSION: Cryobiopsy is safe and has lower complication and mortality rates compared to SLB. TBLC might, therefore, be considered the first diagnostic approach for obtaining tissue in ILDs, reserving the surgical approach for cases in which TBLC is not diagnostic.

A randomized, controlled trial comparing real-time insertion pain during colonoscopy confirmed water exchange to be superior to water immersion in enhancing patient comfort.

BACKGROUND: A recent American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Technology Status Evaluation Report recommended comparative studies of water-aided colonoscopy methods to refine the optimal insertion technique. OBJECTIVE: Air insufflation (AI), water immersion (WI), and water exchange (WE) were compared head-to-head to test the hypothesis that WE produces the least insertion pain. DESIGN: Patient-blinded, prospective, randomized, controlled trials. SETTING: Two community hospitals in Italy. PATIENTS: First-time diagnostic or screening colonoscopy in unsedated patients with the option of on-demand sedation. INTERVENTION: Colonoscopy with AI, WI, or WE. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Real-time maximum insertion pain (0 = none, 10 = worst). To avoid interventional bias, the timing of recording was at the discretion of the nurse assistant. Adjunct measures were implemented to ensure patient perception of minimal discomfort. Recalled pain and patients' guess of insertion methods were recorded after colonoscopy. RESULTS: Results were merged for 576 randomized patients. Correct patient guesses lower than 33% confirmed adequate blinding. Significant correlation (Pearson coefficient 0.6, P < .0005) between real-time and recalled pain provided internal validation of the former as the primary outcome. Real-time pain (95% confidence interval [CI]: AI, 4.1 [3.7-4.5]; WI, 3.5 [3.0-3.9]; and WE, 2.5 [2.2-2.9] [P < .0005] was the lowest in the WE group. The proportions of patients completing unsedated colonoscopy based on the assigned methods were significantly different (WE, 74.7% vs WI, 62.4%; P = .009; vs AI, 65.3%; P = .04). WE required the least implementation of adjunct maneuvers. LIMITATIONS: Unblinded colonoscopists. CONCLUSION: The current findings with an internally validated primary outcome in adequately blinded patients support the hypothesis that WE is superior to WI in attenuating real-time insertion pain and enhancing completion of unsedated colonoscopy.

A two-center randomized controlled trial of water-aided colonoscopy versus air insufflation colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Water-aided colonoscopy includes water immersion and water exchange. Several small single-center studies have suggested that the use of water rather than air insufflation during colonoscopy reduces pain on insertion. The aim of this study was to investigate whether water-aided colonoscopy is less painful than air insufflation in a large cohort of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a two-center, randomized controlled trial. Consecutive patients who agreed to start colonoscopy without premedication were included. Sedation was administered on demand. Water-aided colonoscopy was performed using water immersion in the early phase of the study, and subsequently water exchange was used. The primary endpoint was cecal intubation with pain scores of ≤ 2 and sedation with no or ≤ 2 mg midazolam. Secondary outcomes were pain score at discharge, cecal intubation rate and time, and adenoma detection rate (ADR). RESULTS: A total of 672 patients were randomized to water exchange (n = 338) or air insufflation (n = 334). The primary endpoint was achieved in more patients in the water exchange group (83.8 % vs. 62 %; P < 0.0005). On-demand sedation was also required less (11.5 % vs. 26.0 %; P < 0.0005) and mean pain score was lower (1.3 vs. 2.3; P < 0.0005) in the water exchange group. The cecal intubation rates were comparable. Water exchange had a significantly higher overall ADR (25.8 % vs. 19.1 %; P = 0.041), proximal ADR (10.1 % vs. 4.8 %; P = 0.014), and proximal < 10 mm ADR (7.7 % vs. 3.9 %; P = 0.046); proximal ADR was also higher in screening-only patients in the water exchange group (18.9 % vs. 7.4 %; P  = 0.015). No detailed analysis was possible for the air insufflation vs. water immersion comparison. CONCLUSION: The current results confirmed that water exchange minimized the requirement for sedation and increased the ADR.

Lung Metastasectomy: Where Do We Stand? Results from an Italian Multicentric Prospective Database.

Background/Objectives: The surgical resection of pulmonary metastases is considered a therapeutic option in selected cases. In light of this, we present the results from a national multicenter prospective registry of lung metastasectomy. Methods: This retrospective analysis involves data collected prospectively and consecutively in a national multicentric Italian database, including patients who underwent lung metastasectomy. The primary endpoints were the analysis of morbidity and overall survival (OS), with secondary endpoints focusing on the analysis of potential risk factors affecting both morbidity and OS. Results: A total 470 lung procedures were performed (4 pneumonectomies, 46 lobectomies/bilobectomies, 13 segmentectomies and 407 wedge resections) on 461 patients (258 men and 203 women, mean age of 63.1 years). The majority of patients had metastases from colorectal cancer (45.8%). In most cases (63.6%), patients had only one lung metastasis. A minimally invasive approach was chosen in 143 cases (30.4%). The mean operative time was 118 min, with no reported deaths. Morbidity most frequently consisted of prolonged air leaking and bleeding, but no re-intervention was required. Statistical analysis revealed that morbidity was significantly affected by operative time and pulmonary comorbidities, while OS was significantly affected by disease-free interval (DFI) > 24 months (p = 0.005), epithelial histology (p = 0.001) and colorectal histology (p = 0.004) during univariate analysis. No significant correlation was found between OS and age, gender, surgical approach, surgical extent, surgical device, the number of resected metastases, lesion diameter, the site of lesions and nodal involvement. Multivariate analysis of OS confirmed that only epithelial histology and DFI were risk-factors, with p-values of 0.041 and 0.031, respectively. Conclusions: Lung metastasectomy appears to be a safe procedure, with acceptable morbidity, even with a minimally invasive approach. However, it remains a local treatment of a systemic disease. Therefore, careful attention should be paid to selecting patients who could truly benefit from surgical intervention.

Multicenter institutional experience of surgically resected thymic epithelial tumors (TETs): an observational report on behalf of F.O.N.I.C.A.P. (Forza Operativa Nazionale Interdisciplinare Contro il Cancro del Polmone).

BACKGROUND: This multicenter analysis evaluated patient outcome and clinical pathologic features of thymic epithelial tumors after complete surgical resection and adjuvant treatment. METHODS: Histologic classification and clinical staging were performed according to WHO classification and Masaoka staging system, respectively. RESULTS: We analyzed 62 patients, 20 (32%) of whom had myasthenia at diagnosis. Clinical and pathologic staging was as follows: 31 (50%) and 30 (48%) patients had stage I disease, 19 (30%) and 22 (35%) stage II, 5 (8%) and 3 (6%) stage III, 2 (4%) and 2 (3%) stage IVa, and 5 (8%) and 5 (8%) stage IVb, respectively. Histologic examination revealed 11 (19%) type A tumors, 19 (30%) type AB tumors, 7 (12%) type B1 tumors, 11 (17%) type B2 tumors, 11 (17%) type B3 tumors, and 3 (5%) type C tumors. Adjuvant therapies comprised chemotherapy in 3 (5%) patients and radiotherapy in 16 (26%) patients. Median follow-up was 71 months (range 1-145). DFS and OS at 48, 60, and 72 months were 89 and 89%, 86 and 97%, and 95% and 92%, respectively. Myasthenia at the onset of disease (P=0.18 for DFS; P=0.97) and tumor size>5 cm (P=0.94 for DFS; P=0.56) were not prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: TETs are rare and indolent tumors. Complete surgical resection followed by adjuvant therapies, such as chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, in patients at risk of recurrence show very good DFS and OS results, even in cases with radically resected pleural-pulmonary metastases.

Unilateral pulmonary artery agenesia complicated by massive haemoptysis in an adult female.

Isolated unilateral pulmonary artery agenesis is a rare congenital abnormality. We report a case of right pulmonary artery agenesis in an adult female without other cardiovascular anomalies. The patient presented with massive haemoptysis four years after the original diagnosis. The patient underwent right pneumonectomy with stapled suture of the main bronchus covered by an intercostal muscle flap. The clinical course was complicated by a bronchopleural fistula one month after the first operation. The fistula was successfully treated with a videothoracoscopic omentoplasty and serratus muscle flap. In these patients the surgical approach can be particularly complex because of the high risk of bleeding from the highly vascularised and extensive adhesions between the lung and the chest wall, associated with hyperplasia of the bronchial and intercostal arterial trees. In spite of these difficulties, access to the pulmonary veins and the main bronchus during pneumonectomy is not challenging.

The role of Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in the treatment of achalasia with megaesophagus: A case report.

Introduction: Achalasia with megaesophagus is a pathology characterized by widespread and irregular dilation of the esophageal lumen. In most cases, this dilation is caused by contraction and subsequent failed relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). It may be associated with a partial or complete slowing of the esophageal peristalsis. Case overview: We present the case of a 58-year-old woman who developed dysphagia, regurgitation, and substantial weight loss (11 kg) over a span of 1 year. Symptomatic achalasia with megaesophagus was diagnosed following chest and abdominal computed tomography (CT) with contrast and transit RX with gastrografin and esophageal manometry. The patient refuse all minimally endoscopic treatments and opted straightly for the treatment with esophagectomy sec. Ivor-Lewis. At the 6-month follow-up, the patient appeared in excellent general clinical condition and oral gastrografin radiography (OGR) showed good channeling. Discussion: Patients require medical attention when presenting with achalasia that has eroded the esophageal wall enough to form a megaesophagus. Early and minimally invasive treatments (i.e., medical therapy, endoscopic dilation, and myotomy) are insufficient at this stage, and thus esophageal surgery is required. Among the most common surgical approaches, we must mention esophagectomy sec. McKeown and esophagectomy with interposition of a colic loop sec. Wilkins; however, based on our experience, esophagectomy sec. Ivor-Lewis with intrathoracic anastomosis leads to excellent results and can therefore be considered a valid alternative for treating complex cases. Conclusions: Subtotal esophagectomy sec. Ivor-Lewis with intrathoracic anastomosis is effective in treating achalasia with megaesophagus.

A large and late mediastinal metastasis from a uterine smooth muscle tumour of uncertain malignant potential: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Smooth muscle tumours of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) are mesenchymal uterine tumours with a malignant potential found somewhere between that of benign leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas. Only three cases of STUMP pulmonary metastasis exist in the literature. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 63 year-old female patient presenting with dysphonia secondary to recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis due to an enormous mediastinal STUMP metastasis, 14 years after having undergone a total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. A successful left pneumonectomy was performed and the mass weighing 1570 g was histologically confirmed as a STUMP metastasis. DISCUSSION: Only three cases of pulmonary metastasis from STUMP have been reported in the recent literature and no robust information exists about the metastatic nature of STUMP. No cases exist in the literature of a successful pneumonectomy performed for a STUMP metastasis of such large dimensions presenting after many years from the diagnosis of the primary uterine lesion. Physicians should keep in mind that the finding of a smooth muscle tumour in the lung of a woman should promptly raise the suspicion of a metastatic uterine malignancy, even several years after diagnosis of the primary lesion. CONCLUSION: Despite the size, invasiveness and late presentation of the STUMP metastasis, the surgery was successful and the patient no longer requires oxygen therapy.

Sleeve Lobectomy: To Wrap or Not to Wrap the Bronchial Anastomosis?

BACKGROUND: Bronchoplastic procedures have become the reference standard in the lung parenchyma-sparing treatment of centrally located bronchopulmonary tumors. Two schools of thought exist regarding performing a bronchial sleeve resection: those who wrap the anastomosis with a pedicled flap and those who leave the anastomosis unprotected. We performed a study comparing these 2 methods. METHODS: This study was a retrospective multicenter observational analysis of 90 consecutive patients undergoing bronchial sleeve resections for neoplastic disease between June 2009 and July 2019. Group A (60 patients) underwent bronchial wrapping and group B (30 patients) did not undergo wrapping. RESULTS: The only difference between group A, which had 5 patients (8.3%), and group B, which had 10 patients (33.3%), regarding general characteristics was the presence of diabetes (P = .003). There were no differences in surgical, postoperative, and follow-up characteristics. There was no statistically significant difference between groups (group A, 9 patients [15%]; and group B, 6 patients [20%]) in terms of anastomotic complications at 1 year (P = .425). Diabetes was an independent predictive factor for anastomotic complications at 1 year (P = .035). The number of postoperative complications (P < .001) was an independent risk factor for length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: We found no differences between groups in terms of postoperative complications and length of hospital stay, which confirmed previous reports that sleeve resections may be performed safely without bronchial wrapping.

The importance of diaphragmatic surgery, chemical pleurodesis and postoperative hormonal therapy in preventing recurrence in catamenial pneumothorax: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Catamenial pneumothorax (CP) is defined as a recurrent, spontaneous pneumothorax occurring within a day before or 72 h after the onset of menstruation. Most first episodes go undiagnosed and treated as primary spontaneous pneumothorax, and only after recurrence is the clinical suspicion of CP raised. No gold-standard management approach exists, especially in terms of managing diaphragmatic involvement. METHODS: This study is a single-centre cohort retrospective study of 24 female patients who underwent surgery for pneumothorax due to diaphragmatic endometriosis between January 2008 and December 2016. Two groups were compared: a group that underwent pleurodesis alone (8 patients) and a group that underwent diaphragmatic surgery and pleurodesis (16 patients). RESULTS: There were differences in BMI and smoking habits between the two groups. The right diaphragm was involved more often (6vs15, p = 0.190). VATS was the preferred surgical approach and only one conversion occurred in the diaphragmatic surgery group (p = 0.470). Diaphragmatic abnormalities were present in all the patients, brown/violet spots (100%) in the pleurodesis group and perforations (100%) in the diaphragmatic surgery group (p < 0.001). There were no differences in days of chest tube removal and length of stay. The recurrence rate was 100% in the pleurodesis alone group while it was only 12.5% in the diaphragmatic surgery group (< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, diaphragmatic surgery and pleurodesis followed by hormonal therapy was an effective approach in preventing recurrence in patients with catamenial pneumothorax and diaphragmatic involvement.

The success of Eso-SPONGE® therapy in the treatment of anastomotic dehiscence after Ivor-Lewis subtotal esophagectomy: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Eso-SPONGE® has proved to be an excellent method for the treatment of persistent dehiscence of the intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis during the operation of subtotal esophagectomy sec. Ivor Lewis. CLINICAL CASE PRESENTATION: The case presented is of a 72-year-old patient with esophageal adenocarcinoma (ADK) who underwent sub-total esophagectomy and esophagoplasty sec. Ivor Lewis complicated by an esophageal leak. The Eso-SPONGE® therapy has been successful halving the index of inflammation after the first two sessions and generation of a neowall after seven sessions. DISCUSSION: Eso-SPONGE® therapy has proven to be a valuable resource as a treatment for esophageal anastomotic dehiscences because it is easily repeatable in suburban centers, provided that they have a digestive endoscopy specialized in the positioning process. CONCLUSIONS: Eso-SPONGE® is a minimally invasive method that delivers excellent results in the treatment of fragile patients, such as those who have post-esophageal anastomotic dehiscence.

A strange case of foreign body embolism in the right lower pulmonary artery.

Foreign bodies in the pulmonary circulation have been documented in the literature, with almost all cases being iatrogenic, involving venous catheters, or due to penetrating foreign body emboli. Foreign body pulmonary emboli are often difficult to diagnose due to their varied clinical presentation, the nature of the embolizing material and dubious radiological features. We describe the case of a patient who experienced episodes of massive hemoptysis with inconclusive radiological findings, who underwent a thoracotomy with the discovery of a wooden object of 7 cm in length in the right lower lobe artery, with no apparent mechanism of injury.

Unexpected high response rate to traditional therapy after dendritic cell-based vaccine in advanced melanoma: update of clinical outcome and subgroup analysis.

We reviewed the clinical results of a dendritic cell-based phase II clinical vaccine trial in stage IV melanoma and analyzed a patient subgroup treated with standard therapies after stopping vaccination. From 2003 to 2009, 24 metastatic melanoma patients were treated with mature dendritic cells pulsed with autologous tumor lysate and keyhole limpet hemocyanin and low-dose interleukin-2. Overall response (OR) to vaccination was 37.5% with a clinical benefit of 54.1%. All 14 responders showed delayed type hypersensitivity positivity. Median overall survival (OS) was 15 months (95% CI, 8-33). Eleven patients underwent other treatments (3 surgery, 2 biotherapy, 2 radiotherapy, 2 chemotherapy, and 4 biochemotherapy) after stopping vaccination. Of these, 2 patients had a complete response and 5 a partial response, with an OR of 63.6%. Median OS was 34 months (range 16-61). Our results suggest that therapeutic DC vaccination could favor clinical response in patients after more than one line of therapy.

Chest wall reconstruction using a new titanium mesh: a multicenters experience.

BACKGROUND: Many new surgical techniques and materials have been introduced in the last decade for chest wall reconstruction or stabilization with the purpose of improving the incorporation, maintaining chest wall stability with reduction of infections. However, none of them are yet considered a gold standard procedure. The aim of this work is to evaluate the initial experience using a new titanium mesh for chest wall reconstruction in four Italian Thoracic Surgery Departments. METHODS: A review was performed of all patients undergoing chest wall reconstruction using a new titanium mesh between January 2014 and September 2018. Surgical indications, the location and size of the chest wall defect, intraoperative variables and postoperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 26 consecutive patients were included. The most common indications for surgery were primary or secondary chest wall tumors (38%) followed by lung cancer invading chest wall (31%). The most common localization of chest wall defect was anterolateral (46%). Sternal reconstruction was required in 3 patients (12%). The average size of the defect was 9.3×7.8 cm. The median number of resected ribs was 3.6. No perioperative deaths occurred. Mean hospital stay was 11.9 days. Overall morbidity was 19%. One failure of reconstruction (4%) was reported during follow up. CONCLUSIONS: In our early clinical experience chest wall reconstruction using titanium mesh can be performed as a safe and effective surgical procedure. This mesh has excellent biomechanical characteristics between rigid and malleable materials, it's easy to trim and fix for optimal adaptation without necessity of dedicated instruments. The early and mid-term results are satisfactory with low incidence of complications related to the titanium mesh implant.

Materials and techniques in chest wall reconstruction: a review.

Extensive chest wall resection and reconstruction are a challenging procedure that requires a multidisciplinary approach, including input from thoracic surgeon, plastic surgeon and oncologist. In particular chest wall neoplastic pathology is associated with high surgical morbidity and can result in full thickness defects hard to reconstruct. The goals of a successful chest wall reconstruction are to restore the chest wall rigidity, preserve pulmonary mechanic and protect the intrathoracic organs minimizing the thoracic deformity. In case of large full thickness defects synthetic, biologic or composite meshes can be used, with or without titanium plate to restore thoracic cage rigidity as like as more recently the use of allograft to reconstruct the sternum. After skeletal stability is established full tissue coverage can be achieved using direct suture, skin graft or local advancement flaps, pedicled myocutaneous flaps or free flaps. The aim of this article is to illustrate the indications, various materials and techniques for chest wall reconstruction with the goal to obtain the best chest wall rigidity and soft tissue coverage.

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in hemothorax.

The management of hemothorax (spontaneous or, more often, due to thoracic trauma lesions), follows basic tenets well-respected by cardiothoracic surgeons. In most, a non-operative approach is adequate and safe, with a defined group of patients requiring only tube thoracostomy. Only a minority of patients need a surgical intervention due to retained hemothorax, persistent bleeding or incoming complications, as pleural empyema or entrapped lung. In the early 1990s, the rapid technological developments determined an increase of diagnostic and therapeutical indications for multiport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) as the gold standard therapy for retained and persistent hemothorax, allowing an earlier diagnosis, total clots removal and better tubes placement with less morbidity, reduced post-operative pain and shorter hospital stay. There is no consensus in the literature regarding the timing for draining hemothorax, but best results are obtained when the drainage is performed within the first 5 days after the onset. The traditional multi-port approach has evolved in the last years into an uniportal approach that mimics open surgical vantage points utilizing a non-rib-spreading single small incision. Currently, in experienced hands, this technique is used for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions as hemothorax evacuation as like as the more complex procedures, such as lobectomies or bronchial sleeve and vascular reconstructions.

[Esophageal perforation: analysis of seven cases treated by early surgical treatment with good functional results]. / Le perforazioni esofagee: analisi di 7 recenti casi risoltisi favorevolmente con trattamento chirurgico precoce.

INTRODUCTION: Esophageal perforation has been considered a catastrophic and often life-threatening event, with very high mortality rates. Most of the cases are due to a complication in endoscopic manouvers and the best treatment, conservative rather than aggressive, remains a controversial topic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 1995-2005 period we observed 7 cases of esophageal perforation, 5 women and 2 men mean age 73.2 y (range 60-87). Three cases are due to foreign body ingestion, 2 cases to endoscopic manoeuvres, 2 cases were spontaneous. In 3 cases the lesion was in the cervical tract of the esophagus, in the thoracic tract the others. All the patients were admitted very early to our Unit and presented disphagia, vomiting and dyspnoea, 2 out of them also a pleural effusion. In iatrogenic perforation we performed a cervicotomy and a drainage of mediastinic abscess, while in spontaneous lesions mono (one case) or bipolar esophageal exclusion (one case) with primary suture, jujunostomy and drainage of pleural effusion were the treatment. In foreign body perforation we performed thoracotomic and cervicotomic esophagotomy, extraction of the foreign body, direct suture with pleural or muscle protection. We didn't observe any intra or post-operative mortality. About the complications, we observed a bilateral pleural empyema, a chylous fistula, a digestive bleeding due to gastric ulcer, a laparotomic infection, a parossistic FA and a persistent esophageal fistula. Mean hospital stay was 24.3 days (range 10-43). All the patients were discharged to the hospital in good conditions. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion in most of the cases of esophageal perforation the surgical treatment is the treatment of choice for its lower morbidity and mortality and good functional results.

Insertion water exchange increases right colon adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection rates during withdrawal.

BACKGROUND: Single site studies in male Veterans in the U.S. reported increased detection of presumptive cancer precursors (adenomas, hyperplastic polyps) in the proximal colon (cecum-splenic flexure) by water exchange. AIMS: Assess the reproducibility of the observation. METHODS: Analysis of secondary outcomes collected prospectively in 3 similarly designed randomized controlled trials using water exchange, water immersion and insufflation (air or carbon dioxide). MAIN OUTCOME: detection rates of adenomas and hyperplastic polyps in proximal, transverse and right colon (cecum-ascending). RESULTS: 704 males (173 screening) were evaluated. In the proximal colon, WE showed increased detection of small adenomas (p=0.009) and adenomas plus hyperplastic polyps (p=0.015) (vs insufflation); increased detection of adenomas plus hyperplastic polyps of any size (p=0.045) and of small size (p=0.04) (vs water immersion). In the right colon water exchange increased detection of small adenomas (19% vs 12.1%, p=0.04) (vs insufflation); small adenomas (19% vs 12%, p=0.038), adenomas plus hyperplastic polyps of any size (25% vs 16.7%, p=0.028) and of small size (23.7% vs 14.6%, p=0.012) (vs water immersion). Water exchange significantly improved bowel cleanliness. Sedation had no impact on lesion detection. CONCLUSIONS: Water exchange is a superior insertion technique for detection of adenomas and hyperplastic polyps primarily in the right colon, especially those of small size.

Evidence to suggest adoption of water exchange deserves broader consideration: Its pain alleviating impact occurs in 90% of investigators.

AIM: To determine whether observations were reproducible among investigators. METHODS: From March 2013 through June 2014, 18-85-year-old diagnostic and 50-70-year-old screening patients were enrolled at each center to on-demand sedation colonoscopy with water exchange (WE), water immersion (WI) and insufflation with air or CO2 for insertion and withdrawal [air or carbon dioxide (AICD)]. Data were aggregated for analysis. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Variations in real-time maximum insertion pain (0 = none, 1-2 = discomfort, 10 = worst). RESULTS: One thousand and ninety-one cases analyzed: WE (n = 371); WI (n = 338); AICD (n = 382). Demographics and indications were comparable. The WE group had the lowest real-time maximum insertion pain score, mean (95%CI): WE 2.8 (2.6-3.0), WI 3.8 (3.5-4.1) and AICD 4.4 (4.1-4.7), P < 0.0005. Ninety percent of the colonoscopists were able to use water exchange to significantly decrease maximum insertion pain scores. One investigator had high insertion pain in all groups, nonetheless WE achieved the lowest real-time maximum insertion pain score. WE had the highest proportions of patients with painless unsedated colonoscopy (vs WI, P = 0.013; vs AICD, P < 0.0005); unsedated colonoscopy with only minor discomfort (vs AICD, P < 0.0005), and completion without sedation (vs AICD, P < 0.0005). CONCLUSION: Aggregate data confirm superiority of WE in lowering colonoscopy real-time maximum insertion pain and need for sedation. Ninety percent of investigators were able to use water exchange to significantly decrease maximum insertion pain scores. Our results suggest that the technique deserves consideration in a broader scale.