High prevalence of cardiac post-acute sequelae in patients recovered from Covid-19. Results from the ARCA post-COVID study.

Background: Many data were published about Long-Covid prevalence, very few about the findings of new cardiac alterations (NCA) in COVID-19-recovered people. ARCA-post-COVID is an observational study designed to investigate the prevalence of NCA in patients recovered from Covid-19.Methods: from June 2020 to December 2022, we enrolled 502 patients with a positive nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV2 and a subsequent negative one. We performed anamnesis, lab-test, and routine cardiological tests (ECG, Holter, TTE). Results: The median age was 56 years (IQR 44-67); women were 52.19%; in the acute phase 24.1% of patients were treated in a medical department, 7.2% in the ICU and the others at home. At the visit, 389 patients (77.49%) complained of a broad range of symptoms. We reported patients' characteristics according to the course of the disease and the persistence of symptoms. NCA were found in 138 patients (27.49%): among them 60 cases (11.95%) of pericardial effusion. Patients with NCA were older (median 60y, IQR: 47-72, vs median 56y, IQR 42-65), had a higher prevalence of smokers (27% vs 17%; p0.014), CAD (11% vs 6%; p0.048) and stroke/TIA (3.6% vs 0.3%; p0.002) and a lower prevalence of hypercholesterolemia (18% vs 30%; p0.007). The prevalence of NCA seems constant with different subtypes of the virus. Conclusion: the prevalence of NCA in patients who recovered from COVID-19 is high and constant since the beginning of the pandemic; it is predictable based on hospitalization and long-lasting symptoms (9.64%-42.52%). Patients with one of these characteristics should undergo cardiological screening.

Alert-LDL-2: adherence to guidelines and goals attainment in the treatment of diabetic patients with dyslipidemia.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with a cluster of lipid and apolipoprotein abnormalities which increase the risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adherence to guidelines-oriented dyslipidemia treatment in diabetic patients and to assess the efficacy of a territorial goal-oriented program. METHODS: One thousand seventy-one diabetic patients at very high cardiovascular risk were enrolled in this prospective study. They performed a clinical-laboratory follow-up program, received lifestyle recommendations and optimization of their antihyperlipidemic therapies. At the beginning and the 3-month follow-up visit, LDL-c data were collected, and further therapies were prescribed to the patients that did not reach the target. After 12 month follow-up, LDL-c data were collected again. RESULTS: Diabetic patients significantly improved mean LDL cholesterol levels during one-year follow-up (LDLc mean value 135 mg/dL at baseline, 60 mg/dL at the end of the study), obtaining a greater reduction compared to non-diabetic patients participating in the same program. Accordingly, the percentage of patients that reached the lipid target was significantly higher in diabetic patients after 3-months and 12- follow-ups (P<0.05). Diabetic patients assuming statins, both in monotherapy and in combination with ezetimibe, increased during the follow-up (74.1% at the enrolment vs. 88.2% one year later). GLP1ra-treated patients achieved the greatest reduction in cholesterol levels compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study recommend encouraging strategies and appropriate treatments to achieve a targeted lipid profile in diabetic patients at very high cardiovascular risk.

ALERT-LDL: adherence to guidelines in the treatment of patients with dyslipidemia.

The association between LDL-c levels and cardiovascular outcomes suggests tailoring lipid-lowering therapies according to total cardiovascular risk. We aimed to evaluate the adherence to guidelines-oriented dyslipidaemia's treatment in an outpatient population referring to ARCA cardiologists, and assess the efficacy of treatment's optimization for each specific level of risk. Three thousand seventy-five patients enrolled in this prospective study were classified according to cardiovascular risk category, and their therapies were optimized. At the beginning and the 3 month follow-up visit, LDL-c data were collected, and further therapies were prescribed to the patients that did not reach the target. A significant LDL-c reduction was observed in all subgroups at different cardiovascular risk at the end of the study (p < 0.05). The number of patients assuming statins, both in monotherapy and in combination with ezetimibe, increased during the follow-up (63% at the enrollment vs 89% after 12 months). At the enrollment, only 1.4% of patients were treated with PCSK-9 inhibitors while after 12 months the percentage increased both in high (5.8%) and very high-risk (18.4%) patients. At the beginning of the study, only 698/3075 patients (22.7%) reached lipid targets. At the end of the study, carried out by the referring cardiologists in the pertaining healthcare districts and specifically aimed to control the lipid profile, the percentage of patients on target increased in all risk categories (68.5%). Our results suggest carefully implementing measures that encourage outpatients and their cardiologists to achieve the targeted lipid profile according to cardiovascular risk.

Clinical Discussions in Antithrombotic Therapy Management in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Delphi Consensus Panel.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have entered clinical practice for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation or prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. However, remaining uncertainty regarding DOAC use in some clinical scenarios commonly encountered in the real world has not been fully explored in clinical trials. METHODS: We report on use of a Delphi consensus process on DOAC use in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients. The consensus process dealt with 9 main topics: (i) DOACs vs vitamin K antagonists in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients; (ii) therapeutic options for patients with stable total time in range treated with vitamin K antagonists; (iii) therapeutic options for patients aged > 85 years; (iv) therapeutic management of hyperfiltering patients; (v) pharmacologic interactions; (vi) therapeutic options in the long-term treatment (prevention) of patients with AF and acute coronary syndrome after the triple therapy; (vii) low doses of DOACs in AF patients; (viii) ischemic stroke in patients inappropriately treated with low doses of DOACs; (ix) management of patients taking DOACs with left atrial appendage thrombosis. RESULTS: A total of 101 physicians (cardiologists, internists, geriatricians, and hematologists) from Italy expressed their level of agreement on each statement by using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree; 2 = disagree; 3 = somewhat agree; 4 = agree; 5 = strongly agree). Votes 1-2 were considered to be disagreement; votes 3-5 were considered to be agreement. Agreement among the respondents of ≥ 66% for each statement was considered consensus. A brief discussion of the results for each topic is also reported. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, there is still uncertainty on DOAC use, especially in elderly, fragile, comorbid, and hyperfiltering patients.

CONTEXTE: Depuis quelques années, les cliniciens prescrivent des anticoagulants oraux directs (AOD) pour prévenir les accidents vasculaires cérébraux (AVC) chez les patients présentant une fibrillation auriculaire (FA) non valvulaire ou pour prévenir et traiter les thromboembolies veineuses. Cependant, les doutes que suscite encore l'emploi des AOD dans certains contextes courants de la pratique clinique n'ont pas encore été bien explorés dans le cadre des études cliniques. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons utilisé la méthode de Delphes, une démarche visant à dégager un consensus, afin d'évaluer le recours aux AOD chez des patients présentant une FA non valvulaire. L'étude comprenait 9 thèmes principaux : i) utilisation des AOD et des antagonistes de la vitamine K chez les patients présentant une FA; ii) options thérapeutiques pour les patients traités par un antagoniste de la vitamine K dont l'état se maintient depuis un certain temps dans une plage de valeurs normales; iii) options thérapeutiques pour les patients âgés de plus de 85 ans; iv) prise en charge thérapeutique des patients souffrant d'hyperfiltration; v) interactions pharmacologiques; vi) options thérapeutiques pour le traitement prolongé (préventif) des patients présentant une FA et un syndrome coronarien aigu après une trithérapie; vii) utilisation des AOD à faible dose chez les patients présentant une FA; viii) AVC ischémique chez les patients traités de façon inappropriée par un AOD à faible dose; ix) prise en charge des patients prenant un AOD qui présentent une thrombose de l'appendice auriculaire gauche. RÉSULTATS: Au total, 101 médecins (cardiologues, internistes, gériatres et hématologues) italiens ont exprimé leur degré d'accord avec chacun des énoncés proposés sur une échelle de Likert à 5 points (1 = tout à fait en désaccord; 2 = en désaccord; 3 = moyennement d'accord; 4 = d'accord; 5 = tout à fait d'accord). Une note de 1 ou 2 a été considérée comme un désaccord et une note de 3, 4 ou 5, comme un accord. On considérait qu'il y avait un consensus si 66 % ou plus des répondants étaient d'accord avec l'énoncé. Nous présentons également brièvement les résultats obtenus pour chacun des thèmes. CONCLUSIONS: Dans la pratique clinique, l'emploi des AOD soulève encore des doutes, en particulier chez les patients âgés, fragiles ou présentant des affections concomitantes ou une hyperfiltration.

Management of chronic heart failure: Role of home echocardiography in monitoring care programs.

AIM: To identify a possible role of home echocardiography for monitoring chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. METHODS: We prospectively investigated 118 patients hospitalized during the last year for CHF who could not easily reach the pertaining District Healthcare Center. The patients were followed up with 2 home management programs: one including clinical and electrocardiographic evaluations and also periodic home echocardiographic examinations (group A), the other including clinical and electrocardiographic evaluations only (group B). RESULTS: At the end of the 18-mo follow-up no signi-ficant differences were observed between the 2 groups as regards the primary endpoint: rehospitalization occurred in 4 patients of the group A and in 6 patients of the group B; major cardiovascular events occurred in 2 and in 3 patients, respectively. No significant differences were observed with respect to the secondary endpoints: one vascular event appeared in both the groups, 3 cardiovascular deaths occurred in group A and 2 in group B. No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups as regards the composite endpoint of death plus hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Home echocardiography for monitoring of CHF patients does not improve the cardiovascular endpoints. In our CHF patients, a low incidence of vascular events was observed.