Autonomic Nervous System Dysfunction in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: An Underrecognized Cardiovascular Risk Factor?

BACKGROUND: In patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD), cardiovascular events represent the predominant cause of morbidity and mortality, with cardiac arrhythmias and sudden death being the leading causes of death in this population. Autonomic nervous system (ANS) dysfunction is listed among the non-traditional risk factors accounting for the observed high cardiovascular burden, with a plethora of complex and not yet fully understood pathophysiologic mechanisms being involved. SUMMARY: In recent years, preliminary studies have investigated and confirmed the presence of ANS dysfunction in PD patients, while relevant results from cohort studies have linked ANS dysfunction with adverse clinical outcomes in these patients. In light of these findings, ANS dysfunction has been recently receiving wider consideration as an independent cardiovascular risk factor in PD patients. The aim of this review was to describe the mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of ANS dysfunction in ESKD and particularly PD patients and to summarize the existing studies evaluating ANS dysfunction in PD patients. KEY MESSAGES: ANS dysfunction in PD patients is related to multiple complex mechanisms that impair the balance between SNS/PNS, and this disruption represents a crucial intermediator of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in this population.

Uromodulin biology.

Uromodulin is a kidney-specific glycoprotein which is exclusively produced by the epithelial cells lining the thick ascending limb and early distal convoluted tubule. It is currently recognized as a multifaceted player in kidney physiology and disease, with discrete roles for intracellular, urinary, interstitial and serum uromodulin. Among these, uromodulin modulates renal sodium handling through the regulation of tubular sodium transporters that reabsorb sodium and are targeted by diuretics, such as the loop diuretic-sensitive Na+-K+-2Cl- cotransporter type 2 (NKCC2) and the thiazide-sensitive Na+/Cl- cotransporter (NCC). Given these roles, the contribution of uromodulin to sodium-sensitive hypertension has been proposed. However, recent studies in humans suggest a more complex interaction between dietary sodium intake, uromodulin and blood pressure. This review presents an updated overview of the uromodulin's biology and its various roles, and focuses on the interaction between uromodulin and sodium-sensitive hypertension.

Design and baseline characteristics of the Finerenone, in addition to standard of care, on the progression of kidney disease in patients with Non-Diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease (FIND-CKD) randomized trial.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Finerenone, a non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, improved kidney, and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with CKD and T2D in two Phase 3 outcome trials. The FIND-CKD study investigates the effect of finerenone in adults with CKD without diabetes. METHODS: FIND-CKD (NCT05047263 and EU CT 2023-506897-11-00) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trial in patients with CKD of non-diabetic aetiology. Adults with a urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) of ≥ 200 to ≤3500 mg/g and eGFR ≥ 25 to <90 mL/min/1.73 m2 receiving a maximum tolerated dose of a renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) inhibitor were randomized 1:1 to once daily placebo or finerenone 10 or 20 mg depending on eGFR above or below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. The primary efficacy outcome is total eGFR slope, defined as the mean annual rate of change in eGFR from baseline to Month 32. Secondary efficacy outcomes include a combined cardiorenal composite outcome comprising time to kidney failure, sustained ≥57% decrease in eGFR, hospitalization for heart failure, or cardiovascular death, as well as separate kidney and cardiovascular composite outcomes. Adverse events are recorded to assess tolerability and safety. RESULTS: Across 24 countries, 3231 patients were screened and 1584 were randomized to study treatment. The most common causes of CKD were chronic glomerulonephritis (57.0%) and hypertensive/ischaemic nephropathy (29.0%). Immunoglobulin A nephropathy was the most common glomerulonephritis (26.3% of the total population). At baseline, mean eGFR and median UACR were 46.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 818.9 mg/g, respectively. Diuretics were used by 282 participants (17.8%), statins by 851 (53.7%), and calcium channel blockers by 794 (50.1%). SGLT2 inhibitors were used in 16.9% of patients; these individuals had a similar mean eGFR (45.6 vs 46.8 mL/min/1.73 m2) and slightly higher median UACR (871.9 vs 808.3 mg/g) compared to those not using SGLT2 inhibitors at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: FIND-CKD is the first Phase 3 trial of finerenone in patients with CKD of non-diabetic aetiology.

Chronic kidney disease: the missing concept in the 2019 EULAR/ERA-EDTA recommendations for lupus nephritis.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is diagnosed when glomerular filtration rate (GFR) falls below 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 or urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (UACR) reaches ≥30 mg/g, as these two thresholds indicate a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, including cardiovascular mortality. CKD is classified as mild, moderate or severe, based on GFR and UACR values, and the latter two classifications convey a high or very high cardiovascular risk, respectively. Additionally, CKD can be diagnosed based on abnormalities detected by histology or imaging. Lupus nephritis (LN) is a cause of CKD. Despite the high cardiovascular mortality of patients with LN, neither albuminuria nor CKD are discussed in the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association recommendations for the management of LN or the more recent 2022 EULAR recommendations for cardiovascular risk management in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. Indeed, the proteinuria target values discussed in the recommendations may be present in patients with severe CKD and a very high cardiovascular risk who may benefit from guidance detailed in the 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. We propose that the recommendations should move from a conceptual framework of LN as an entity separate from CKD to a framework in which LN is considered a cause of CKD and evidence generated from large CKD trials applies unless demonstrated otherwise.

Atherosclerotic renovascular disease: a clinical practice document by the European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) board of the European Renal Association (ERA) and the Working Group Hypertension and the Kidney of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH).

Atherosclerotic renovascular disease (ARVD) is the most common type of renal artery stenosis. It represents a common health problem with clinical presentations relevant to many medical specialties and carries a high risk for future cardiovascular and renal events, as well as overall mortality. The available evidence regarding the management of ARVD is conflicting. Randomized controlled trials failed to demonstrate superiority of percutaneous transluminal renal artery angioplasty (PTRA) with or without stenting in addition to standard medical therapy compared with medical therapy alone in lowering blood pressure levels or preventing adverse renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ARVD, but they carried several limitations and met important criticism. Observational studies showed that PTRA is associated with future cardiorenal benefits in patients presenting with high-risk ARVD phenotypes (i.e. flash pulmonary oedema, resistant hypertension or rapid loss of kidney function). This clinical practice document, prepared by experts from the European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) board of the European Renal Association (ERA) and from the Working Group on Hypertension and the Kidney of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH), summarizes current knowledge in epidemiology, pathophysiology and diagnostic assessment of ARVD and presents, following a systematic literature review, key evidence relevant to treatment, with an aim to support clinicians in decision making and everyday management of patients with this condition.

Peripheral endothelial and microvascular damage in liver cirrhosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using any available functional method to examine differences in peripheral endothelial function between cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic individuals. METHODS: Literature search involved PubMed, Web-of-Science, and Scopus databases, as well as gray literature sources. We included studies in adult subjects evaluating endothelial function with any semi-invasive or non-invasive functional method in patients with and without liver cirrhosis. RESULTS: From 3378 records initially retrieved, 15 studies with a total of 570 participants were included in the final quantitative meta-analysis. In six studies examining endothelial function with flow-mediated-dilatation, no differences between patients with cirrhosis and controls were evident (WMD: 1.33, 95%CI [-2.87, 5.53], I2  = 97%, p < .00001). Among studies assessing differences in endothelial-dependent or endothelial-independent vasodilation with venous-occlusion-plethysmography, there were no significant differences between the two groups. When pooling all studies together, regardless of the technique used, no significant difference in endothelial function between cirrhotic patients and controls was observed(SMD: 0.79, 95%CI[-0.04, 1.63], I2  = 94%, p < .00001). CONCLUSIONS: No differences in peripheral endothelial function assessed with semi-invasive or non-invasive functional methods exist between cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic subjects. The increasing co-existence of cardiovascular risk factors leading to impaired vascular reactivity in cirrhotic patients may partly explain these findings.

Ambulatory central BP and arterial stiffness in patients with and without intradialytic hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Increased arterial stiffness is suggested to be involved in the pathogenesis of intradialytic-hypertension (IDH). Ambulatory pulse-wave-velocity (PWV) is an independent predictor for all-cause-mortality in haemodialysis and its prognostic power is better than office PWV. This is the first study examining ambulatory central blood pressure (BP) and arterial stiffness parameters in patients with and without IDH. METHODS: This study examined 45 patients with IDH (SBP rise ≥10 mmHg from pre- to post-dialysis and post-dialysis SBP ≥150 mmHg) in comparison with 197 patients without IDH. All participants underwent 48-h ABPM with Mobil-O-Graph-NG; parameters of central haemodynamics, wave reflection and PWV were estimated. RESULTS: Age, dialysis vintage and interdialytic weight gain did not differ between-groups. IDH patients had higher 48-h cSBP (131.7 ± 16.2 vs. 119.2 ± 15.2 mmHg, p < 0.001), 48-h cDBP (86.7 ± 12.7 vs. 79.6 ± 11.5 mmHg, p < 0.001) and 48-h cPP (45.5 ± 10.4 vs. 39.8 ± 10.0 mmHg, p = 0.001) compared to patients without IDH. Similarly, during day- and nighttime periods, cSBP/cDBP and cPP levels were higher in IDH-patients compared to non-IDH. Forty-eight-hour augmentation pressure and index, but not AIx(75) were higher in IDH patients; 48-h PWV (10.0 ± 2.0 vs. 9.2 ± 2.1 m/s, p = 0.017) was significantly higher in patients with IDH. The two study groups displayed different trajectories in central BP and PWV over the course of the recording; IDH patients had steadily high values of the above variables during the 2 days of the interdialytic-interval, whereas non-IDH patients showed a gradual elevation, with significant increases from the 1st to 2nd 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: IDH patients have significantly higher levels of ambulatory central BP and arterial stiffness parameters and a different course over the 48-h period compared with non-IDH patients. Increased arterial stiffness could be a prominent factor associated with the high burden of cardiovascular disease in this population.

Lung Ultrasound as a Tool to Evaluate Fluid Accumulation in Dialysis Patients.

BACKGROUND: Volume overload is the main mechanism of BP elevation in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients undergoing hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis and has been linked to adverse outcomes and increased mortality in this population. SUMMARY: This review discusses current knowledge on lung ultrasound as a tool for detection of extracellular volume overload through evaluation of extravascular lung water content. We describe the principles of lung US, the main protocols to apply it in clinical practice, and accumulated data evidence regarding its associations with cardiovascular events and mortality. We also summarize available evidence on the effect of lung ultrasound-guided -volume management strategies on BP control, echocardiographic parameters, and major outcomes in patients undergoing dialysis. KEY MESSAGES: Among interventions attempting to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease in ESKD, effective management of volume overload represents an unmet clinical need. Assessment of hydration status by lung ultrasound is a cheap, easy to employ, and real-time technique that can offer accurate dry weight assessment leading to several clinical benefits.

Volume overload in hemodialysis: diagnosis, cardiovascular consequences, and management.

Volume overload in haemodialysis (HD) patients associates with hypertension and cardiac dysfunction and is a major risk factor for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in this population. The diagnosis of volume excess and estimation of dry weight is based largely on clinical criteria and has a notoriously poor diagnostic accuracy. The search for accurate and objective methods to evaluate dry weight and to diagnose subclinical volume overload has been intensively pursued over the last 3 decades. Most methods have not been tested in appropriate clinical trials and their usefulness in clinical practice remains uncertain, except for bioimpedance spectroscopy and lung ultrasound (US). Bioimpedance spectroscopy is possibly the most widely used method to subjectively quantify fluid distributions over body compartments and produces reliable and reproducible results. Lung US provides reliable estimates of extravascular water in the lung, a critical parameter of the central circulation that in large part reflects the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. To maximize cardiovascular tolerance, fluid removal in volume-expanded HD patients should be gradual and distributed over a sufficiently long time window. This review summarizes current knowledge about the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of volume overload in HD patients.

Cardiorespiratory fitness in kidney transplant recipients compared to patients with kidney failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Patients with kidney failure often present with reduced cardiovascular functional reserve and exercise tolerance. Previous studies on cardiorespiratory fitness examined with cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) had variable results. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies examining cardiovascular functional reserve with CPET in KTR in comparison with patients with kidney failure (CKD-Stage-5 before dialysis, hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis), as well as before and after kidney transplantation. Literature search involved PubMed, Web-of-Science and Scopus databases, manual search of article references and grey literature. From a total of 4,944 identified records, eight studies (with 461 participants) were included in quantitative analysis for the primary question. Across these studies, KTR had significantly higher oxygen consumption at peak/max exercise (VO2 peak/VO2 max) compared to patients with kidney failure (SMD = 0.70, 95% CI [0.31, 1.10], I2  = 70%, P = 0.002). In subgroup analyses, similar differences were evident among seven studies comparing KTR and hemodialysis patients (SMD = 0.64, 95% CI [0.16, 1.12], I2  = 65%, P = 0.009) and two studies comparing KTR with peritoneal dialysis subjects (SMD = 1.14, 95% CI [0.19, 2.09], I2  = 50%, P = 0.16). Across four studies with relevant data, oxygen consumption during peak/max exercise showed significant improvement after kidney transplantation compared to pretransplantation values (WMD = 2.43, 95% CI [0.01, 4.85], I2  = 68%, P = 0.02). In conclusion, KTR exhibit significantly higher cardiovascular functional reserve during CPET compared to patients with kidney failure. Cardiovascular reserve is significantly improved after kidney transplantation in relation to presurgery levels.

Blood pressure and volume management in dialysis: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference.

Blood pressure (BP) and volume control are critical components of dialysis care and have substantial impacts on patient symptoms, quality of life, and cardiovascular complications. Yet, developing consensus best practices for BP and volume control have been challenging, given the absence of objective measures of extracellular volume status and the lack of high-quality evidence for many therapeutic interventions. In February of 2019, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) held a Controversies Conference titled Blood Pressure and Volume Management in Dialysis to assess the current state of knowledge related to BP and volume management and identify opportunities to improve clinical and patient-reported outcomes among individuals receiving maintenance dialysis. Four major topics were addressed: BP measurement, BP targets, and pharmacologic management of suboptimal BP; dialysis prescriptions as they relate to BP and volume; extracellular volume assessment and management with a focus on technology-based solutions; and volume-related patient symptoms and experiences. The overarching theme resulting from presentations and discussions was that managing BP and volume in dialysis involves weighing multiple clinical factors and risk considerations as well as patient lifestyle and preferences, all within a narrow therapeutic window for avoiding acute or chronic volume-related complications. Striking this challenging balance requires individualizing the dialysis prescription by incorporating comorbid health conditions, treatment hemodynamic patterns, clinical judgment, and patient preferences into decision-making, all within local resource constraints.

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Trajectories and Blood Pressure Variability in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic kidney disease is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease worldwide. Whether diabetes mellitus (DM) is an additional factor leading to elevated blood pressure (BP) levels and BP variability (BPV) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unknown. This study aimed to compare ambulatory BP levels, BP trends and BPV in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with CKD. METHODS: This study included 48 diabetic and 48 non-diabetic adult patients (>18 years) with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <90 and ≥15 mL/min/1.73 m2), matched in a 1:1 ratio for age, sex and eGFR within each CKD stage (2, 3a, 3b and 4). All patients underwent 24-h ambulatory BP measurement with the Mobil-O-graph device. To evaluate the effect of DM and time on the trajectories of 24-h BP levels, we performed two-way mixed ANOVA analysis for repeated measurements using hourly means. BPV was calculated with validated formulas. RESULTS: In total, patients with DM had significantly higher 24-h systolic BP (SBP; 132.13 ± 10.71 vs. 124.16 ± 11.45; p = 0.001) and pulse pressure (PP; 57.1 ± 9.6 vs. 49.5 ± 10.9; p < 0.001), but similar 24-h diastolic BP (DBP; 75.00 ± 8.43 vs. 74.62 ± 6.86 mm Hg; p = 0.809) compared to patients without DM. A similar trend was evident across all CKD stages. The effect of DM on BP trajectories during the recording period was significant for SBP (F = 18.766, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.261) and marginally significant for DBP (F = 3.782, p = 0.057, partial η2 = 0.067). Twenty-four hour SBP SD, weighted SD (wSD) and average real variability (ARV; 10.94 ± 2.75 vs. 9.46 ± 2.10; p = 0.004), as well as 24 h DBP SD, wSD, coefficient of variation (CV) and ARV (8.23 ± 2.10 vs. 7.10 ± 1.33; p = 0.002) were significantly higher in diabetic compared to non-diabetic CKD patients. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory SBP and PP levels are higher and SBP-profile is different in patients with diabetic compared to those with non-diabetic CKD. Systolic and diastolic BPV are also higher in diabetics. These findings may signify a higher cardiovascular risk for patients with both DM and CKD compared to patients with CKD alone, through higher BP levels and BPV.

Chronic Therapy with Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide Does Not Affect Iron and Anemia Markers in Dialysis Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SOH) is an iron-based phosphate binder (PB), and its use has been widely expanded since its initial approval in 2014. Based on the existing data, however, it remains yet unclear whether its long-term administration is followed by iron overload in dialysis patients. The purpose of this observational study was to evaluate the longstanding effects of SOH on the anemia and iron indices in patients on dialysis. METHODS: A total of 110 patients from 3 dialysis centers were included in the study; 49 were under chronic treatment with SOH (cohort A), while 61 were either receiving other PB or no treatment for hyperphosphatemia (cohort B). We initially compared the hematologic profile of patients in 2 cohorts (phase I), and subsequently, we evaluated modifications of the above parameters in the SOH treated patients over a period of 6 months (phase II). RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between 2 cohorts in terms of hemoglobin (Hb; 11.4 ± 1.3 vs. 11.6 ± 0.9 g/dL, p = 0.375), ferritin (473 ± 230 vs. 436 ± 235 ng/mL, p = 0.419) and transferrin saturation (TSAT;26.6 ± 13.2 vs. 26.5 ± 10.6%, p = 0.675), serum phosphate concentration (4.57 ± 1.05 vs. 4.3 ± 0.96 mg/dL, p = ns), and intact PTH (286 ± 313 vs. 239 ± 296 pg/mL, p = ns). Marginally, but significantly higher calcium levels were found in cohort A compared to cohort B (9.18 ± 0.58 vs. 8.9 ± 0.51 mg/dL, respectively, p = 0.008). In phase II, no significant changes were observed in hematological parameters after a 6-month treatment with SOH (Hb: from 11.5 ± 1.1 to 11.4 ± 1.3 g/dL, p = 0.4, serum ferritin levels: from 475 ± 264 to 473 ± 230 ng/mL, p = 0.951, TSAT: from 26.5 ± 16.7 to 26.6 ± 13.2%, p = 0.933). There were also no significant changes in the administration of iron supplements or erythropoietin dose during this period. CONCLUSIONS: SOH is an effective PB, and its long-term use is not complicated by iron overload.

The effect of dry-weight reduction guided by lung ultrasound on ambulatory blood pressure in hemodialysis patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Approximately 85% of hemodialysis patients are hypertensive, but less than 30% achieve adequate blood pressure (BP) control. Reduction of volume overload is fundamental for BP control, but clinical criteria to estimate dry-weight are inaccurate. In the present study we examined the effect of dry-weight reduction with a lung-ultrasound-guided strategy on ambulatory BP in 71 clinically euvolemic hemodialysis patients with hypertension. Patients were equally randomized into an active group, following a strategy for dry-weight reduction guided by pre-hemodialysis lung ultrasound, and a control group with standard-of-care treatment. All patients underwent 48-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) at baseline and after eight weeks. Overall, more patients in the active than in the control group had dry weight reduction, 54.3% compared to 13.9%, respectively. The ultrasonographic-B line change during follow-up was significantly different (-5.3±12.5 in active versus +2.2±7.6 in control group), which corresponded to significant differences in dry weight changes between the groups. The magnitude of reductions in 48-hour systolic BP (-6.61±9.57 vs. -0.67±13.07) and diastolic BP (-3.85±6.34 vs. -0.55±8.28) was significantly greater in the active group. Similarly, intradialytic BP, 44-hour BP, and daytime or night-time systolic/diastolic BP during both days of the interdialytic interval were significantly reduced in the active group but remained unchanged in the control group. The percentage of patients experiencing one or more intradialytic hypotensive episodes was marginally lower in the active group (34.3% vs. 55.6%). Thus, a lung-ultrasound-guided strategy for dry-weight reduction can effectively and safely reduce ambulatory BP levels in hemodialysis patients. Clinical implementation of this simple technique can help increase BP control in this population.

Comparison of 24-hour and Office Pulse Wave Velocity for Prediction of Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients.

BACKGROUND: Mortality in hemodialysis patients still remains unacceptably high. Enhanced arterial stiffness is a known cardiovascular risk factor, and pulse wave velocity (PWV) has proven to be a valid parameter to quantify risk. Recent studies showed controversial results regarding the prognostic significance of PWV for mortality in hemodialysis patients, which may be due to methodological issues, such as assessment of PWV in the office setting (Office-PWV). METHOD: This study cohort contains patients from the "Risk stratification in end-stage renal disease - the ISAR study," a multicenter prospective longitudinal observatory cohort study. We examined and compared the predictive value of ambulatory 24-hour PWV (24 h-PWV) and Office-PWV on mortality in a total of 344 hemodialysis patients. The endpoints of the study were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Survival analysis included Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: During a follow-up of 36 months, a total of 89 patients died, 35 patients due to cardiovascular cause. Kaplan-Meier estimates for tertiles of 24 h-PWV and Office-PWV were similarly associated with mortality. In univariate Cox regression analysis, 24 h-PWV and Office-PWV were equivalent predictors for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. After adjustment for common risk factors, only 24 h-PWV remained solely predictive for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 2.51 [95% CI 1.31-4.81]; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Comparing both measurements, 24 h-PWV is an independent predictor for all-cause-mortality in hemodialysis patients beyond Office-PWV.

The association of interdialytic blood pressure variability with cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Long-term pre-dialysis blood pressure variability (BPV) in haemodialysis patients is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. The association of the main haemodynamic culprit in dialysis, that is, short-term BPV, with outcomes has not been investigated. We examine the prognostic role of short-term BPV for mortality and cardiovascular events in this population. METHODS: A total of 227 haemodialysis patients underwent 44-h ambulatory monitoring during a standard interval and were followed-up for 30.17 ± 17.70 months. We calculated SD, weighted SD (wSD), coefficient of variation (CV) and average real variability (ARV) of BP with validated formulas. The primary endpoint was first occurrence of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke. Secondary endpoints were: (i) all-cause mortality, (ii) cardiovascular mortality and (iii) a combination of cardiovascular events. RESULTS: Cumulative freedom from the primary endpoint was similar for quartiles of pre-dialysis and 44-h systolic BP (SBP), but was progressively longer for increasing quartiles of 44-h SBP-SD (P = 0.014), wSD (P = 0.007), CV (P = 0.031) and ARV (83.9, 71.9, 70.2 and 43.9% for quartiles 1-4; P < 0.001). Higher quartiles of 44-h SBP-ARV were associated with higher risk of all studied outcomes. Among diastolic BPV indices, 44-h diastolic BP (DBP)-CV and 44-h DBP-ARV were associated with increased risk for the composite cardiovascular outcome. In Cox regression analysis, SBP-BPV was related to the primary endpoint, independently of SBP levels and interdialytic weight gain [ARV: hazard ratio (HR) 1.115, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.048-1.185]. This association become insignificant after adjustment for pulse wave velocity (PWV; HR 1.061, 95% CI 0.989-1.137), and further attenuated after additional adjustment for age, dialysis vintage, gender, comorbidities and prevalent cardiovascular disease (HR 1.031, 95% CI 0.946-1.122). CONCLUSIONS: Increased BPV during the interdialytic interval is associated with higher risk of death and cardiovascular events, whereas ambulatory BP levels are not. This association was not independent after adjustment for PWV, other risk factors and prevalent cardiovascular disease. Short-term BPV could be a mediator promoting the adverse cardiovascular profile of haemodialysis patients.

Prevalence and control of hypertension by 48-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in haemodialysis patients: a study by the European Cardiovascular and Renal Medicine (EURECA-m) working group of the ERA-EDTA.

BACKGROUND: Population-specific consensus documents recommend that the diagnosis of hypertension in haemodialysis patients be based on 48-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring. However, until now there is just one study in the USA on the prevalence of hypertension in haemodialysis patients by 44-h recordings. Since there is a knowledge gap on the problem in European countries, we reassessed the problem in the European Cardiovascular and Renal Medicine working group Registry of the European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association. METHODS: A total of 396 haemodialysis patients underwent 48-h ABP monitoring during a regular haemodialysis session and the subsequent interdialytic interval. Hypertension was defined as (i) pre-haemodialysis blood pressure (BP) ≥140/90 mmHg or use of antihypertensive agents and (ii) ABP ≥130/80 mmHg or use of antihypertensive agents. RESULTS: The prevalence of hypertension by 48-h ABP monitoring was very high (84.3%) and close to that by pre-haemodialysis BP (89.4%) but the agreement of the two techniques was not of the same magnitude (κ statistics = 0.648; P <0.001). In all, 290 participants were receiving antihypertensive treatment. In all, 9.1% of haemodialysis patients were categorized as normotensives, 12.6% had controlled hypertension confirmed by the two BP techniques, while 46.0% had uncontrolled hypertension with both techniques. The prevalence of white coat hypertension was 18.2% and that of masked hypertension 14.1%. Of note, hypertension was confined only to night-time in 22.2% of patients while just 1% of patients had only daytime hypertension. Pre-dialysis BP ≥140/90 mmHg had 76% sensitivity and 54% specificity for the diagnosis of BP ≥130/80 mmHg by 48-h ABP monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of hypertension in haemodialysis patients assessed by 48-h ABP monitoring is very high. Pre-haemodialysis BP poorly reflects the 48 h-ABP burden. About a third of the haemodialysis population has white coat or masked hypertension. These findings add weight to consensus documents supporting the use of ABP monitoring for proper hypertension diagnosis and treatment in this population.

Increased Sclerostin, but Not Dickkopf-1 Protein, Is Associated with Elevated Pulse Wave Velocity in Hemodialysis Subjects.

BACKGROUND: Sclerostin and Dickkopf-1 (Dkk-1) proteins are inhibitors of the canonical Wnt/ß-catenin bone pathway. Pilot data suggest that sclerostin may be involved in vascular changes in chronic kidney disease (CKD), but data on the effects of Dkk-1 are scarce. This is the first study investigating simultaneously the associations of sclerostin and Dkk-1 with arterial stiffness in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: A total of 80 patients on chronic hemodialysis had carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), central blood pressure (BP), and wave reflections evaluated with applanation tonometry (Sphygmocor) on a midweek non-dialysis day. Serum levels of sclerostin and Dkk-1 were measured with ELISA. A large set of demographic, comorbid, laboratory, and drug parameters were used in the analyses. RESULTS: Subjects with PWV >9.5 m/s (high arterial stiffness group, n = 40) were older, had higher BMI, higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and coronary heart disease, and higher peripheral systolic BP, central systolic BP, C-reactive protein, and serum sclerostin (p = 0.02), but similar Dkk-1, compared to subjects with low PWV. When dichotomizing the population by sclerostin levels, those with high sclerostin had higher PWV than patients with low sclerostin levels (10.63 ± 2.71 vs. 9.77 ± 3.13, p = 0.048). Increased sclerostin (>200 pg/mL) was significantly associated with increased PWV (>9.5 m/s; HR 2.778, 95% CI 1.123-6.868 per pg/mL increase); this association remained significant after stepwise adjustment for Dkk-1, intact parathyroid hormone, and calcium × phosphate product. In contrast, no association was noted between Dkk-1 and PWV (HR 1.000, 95% CI 0.416-2.403). CONCLUSION: Serum sclerostin is associated with PWV independently of routine markers of CKD-MBD in hemodialysis patients. In contrast, Dkk-1 has no association with arterial stiffness and is not pathophysiologically involved in relevant vascular changes.

The Ebb and Flow of Echocardiographic Cardiac Function Parameters in Relationship to Hemodialysis Treatment in Patients with ESRD.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality in patients receiving hemodialysis. Cardiovascular events in these patients demonstrate a day-of-week pattern; i.e., they occur more commonly during the last day of the long interdialytic interval and the first session of the week. The hemodialysis process causes acute decreases in cardiac chamber size and pulmonary circulation loading and acute diastolic dysfunction, possibly through myocardial stunning and other non-myocardial-related mechanisms; systolic function, in contrast, is largely unchanged. During interdialytic intervals volume overload, acid-base, and electrolyte shifts, as well as arterial and myocardial wall changes, result in dilatation of right cardiac chambers and pulmonary circulation overload. Recent studies suggest that these alterations are more extended during the long interdialytic interval or the first dialysis session of the week and are associated with excess volume overload or removal, respectively, thus adding a mechanism for the day-of-week pattern of mortality in patients receiving hemodialysis. This review summarizes the existing data from echocardiographic studies of cardiac morphology and function during the hemodialysis session, as well as during the interdialytic intervals.

Association of Ambulatory Blood Pressure with All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients: Effects of Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Evidence on the utility of ambulatory BP monitoring for risk prediction has been scarce and inconclusive in patients on hemodialysis. In addition, in cardiac diseases such as heart failure and atrial fibrillation (common among patients on hemodialysis), studies have found that parameters such as systolic BP (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP) have inverse or nonlinear (U-shaped) associations with mortality. METHODS: In total, 344 patients on hemodialysis (105 with atrial fibrillation, heart failure, or both) underwent ambulatory BP monitoring for 24 hours, starting before a dialysis session. The primary end point was all-cause mortality; the prespecified secondary end point was cardiovascular mortality. We performed linear and nonlinear Cox regression analyses for risk prediction to determine the associations between BP and study end points. RESULTS: During the mean 37.6-month follow-up, 115 patients died (47 from a cardiovascular cause). SBP and PP showed a U-shaped association with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the cohort. In linear subgroup analysis, SBP and PP were independent risk predictors and showed a significant inverse relationship to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation or heart failure. In patients without these conditions, these associations were in the opposite direction. SBP and PP were significant independent risk predictors for cardiovascular mortality; PP was a significant independent risk predictor for all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence for the U-shaped association between peripheral ambulatory SBP or PP and mortality in patients on hemodialysis. Furthermore, it suggests that underlying cardiac disease can explain the opposite direction of associations.