Development of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients Aged 75-84 Years With Chronic Hepatitis C Treated With Direct-Acting Antivirals.

BACKGROUND: Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment has revolutionized hepatitis C virus (HCV) care. We aimed to evaluate the risk for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients aged 75-84 years with chronic hepatitis C after HCV elimination. METHODS: This multicenter cohort study included 2405 consecutive patients with chronic hepatitis C without a history of HCC who achieved HCV elimination by DAAs. Patients in whom HCC developed within 1 year of DAA initiation were excluded. Propensity score matching analysis was used to evaluate differences in HCC risk between patients aged 75-84 versus 60-74 years. RESULTS: The median observational period was 3.5 years. Among patients aged 75-84 years with a high Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index (≥3.25 at baseline), there was no significant difference in the annual incidence of HCCs between groups with an FIB-4 index ≥3.25 (2.75 per 100 person-years [PY]) versus <3.25 (2.16 per 100 PY) at 12 weeks after the end of treatment, unlike the results in those aged 60-74 years (3.61 and 1.51 per 100 PY, respectively) (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.20; P = .04). In 495 pairs matched by propensity score matching, in patients without cirrhosis, the cumulative HCC incidence was significantly higher in the 75-84-year than in the 60-74-year age group (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients aged 75-84 years remained at high risk for the development of HCC, even after HCV elimination and the improvement of the FIB-4 index to <3.25.

Long-term hepatic function of patients with compensated cirrhosis following successful direct-acting antiviral treatment for hepatitis C virus infection.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have contributed to the improvement of outcomes for all patients with chronic hepatitis C. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term hepatic benefits of hepatitis C virus (HCV) cure by DAAs in patients with compensated cirrhosis. METHODS: This multicenter cohort study consisted of consecutive patients with compensated cirrhosis who initiated interferon-free DAA treatment before September 2016. The impact of treatment on long-term hepatic function was followed for at least 4 years after the end of treatment, and the progression to decompensation was evaluated. RESULTS: The data of 394 patients were available for study. The median age was 70, and 41% had modified albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade 2b. During a short-term follow-up 1 year after the end of treatment, FIB-4 index and ALBI score significantly improved. The achievement rates of FIB-4 < 3.25 (40%) and ALBI grade 1 (70%) reached their plateau in the first year; however, there were significant further improvements in platelet count and α-fetoprotein level after the first year. The annual incidence of decompensation was 1.30 (95% confidence interval 0.83-2.02) per 100 person-years. In multivariable analysis, male sex and modified ALBI grade 2b at baseline were associated with decompensation. CONCLUSIONS: In a large real-world cohort of patients with compensated cirrhosis treated with a DAA, remarkable improvement in hepatic function was seen after HCV cure, especially during the first year after the end of treatment. Treatment in the early stage of cirrhosis would be of great benefit for preventing liver deterioration to decompensation.

Long-term assessment of recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis C after viral cure by direct-acting antivirals.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence is common, even after achieving hepatitis C virus (HCV) cure. This study was carried out to assess the long-term trends and predictors of recurrence after HCV cure by direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study enrolled 365 consecutive patients with chronic hepatitis C who required HCC treatment following sustained viral response (SVR) by DAA administration. Patients with HCC recurrence before SVR were excluded. Late HCC recurrence and its predictors beyond the post-treatment early phase (24 weeks after SVR) were evaluated. RESULTS: The data of 326 patients were available for the final analysis. The median follow-up duration from SVR determination was 2.7 years. Median age was 74, and 220 (67.5%) were 70 or over. The corresponding 5-year cumulative HCC recurrence rates of previous curative and palliative treatment groups were 45.4% and 65.7%, respectively (log-rank test: P < 0.001). Cox regression multivariable analysis revealed that cirrhosis (hazard ratio [HR] 1.85, P = 0.021), the number of HCC nodules (≥ 2) (HR 1.52, P = 0.031), and previous palliative HCC treatment (HR 1.71, P = 0.012) were independent predictors of late recurrence, in addition to the predictors of early recurrence; AFP > 7 ng/mL at 12 weeks after DAA administration, time from HCC complete response (CR) to DAA initiation (< 1 year), and the number of HCC treatments necessary to achieve CR (≥ 2). CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of fibrosis and characteristics of the previous HCC would allow for better HCC recurrence stratification, which would be helpful for developing long-term surveillance strategies.

Tenofovir alafenamide after switching from entecavir or nucleos(t)ide combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) has been newly approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We aimed to assess the effectiveness and renal safety of switching from entecavir (ETV) or nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) combination therapy to TAF. METHODS: This multicentre, retrospective, cohort study included 313 consecutive CHB patients who switched to TAF monotherapy after treatment with ETV or a nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) combination for over 2 years. Virological/laboratory responses were evaluated for 48 weeks after switchover. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Differences in longitudinal parameters were compared by the generalized estimating equation method. RESULTS: In the prior ETV group (n = 191), the HBV DNA suppression rate at week 48 was significantly increased, from 75.9% to 96.9% (P < .001). Additionally, mean changes in the HBsAg level at week 48 in HBsAg ≥ 3.0 logIU/mL and < 3.0 logIU/mL groups were -0.09 and -0.13 logIU/mL respectively. In the prior NA combination group (n = 122), the mean changes in HBsAg level at week 48 in the HBsAg ≥ 3.0 logIU/mL and <3.0 logIU/mL groups were -0.08 and -0.11 logIU/mL respectively. For patients with CKD, the eGFR at week 48 was significantly improved compared to those with non-CKD (adjusted slope coefficient difference: 2.75 mL/min/1.73 m2 /48 weeks; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Switching from ETV or an NA combination to TAF was effective for HBV suppression and continued HBsAg reduction. Moreover, the renal glomerular function of patients in the prior NA combination group with CKD was significantly improved compared to those with non-CKD. LAY SUMMARY: Nucleos(t)ide analogues, such as entecavir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and tenofovir alafenamide, inhibit hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication and are recommended as first-line oral agents for chronic HBV infection. We evaluated the virological/biochemical effects and renal safety when patients are switched from entecavir or nucleoside-nucleotide analogue combination therapy to tenofovir alafenamide. Our findings suggest that switching to tenofovir alafenamide was effective for HBV suppression and the improvement in renal function for patients with chronic kidney disease.

Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for 12 weeks for hepatitis C virus genotype 2 infection: A propensity score matched analysis.

AIM: Hepatitis C virus genotype 2 is common in East Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, and Latin America. However, many countries in these areas lag behind other areas of the world in government approval for new direct-acting antivirals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment outcome of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 2 infection. METHODS: This is a two-part multicenter, real-world cohort study. Study 1 consisted of 58 consecutive patients who were treated with LDV/SOF for 12 weeks. Study 2 used propensity score matching for LDV/SOF (n = 58) and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (n = 207) treatment groups (1:1) with a set of clinically important variables. Sustained viral response 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12) and adverse events were evaluated in both studies. RESULTS: In study 1, the overall SVR12 rates of the intention-to-treat and modified intention-to-treat populations were 94.8% (55/58) and 96.5% (55/57), respectively. High SVR12 rates were observed in almost all subgroups, including older age, compensated cirrhosis, and treatment experience. In study 2, propensity score matching of the entire study population yielded 52 matched pairs with similar baseline characteristics. There were no statistically significant differences between the LDV/SOF (96.1%) and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (98.0%) groups in the overall SVR12 rates of the modified intention-to-treat populations, and their rates of treatment discontinuation and adverse events were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with LDV/SOF for hepatitis C virus genotype 2 resulted in a high rate of SVR12 and excellent tolerability. The outcomes of LDV/SOF were very similar to those of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir.

Glecaprevir and pibrentasvir for Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 or 2 infection: Results from a multicenter, real-world cohort study.

AIM: Glecaprevir (GLE) and pibrentasvir (PIB) are new direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) with pangenotypic inhibitors that respectively target the hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4 protease and NS5A. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combining GLE and PIB for patients with HCV genotype (GT) 1 or 2 infection in the clinical setting, including patients DAA-experienced or on hemodialysis. METHODS: This multicenter, real-world, retrospective, cohort study consisted of 314 Japanese patients who were treated with GLE (300 mg) and PIB (120 mg) for a fixed 8- or 12-week duration. We evaluated the sustained virologic response rate 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12) and adverse events. RESULTS: Among the treated patients, 122 had GT1 and 192 GT2 infection. The overall SVR12 rates in the per-protocol populations were 99.2% (119/120) for GT1 and 98.9% (183/185) for GT2. High SVR12 rates were observed in almost all subgroups, including cirrhosis, receiving hemodialysis, or previous all-oral DAA groups treated with asunaprevir and daclatasvir (GT1b), ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (GT1), or sofosbuvir and ribavirin (GT2). Virological relapse occurred in only 1.0% (3/305) of the patients who completed treatment. The most common adverse events were pruritus and fatigue (>5% of patients). Serious adverse events were rare and discontinuation due to an adverse event was required for 1.6% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world cohort study, treatment with GLE/PIB achieved high SVR12 rates with a low rate of serious adverse events among patients with HCV GT1 or 2 infection.

Effectiveness and safety of daclatasvir plus asunaprevir for patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b aged 75 years and over with or without cirrhosis.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 24-week daclatasvir (NS5A inhibitor) plus asunaprevir (NS3/4 A protease inhibitor) treatment for elderly patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b infection. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter study consisted of 321 Japanese HCV genotype 1b patients who were interferon-ineligible/intolerant or non-responders to interferon-based regimens, including 103 (32.1%) aged ≥75 years and 127 (39.6%) with cirrhosis. Sustained virological response (SVR) at 24 weeks after the end of treatment and adverse effects were analyzed according to age. RESULTS: The overall SVR rate was 90.3%. In terms of by age, 94.5% (69/73), 88.3% (128/145), and 90.3% (93/103) of the patients aged <65, 65-74, and ≥75 years, respectively, achieved SVR. For the entire cohort, pre-existent NS5A resistance-associated variants and prior simeprevir failure were independently associated with treatment failure. According to the analysis of patients without these unfavorable pretreatment factors, 90.8% (89/98) aged ≥75 years achieved SVR, although this was significantly lower than for those aged <65 years (98.5%, 66/67) (P < 0.05). The frequency of adverse effects was comparable for the <75 and ≥75 age groups, the most common being an elevated alanine aminotransferase level (>150 U/L, 8.7%), however, no decompensating events were seen. CONCLUSIONS: Daclatasvir plus asunaprevir for HCV genotype 1b was well tolerated and effective for patients without pre-existent NS5A resistance-associated variants or simeprevir failure, irrespective of fibrosis status. However, it was less effective for very old patients aged ≥75 years compared to those aged <65.

Efficacy of interferon-beta plus ribavirin combination treatment on the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis C.

AIM: Although there is much evidence of an antitumor effect of pegylated interferon (IFN)-α-based treatment, limited data is available about that of IFN-ß-based treatment. Our goal was to evaluate the impact of IFN-ß plus ribavirin (RBV) treatment on the suppression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter study consisted of 124 chronic hepatitis C patients who were treated with IFN-ß plus RBV treatment, including 61 with advanced fibrosis and five with pretreatment HCC. All participants were followed for a median of 2.8 years (range, 2.2-3.2) after the end of their antiviral treatment. The data of 112 patients who finished the treatment were available for analysis. Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed to determine factors significantly associated with HCC development. Cumulative incidence curves for HCC were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences between groups were assessed using the log-rank test. RESULTS: The 2.9% rate of HCC development of patients with sustained virological response (SVR) was significantly lower (P = 0.027) than the 15.9% of non-SVR patients. Interestingly, no significant difference was observed between the rates of HCC development of patients with and without advanced fibrosis (P = 0.733), even though the SVR rate of patients with advanced fibrosis was significantly lower than that of those without advanced fibrosis (P < 0.001). Stepwise multivariable Cox analysis extracted that only SVR was significantly associated with HCC development (hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.84, P = 0.027). CONCLUSION: SVR was significantly associated with a lower risk of HCC development after IFN-ß plus RBV treatment.

Portal Vein Thrombosis Repeatedly Observed in a Cirrhotic Patient with Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome.

Background: Although portal vein thrombosis in cirrhotic patients is frequently observed, the detailed process remains to be clarified, and the role of anticardiolipin antibody in the development of portal vein thrombosis has been controversial. Case Report: A 52-year-old man, who had been diagnosed with alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver, was admitted to our hospital suffering from dyspnea and ascites. Just after being diagnosed as having antiphospholipid antibody syndrome with lung thrombosis and delivering a positive result for the ß 2-glycoprotein I-dependent anticardiolipin antibody, he sustained rupture of the esophageal varices with rapid development of portal vein thrombosis, which resolved under anticoagulant therapy. Two years later, he was admitted again on suspicion of thrombosis because of an elevation in the serum D-dimer level, and computed tomography showed portal and upper mesenteric vein thrombosis. Although immediate anticoagulant therapy resulted in complete recanalization, he suffered the same episode 2 months later, which occurred with re-elevation of the serum D-dimer level. Conclusion: A positive finding of an anticardiolipin antibody in cirrhotic patients has been considered to be nonspecific and not related to the development of thrombus in the portal vein. This case, however, seems to indicate that cirrhotic patients with the ß2-glycoprotein I-dependent anticardiolipin antibody should be regarded as being at high risk for portal vein thrombosis. Monitoring with the serum D-dimer was useful in detecting portal vein thrombosis in its early stage.

Comparative effectiveness and safety study of triple therapy with simeprevir or telaprevir for non-cirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The addition of hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A protease inhibitors to pegylated-interferon alpha (PEG-IFNα) and ribavirin (triple therapy) has greatly improved treatment outcome. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of simeprevir-based or telaprevir-based triple therapy for non-cirrhotic patients in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: This multicenter study consisted of 835 consecutive Japanese HCV genotype 1b patients treated in a clinical setting, 716 of whom were enrolled (simeprevir = 256 and telaprevir = 460). Logistic regression was carried out after propensity score matching to assess the sustained virological response at week 12 after the end of treatment (SVR12). RESULTS: In the propensity-matched cohort (253 matched pairs), the SVR12 rates of the patients who underwent simeprevir-based or telaprevir-based triple therapy were 85.0% and 84.2%, respectively, by intention-to-treat analysis. Prior treatment response to PEG-IFNα/ribavirin and IL28B genotype was independently associated with SVR12 in both groups. No significant differences in the SVR12 rates stratified by prior treatment response to PEG-IFNα/ribavirin were found between the simeprevir (treatment-naïve 89.1%, prior relapse 94.3%, prior partial response 65.0%, and prior null response 33.3%) and telaprevir (treatment-naïve 87.8%, prior relapse 90.1%, prior partial response 68.4%, and prior null response 50.0%) groups. The incidence of adverse effects, such as anemia, severe rash, and the elevation of serum creatinine, was markedly higher in the telaprevir group. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the effectiveness and safety, simeprevir-based triple therapy will continue to be a useful treatment option in Japan for treatment-naïve or prior relapse patients with a favorable IL28B genotype.

Comparative safety study on severe anemia by simeprevir versus telaprevir-based triple therapy for chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The addition of hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A protease inhibitors to the pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) α and ribavirin combination regimen (triple therapy) has dramatically improved treatment outcome. Unfortunately, anemia remains a common adverse effect. This study was done to compare the development of severe anemia during simeprevir- or telaprevir-based triple therapy. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study consisted of 837 consecutive Japanese HCV genotype 1 patients treated in a real-world clinical setting, 811 of whom were enrolled (simeprevir 281, telaprevir 530). The inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase (ITPA) genotype at rs1127354 was determined for all studied patients. Logistic regression was done after propensity score matching to assess the risk of development of severe anemia. RESULTS: Propensity score matching of the entire study population yielded 266 matched pairs. Severe anemia (nadir hemoglobin < 9.0 g/dL) was developed during the treatment period by 81 (30.5%) and 144 (54.1%) patients treated with simeprevir and telaprevir, respectively. Treatment with simeprevir was independently associated with a lower risk of severe anemia (odds ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.38, P < 0.0001). Moreover, ITPA genotype, age, hemoglobin level, and estimated glomerular filtration rate at baseline were also independent factors associated with the development of severe anemia. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with simeprevir-based triple therapy have a lower risk of the development of severe anemia than those treated with telaprevir. Moreover, ITPA genotype and age may be useful for individualizing treatment to reduce the risk of anemia-related adverse effects.

Efficacy and safety of splenectomy in telaprevir-based triple therapy for chronic hepatitis C patients with thrombocytopenia and advanced fibrosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Thrombocytopenia (TCP) of chronic hepatitis C patients with cirrhosis has a negative impact on the management of interferon-based treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of telaprevir-based triple therapy for patients who have undergone splenectomy (Spx). METHODS: This prospective, multicenter study consisted of 80 patients, including 32 Spx and 48 non-Spx/TCP (platelet count: 60-99 × 10(9) /L) patients with advanced fibrosis infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b. All received 12 weeks of telaprevir in combination with 24 weeks of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) α2b and ribavirin. RESULTS: The sustained virological response (SVR) rate of the Spx group (75.0%) was significantly higher than that of the non-Spx/TCP group (52.1%) (P < 0.05). Under favorable conditions such as treatment-naïve/prior relapse and interleukin-28B (IL28B) TT allele (rs8099917), the SVR rates of the Spx group were significantly higher than those of the non-Spx/moderate TCP (60-79 × 10(9) /L) groups (91.3% vs 50.0% and 93.8% vs 37.5%, respectively; both P < 0.05). Adequate PEG-IFNα2b adherence was associated with SVR. However, the percentage of patients who achieved 80% adherence to PEG-IFNα2b in the non-Spx/moderate TCP (42.9%) group was significantly lower than that of the Spx (79.3%) and non-Spx/mild TCP (80-99 × 10(9) /L) (80.0%) groups. Treatment discontinuation due to adverse effects and the development of bacterial infection did not differ between the Spx and non-Spx/TCP groups. CONCLUSION: The increase of platelet count after Spx contributed to treatment success, especially for moderate to severe TCP patients who are treatment-naïve/prior relapse or IL28B TT allele.

Efficacy of pegylated interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin treatment on the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis C: a prospective, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The effects of pegylated interferon (PegIFN) α and ribavirin (RBV) treatment of chronic hepatitis C on the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have not been well established. This study investigated the impact of treatment outcome on the development of HCC by chronic hepatitis C patients treated with PegIFNα2b and RBV. METHODS: This large-scale, prospective, multicenter study consisted of 1013 Japanese chronic hepatitis C patients with no history of HCC (non-cirrhosis, n=863 and cirrhosis, n=150). All patients were treated with PegIFNα2b and RBV and the follow-up period started at the end of the antiviral treatment (median observation period of 3.6 years). The cumulative incidence rate of HCC was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, according to treatment outcome. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients (4.6%) developed HCC during the observation period. In the non-cirrhosis group, the 5-year cumulative incidence rates of HCC for the sustained virological response (SVR) (1.7%) and transient virological response (3.2%) (TVR: defined as relapse or breakthrough) groups were significantly lower than those of the non-virological response (NVR) group (7.6%) (p=0.003 and p=0.03, respectively). A significantly low rate of incidence of HCC by TVR patients in comparison with NVR patients was found for patients aged 60 years and over, but not for those under 60 years of age. In the cirrhosis group, the 5-year cumulative incidence rates of HCC for the SVR (18.9%) and TVR groups (20.8%) were also significantly lower than those of the NVR group (39.4%) (p=0.03 and p=0.04, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: SVR and complete viral suppression during treatment with relapse (TVR) were associated with a lower risk of HCC development when compared with NVR.

Clinical milestones for the prediction of severe anemia by chronic hepatitis C patients receiving telaprevir-based triple therapy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Anemia is a common adverse effect of telaprevir (TVR) in combination with pegylated interferon (PegIFN)α and ribavirin (RBV) therapy. It occurs at a higher incidence with the TVR relative to PegIFNα and RBV alone. We herein evaluate the baseline and on-treatment predictors of the development of severe anemia by chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients receiving TVR-based triple therapy. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter study consisted of 292 patients (median age: 62 years) infected with HCV genotype 1. All received 12 weeks of TVR in combination with 24 weeks of PegIFNα2b and RBV. The definition of severe anemia during antiviral treatment is hemoglobin (Hb)<85 g/L. RESULTS: 101 (34.6%) patients developed severe anemia during the treatment period. Multivariable logistic regression analysis of possible pretreatment predictors of the development of severe anemia extracted baseline Hb < 135 g/L (Hazard ratio [HR], 2.53; p = 0.0013), estimated glomerular filtration rate <80 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (HR, 1.83; p = 0.0265), and inosine triphosphatase (ITPA) CC genotype (rs1127354) (HR, 2.91; p = 0.0024). For patients with ITPA CC (n = 227), multivariable logistic regression analysis of possible pretreatment and on-treatment predictors of the development of severe anemia extracted Hb level at week 2 (HR, 0.96; p = 0.0085) and the initial four weeks of weight-adjusted TVR (HR, 1.05; p = 0.0281). CONCLUSIONS: Anemia remains a risk for all patients treated with TVR-based triple therapy. However, ITPA polymorphism (rs1127354) is useful for predicting the development of severe anemia and will be helpful in the management of treatment.

Telaprevir can be successfully and safely used to treat older patients with genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of a triple therapy in older Japanese patients; telaprevir (TVR) was added to pegylated interferon α2b and ribavirin. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled 120 genotype 1b patients with chronic hepatitis C who received 12 weeks of triple therapy followed by a 12-week dual therapy that included pegylated interferon α2b and ribavirin. Patients were categorized according to age: group A, 64 patients aged >60 and group B, 56 patients aged ⩽60. Serum HCV RNA levels were monitored by COBAS TaqMan HCV test. RESULTS: The rates of undetectable HCV RNA at week 4 (rapid virological response, RVR) were 73.4% in group A and 73.2% in group B. No significant difference in sustained virological response (SVR) was found between groups A (76.6%) and B (83.9%) (p=0.314). The SVR rates for patients with interleukin 28B (IL28B) (rs8099917) TT allele (89.4% and 91.9% for groups A and B) were significantly higher than for those with the IL28B TG/GG allele (41.2% and 68.4%, respectively) (both p<0.05). Multivariate analysis extracted IL28B TT and RVR as independent factors associated with SVR. Adverse effects resulted in treatment discontinuation by 12.5% in each group. Hemoglobin decrease significantly differed between groups A and B: the decrease to ≤100 g/L, to 85 - <100g/L, and to <85 g/L, was 9.4%, 40.6%, and 50% in group A patients, respectively, and 41.1%, 25%, and 33.9% in group B patients, respectively (p=0.0006). CONCLUSIONS: TVR-based triple therapy can be successfully used to treat older patients with genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C.

Hepatitis B virus strains of subgenotype A2 with an identical sequence spreading rapidly from the capital region to all over Japan in patients with acute hepatitis B.

OBJECTIVE: To examine recent trends of acute infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) in Japan by nationwide surveillance and phylogenetic analyses. METHODS: During 1991 through 2009, a sentinel surveillance was conducted in 28 national hospitals in a prospective cohort study. Genotypes of HBV were determined in 547 patients with acute hepatitis B. Nucleotide sequences in the preS1/S2/S gene of genotype A and B isolates were determined for phylogenetic analyses. RESULTS: HBV genotype A was detected in 137 (25% (accompanied by genotype G in one)) patients, B in 48 (9%), C in 359 (66%), and other genotypes in the remaining three (0.5%). HBV persisted in five with genotype A including the one accompanied by genotype G; another was co-infected with HIV type 1. The genotype was A in 4.8% of patients during 1991-1996, 29.3% during 1997-2002, and 50.0% during 2003-2008 in the capital region, as against 6.5%, 8.5% and 33.1%, respectively, in other regions. Of the 114 genotype A isolates, 13 (11.4%) were subgenotype A1, and 101 (88.6%) were A2, whereas of the 43 genotype B isolates, 10 (23.3%) were subgenotype B1, 28 (65.1%) were B2, two (4.7%) were B3, and three (7.0%) were B4. Sequences of 65 (64%) isolates of A2 were identical, as were three (23%) of A1, and five (18%) of B2, but none of the B1, B3 and B4 isolates shared a sequence. CONCLUSIONS: Acute infection with HBV of genotype A, subgenotype A2 in particular, appear to be increasing, mainly through sexual contact, and spreading from the capital region to other regions in Japan nationwide. Infection persisted in 4% of the patients with genotype A, and HBV strains with an identical sequence prevailed in subgenotype A2 infections. This study indicates the need for universal vaccination of young people to prevent increases in HBV infection in Japan.

Evaluation of the adverse effect of premature discontinuation of pegylated interferon α-2b and ribavirin treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus infection: results from Kyushu University Liver Disease Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) α-2b and ribavirin (RBV) treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with a substantially elevated risk of discontinuation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the reason for premature discontinuation during PEG-IFN α-2b and RBV treatment due to adverse effects in patients with chronic HCV infection. METHODS: A total of 2871 Japanese patients who had chronic HCV infection treated with PEG-IFN α-2b and RBV were screened. We prospectively investigated the reasons for premature discontinuation of treatment classified by sex and age, and analyzed the timing of discontinuation. RESULTS: Of the 2871 patients, 250 (8.7%) discontinued treatment because of adverse effects. The main reasons for premature discontinuation were neurovegetative symptoms (n = 77, 30.8%), depression-related syndrome (n = 46, 18.4%), hematologic effects (n = 41, 16.4%) and dermatologic effects (n = 27, 10.8%). The rate of discontinuation of treatment for patients aged ≥ 65 years was significantly higher than for patients aged < 65 years, for both men (P < 0.0001) and women (P = 0.0121). Moreover, the frequency of discontinuation due to neurovegetative symptoms, depression-related syndrome, and hematologic effects for men aged ≥ 65 years was significantly higher than for those aged < 65 years (P = 0.0001, P = 0.0016, and P = 0.0170, respectively), but not for women. CONCLUSION: Premature discontinuation due to the adverse effects of PEG-IFN α-2b and RBV treatment by patients with chronic HCV infection is mainly due to neuropsychiatric symptoms and is more common for older than for younger patients.

An inadequate dose of ribavirin is related to virological relapse by chronic hepatitis C patients treated with pegylated interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin.

The aim of this large-scale analysis was to assess the effect of 48-week pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) α-2b and ribavirin (RBV) therapy on virological relapse by patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1. The relationship between virological relapse and the dose of PEG-IFNα-2b and RBV was investigated in 619 patients who had once cleared HCV RNA during PEG-IFNα-2b and RBV treatment for 48 weeks. The overall virological relapse rate was 34.1% (211 of 619). The relapse rate was 59.5% (22 of 37) for patients who received <6 mg/kg/day of RBV, even if a sufficient dose of PEG-IFNα-2b (≥1.5 µg/kg/day) was received. In contrast, the relapse rate was 28.1% (16 of 57) for patients who received ≥12 mg/kg/day of RBV, irrespective of the PEG-IFNα-2b dose. The relapse rates were significantly increased with the reduction of the RBV dose for both PEG-IFNα-2b doses of ≥1.2 and <1.2 µg/kg/week (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0006, respectively). Moreover, the relapse rate was 41.2% (35 of 85) for patients with an early virological response (EVR) who received <6 mg/kg/day of RBV. The relapse rates were significantly increased with the reduction of the RBV dose in both those patients with an EVR and those with a late virological response (P = 0.0006 and P = 0.0088, respectively). To summarize, for HCV genotype 1 patients treated with PEG-IFNα-2b and RBV, the virological relapse of HCV was RBV dose-dependent, irrespective of the dose of PEG-IFNα or the effect of early viral kinetics.

Switching to tenofovir alafenamide for nucleos(t)ide analogue-experienced patients with chronic hepatitis B: week 144 results from a real-world, multi-centre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) may be preferable to other nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) regarding outcomes against chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. AIMS: To evaluate the longer term virological/biochemical effectiveness of TAF and the renal safety of sequential therapy to TAF in real-world settings METHODS: This multi-centre, retrospective cohort study included consecutive adult patients who were switched from other NAs to TAF. We assessed the virological and biochemical responses up to 144 weeks. We performed sensitivity analyses for a subgroup with chronic kidney disease (CKD) at baseline. RESULTS: We analysed the data of 391 patients with chronic hepatitis B previously treated with entecavir (ETV) (n = 174), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) (n = 116) or an NA combination (n = 101) for ≥ 24 months. HBV DNA <10 IU/ml at week 144 was found for 99% of patients, regardless of prior NA regimen or HBV DNA level at baseline. For patients who switched from TDF to TAF, total, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides were significantly increased after the switch. Patients who switched from a nucleotide analogue to TAF had an improved estimated glomerular filtration rate, although the rate of hypophosphataemia (<2.5 mg/dl) remained 9.7% at week 144. The virological and biochemical responses of patients with CKD were similar to the overall results. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to TAF remained effective and safe for up to 3 years. Given the increasing comorbidities related to ageing, it will be important to carefully follow the change in the lipid levels of patients with a prior TDF-based regimen.

Sequential HBV treatment with tenofovir alafenamide for patients with chronic hepatitis B: week 96 results from a real-world, multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Outcome data of sequential hepatitis B virus treatment with tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are limited. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and renal safety of TAF in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who were previously treated with entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), or a nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) combination. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective, cohort study included 458 consecutive CHB patients who switched to TAF monotherapy after at least 2 years of treatment with another NA. The longitudinal virological/laboratory responses were evaluated up to 96 weeks after switchover. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. RESULTS: The proportions of complete viral suppression (CVS) (HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL) at week 96 were 99.0%, 98.5%, and 98.4% in the prior ETV (n = 198), TDF (n = 137), and NA combination (n = 123) groups, respectively. Almost all patients with HBV DNA of 20-2000 IU/mL at baseline achieved CVS at week 96. On multivariable generalized estimated equation analysis, a low quantitative hepatitis surface antigen (qHBsAg) level at baseline was associated with a lower follow-up qHBsAg level (coefficient 0.81, p < 0.001). The eGFR showed greater improvement in patients with CKD compared to those without (coefficient 21.7, p < 0.001). However, the increase of eGFR reached a peak between weeks 24 and 48. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this longitudinal data analysis up to 96 weeks, sequential NA therapy with a switch to TAF is a good option to achieve high viral suppression and renal safety.