Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Hum Vaccin ; 7(11): 1130-6, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22048110

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the general safety of zoster vaccine (ZV) in adults ≥60 years old. PATIENTS/METHODS: Subjects were enrolled in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 dose of ZV or placebo. Subjects were followed for serious adverse experiences (SAEs) for 42 days (primary follow-up period) and 182 days (secondary follow-up period) postvaccination. Relative-risks (ZV/placebo) for SAEs during both safety periods were calculated. STUDY PERIOD: 17-Sep­2007 to 09-Jan-2009. RESULTS: Overall, 5,983 subjects received ZV and 5,997 received placebo. Within the primary 42-day follow-up period, 84 ZV subjects and 67 placebo subjects reported SAEs. The estimated risk of SAEs within 42 days was 1.41% for ZV versus 1.12% for placebo, with a relative-risk of 1.26 (95% CI 0.91,1.73); indicating no statistically significant difference between groups, meeting the pre-specified success criterion. During the 182-day follow-up period, 340 ZV subjects and 300 placebo subjects reported SAEs. The estimated risk of SAEs within 182 days was 5.68% for ZV versus 5.01% for placebo, with a relative-risk of 1.13 (95% CI 0.98,1.32), indicating no statistically significant difference between groups. Two subjects in the ZV group reported SAEs deemed by the investigator to be vaccine-related (uveitis and sciatica; onset Day 5 and 4, respectively). One subject in the placebo group reported a SAE deemed by the investigator to be vaccine-related (lumbar radiculopathy; onset Day 51). There were 24 fatal SAEs in the ZV group and 17 in the placebo group (relative risk = 1.41; CI: 0.77, 2.60); 6 and 5, respectively, with SAE onset during the primary 42-day follow-up period. No deaths were deemed vaccine-related. CONCLUSIONS: ZV and placebo groups had similar safety profiles in terms of SAEs during the primary (Day 1 to 42) and secondary (Day 1 to 182) follow-up periods.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/efectos adversos , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Herpes Zóster/inmunología , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vacunación
2.
Pediatrics ; 134(3): e657-65, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25136050

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We present a long-term safety, immunogenicity, and effectiveness study of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV4) vaccine. METHODS: Sexually naive boys and girls aged 9 to 15 years (N = 1781) were assigned (2:1) to receive HPV4 vaccine or saline placebo at day 1 and months 2 and 6. At month 30, the placebo group (n = 482) received HPV4 vaccine following the same regimen and both cohorts were followed through month 96. Subjects ≥ 16 years were eligible for effectiveness evaluations. The primary objective was to evaluate the long-term anti-HPV6/11/16/18 serological levels. The secondary objective was to estimate vaccine effectiveness against HPV6/11/16/18-related persistent infection or disease. RESULTS: For each of the HPV4 vaccine types, vaccination-induced anti-HPV response persisted through month 96. Among 429 subjects who received HPV4 vaccine at a mean age of 12, none developed HPV6/11/16/18-related disease or persistent infection of ≥ 12 months' duration. Acquisition of new sexual partners (among those ≥ 16 years) was ∼1 per year. Subjects receiving HPV4 vaccine at month 30 (mean age 15 years) had a similar baseline rate of seropositivity to ≥ 1 of the 4 HPV types to those vaccinated at day 1 (mean age 12 years; 1.9% [9 of 474] vs 1.7% [20 of 1157]); however, 4 of the 9 subjects vaccinated at the later age were seropositive to 3 vaccine types, indicating previous HPV exposure. No new significant serious adverse events were observed for 8 years postvaccination in both genders. CONCLUSIONS: When administered to adolescents, the HPV4 vaccine demonstrated durability in clinically effective protection and sustained antibody titers over 8 years.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Vacunación/tendencias , Adolescente , Niño , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Papillomavirus Humano 11/efectos de los fármacos , Papillomavirus Humano 11/fisiología , Papillomavirus Humano 16/efectos de los fármacos , Papillomavirus Humano 16/fisiología , Papillomavirus Humano 18/efectos de los fármacos , Papillomavirus Humano 18/fisiología , Papillomavirus Humano 6/efectos de los fármacos , Papillomavirus Humano 6/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/sangre , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/epidemiología , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/sangre , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA