RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pediatric Post-COVID-Condition (PPCC) clinics treat children despite limited scientific substantiation. By exploring real-life management of children diagnosed with PPCC, the International Post-COVID-Condition in Children Collaboration (IP4C) aimed to provide guidance for future PPCC care. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional international, multicenter study on used PPCC definitions; the organization of PPCC care programs and patients characteristics. We compared aggregated data from PPCC cohorts and identified priorities to improve PPCC care. RESULTS: Ten PPCC care programs and six COVID-19 follow-up research cohorts participated. Aggregated data from 584 PPCC patients was analyzed. The most common symptoms included fatigue (71%), headache (55%), concentration difficulties (53%), and brain fog (48%). Severe limitations in daily life were reported in 31% of patients. Most PPCC care programs organized in-person visits with multidisciplinary teams. Diagnostic testing for respiratory and cardiac morbidity was most frequently performed and seldom abnormal. Treatment was often limited to physical therapy and psychological support. CONCLUSIONS: We found substantial heterogeneity in both the diagnostics and management of PPCC, possibly explained by scarce scientific evidence and lack of standardized care. We present a list of components which future guidelines should address, and outline priorities concerning PPCC care pathways, research and international collaboration. IMPACT: Pediatric Post-COVID Condition (PPCC) Care programs have been initiated in many countries. Children with PPCC in different countries are affected by similar symptoms, limiting many to participate in daily life. There is substantial heterogeneity in diagnostic testing. Access to specific diagnostic tests is required to identify some long-term COVID-19 sequelae. Treatments provided were limited to physical therapy and psychological support. This study emphasizes the need for evidence-based diagnostics and treatment of PPCC. The International Post-COVID Collaboration for Children (IP4C) provides guidance for guideline development and introduces a framework of priorities for PPCC care and research, to improve PPCC outcomes.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Adolescente , Masculino , Preescolar , SARS-CoV-2 , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19 , LactanteRESUMEN
AIM: To describe a cohort of patients aged 7-17 years presenting with mental health (MH) problems to an Australian tertiary paediatric emergency department (ED), in order to identify: (i) predictors of admission; and (ii) prolonged length of stay (LOS); (iii) reasons for ED presentation based on diagnosis and (iv) differences between major diagnostic groups. METHODS: Data for all presentations from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2018 were extracted and analysed from the hospital's electronic medical record system. MH presentations were identified though rule-based coding and manual file review. RESULTS: In this 12-month period, 1071 children had 1690 emergency MH presentations constituting 6.7% of all ED presentations for children aged 7-17 years. Collectively, the leading cause for presentations was suicidal ideation, self-harm or drug overdose (55%). Compared to discharged patients, admitted patients were more likely to be female (odds ratio (OR) 1.82, confidence interval (CI) 1.41-2.35), aged over 14-years (OR 2.50, CI 1.98-3.15), triaged with high acuity (OR 2.70, CI 2.00-3.65) and arrive by ambulance or police (OR 1.31, CI 1.04-1.64). The highest risk diagnosis associated with admission was eating disorders (OR 9.19, CI 5.48-15.40). Patients with a prolonged LOS (>8 h) were more likely to need admission (OR 5.38, CI 3.81-7.61) and be diagnosed with drug overdose (OR 2.39, CI 1.51-3.80) or acute behavioural disturbance (OR 1.61, CI 1.09-2.39). CONCLUSION: Mental health presentations constitute a large proportion of ED presentations. Suicidal behaviour and self-harm account for half of them. We have identified patients at increased risk of admission and prolonged ED LOS.
Asunto(s)
Salud Mental , Conducta Autodestructiva , Adolescente , Australia/epidemiología , Niño , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Conducta Autodestructiva/diagnóstico , Conducta Autodestructiva/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
AIM: To characterise the key features and management of young people presenting to the emergency department (ED) with a mental health (MH) complaint and a known diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODS: Retrospective review of all ED MH presentations in children aged 7-17 years, presenting over a 12-month period from the 1st of January 2018 to the 31st of December 2018, to the Royal Children's Hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Univariate analyses were carried out to examine the relationship between an underlying diagnosis of ASD and/or ADHD and a number of key presentation variables. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for ED management outcomes. RESULTS: There were 374 presentations in this cohort, representing 28% of the total MH presentations in 2018. The most common reason for presentation was acute severe behavioural disturbance. Young people with ASD and ADHD were at increased risk of having an acute crisis team response activated (ASD RR 2.3, CI 1.6-3.3, ADHD RR 2.2, CI 1.2-4.1). Compared to those without either diagnosis, young people with ASD were more likely to be physically restrained (RR 2.8, CI 1.7-4.6), managed in seclusion (RR 3.3, CI 1.7-6.4) and to receive medication to assist with behavioural de-escalation (RR 2.8, CI 1.6-4.9). CONCLUSIONS: Children with ASD and/or ADHD represent one-quarter of all children presenting to the ED with MH complaints. They experience high rates of acute severe behavioural disturbance. Future research is needed to co-design, implement and evaluate better approaches for their management.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad , Trastorno del Espectro Autista , Adolescente , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/epidemiología , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/complicaciones , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/epidemiología , Niño , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Salud Mental , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: There is paucity of evidence for psychotropic medication use in children and adolescents presenting with mental health (MH) problems to the ED. We set out to describe paediatric psychotropic medication use in the ED. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective electronic medical record review of ED patients with MH discharge codes at a tertiary paediatric ED in 2018. We assessed the epidemiology and management of patients who received a psychotropic medication. We calculated the odds ratios (ORs with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) of key demographic factors of medicated versus non-medicated MH patients. RESULTS: During 2018 there were 1695 MH-related presentations to the ED. Of these, 280 presentations resulted in the patient receiving a psychotropic medication (16.5%). Medicated children with MH illness were more likely to be male (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.16-1.96), have a more acute triage category (OR 3.37, 95% CI 2.28-4.98), have an ED length of stay greater than 12 h (OR 3.96, 95% CI 2.56-6.13) and present after hours (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.16-1.96). Most had a diagnosis of acute behavioural disturbance or suicidal ideation. A variety of treatment regimens were used but children primarily received a single oral agent (diazepam or olanzapine). Parenteral medications were given in 8.6%. No adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSION: A minority of children with MH presentations to the ED were medicated. It will require multicentre research to determine the most effective and safe acute psychotropic agents for oral and parenteral use in children in the ED.