RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Research has shown that many babies who die in neonatal units could have been potential tissue and/or organ donors. Despite the existence of guidelines supporting its implementation, the incidence of neonatal donation remains rare in the United Kingdom. AIM: The aim of this audit was to retrospectively determine potential eligibility for neonatal tissue and/or organ donation referral in infants who died in a single UK tertiary-level neonatal unit between 2012 and 2021. Cause of death and documentation of any discussions held regarding referral for donation were also explored. STUDY DESIGN: An audit was undertaken to identify all neonatal deaths at a single tertiary-level NICU in London from 2012-2021. Infants who retrospectively could have been referred as potential tissue and/or organ donors were identified using current NHS Blood and Transplant inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A significant missed potential for neonatal tissue and/or organ donation referrals was identified, which is likely not just limited to the unit audited. Causes of death were as expected for a tertiary level neonatal unit and centre for therapeutic cooling of babies born with hypoxic perinatal brain injuries. Only one documented conversation was found regarding neonatal donation. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: To enable conversations regarding neonatal donation to become a routine part of end-of-life care discussions with families as appropriate, good links between neonatal healthcare professionals and Specialist Nurses in Organ Donation need to be established. This will facilitate the referral of all suitable neonates as potential donors and ensure that neonatal staff feel supported to care for babies identified as potential donors.
RESUMEN
This article explores ways in which paediatricians can help increase awareness and embed organ and tissue donation in the end-of-life care process. This can save patient lives on the organ transplant waiting list, many of whom currently die prematurely. The information benefits multidisciplinary staff including doctors, nurses and allied professionals to (1) recognise triggers for making referral to the specialist nurse for organ donation in order to make timely assessment for suitability for organ and/or tissue donation, (2) plan a multidisciplinary approach for families to make decisions for the gift of life and (3) help provide on-going support to families and staff.
Asunto(s)
Médicos , Cuidado Terminal , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Niño , Humanos , Derivación y ConsultaRESUMEN
Optimal management of pediatric cardiac donors is essential in order to maximize donor heart utilization and minimize the rate of discarded organs. This review was performed after a systematic literature review and gives a detailed overview on current practices and guidelines. The review focuses on optimal monitoring of pediatric donors, donor workup, hormonal replacement, and obliterating the adverse effects of brain death. The current evidence on catecholamine support and thyroid hormone replacement is also discussed. Recognizing and addressing this shall help in a standardized approach toward donor management and optimal utilization of pediatric heart donors organs.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Corazón , Donantes de Tejidos , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Adolescente , Muerte Encefálica , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en MedicinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are no currently agreed upon international standards for reporting of pediatric deceased organ donation activity. This leads to difficulty in comparisons between jurisdictions for both researchers and policy stakeholders. The goal of this project was to develop and test a standardized registry for pediatric deceased donation activity. METHODS: Four countries (Canada, Spain, USA, and the UK) with geographical and practice diversity were approached to participate. Iterative exchanges were used to create data fields and definitions that were acceptable to all participants. Data from 2011 to 2015 (inclusive) were requested from national health databases and analyzed on a secure, web-based survey platform. RESULTS: Data were obtained from three of the four countries (Canada unable to provide). Total pediatric donation rates were stable over the 5-year period, but with variation between countries. pDCD rates were the most variable, representing 32.2% of total pediatric donation in the UK, 14.4% in the United States, and 2.6% in Spain during the studied period. Most organs from pediatric donors were allocated to adult recipients, though the rates of allocation of pediatric kidneys to pediatric recipients ranged from 7% in the United States to 40% in Spain. DISCUSSION: In this limited cohort of three countries, we demonstrated substantial variation in pediatric donation rates and practice. These data highlight opportunities for practice improvement such as the development of rigorous clinical practice guidelines. Future development of this registry will seek to engage more countries, and address barriers that prevented full participation of approached jurisdictions.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Órganos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pediatría/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Donantes de Tejidos/estadística & datos numéricos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Cooperación Internacional , Internet , Mortalidad , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
AIM: Following the elective ventilation and referral for organ donation of an infant with anencephaly, we sought local perinatal professionals' views of this practice. METHODS: Anonymous online survey: demographics, ethical viewpoints and potential public/maternal perceptions (standard 5-part Likert scale and free text). DEMOGRAPHICS: 49 replies (38 female): 4 obstetricians, 14 neonatologists, 6 foetal clinicians, 23 nurses, 1 anaesthetist and 1 reproductive specialist. EXPERIENCE: 0.5-33 years (average 12). Twenty-one had experience of anencephalic delivery, and 10 reported pregnancy continued for religious reasons. ETHICS: (i) 73% thought anencephalic donation acceptable, of which 64% supported elective ventilation, 20% neutral and 16% disagreed. (ii) Provision of treatments not in infant's strict best interest to facilitate donation: 22% strongly agreed, 36% agreed, 33% neutral and 9% disagreed. (iii) Accept ventilation to permit donation if societal benefit: 53% agreed, 33% neutral and 13% disagreed. (iv) Public opinion: 59% disagreed anencephalic donation would harm public opinion about donation and 19% agreed. CONCLUSION: We found a supportive local environment for donation in the setting of anencephaly, including support for elective ventilation. Given this, and our ethical analysis, we recommend provision of organ donation information as part of palliative care counselling for women carrying a foetus with a condition likely to be fatal in infancy.