Comparison of high flow nasal cannula therapy to nasal oxygen as a treatment for obstructive sleep apnea in infants.

INTRODUCTION: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in infants is treated with low flow oxygen via nasal cannula (NC), CPAP (continous positive airway pressure), or surgery. Literature supports the use of high flow NC (HFNC) in children in the outpatient setting, however there is limited data on the use of HFNC in infants. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare HFNC and low-flow oxygen as treatments for OSA in infants. METHODS: A prospective pilot study was performed at two institutions. Infants with primarily OSA underwent a 3-4 h sleep study with HFNC titration at 6-14 lpm for OSA, followed by clinical polysomnography (PSG) for oxygen titration (1/8-1 lpm). Infants with primarily central apnea were excluded. RESULTS: Nine infants were enrolled, with a mean age of 1.3 ± 1.7 months. Average apnea hypopnea index (AHI), average obstructive apnea hypopnea index (OAHI) and average central apnea index during the diagnostic PSG was 17.2 ± 7/h, 13.4 ± 5.4/h and 3.7 ± 4.8/h respectively. OSA improved in 44.4% of subjects with HFNC; the mean AHI and OAHI decreased from 15.6 ± 5.65/h and 12.8 ± 4.4/h on diagnostic PSG to 5.12 ± 2.5/h and 4.25 ± 2.5/h on titration PSG. OSA improved universally with low flow oxygen; the mean AHI decreased from 17.2 ± 7/h on diagnostic PSG to 4.44 ± 3.6/h on titration PSG. CONCLUSION: HFNC reduced OSA in some infants, though low flow oxygen reduced OSA in all subjects. Respiratory instability (high loop gain) in infants may explain why infants responded to low flow oxygen. More studies are needed to determine if HFNC is beneficial in selected groups of infants with OSA.

Home Insulin Pump Use in Hospitalized Children With Type 1 Diabetes.

Importance: Pediatric data on inpatient home insulin pumps are absent in the literature. Understanding safety of home insulin pumps, managed by patients or caregivers, during times of illness will help diabetes technology securely move into pediatric hospitals. Objective: To examine whether insulin can be safely and accurately delivered to hospitalized children through home insulin pumps when managed by patients or caregivers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study included children with insulin-dependent diabetes admitted to a tertiary children's hospital from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021. In all these patients, diabetes was the primary or secondary diagnosis on admission. Exposure: Insulin delivery via home insulin pump, hospital insulin pump, or subcutaneous injection. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hyperglycemia (glucose, >250 mg/dL) and hypoglycemia (glucose, <45 mg/dL) rates (quantified as the proportion of total insulin-days), glucose variability, and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) recurrences were compared for hospital pumps (manual mode), home pumps (manual mode), and subcutaneous injections using bivariate tests. Results: There were 18 096 insulin-days among 2738 patients aged 0.5 to 25 years (median age, 15.8 years [IQR, 12.3-18.3 years]). Overall, 990 (5.5%) of insulin-days involved hospital insulin pumps, and 775 (4.3%) involved home pumps. A total of 155 insulin-days (15.7%) involving hospital pumps were hyperglycemic, compared with 209 (27.0%) involving home pumps and 7374 (45.2%) involving injections (P < .001). Moderate hypoglycemia days comprised 31 insulin-days (3.1%) involving hospital pumps compared with 35 (4.5%) involving home pumps and 830 (5.1%) involving injections (P = .02). Severe hypoglycemia did not differ significantly according to insulin delivery method. Two patients using injections (0.01%) developed DKA; no patients using hospital or home pumps developed DKA. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, home insulin pump use was found to be safe in a children's hospital regarding hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. These data support use of home insulin pumps during pediatric admissions in patients who do not require intensive care and without active DKA.

Education-related needs for children with cystic fibrosis: Perspectives of US pediatric care teams.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) often bring education-related concerns to their medical teams. Concerns around the ability for CF care teams to identify and address these concerns exist. We sought to describe CF care team perceptions of (1) patient and family education-related needs, (2) how these needs are identified, documented and addressed, and (3) education-related resource gaps. METHODS: A survey was emailed to pediatric care teams in the CF Foundation Care Center Network in April 2022. Individuals or care teams could complete the survey. Responses were aggregated for descriptive analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-seven programs responded representing 52% of United States pediatric CF centers. Most centers (88%) indicated social workers primarily address school concerns. Care teams often complete school forms (99%), coach families to communicate with schools (96%), communicate with schools directly (90%), and develop educational plans (76%). Formal education risk assessment and support programs are relatively uncommon (19%). Common student-specific needs include carrying medications (75%) and leaving class for gastrointestinal issues (54%). Needs reported are informational materials for families and schools (94%), staff education about school concerns and how to address them (91%), additional staff for education-related issues (65%), and expertise in education plan development (62%). CONCLUSION: CF care teams often lack comprehensive resources to identify and address education-related concerns. Systematically performing needs assessments, improving training for providers, and evaluating the benefits of education specialists on care teams may better identify and address education-related needs. Supporting educational progression will foster continued independence and well-being in adulthood.

Integrating education for clinical practice change.

BACKGROUND: Children with chronic medical conditions and their families have significant emotional health concerns, yet paediatricians are often ill-equipped to address these needs. The American Board of Pediatrics launched the Roadmap Project to better support emotional health as part of routine care. We present pilot work in paediatric training programmes to test educational approaches and explore lessons learned. APPROACH: Four institutions implemented Roadmap tools into their paediatric training programmes, either incorporating them into existing educational structures or embedding them into the clinical workplace. One programme utilised an existing longitudinal curriculum, and another incorporated into a block rotation. Two programmes embedded training for residents into a larger programme for the healthcare team within the clinical space, one in outpatient clinics and one in an inpatient service. EVALUATION: Evaluation strategies at each site matched the intended outcomes. Sites working within education programmes evaluated learners, demonstrating increases in resident skills and confidence on pre-/post-self-assessments. Sites embedding tools into the practice context measured changes in the clinical practice of the healthcare team. Despite variability in implementation, all approaches improved trainee skills; sites embedding education into a clinical setting saw greater changes in clinical practice. IMPLICATIONS: Our pilot provided structure yet allowed for flexibility, and all sites improved trainee skills. Engaging the entire healthcare team within practice settings appears advantageous, thus embedding education into clinical practice may be preferable to a separate education programme. Similar to outcomes found in interprofessional education (IPE), educating clinical teams together may be more impactful for cultural shifts needed for changing clinical practice.