RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Measures of the sonorheometry based Quantra® viscoelastic hemostatic analyzer (HemoSonics, LCC, Charlottesville, VA, USA) were compared with corresponding results of the ROTEM® sigma device (Instrumentation Laboratory, Bedford, MA, USA). METHODS: In thirty-eight patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery between December 2018 and October 2019, blood samples were taken after induction of anesthesia (sample 1) and after heparin neutralization (sample 2) and measured on Quantra (QPlus® Cartridge) and ROTEM sigma (ROTEM® sigma complete + hep Cartridge). Clot times and clot stiffness values were recorded. Clot stiffness values of ROTEM amplitudes (A in mm) were converted to shear modulus (G) in hectoPascal (hPa): G (hPa) = (5 x A)/(100-A). Additionally, time-to-results was recorded. Spearman rank test correlation and Bland Altman analysis were performed. RESULTS: Clot stiffness parameters of the Quantra correlated strongly with corresponding measurements of the ROTEM with r = 0.93 and 0.94 for EXTEM A10 vs CS and r = 0.94 and 0.96 for FIBTEM A10 vs FCS for sample 1 and 2, respectively. Quantra clot time correlated strongly with ROTEM INTEM CT with r = 0.71 for sample 1 and r = 0.75 for sample 2. However, Bland Altman analysis showed no agreement in all compared assays of both methods. The median time to delivery of first and complete results was significantly shorter for Quantra (412 and 658 s) compared to ROTEM sigma (839 and 1290 s). CONCLUSIONS: The Quantra showed a strong correlation with the ROTEM sigma for determining clot times and clot stiffness and the parameters assess similar aspects of clot development. However, these parameters are not directly interchangeable and implicate that separate cut-off values need to be established for users of the Quantra device. Word count: 278. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04210830 ) at December 20th 2019.
Asunto(s)
Coagulación Sanguínea , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/instrumentación , Tromboelastografía , Ultrasonido/instrumentación , Anciano , Elasticidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Reología/instrumentaciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: In patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, after failure of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, this trial compares the efficacy of second-line therapy with FOLFIRI vs. OFF (1:1 randomisation) with cross-over to the vice-versa regimen as third-line therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The primary endpoint was PFS (progression-free survival: time from randomization until progression or death) of second-line therapy. The trial aimed to demonstrate non-inferiority of FOLFIRI vs OFF (non-inferiority margin of a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.5, power of 80% and a significance level of 5%, 196 events needed). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival of third-line therapy and safety. The trial is registered with EudraCT Nr. 2016-004640-11. RESULTS: The trial was terminated with 60 evaluable (37 with FOLFIRI, 23 with OFF) patients due to insufficient recruitment. PFS of second-line therapy was 2.4 (95% CI 2.3-2.6) months with FOLFIRI vs 2.4 (95% CI 2.2-2.7) months with OFF (HR: 0.80, 95% CI 0.45-1.42, P = 0.43). OS was comparable between the arms (HR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.54-1.66), P = 0.84). Only 4 out of 28 (14%) patients receiving third-line therapy achieved a disease control (partial remission or stable disease). Both second-line regimens were well tolerated without new or unexpected safety signals being observed. CONCLUSION: The exploratory analysis of this early terminated trial suggests that FOLFIRI and OFF have similar efficacy ant toxicity as second-line therapy of PDAC after failure of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. Third-line therapy regardless of regimen does not provide satisfactory efficacy in this sequential treatment algorithm.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Fluorouracilo , Irinotecán , Leucovorina , Oxaliplatino , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Oxaliplatino/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino/uso terapéutico , Irinotecán/administración & dosificación , Irinotecán/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Camptotecina/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios CruzadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is an unmet need for effective therapies in pretreated advanced biliary tract cancer. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of nanoliposomal irinotecan and fluorouracil plus leucovorin compared with fluorouracil plus leucovorin as second-line treatment for biliary tract cancer. METHODS: NALIRICC was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial done in 17 German centres for patients aged 18 years or older, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, metastatic biliary tract cancer, and progression on gemcitabine-based therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous infusions of nanoliposomal irinotecan (70 mg/m2), fluorouracil (2400 mg/m2), and leucovorin (400 mg/m2) every 2 weeks (nanoliposomal irinotecan group) or fluorouracil (2400 mg/m2) plus leucovorin (400 mg/m2) every 2 weeks (control group). Randomisation was by permutated block randomisation in block sizes of four, stratified by primary tumour site. Investigator-assessed progression-free survival was the primary endpoint, which was evaluated in all randomly assigned patients. Secondary efficacy outcomes were overall survival, objective response rate, and quality of life. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of the study treatment. Enrolment for this trial has been completed, and it is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03043547. FINDING: Between Dec 4, 2017, and Aug 2, 2021, 49 patients were randomly assigned to the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 51 patients to the control group. Median age was 65 years (IQR 59-71); 45 (45%) of 100 patients were female. Median progression-free survival was 2·6 months (95% CI 1·7-3·6) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 2·3 months (1·6-3·4) in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·87 [0·56-1·35]). Median overall survival was 6·9 months (95% CI 5·3-10·6) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 8·2 months (5·4-11·9) in the control group (HR 1·08 [0·68-1·72]). The objective response rate was 14% (95% CI 6-27; seven patients) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 4% (1-14; two patients) in the control group. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group were neutropenia (eight [17%] of 48 vs none in the control group), diarrhoea (seven [15%] vs one [2%]), and nausea (four [8%] vs none). In the control group, the most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were cholangitis (four [8%] patients vs none in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group) and bile duct stenosis (four [8%] vs three [6%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 16 (33%) patients in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group (grade 2-3 diarrhoea in five patients; one case each of abdominal infection, acute kidney injury, pancytopenia, increased blood bilirubin, colitis, dehydration, dyspnoea, infectious enterocolitis, ileus, oral mucositis, and nausea). One (2%) treatment-related serious adverse event occurred in the control group (worsening of general condition). Median duration until deterioration of global health status, characterised by the time from randomisation to the initial observation of a score decline exceeding 10 points, was 4·0 months (95% CI 2·2-not reached) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 3·7 months (2·7-not reached) in the control group. INTERPRETATION: The addition of nanoliposomal irinotecan to fluorouracil plus leucovorin did not improve progression-free survival or overall survival and was associated with higher toxicity compared with fluorouracil plus leucovorin. Further research is necessary to define the role of irinotecan-based combinations in second-line treatment of biliary tract cancer. FUNDING: Servier and AIO-Studien.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Colangiocarcinoma , Desoxicitidina , Fluorouracilo , Gemcitabina , Irinotecán , Leucovorina , Liposomas , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Leucovorina/efectos adversos , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Irinotecán/administración & dosificación , Irinotecán/efectos adversos , Irinotecán/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Colangiocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Colangiocarcinoma/patología , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/patología , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Nanopartículas/administración & dosificaciónAsunto(s)
Ciclina D1/genética , Ciclina D1/metabolismo , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Linfoma de Células del Manto/genética , Linfoma de Células del Manto/metabolismo , Mutación , Translocación Genética , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Cromosomas Humanos Par 11 , Cromosomas Humanos Par 14 , Análisis Mutacional de ADN , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Linfoma de Células del Manto/diagnóstico , Linfoma de Células del Manto/tratamiento farmacológico , Isoformas de Proteínas , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Cancer of unknown primary has a dismal prognosis, especially following failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. 10-20% of patients have a high tumor mutational burden (TMB), which predicts response to immunotherapy in many cancer types. In this prospective, non-randomized, open-label, multicenter Phase II trial (EudraCT 2018-004562-33; NCT04131621), patients relapsed or refractory after platinum-based chemotherapy received nivolumab and ipilimumab following TMBhigh vs. TMBlow stratification. Progression-free survival (PFS) represented the primary endpoint; overall survival (OS), response rates, duration of clinical benefit and safety were the secondary endpoints. The trial was prematurely terminated in March 2021 before reaching the preplanned sample size (n = 194). Among 31 evaluable patients, 16% had a high TMB ( > 12 mutations/Mb). Overall response rate was 16% (95% CI 6-34%), with 7.7% (95% CI 1-25%) vs. 60% (95% CI 15-95%) in TMBlow and TMBhigh, respectively. Although the primary endpoint was not met, high TMB was associated with better median PFS (18.3 vs. 2.4 months) and OS (18.3 vs. 3.6 months). Severe immune-related adverse events were reported in 29% of cases. Assessing on-treatment dynamics of circulating tumor DNA using combined targeted hotspot mutation and shallow whole genome sequencing as part of a predefined exploratory analysis identified patients benefiting from immunotherapy irrespective of initial radiologic response.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neoplasias Primarias Desconocidas , Humanos , Nivolumab/uso terapéutico , Ipilimumab/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Primarias Desconocidas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Primarias Desconocidas/genética , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The role of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) maintenance therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is undefined. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether switch maintenance therapy with nivolumab improves clinical outcomes in patients with mRCC with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sensitivity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This open-label phase 2 trial randomized patients with a partial response or stable disease after 10-12-wk TKI induction therapy to either TKI or nivolumab maintenance. Key inclusion criteria were measurable disease, clear cell histology, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-2, and adequate organ function. INTERVENTION: Intravenous nivolumab 8 × 240 mg every 2 wk, followed by 480 mg every 4 wk or sunitinib 50 mg (4-2 regimen) or pazopanib 800 mg once daily orally. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES: The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1), progression-free survival (PFS), safety (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03), and patient-reported outcomes (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index). The Kaplan-Meier method, two-sided log-rank tests, and Cox regression models were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Maintenance therapy was nivolumab for 25 patients (51.0%) and TKI for 24 (48.9%). The median age was 65 yr (range 35-79). Nine patients (18.4%) were female, 31 (63.3%) had ECOG PS of 0, and 15 (30.6%) had favorable risk. OS data are immature (17 deaths, 34.7%). The ORR was 20.0% (n = 5) for nivolumab and 52.2% (n = 12) for TKI. PFS was worse with nivolumab (hazard ratio 2.57, 95% confidence interval 1.36-4.89; p = 0.003). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 14 patients (56.0%) with nivolumab and 17 (70.8%) with TKI. A major limitation is early termination of our study. CONCLUSIONS: TKI treatment achieved superior ORR and PFS in comparison to nivolumab maintenance therapy. Our data do not indicate a role for nivolumab switch maintenance in mRCC. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients with metastatic kidney cancer who experienced a tumor response or disease stabilization after a short period of targeted treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor did not benefit from a switch to the immunotherapy drug nivolumab. Patients who continued their original treatment achieved better responses and a longer time without disease progression. This trial is registered on EudraCT as 2016-002170-13 and on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02959554.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Nivolumab/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
We retrospectively studied 73 consecutive patients who underwent surgery 2015-2020 for removal of cerebellar metastases (CM). Median overall survival (medOS) varied widely between patients and compared favorably with the more recent literature (9.2, 25-75% IQR: 3.2-21.7 months vs. 5-8 months). Prognostic factors included clinical (but not radiological) hydrocephalus (medOS 11.3 vs. 5.2 months, p = 0.0374). Of note, a third of the patients with a KPI <70% or multiple metastases survived >12 months. Chemotherapy played a prominent prognostic role (medOS 15.5 vs. 2.3, p < 0.0001) possibly reflecting advances in treating systemic vis-à-vis controlled CNS disease. Major neurological (≥30 days), surgical and medical complications (CTCAE III-V) were observed in 8.2%, 13.7%, and 9.6%, respectively. The occurrence of a major complication markedly reduced survival (10.7 vs. 2.5 months, p = 0.020). The presence of extracerebral metastases did not significantly influence OS. Postponing staging was not associated with more complications or shorter survival. Together these data argue for individualized decision making which includes offering surgery in selected cases with a presumably adverse prognosis and also occasional urgent operations in cases without a preoperative oncological work-up. Complication avoidance is of utmost importance.
RESUMEN
Following the PACIFIC trial, durvalumab has been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for consolidation of locally advanced PD-L1-positive NSCLC after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Patients were treated with durvalumab in the EAP from 22.11.2017 to 15.10.2018 allowing analysis of its efficacy and safety. 211 patients were registered by 90 German centres. Data were collected retrospectively by questionnaire and queries. 56 centres reported data on 126 patients who actually received at least one cycle of durvalumab. In contrast to the PACIFIC-trial population, some patients with oligometastatic disease and a history of autoimmune disease are included in the EAP population. Information on PD-L1 status was obtained for 111 patients. Baseline data include age, gender, ECOG, stage (IASLC 8th ed.), and smoking history. Treatment data include mode of chemoradiotherapy, used chemotherapy agent, and duration of durvalumab therapy. Adverse evants were documented according to CTAEC 5.0. Data were analysed for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AE). The results were published in Lung Cancer [1].
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Following the PACIFIC trial, durvalumab has been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for consolidation of locally advanced PD-L1-positive NSCLC after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Patients were treated with durvalumab in the EAP from 22.11.2017 to 15.10.2018 allowing analysis of its efficacy and safety. METHODS: Data from 56 centres were analysed for adverse events (AE), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS). RESULTS: 126 patients actually received at least 1 cycle durvalumab. Compared to the PACIFIC trial, the EAP population had more advanced stage and included "oligometastatic" stage IV patients and patients with autoimmune disease. PFS (20.1 months) and OS (not reached) were similar in the EAP and the PACIFIC trial. 42.9 % completed 12 months of durvalumab without deaths during FU. Stage IV patients (n = 7) had encouraging OS (not reached at 27 months). Autoimmune disease did not affect survival. PFS and OS were similar in PD-L1-negative patients (n = 32) and PD-L1-positive patients (n = 79). CONCLUSIONS: Survival in the EAP was comparable to the PACIFIC trial. Selected stage IV patients and patients with autoimmune disease may benefit from durvalumab consolidation and should be included in future immuno-oncological trials. PD-L1 did not predict survival challenging the exclusion of PD-L1-negative patients from durvalumab consolidation. In summary, durvalumab consolidation is safe and effective in a European real-world setting.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioradioterapia , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
We here describe a novel xenograft model of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) generated by infusion of human primary CLL cells into immunodeficient nonobese/severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) mice. Combined i.v. and i.p. injection of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from 39 patients with CLL resulted in highly reproducible splenic (37 of 39) and peritoneal (35 of 39) engraftment, which remained stable over a time span of 4 to 8 weeks. By comparison, recovery of leukemic cells from bone marrow (21 of 39) or peripheral blood (8 of 22) was substantially lower. The engraftment pattern of CLL PBMC 4 weeks posttransplant was correlated with clinical disease activity: infusion of PBMC from donors with Binet stage A, lymphocyte doubling time of >12 months, and normal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) serum levels led to marked engraftment of T cells whereas comparably few tumor cells could be detected. In contrast, NOD/SCID mice receiving PBMC from donors with advanced stage Binet C, lymphocyte doubling time of <12 months, and elevated LDH serum levels exhibited predominant engraftment of tumor cells and comparably low numbers of T cells. These results suggest that this model reflects the heterogeneity and important clinical characteristics of the disease, and thus may serve as a tool for preclinical drug testing and investigation of the pathophysiology of CLL.
Asunto(s)
Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Animales , Procesos de Crecimiento Celular/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos NOD , Ratones SCID , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trasplante de Neoplasias , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Riesgo , Bazo/patología , Linfocitos T/patología , Trasplante HeterólogoRESUMEN
Because of the variable clinical course of multiple myeloma, the identification of prognostic parameters is of clinical interest. Therefore, we analyzed the clinical significance of serum levels of soluble human leukocyte antigen class I molecules (sHLA-I), carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type-I collagen (ICTP), and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL). Compared with controls, sHLA-I were threefold (p < 0.001) elevated in multiple myeloma. Increased levels of ICTP and RANKL were demonstrated in 50 and 43% of patients, respectively. sHLA-I correlated significantly with stage of disease. Serial determination of sHLA-I in 11 patients revealed significantly higher sHLA-I levels (median [range] mug/l) during active disease than during remission (700 [250-2090] versus 380 [130-920]). ICTP demonstrated an association with stages of disease and the presence of osteolytic lesions, whereas there were no differences with respect to active/remittent disease. Importantly, levels of sHLA-I > or = 1000 microg/l and ICTP > or = 5 microg/l were significantly associated with a poor overall survival. For RANKL, no significant associations were observed with disease stages, disease status, osteolytic lesions, and survival. In conclusion, sHLA-I and ICTP serum levels seem to be of prognostic significance in multiple myeloma and might be helpful to identify patients of poor prognosis.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor , Antígenos HLA/sangre , Mieloma Múltiple/sangre , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Fragmentos de Péptidos/sangre , Procolágeno/sangre , Ligando RANK/sangre , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colágeno Tipo I , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Péptidos , Pronóstico , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
AIMS AND BACKGROUND: To improve the survival of patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, we evaluated a risk-adapted therapeutic approach using high-dose (HD) or conventional-dose (CD) chemotherapy (CT) for poor-risk and good-risk patients, respectively. METHODS: Twenty patients were treated in each group. In both groups, the first chemotherapy cycle consisted of dexamethasone, vincristine, ifosfamide, and etoposide. Thereafter, the CD or HD patients received 3 or 2 cycles of dexamethasone, vincristine, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide, respectively, followed by 1 cycle of dexamethasone, carboplatin, and etoposide. In the HD group cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, carboplatin, and etoposide were dose-escalated by a factor of 6, 3, 3, and 3, respectively, as compared to the CD group, and autologous peripheral blood stem cells were administered after each HD-CT cycle. RESULTS: Grade III-IV toxicities were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia (100%), anemia (55%), and stomatitis (30%) in patients with HD-CT, and neutropenia (90%) in patients with CD-CT. One toxic death occurred in a patient with HD-CT. The overall response rate was 100% in HD-CT patients, including 70% complete remissions, and 80% in CD-CT patients, including 60% complete remissions. The 10-year overall survival was 55% for patients with HD-CT and 80% for patients with CD-CT. CONCLUSIONS: The risk-adapted treatment approach showed tolerable toxicities and was associated with encouraging results.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Linfoma no Hodgkin/terapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre Periférica , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Terapia Combinada , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Etopósido/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Ifosfamida/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inducción de Remisión , Tasa de Supervivencia , Trasplante Autólogo , Vincristina/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
The present study evaluated cellular and humoral immune parameters in myeloma patients, focusing on the effect of treatment and the risk of opportunistic infections. Peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets and serum levels of nonmyeloma immunoglobulins (Ig) were analysed in 480 blood samples from 77 myeloma patients. Untreated myeloma patients exhibited significantly reduced CD4+/45RO+, CD19+, CD3+/HLA-DR+, and natural killer (NK) cells, as well as nonmyeloma IgA, IgG and IgM. Conventional-dose chemotherapy resulted in significantly reduced CD4+ and even further decline of CD4+/CD45RO+ and CD19+ cells, most notably in relapsed patients. Additional thalidomide treatment had no significant effects on these parameters. Following high-dose chemotherapy (HD-CTX), prolonged immunosuppression was observed. Although CD8+, NK, CD19+ and CD+/CD45RO+ cells recovered to normal values within 60, 90, 360 and 720 days, respectively, CD4+ counts remained reduced even thereafter. Nine opportunistic infections were observed, including five cytomegalovirus (CMV) diseases, one Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) and three varicella zoster virus infections with CMV diseases and PCP occurring exclusively after HD-CTX. Opportunistic infections were correlated with severely reduced CD4+, as well as CD4+/CD45RO+ and CD19+ counts. Thus, myeloma patients display cellular and humoral immunodeficiencies, which increase following conventional as well as HD-CTX, and constitute an important predisposing factor for opportunistic infections.
Asunto(s)
Formación de Anticuerpos , Inmunidad Celular , Isotipos de Inmunoglobulinas/sangre , Subgrupos Linfocitarios/patología , Mieloma Múltiple/inmunología , Infecciones Oportunistas/etiología , Anciano , Antígenos CD/análisis , Antígenos CD19 , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos , Células Cultivadas , Antígenos HLA-DR/análisis , Humanos , Subgrupos Linfocitarios/efectos de los fármacos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Mieloma Múltiple/patologíaRESUMEN
The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic significance of soluble human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I (sHLA-I) and HLA-G molecules in lung cancer patients. A total of 23 small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and 114 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, including 55 adenocarcinoma, 46 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and 13 patients with undifferentiated carcinoma, were prospectively enrolled. Levels of sHLA-G and sHLA-I were analyzed by specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Median levels of sHLA-G and sHLA-I were significantly increased in patients compared with controls (34 ng/ml [3.6-160] vs 14 ng/ml [0-98], p < 0.0001; 2580 ng/ml [749-5770] vs 1370 ng/ml [274-2670], p < 0.0001, respectively). Regarding the different subgroups, patients with NSCLC or SCLC showed increased sHLA-I levels, whereas sHLA-G was exclusively elevated in NSCLC, especially in patients with SCC. Patients with sHLA-I<2800 ng/ml (p = 0.008) or sHLA-G<40 ng/ml (p = 0.073) showed prolonged overall survival (OS). Using these cut-offs in patients with SCC, a pronounced prognostic significance for sHLA-G (p = 0.003) and sHLA-I (p = 0.004) was observed for the prediction of OS. Here, multivariate analysis confirmed sHLA-G and sHLA-I in addition to disease stage as independent prognostic factors. The prognostic power was further enhanced by combining the two factors and comparing the OS of patients with low sHLA-I and low sHLA-G against the remaining ones. In conclusion, plasma levels of sHLA-G and sHLA-I are potent predictors for OS in lung cancer patients.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Antígenos HLA/sangre , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidad Clase I/sangre , Neoplasias Pulmonares/sangre , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inmunología , Biomarcadores de Tumor/inmunología , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Femenino , Antígenos HLA-G , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , PronósticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This randomized phase II study investigated pemetrexed in combination with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeting monoclonal antibody matuzumab compared with pemetrexed alone as second-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m every 3 weeks either alone (n = 50) or in combination with matuzumab at either 800 mg weekly (n = 51) or 1600 mg every 3 weeks (n = 47). The primary end point was objective response, as assessed by an independent review committee. RESULTS: Tumor EGFR expression was detected in 87% of randomized patients. The objective response rate for the pooled matuzumab-treated arms was 11% compared with 5% for pemetrexed alone (p = 0.332). Apart from one patient in the pemetrexed alone group, all responses occurred in patients whose tumors expressed EGFR. The objective response rate for patients receiving weekly matuzumab was 16% compared with 2% for those receiving matuzumab every 3 weeks. There was also a trend for improved overall survival in patients receiving matuzumab weekly versus every 3 weeks (12.4 months versus 5.9 months, respectively, versus 7.9 months for pemetrexed alone). The combination of pemetrexed and matuzumab demonstrated an acceptable safety profile, with the most common grade 3/4 adverse event being neutropenia. CONCLUSION: Although the analysis on the pooled matuzumab-treated arms did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in objective response for the addition of matuzumab to pemetrexed compared with pemetrexed alone, the trends for improvement in objective response and overall survival for pemetrexed plus weekly matuzumab compared with pemetrexed alone warrant confirmation in additional clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Glutamatos/uso terapéutico , Guanina/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/psicología , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inhibidores , Femenino , Glutamatos/administración & dosificación , Glutamatos/efectos adversos , Guanina/administración & dosificación , Guanina/efectos adversos , Guanina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/psicología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pemetrexed , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
Major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain A (MICA) molecules are frequently expressed in lymphoproliferative malignancies including multiple myeloma (MM). MICA activates NK cells and co-stimulates T cells by interaction with its immunoreceptor NKG2D. In contrast, soluble MICA (sMICA) molecules impair the functions of NKG2D(+) T and NK cells, which may facilitate tumor cell escape from immunosurveillance. Here, we analyzed the clinical relevance of sMICA in 97 MM patients. sMICA (mean+/-SEM pg/ml) was significantly increased (p<0.0001) in patients (429+/-20) compared to controls (230+/-20; N=43). Serial determination showed a strong correlation between increments of sMICA and paraprotein levels (r=0.543, p<0.0001, N=49). sMICA levels >305 pg/ml are associated with a poor overall (p=0.004) and progression-free survival (p=0.002). Multivariate analysis revealed sMICA as an independent predictive factor for overall (p=0.007) and progression-free survival (p=0.002). Thus, our results suggest sMICA as a potent prognostic marker in MM, which may be useful to identify risk patients.
Asunto(s)
Antígenos de Histocompatibilidad Clase I/sangre , Mieloma Múltiple/sangre , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate the V-Sign digital sensor (SenTec AG, Therweil, Switzerland) for combined noninvasive assessment of pulse oxymetric oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) and transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension (PtcCO(2)) in adults after cardiac surgery. METHODS: In twenty one patients, aged 51-86 years, simultaneous measurements of blood gases with the V-Sign Sensor and with two Nellcor Durasensors (model DS-100A), one at the opposite earlobe and one with a finger clip, were compared first during hyper-, normo- and hypocapnia and at different pulse rates using a pacemaker, and then at 2-h intervals up to 8 h. Agreement was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: PtcCO(2) data of three patients were excluded because of calibration failure of the device. Median (range) PtcCO(2) for the remaining patients was 5.49 (3.3-7.6) kPa and arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO(2)) was 5.43 (3.61-7.41) kPa. Corresponding mean bias was +0.05 kPa and limits of agreement (LOA) were -1.2/+1.3 kPa. During normo- and hypoventilation, mean bias was good at +0.02 and +0.04 kPa respectively, but limits of agreement were poor at -0.67/+0.69 and -0.81/+0.88 kPa. In 10 patients, an initial overshoot of PtcCO(2 )was observed. Mean bias of SpO(2) and pulse rate was close to zero (-1.5% and +0.001 bpm respectively), but limits of agreement were unacceptably high (-21.4/+18.4% and -22.3/+22.3 bpm). CONCLUSIONS: In the present state of development the SenTeC Digital monitor V-Sign device has serious limitations. Additional efforts are necessary to eliminate calibration failures and the initial overshoot of PtcCO(2) as well as to improve detection of SpO(2) and pulse rate.
Asunto(s)
Monitoreo de Gas Sanguíneo Transcutáneo/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Sesgo , Monitoreo de Gas Sanguíneo Transcutáneo/instrumentación , Monitoreo de Gas Sanguíneo Transcutáneo/estadística & datos numéricos , Dióxido de Carbono/sangre , Oído/irrigación sanguínea , Femenino , Dedos/irrigación sanguínea , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxígeno/sangreRESUMEN
While vaccination with antigen-pulsed dendritic cells (DCs) represents a promising therapeutic strategy in multiple myeloma (MM), clinical benefit, so far, has been limited to individual patients. To identify potential problems with this approach, we have analyzed the influence of treatment parameters, in particular high-dose chemotherapy (HD-CTX) and thalidomide, on in vitro DC generation and peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets in MM patients. From a total of 25 MM patients, including 14 patients on thalidomide treatment and 11 after HD-CTX, in vitro DC generation from peripheral blood monocytes under serum-free condition was investigated. In addition, peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets were assessed in 17 patients including 10 patients on thalidomide treatment and 9 patients after HD-CTX. Efficient in vitro generation of DCs (median 7.1x10(6)/100 ml peripheral blood; range 0.1-42.5x10(6)/100 ml peripheral blood) expressing DC-typical surface markers was observed in 23 MM patients (92%), although reduced expression of CD1a, CD40, CD83, and HLA-DR was observed in patients treated with thalidomide. With respect to lymphocyte subsets, MM patients showed significantly (p<0.05) reduced B and CD4+ lymphocytes in the peripheral blood. This effect was most prominent within 6 months of HD-CTX and in patients receiving thalidomide (usually in combination with CTX). CD8+ lymphocytes were significantly increased in MM patients. Thus, despite the well-known deficiencies in their immune system, adequate numbers of DCs can be generated in most myeloma patients. In patients treated with thalidomide, however, it remains to be seen whether the reduced expression of co-stimulatory molecules has functional relevance.
Asunto(s)
Células Dendríticas/inmunología , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Subgrupos de Linfocitos T/inmunología , Talidomida/uso terapéutico , Antígenos de Superficie/análisis , Diferenciación Celular , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/farmacología , Humanos , Interleucina-4/farmacología , Monocitos/efectos de los fármacos , Mieloma Múltiple/inmunologíaRESUMEN
The aim of this study was to assess the side effects and the efficacy of thalidomide alone or in combination with dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) and to evaluate possible predictive factors for response rate and survival. Twenty-nine pretreated patients were enrolled, including 13 patients with a relapse after high-dose chemotherapy. The median number of relapses was 3 (range: 1-7). Twenty-two patients received thalidomide in combination with dexamethasone and seven patients thalidomide alone. The dosage of thalidomide was 400 mg/day and the dosage of dexamethasone 20 mg/m2 daily for 4 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Cycles of dexamethasone were given until maximal decline of myeloma protein was achieved, whereas therapy with thalidomide was maintained until disease progression. Responses occurred in 62% of patients, including 5 (17%) complete remissions and 13 (45%) partial remissions. The median event-free survival (EFS) was 7.2 months and the median overall survival (OS) 26.1 months. In multivariate analysis, pretreatment serum levels of soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) were a significant prognostic factor for EFS, and those of beta2-microglobulin (beta2M) and sIL-2R for OS. Serum levels of sIL-2R significantly increased after 3 weeks of treatment in 89% of patients, possibly representing lymphocyte activation induced by thalidomide. Two patients died of septic complications within 3 months after starting treatment with thalidomide and dexamethasone and one patient of herpes encephalitis after 26 months of treatment with thalidomide alone. Also, one case of pneumonia and one case of deep venous thrombosis of the lower limb occurred. Other side effects were somnolence, peripheral neuropathy, and bradycardia occurring in 35, 55, 38 and 55% of patients, respectively. The combination of thalidomide and dexamethasone is an effective therapy in heavily pretreated myeloma patients with a high response rate and acceptable toxicities. A powerful predictive factor both for EFS and OS was the pretreatment serum level of sIL-2R.