RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery has been proven to be the most effective therapy for obesity and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is one of the most commonly performed procedure. However, weight regain and dumping syndrome occur over time. The transoral outlet reduction (TORe) procedure using an endoscopic suturing device may be an option to treat these conditions. We aimed to analyze outcome parameters and long-term results for this endoscopic technique. METHODS: A retrospective data analysis of patients who underwent TORe using an endoscopic suturing system at our institution from January 2015 to December 2020 was performed. A total of 71 subjects were included. Forty-five patients received the intervention for weight regain, 9 for dumping syndrome and 17 for both. The primary endpoint was weight stabilization or weight loss for subjects with weight regain, and resolution of symptoms for those with dumping syndrome. Secondary endpoints were intraoperative complications, procedure time, length of hospital stay and diameter of gastrojejunal anastomosis 1 year post-intervention. RESULTS: The median size of the gastrojejunal anastomosis was estimated at 30 mm before intervention, and after performing a median of 3 endoscopic sutures, the median estimated gastrojejunal anastomosis width was reduced to 9.5 mm. Eight perioperative complications occurred. Overall mean follow-up was 26.5 months. All interventions achieved weight stabilization or weight loss or resolution of dumping symptoms within the first 3 months, 98.2% at 12 months, 91.4% at 24 months and 75.0% at 48 months. In 22/26 subjects a persisting improvement of dumping syndrome was achieved. CONCLUSIONS: TORe is a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of patients with dumping syndrome after laparoscopic RYGB, the effect on weight stabilization is less significant. A prospective randomized trial should be conducted to compare the effects of TORe with other surgical methods like banding the gastrojejunal anastomosis.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Vaciamiento Rápido , Derivación Gástrica , Aumento de Peso , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Derivación Gástrica/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndrome de Vaciamiento Rápido/etiología , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Técnicas de Sutura , Estómago/cirugía , Pérdida de Peso , Yeyuno/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Staple line leakage (SLL) and staple line bleeding (SLB) are the most relevant postoperative complications of sleeve gastrectomy (SG). It is controversial whether and which method of staple line reinforcement (SLR) can best reduce these complications. The primary objective of this study was to investigate whether reinforcement of the most proximal part of the staple line with synthetic buttressing material, a strategy we termed partial SLR (p-SLR), reduces the 30-day incidence of SLL. METHODS: A retrospective search of medical records of all bariatric patients from 2010 to 2019 was performed. Patients who underwent SG with either p-SLR or non-SLR were included. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were analyzed before and after propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: Data from 431 patients were analyzed (364 in the p-SLR group and 67 in the non-SLR group). No difference in the 30-day incidence of SLL was observed between the two groups. The 30-day incidence of SLB (1.1% vs. 6.0% in the p-SLR and non-SLR groups, respectively) was significantly lower in the p-SLR group. These results were confirmed by PSM analysis. CONCLUSION: Partial staple line reinforcement with synthetic buttressing material does not reduce the 30-day incidence of SLL. Although our analysis showed a significant reduction in the 30-day incidence of SLB in the p-SLR group, this result should be interpreted with caution.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Puntaje de Propensión , Laparoscopía/métodos , Grapado Quirúrgico/efectos adversos , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Fuga Anastomótica/epidemiología , Fuga Anastomótica/prevención & control , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes such as postoperative pain are critical for the evaluation of outcomes after incisional hernia repair. The aim of this study is to determine the long-term impact of mesh fixation on postoperative pain in patients operated by open and laparoscopic technique. METHODS: A multicenter prospective observational cohort study was conducted from September 2011 until March 2016 in nine hospitals across Switzerland. Patients undergoing elective incisional hernia repair were included in this study and stratified by either laparoscopic or open surgical technique. Propensity score matching was applied to balance the differences in baseline characteristics between the treatment groups. Clinical follow-up was conducted 3, 12 and 36 months postoperatively to detect hernia recurrence, postoperative pain and complications. RESULTS: Three-hundred-sixty-one patients were included into the study. No significant differences in hernia recurrence and pain at 3, 12 and 36 months postoperatively were observed when comparing the laparoscopic with the open treatment group. Mesh fixation by sutures to fascia versus other mesh fixation led to significantly more pain at 36 months postoperatively (32.8% vs 15.7%, p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: At long-term follow-up, no difference in pain was identified between open and laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Mesh fixation by sutures to fascia was identified to be associated with increased pain 36 months after surgery. Omitting mesh fixation by sutures to the fascia may reduce long-term postoperative pain after hernia repair.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral , Hernia Incisional , Laparoscopía , Fascia , Hernia Ventral/complicaciones , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Hernia Incisional/complicaciones , Hernia Incisional/cirugía , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/cirugía , Prevalencia , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery has gained more and more popularity over the last years. It seems to be advantageous to laparoscopic surgery in selected situations, especially in confined regions like a narrow male pelvis in rectal surgery. Whether robotic-assisted, left-sided colectomies can serve as safe training operations for less frequent, low anterior resections for rectal cancer is still under debate. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate intra- and postoperative results of robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAL) compared to laparoscopic (LSC) surgery in left-sided colectomies. METHODS: Between June 2015 and December 2019, 683 patients undergoing minimally invasive left-sided colectomies in two Swiss, high-volume colorectal centers were included. Intra- and postoperative outcome parameters were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 179 patients undergoing RAL and 504 patients undergoing LSC were analyzed. Baseline characteristics showed similar results. Intraoperative complications occurred in 0.6% of RAL and 2.0% of LSC patients (p = 0.193). Differences in postoperative complications graded Dindo ≥ 3 were not statistically significant (RAL 3.9% vs. LSC 6.3%, p = 0.227). Occurrence of anastomotic leakages showed no statistically significant difference [RAL n = 2 (1.1%), LSC n = 8 (1.6%), p = 0.653]. Length of hospital stay was similar in both groups. Conversions to open surgery were significantly higher in the LSC group (6.2% vs.1.7%, p = 0.018), while stoma formation was similar in both groups [RAL n = 1 (0.6%), LSC n = 5 (1.0%), p = 0.594]. Operative time was longer in the RAL group (300 vs. 210.0 min, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted, left-sided colectomies are safe and feasible compared to laparoscopic resections. Intra- and postoperative complications are similar in both groups. Most notably, the rate of anastomotic leakages is similar. Compared to laparoscopic resections, the analyzed robotic-assisted resections have longer operative times but less conversion rates. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the safety of robotic-assisted, left-sided colectomies as training procedures for low anterior resections.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Fuga Anastomótica/epidemiología , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Colectomía/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Although recent studies reported superior weight reduction in patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) with long biliopancreatic limb (BPL), no recommendation regarding limb lengths exists. This study compares weight loss and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities in patients undergoing RYGB with either long or short BPL. METHODS: A retrospective data search from medical records was performed. A total of 308 patients underwent laparoscopic RYGB with a BPL length of either 100 cm or 50 cm. Data was analyzed before and after propensity score matching. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in weight reduction between long and short BPL RYGB in terms of percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) (86.4 ± 24.5 vs. 83.4 ± 21.4, p = 0.285) and percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) (32.4 ± 8.4 vs. 33.0 ± 8.3, p = 0.543) was found 24 months after surgery. Propensity score-matched analysis did not show any statistically significant difference between groups in both %EWL and %TWL. No significant difference between long and short BPL RYGB in the resolution of obesity-related comorbidities was noted 24 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: Weight loss and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities were not significantly different between long and short BPL RYGB 24 months after surgery.
Asunto(s)
Derivación Gástrica , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Humanos , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/cirugía , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pérdida de PesoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) is nowadays an established bariatric procedure. Although preoperative gastroscopy is recommended to rule out severe pathologies, there is little evidence about the role of routine histopathologic examination of resected specimens. We sought to identify the prevalence of histopathological relevant findings in patients undergoing LSG and to evaluate their impact in clinical practice. METHODS: A retrospective analysis on a prospectively collected dataset on patients undergoing LSG between August 2009 and May 2018 in two bariatric centers was performed. Demographic and clinical data and histopathological results were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixhundred-thrirteen patients were identified, mean age was 43.1 years (14-75), average body mass index was 44.8 kg/m2 (34.4-73.9). Histopathology revealed abnormal findings in 47.97% of the patients, most common pathology was chronic non-active or minimally to moderate active gastritis (n = 202;32.95%). Among others, Helicobacter-associated gastritis (n = 33;5.38%), intestinal metaplasia (n = 13;2.12%), micronodular enterochromaffine-like cell hyperplasia (n = 2; 0.33%) and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (n = 6; 0.98%) were present. No malignancies were found. Histopathological results required a change in the postoperative management in 48 patients (7.83%). The costs of histopathological assessment ranged between 0.77% and 2.55% of per-case payment. CONCLUSION: A wide range of histopathological findings occur in specimens after LSG, requiring a relevant number of patients additional therapies or surveillance. Therefore, routine histopathological examination after LSG is recommendable.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Helicobacter , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Adulto , Gastrectomía , Humanos , Obesidad Mórbida/diagnóstico , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Single-incision laparoscopy (SIL) and natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) aim at reducing surgical access trauma. To monitor the introduction of emerging technologies, the Swiss Association for Laparo- and Thoracoscopic Surgeons launched a database in 2010. The current status of SIL and NOTES in Switzerland is reported, and the techniques are compared. METHODS: The number and type of procedures, surgeon experience, their impressions of performance, conversion, and complications between 2010 and 2015 are described. A survey was used to acquire additional data not included in the registry. RESULTS: Nine centers included 650 procedures. Cholecystectomy (55 %) and sigmoidectomy (26 %) were most prevalent in both techniques. The number of active centers declined from 9 to 2 during the study period. The frequencies of taught procedures were 4 and 43 % for SIL and NOTES (p < 0.001), and surgeon self-estimated impression of performance was perfect in 50 and 89 %, respectively (p < 0.0001). Conversions in total were 3.6 and 5.7 %, respectively, and 1.1 % to open for both techniques. Morbidity was 5 % in SIL and 2.7 % in NOTES, with 0.8 % access-related complications in NOTES and none in SIL (p = 0.29). Of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, sigmoidectomy, and right hemicolectomy, 11.4 and 15.6 % of cases were operated using SIL or NOTES, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although in selected specialized centers, a considerable proportion of patients were treated using novel techniques, a fading interest of the surgical community in SIL and NOTES was observed. The proportion of SIL and NOTES procedures taught is insufficient and calls for improvement.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/métodos , Suiza/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Biliodigestive leaks are typically caused by an insufficiency at the surgical anastomosis. Biliodigestive anastomosis (BDA) insufficiencies can lead to bilomas, abscesses and vascular erosion in chronic conditions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the medical and radiological records of all patients with biliodigestive insufficiency who received interventional treatment between July 2015 and February 2021. Nine patients (three with unilateral drainage and six with bilateral drainage) were treated with a modified percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage (PTCD). Clinical success was considered after complete resolution of the peribiliary collections, absence of bile within the surgical drains, radiological patency of the BDA (contrast medium flowing properly through the BDA and no signs of leakage) and haemodynamic stability of the patient without signs of sepsis. RESULTS: Clinical success was achieved in all nine patients. No patients required revision surgery to repair their BDA. The mean indwelling drainage time was 34.8±16.5 days. The mean number of interventional procedures performed per patient was 6.6±2.0. CONCLUSION: Patients who present with BDA insufficiency may benefit from interventional radiological techniques. Our modified PTCD resolved the BDA leak in all nine cases and should be considered as a valuable option for the treatment of patients with this complication. Our technique demonstrated to be feasible and effective.
Asunto(s)
Fuga Anastomótica , Drenaje , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Fuga Anastomótica/cirugía , Bilis , Drenaje/métodos , Humanos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Tailgut cysts are rare remnants of the embryological hindgut. Resections are difficult to perform due to the narrow and delicate presacral space where they are usually located. Many different approaches have been described, but to date, no studies have been performed concerning robotic assisted surgery for this entity. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the feasibility and outcome parameters of the robotic anterior approach for resection of tailgut cysts and to compare our results with available literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data was retrospectively obtained from hospital records of all patients who underwent robotic assisted resection of tailgut cysts between January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2020. Outcomes include baseline characteristics, pre-operative radiological workup, operative time, intra- and postoperative complications, and histopathological results. RESULTS: Between January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2020, five patients underwent robotic resection of tailgut cysts. All patients were female and mean age was 47.2 years (range 31.6-63.1 years). Only one patient reported to have local symptoms that could be attributed to the tailgut cyst. Median tumor size was 42 mm (range 30-64 mm). There was no conversion and median operating time was 235 minutes (range 184-331 minutes). Four patients had additional procedures. Intra- and postoperative complications included one intra-operative injury of the rectal wall, which was immediately oversewn, and one postoperative presacral hematoseroma with mild neurological symptoms. None of the specimens showed signs of malignant transformation in histopathological workup. CONCLUSION: This retrospective analysis shows that robotic resections of tailgut cysts are feasible and safe. Regarding the localization of tailgut cysts in the presacral space, the robotic assisted anterior approach is excellently suited, especially if the cysts are localized above the levator muscle. Longer operative times and higher material costs are outweighed by precise and safe preparation with a robotic platform in this delicate region and confined space. We recommend the robotic assisted anterior approach for the resection of tailgut cysts and retrorectal lesions in general.
Asunto(s)
Quistes , Hamartoma , Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Adulto , Quistes/cirugía , Femenino , Hamartoma/cirugía , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Bile leakage is a frequent complication after liver resection associated with the need of interventional drainage, endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography (ERCP) or reoperation. The intraoperative application of the white test could be a promising strategy to reduce the occurrence of bile leakages. Therefore, we propose to conduct the first multicentric randomised controlled trial with rate of postoperative bile leakage as primary endpoint with and without the white test. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Bile-Leakage Trial trial is an investigator-initiated randomised controlled, parallel group, double-blinded, multicentric, superiority trial in four Swiss centres. A total of 210 patients undergoing a resection of at least 2 liver segments will be randomly allocated intraoperatively to either the intervention (identification of open bile ducts with administration of 20-40 mL SMOFlipid5% in the bile tract) or the control group (identification with a white gauze on the liver resection surface).Primary outcome will be the comparison of the postoperative bile leakage rate in both groups within 30 days after liver resection, defined according to the classification of the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Secondary outcomes will be operative and postoperative complication, including severity grade of the bile leakage, rate of ERCP, interventional drainage, morbidity, intensive care unit stay, and mortality. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The cantonal ethics committees of all participating centres and Swissmedic approved the study. SMOFlipid20% consists of a mixture of oils, no side effects resulting from the intraoperative application of 20-40 mL in the biliary tract with consecutive enteral absorption are expected nor are side effects described in the literature. SMOFlipid20% will be diluted intraoperatively with isotonic saline solution to a concentration of 5%. The results of the BiLe-Trial will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal regardless of the outcome. As this is an investigator-initiated trial, data are property of the sponsor investigator and can be obtained on request. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov, ID: NCT04523701. Registered on 25 August 2020.Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal (SNCTP), ID: SNCTP000004200. Registered on 20 January 2021. PROTOCOL VERSION: V3.2_14-12-2020_clean.pdf.
Asunto(s)
Bilis , Hepatectomía , Conductos Biliares/diagnóstico por imagen , Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efectos adversos , Humanos , Hígado , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) remain a relevant problem in colorectal surgery. The aim of this study is to implement a bundle of care in order to reduce SSIs in colorectal surgery. METHODS: All patients undergoing colorectal surgery between October 2018 and December 2021 will be included in a prospective observational study. Since our colorectal bundle has been established gradually, patients will be grouped in a pre-implementation (2018-2019), implementation (2019-2020) and post implementation phase (2021), in order to assess the effectiveness of the actions undertaken. Primary endpoint of this study will be surgical site infection (SSI) rate, while secondary endpoints encompass potential risk factors for SSIs. We assume that obesity, age, diabetes, alcoholism and smoking may lead to a higher risk for SSIs. DISCUSSION: This study aims to determine whether the colorectal bundle designed and implemented at Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, will lead to a significant reduction of SSIs. The impact of potential risk factors for SSIs will additionally be evaluated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT04677686. Registered retrospectively 18 December 2020. HIGHLIGHTS: A bundle of care might reduce the occurence of surgical site infections after colorectal surgery.Analysis of risk factors may detect patient's with high probability of developing surgical site infections.
RESUMEN
Spontaneous diaphragmatic rupture (SDR) is a very rare surgical emergency. A possible explanation for SDR might be a sudden increase of intra-abdominal pressure due to intense coughing, physical exercise, vomiting, or delivery. A 66-year-old male patient presented with recurrent coughing, dyspnoea, and intermittent fever. Although initial CT scan was inconspicuous, a follow-up CT scan revealed SDR of the left hemidiaphragm with herniation of the left colonic flexure, stomach, and parts of the greater omentum. Emergency laparotomy confirmed SDR. The ruptured anterior-lateral part of the diaphragm was closed, and additionally, a composite mesh was applied to reinforce the suture line. A right-sided hemicolectomy with primary anastomosis had to be performed. SDR is a rarity and can cause exceptional clinical features that may lead to inaccurate diagnosis and therapeutic delay. Therefore, of paramount importance, medical practitioners need to be aware of this important differential diagnosis for spontaneous dyspnoea or tachypnea.
Asunto(s)
Quistes/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Duodenales/diagnóstico , Pancreatitis/etiología , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Quistes/congénito , Quistes/cirugía , Descompresión Quirúrgica , Enfermedades Duodenales/congénito , Enfermedades Duodenales/cirugía , Duodenoscopía , Humanos , Masculino , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Fungal and bacterial infections are often which may cause sepsis. Mucormycosis is an unfrequent, but often life-threatening disease. A timely diagnosis and treatment is the cornerstone of success. An increase in incidence can be expected, given an aging population and increasing incidence of obesity, diabetes and cancer. We present a rare case where early diagnosis has helped to treat the patient mainly with antifungal therapy as surgical therapy has had high risk of complications.
RESUMEN
AIM: Postoperative ileus is an important factor of complications following gastrointestinal procedures. Its pathophysiology and the parameters, which may impact on its duration, remain unclear. The aim of this study was to measure the role of various clinical determinants on restoration of intestinal function after elective colorectal surgery. METHODS: From July 2002 to September 2003, all patients who underwent laparotomy for colectomy (laparoscopic resections excluded) with either an ileotransverse, colocolic, or high colorectal anastomosis were entered in this prospective study. The intervals in hours between the end of the surgical procedure and passing of flatus (PG) and passing of stool (PS) were recorded by an independent investigator. PG and PS were eventually correlated with the following parameters: type of colectomy, early removal of nasogastric tube (NGT), mechanical bowel preparation (MBP), type of underlying disease, systemic administration of opiates, and surgical training (colorectal fellowship or other). RESULTS: One hundred twenty-four patients were entered in this study. Four patients (3.2%) developed septic complications (3 anastomotic leaks and 1 intraabdominal abscess) and were excluded from the analysis. Median age in this population was 68 (range 30-95) years. Mean duration of postoperative ileus was 70+/-28 h (PG) and 99+/-34 h (PS). The type of colectomy, underlying disease, MBP, and early NGT removal failed, in univariate analysis, to correlate with the duration of postoperative ileus. By contrast, time intervals PG and PS were statistically shorter in the group of patients treated by a colorectal surgeon [56+/-23 vs 74+/-28 h (PG); 82+/-26 vs 103+/-35 h (PS), p=0.004], as well as in patients who received systemic opiates for less than 2 days [64+/-27 vs 75+/-28 h (PG), p=0.04; 88+/-32 vs 108+/-33 h (PS), p=001]. CONCLUSION: Restoration of normal intestinal function after elective open colectomy takes 3 (PG) to 4 (PS) days. In our series, specialized training in colorectal surgery has a positive impact on the duration of postoperative ileus. Surgical specialization should be considered an important parameter in future clinical trials aiming to minimize postoperative ileus.