Correlation between peritoneal cancer index and survival in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer with complete resection.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the relation between the peritoneal cancer index, overall survival, and recurrence free survival, in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients treated at the Gustave-Roussy Institute between December 2004 and November 2017 for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in complete resection were included. The correlation between the peritoneal cancer index and survival was studied using statistical modeling. Multivariate analysis was performed with a logistic regression model. RESULTS: Of the 351 patients included, 94 (27%) had initial surgery and 257 (73%) had interval surgery. Median follow-up was 52.7 months (range 47.6-63.9). Median peritoneal cancer index was 10 (range 0-32). The linear model best represented the relationship between peritoneal cancer index and overall survival. Patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a greater instantaneous risk of baseline death than those with initial surgery, as well as a more rapid increase in this risk as the peritoneal cancer index increased. Overall survival and recurrence free survival were better in the initial surgery group (103.4 months (79.1-not reached (NR)) vs 66.5 months (59.1-95.3) and 31.8 months (23.7-48.7) vs 25.9 months (23.2-29), respectively). Risk factors for death were body mass index, peritoneal cancer index, and need for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The peritoneal cancer index is a prognostic indicator, but its linear relationship with survival precluded setting a unique peritoneal cancer index cut-off. Moreover, the prognostic impact of peritoneal cancer index was stronger in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) testing on cell-free tumor DNA from peritoneal fluid.

BACKGROUND: Knowing the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is vital for patient management. HRD is determined by BRCA1/BRCA2 pathogenic variants or genomic instability. However, tumor DNA analysis is inconclusive in 15-19% of cases. Peritoneal fluid, available in > 95% of advanced EOC cases, could serve as an alternative source of cell-free tumor DNA (cftDNA) for HRD testing. Limited data show the feasibility of cancer panel gene testing on ascites cfDNA but no study, to date, has investigated HRD testing. METHODS: We collected ascites/peritoneal washings from 53 EOC patients (19 from retrospective cohort and 34 from prospective cohort) and performed a Cancer Gene Panel (CGP) using NGS for TP53/HR genes and shallow Whole Genome Sequencing (sWGS) for genomic instability on cfDNA. RESULTS: cfDNA was detectable in 49 out of 53 patients (92.5%), including those with limited peritoneal fluid. Median cfDNA was 3700 ng/ml, with a turnaround time of 21 days. TP53 pathogenic variants were detected in 86% (42/49) of patients, all with HGSOC. BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants were found in 14% (7/49) and 10% (5/49) of cases, respectively. Peritoneal cftDNA showed high sensitivity (97%), specificity (83%), and concordance (95%) with tumor-based TP53 variant detection. NGS CGP on cftDNA identified BRCA2 pathogenic variants in one case where tumor-based testing failed. sWGS on cftDNA provided informative results even when tumor-based genomic instability testing failed. CONCLUSION: Profiling cftDNA from peritoneal fluid is feasible, providing a significant amount of tumor DNA. This fast and reliable approach enables HRD testing, including BRCA1/2 mutations and genomic instability assessment. HRD testing on cfDNA from peritoneal fluid should be offered to all primary laparoscopy patients.

Single-port laparoscopy and extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer: assessment after 52 consecutive patients.

BACKGROUND: To report the feasibility and reproducibility of single-port extraperitoneal para-aortic (PA) lymphadenectomy exclusively using conventional instruments in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) and to evaluate the learning curve. METHODS: From January 2011 to January 2013, 52 a total of consecutive patients with LACC were candidates for extraperitoneal PA lymphadenectomy via an original single-port approach that we developed. All patients underwent positron emission tomography-computed tomography that indicated no PA uptake. RESULTS: Fifty consecutive patients underwent single-port staging surgery. Two patients had peritoneal carcinomatosis and were not submitted to PA lymphadenectomy. Median age and body mass index were, respectively 47 (range 27-68) years and 23 (range 16-37) kg/m(2). In one case, lymphadenectomy was unfeasible because of renal vessel anomalies (a bifurcated left renal vein crossed the aorta at the level of the inferior mesenteric artery), and two nodes were removed. Conventional instruments were used in all cases. The median operative time was 180 (range 110-270) min. The median and mean number of nodes removed were, respectively, 18 (range 2-47) and 19.4. Six (12 %) patients had metastatic PA disease. No conversion to laparotomy or conventional multiport laparoscopy was required. The median postoperative hospital stay and the interval between staging surgery and the beginning of chemoradiation were, respectively, 2 (range 1-26) days and 16.5 (range 1-60) days. The learning curve was evaluated at seven procedures with a decreased median operative time at 160 (range 110-240) min. CONCLUSIONS: Extraperitoneal staging via a single-port left iliac approach is feasible with conventional tools, is reproducible and safe, and offers a high degree of cosmetic satisfaction.

[Surgical de-escalation in gynecologic oncology]. / Désescalade chirurgicale en oncologie gynécologique.

The evolution of knowledge in gynecologic oncology is leading to surgical de-escalation in several areas, particularly in lymph node staging. Sentinel lymph node biopsy that was initially used in low and intermediate risk endometrial cancer, has now been extended to high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer. Sentinel lymph node biopsy plays also an important role in the nodal staging of early-stage cervical cancer. The radicality of hysterectomies in patients with early cervical cancer is under debate. Similarly, surgical staging with para-aortic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer should be performed only for few cases. Systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with advanced ovarian cancers is not recommended anymore.

Cervical Cancer and Fertility-Sparing Treatment.

Radical hysterectomy with pelvic node dissection is the standard treatment for early-stage cervical cancer. However, the latter can be diagnosed at a young age when patients have not yet achieved their pregnancy plans. Dargent first described the vaginal radical trachelectomy for patients with tumors <2 cm. It has since been described a population of low risk of recurrence: patients with tumors <2 cm, without deep stromal infiltration, without lymphovascular invasion (LVSI), and with negative lymph nodes. These patients can benefit from a less radical surgery such as conization or simple trachelectomy with the evaluation of the pelvic node status. Tumors larger than 2 cm have a higher risk of recurrence and their treatment is a challenge. There are currently two options for these patients: abdominal radical trachelectomy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), followed by fertility-sparing surgery. All patients who wish to preserve their fertility must be referred to expert centers.