[Volume Management in Chronic kidney disease]. / Volumenmanagement bei chronischen Nierenerkrankungen.

Understanding the (patho-)physiology of volume regulation and osmoregulation is fundamental to guide patient advice and therapy in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Volume regulation primarily impacts the amount of sodium in the body, and it mainly affects the extracellular space, while osmoregulation primarily impacts the amount of free water, and it affects both the intra- and extracellular space. The kidneys control water and sodium homeostasis both through their sensor (e. g. tubuloglomerular feedback) and regulator systems (e. g. sodium reabsorption). Many CKD patients are advised by non-nephrologists to a high fluid intake, although they often do not require a daily intake of more than 1.5 litres. Many CKD patients are hypervolemic, and sodium restriction is of key importance in patients' effort to utilize lifestyle changes as therapeutic means. Pharmacologically, (particularly loop) diuretics are the basis of therapy, increasing sodium excretion. Recent developments shift the focus towards classes of drugs ameliorating prognosis in CKD: sodium-glucose linked transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have proven beneficial in heart and renal failure - by sodium and fluid excretion, among others; additionally, a novel mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), finerenone, was recently shown to improve prognosis in CKD.

Effects of selective heart rate reduction with ivabradine on LV function and central hemodynamics in patients with chronic coronary syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: We assessed left ventricular (LV) function and central hemodynamic effects in patients with a heart rate (HR) at rest of ≥70 beats per minute (bpm) and chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) after long-term treatment with ivabradine compared to placebo by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a randomized, double-blinded, prospective cross-over design, 23 patients (18 male, 5 female) were treated with ivabradine (7.5 mg bid) or placebo for 6 months. CMR imaging was performed at baseline and after 6 and 12 months to determine LV functional parameters.Mean resting HR on treatment with ivabradine was 58 ± 8.2 bpm and 70.2 ± 8.3 bpm during placebo (p < 0.0001).There was no difference in systolic LV ejection fraction (ivabradine 57.4 ± 11.2% vs placebo 53.0 ± 10.9%, p = 0.18), indexed end-diastolic (EDVi) or end-systolic volumes (ESVi). Indexed stroke volume (SVi) (ml/m2) remained unchanged after treatment with ivabradine. Volume time curve parameters reflecting systolic LV function (peak ejection rate and time) were unaffected by ivabradine, while both peak filling rate (PFR) and PFR/EDV were significantly increased. Mean aortic velocity (cm/s) was significantly reduced during treatment with ivabradine (ivabradine 6.7 ± 2.7 vs placebo 9.0 ± 3.4, p = 0.01). Aortic flow parameters were correlated to parameters of vascular stiffness. The strongest correlation was revealed for mean aortic velocity with aortic distensibility (AD) (r = -0.86 [-0.90 to -0.85], p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Long-term reduction of HR with ivabradine in patients with CCS improved diastolic function and reduced mean aortic flow velocity.

Effects of heart rate reduction with ivabradine on vascular stiffness and endothelial function in chronic stable coronary artery disease.

INTRODUCTION: Epidemiological and clinical studies have shown a relevant association between heart rate and cardiovascular mortality. Experimental studies identified vascular effects of heart rate reduction with the If channel inhibitor ivabradine. Therefore, the effects of heart rate reduction on endothelial function and indices of arterial stiffness were examined in patients with stable coronary artery disease in a prospective, placebo-controlled clinical crossover study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (18 men and 5 women) with a resting heart rate (HR) of at least 70 beats per minute (bpm) and stable coronary artery disease were enrolled in this study. In a cross-over design, all patients were treated with ivabradine (Iva, 7.5 mg b.i.d.) and placebo for 6 months each. Iva reduced heart rate by 11.4 bpm (Iva 58.8 ±â€Š8.2 bpm vs. placebo 70.2 ±â€Š8.3 bpm, P < 0.0001). Augmentation index (AIx75), carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and central aortic blood pressure were measured using applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor). HRR by Iva increased AIx75 by 12.4% (Iva 24.3 ±â€Š10.5% vs. placebo 21.3 ±â€Š10.1%, P < 0.05) and reduced cfPWV by 14.1% (Iva 6.3 ±â€Š1.7 m/s vs. placebo 7.3 ±â€Š1.4 m/s, P < 0.01). Iva increased mean central blood pressure by 7.8% (Iva 107.5 ±â€Š15.4 mmHg vs. placebo 99.1 ±â€Š12.2 mmHg, P < 0.001). Endothelial function was determined measuring the flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) of the brachial artery. HRR by Iva increased FMD by 18.5% (Iva 7.3 ±â€Š2.2% vs. placebo 6.0 ±â€Š2.0%, P < 0.001). Aortic distensibility was characterized by MRI. HRR by Iva increased aortic distensibility by 33.3% (Iva 0.003 ±â€Š0.001/mmHg vs. placebo 0.002 ±â€Š0.010/mmHg, P < 0.01) and circumferential cyclic strain by 37.1% (Iva 0.062 ±â€Š0.027 vs. placebo 0.039 ±â€Š0.018, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Heart rate reduction with Iva increased endothelium-dependent vasodilation and reduced arterial stiffness in patients with stable CAD. These findings corroborate and expand the results collected in experimental studies and indicate the importance of heart rate as a determinant of vascular function.