RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Perioperative bleeding is common in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Tranexamic acid is an antifibrinolytic drug that may safely decrease such bleeding. METHODS: We conducted a trial involving patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive tranexamic acid (1-g intravenous bolus) or placebo at the start and end of surgery (reported here) and, with the use of a partial factorial design, a hypotension-avoidance or hypertension-avoidance strategy (not reported here). The primary efficacy outcome was life-threatening bleeding, major bleeding, or bleeding into a critical organ (composite bleeding outcome) at 30 days. The primary safety outcome was myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery, nonhemorrhagic stroke, peripheral arterial thrombosis, or symptomatic proximal venous thromboembolism (composite cardiovascular outcome) at 30 days. To establish the noninferiority of tranexamic acid to placebo for the composite cardiovascular outcome, the upper boundary of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval for the hazard ratio had to be below 1.125, and the one-sided P value had to be less than 0.025. RESULTS: A total of 9535 patients underwent randomization. A composite bleeding outcome event occurred in 433 of 4757 patients (9.1%) in the tranexamic acid group and in 561 of 4778 patients (11.7%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67 to 0.87; absolute difference, -2.6 percentage points; 95% CI, -3.8 to -1.4; two-sided P<0.001 for superiority). A composite cardiovascular outcome event occurred in 649 of 4581 patients (14.2%) in the tranexamic acid group and in 639 of 4601 patients (13.9%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.14; upper boundary of the one-sided 97.5% CI, 1.14; absolute difference, 0.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.1 to 1.7; one-sided P = 0.04 for noninferiority). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, the incidence of the composite bleeding outcome was significantly lower with tranexamic acid than with placebo. Although the between-group difference in the composite cardiovascular outcome was small, the noninferiority of tranexamic acid was not established. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; POISE-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03505723.).
Asunto(s)
Antifibrinolíticos , Ácido Tranexámico , Antifibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Canadá , Hemorragia/etiología , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Trombosis/inducido químicamente , Trombosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Ácido Tranexámico/efectos adversos , Ácido Tranexámico/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Among patients having noncardiac surgery, perioperative hemodynamic abnormalities are associated with vascular complications. Uncertainty remains about what intraoperative blood pressure to target and how to manage long-term antihypertensive medications perioperatively. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of a hypotension-avoidance and a hypertension-avoidance strategy on major vascular complications after noncardiac surgery. DESIGN: Partial factorial randomized trial of 2 perioperative blood pressure management strategies (reported here) and tranexamic acid versus placebo. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03505723). SETTING: 110 hospitals in 22 countries. PATIENTS: 7490 patients having noncardiac surgery who were at risk for vascular complications and were receiving 1 or more long-term antihypertensive medications. INTERVENTION: In the hypotension-avoidance strategy group, the intraoperative mean arterial pressure target was 80 mm Hg or greater; before and for 2 days after surgery, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors were withheld and the other long-term antihypertensive medications were administered only for systolic blood pressures 130 mm Hg or greater, following an algorithm. In the hypertension-avoidance strategy group, the intraoperative mean arterial pressure target was 60 mm Hg or greater; all antihypertensive medications were continued before and after surgery. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was a composite of vascular death and nonfatal myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery, stroke, and cardiac arrest at 30 days. Outcome adjudicators were masked to treatment assignment. RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in 520 of 3742 patients (13.9%) in the hypotension-avoidance group and in 524 of 3748 patients (14.0%) in the hypertension-avoidance group (hazard ratio, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.12]; P = 0.92). Results were consistent for patients who used 1 or more than 1 antihypertensive medication in the long term. LIMITATION: Adherence to the assigned strategies was suboptimal; however, results were consistent across different adherence levels. CONCLUSION: In patients having noncardiac surgery, our hypotension-avoidance and hypertension-avoidance strategies resulted in a similar incidence of major vascular complications. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia), and Research Grant Council of Hong Kong.
Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Hipotensión , Humanos , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Canadá , Hipotensión/etiología , Hipotensión/prevención & control , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Managing children undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) presents a significant challenge for anesthesiologists. Machine Learning (ML)-assisted tools have the potential to enhance the recognition of patients at risk of complications and predict potential issues, ultimately improving outcomes. METHODS: We evaluated the prediction capacity of six models, ranging from logistic regression to support vector machine, using a dataset comprising 33 variables and 1364 subjects. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) and the F1 score served as the primary evaluation metrics. Our primary objectives were twofold: first, to develop an effective prediction model, and second, to create a user-friendly comprehensive model for identifying high-risk patients. RESULTS: The logistic regression model demonstrated the highest effectiveness, achieving an AUC of 83.65%, and an F1 score of 0.7296, with balanced sensitivity and specificity of 77.94% and 76.47%, respectively. In comparison, the comprehensive three-layer decision tree model achieved an AUC of 72.84%, with sensitivity (79.41%) comparable to more complex models. CONCLUSION: Our machine learning-assisted tools provide an additional perspective and enhance the predictive capabilities of traditional scoring methods. These tools can assist anesthesiologists in making well-informed decisions. Furthermore, we have successfully demonstrated the feasibility of creating a practical white-box model. The next steps involve conducting clinical validation and multicenter cross-validation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05537168.
RESUMEN
Recent data indicated a high incidence of inappropriate management of neuromuscular block, with a high rate of residual paralysis and relaxant-associated postoperative complications. These data are alarming in that the available neuromuscular monitoring, as well as myorelaxants and their antagonists basically allow well tolerated management of neuromuscular blockade. In this first European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) guideline on peri-operative management of neuromuscular block, we aim to present aggregated and evidence-based recommendations to assist clinicians provide best medical care and ensure patient safety. We identified three main clinical questions: Are myorelaxants necessary to facilitate tracheal intubation in adults? Does the intensity of neuromuscular blockade influence a patient's outcome in abdominal surgery? What are the strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of residual paralysis? On the basis of this, PICO (patient, intervention, comparator, outcome) questions were derived that guided a structured literature search. A stepwise approach was used to reduce the number of trials of the initial research ( n â=â24â000) to the finally relevant clinical studies ( n â=â88). GRADE methodology (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) was used for formulating the recommendations based on the findings of the included studies in conjunction with their methodological quality. A two-step Delphi process was used to determine the agreement of the panel members with the recommendations: R1 We recommend using a muscle relaxant to facilitate tracheal intubation (1A). R2 We recommend the use of muscle relaxants to reduce pharyngeal and/or laryngeal injury following endotracheal intubation (1C). R3 We recommend the use of a fast-acting muscle relaxant for rapid sequence induction intubation (RSII) such as succinylcholine 1âmg kg -1 or rocuronium 0.9 to 1.2âmg kg -1 (1B). R4 We recommend deepening neuromuscular blockade if surgical conditions need to be improved (1B). R5 There is insufficient evidence to recommend deep neuromuscular blockade in general to reduce postoperative pain or decrease the incidence of peri-operative complications. (2C). R6 We recommend the use of ulnar nerve stimulation and quantitative neuromuscular monitoring at the adductor pollicis muscle to exclude residual paralysis (1B). R7 We recommend using sugammadex to antagonise deep, moderate and shallow neuromuscular blockade induced by aminosteroidal agents (rocuronium, vecuronium) (1A). R8 We recommend advanced spontaneous recovery (i.e. TOF ratio >0.2) before starting neostigmine-based reversal and to continue quantitative monitoring of neuromuscular blockade until a TOF ratio of more than 0.9 has been attained. (1C).
Asunto(s)
Anestesiología , Anestésicos , Bloqueo Neuromuscular , Fármacos Neuromusculares no Despolarizantes , Adulto , Humanos , Bloqueo Neuromuscular/efectos adversos , Bloqueo Neuromuscular/métodos , Rocuronio , Fármacos Neuromusculares no Despolarizantes/efectos adversos , Androstanoles/efectos adversos , Neostigmina , Parálisis/inducido químicamente , Cuidados CríticosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) facilitate endotracheal intubation and reduce related laryngeal morbidity. However, NMBA interfere with intraoperative neuromonitoring amplitudes during thyroidectomy. The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of rocuronium used for tracheal intubation on early intraoperative neuromonitoring vagal amplitudes observed during first thyroid lobe dissection. METHODS: This is an observational pharmacoepidemiological study with prospective data collection and retrospective analysis. During the study period, all consecutive patients who underwent thyroid surgery with neuromonitoring were included. Patients underwent endotracheal intubation either using a single dose of rocuronium (NMBA group) or without NMBA (NMBA-free group) according to the anesthesiologist's preference. RESULTS: Six hundred six patients were included (213 NMBA and 393 NMBA-free group patients). At V1, 39 patients (18%) in the NMBA group had an amplitude < 100 µV (need for curarization reversal in 30 patients) and 13 patients (3.3%) in the NMBA-free group (p < 0.001). In the remaining 554 patients, the mean V1 amplitude was significantly decreased in the NMBA group (544 versus 685 µV; p < 0.001). After exclusion of 25 patients with loss of signal types 1 and 2 during dissection, the difference between mean V1 and mean V2 was significantly lower in NMBA group patients (- 22 versus - 86 µV; p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: This study provides new data showing how NMBA used for tracheal intubation significantly decrease V1 amplitude baseline and modify amplitude variations from V1 to V2 values during the first thyroid lobe dissection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Pharmacoepidemiological study.
Asunto(s)
Tiroidectomía , Nervio Vago , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rocuronio , Glándula TiroidesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: An increasing number of patients older than 80 years are undergoing anesthesia, but little information is available regarding pharmacodynamic effects of myorelaxants in this population. This study aims to compare the time course of rocuronium neuromuscular block in patients ≥ 80 years with those of younger adults. METHODS: Under total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and sufentanil, time course of a bolus of rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg neuromuscular block was assessed with acceleromyography in patients ≥ 80 and in patients 20-50 years old. Onset time, clinical duration, duration until 90% and 100% recovery of baseline were determined. RESULTS: Data from 32 patients were analyzed, 16 were ≥ 80 years and 16 were 20-50 years old. Demographic data are shown in Table 1. In the group ≥ 80, onset time was 190 s ± 46 s compared to 123 s ± 40 s in the group 20-50, P < 0.001 and the clinical duration was 52 [48-69.5] min and 36 [34-41] min, respectively, P < 0.001. Duration to 90% recovery of baseline was 77.5 [71-88.5] min and duration to 100% recovery of baseline was 91.2 [82.2-98] min in patients ≥ 80 years and the corresponding values in the patients 20-50 years old were 53.5 [49-55.5] min and 59.5 [56.5-70.25] min, respectively, P < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Compared to younger adults rocuronium shifted in patients ≥ 80 years from a rapid onset, intermediate acting compound to a slower onset, long-acting compound. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03551652 (29/05/2018).
Asunto(s)
Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Bloqueo Neuromuscular/métodos , Fármacos Neuromusculares no Despolarizantes/farmacocinética , Rocuronio/farmacocinética , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Unbalanced fluid solutions cause metabolic acidosis and could be associated with impaired coagulation and increased blood loss. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the use of a balanced colloid compared with a saline colloid for peri-operative fluid therapy in children undergoing cardiac surgery is associated with decreased blood loss and exposure to blood products. DESIGN: Double-blinded randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary children's hospital from 2013 to 2016. PATIENTS: Children older than 29âdays and younger than 3âyears admitted for cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Exclusion criteria were emergency cardiac surgery, moribund (American Society of Anesthesiologists 5), Jehovah's witnesses, coagulopathy, renal failure, liver injury, intracranial haemorrhage and electrolyte disturbances. From the 128 patients eligible, 88 were included in the study. INTERVENTION: Random assignment of patients to either a saline colloid (6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 in 0.9% NaCl) or a balanced-electrolyte colloid (6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 in an isotonic solution) for CPB priming and intra- and postoperative fluid therapy during the first postoperative 48âh. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome measure was calculated blood loss until the third postoperative day (POD3). RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were included in each study arm. Calculated blood loss at POD3 was not significantly different between the groups (saline colloid 19.9 [IQR 13.8 to 26.1] ml kg-1 versus balanced colloid 15.9 [IQR 9.0 to 25.3âmlâkg-1], Pâ=â0.409). Secondary outcomes related to bleeding, exposure to blood products and coagulation were not different between groups. There was also no difference in length of mechanical ventilation, intensive care and hospital length of stay between groups. CONCLUSION: The use of a balanced colloid for peri-operative fluid therapy compared with a saline one is not associated with decreased blood loss or exposure to blood products. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT identifier: 2012-006034-17 and ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT02584868.
Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Niño , Coloides , Fluidoterapia , Humanos , Derivados de Hidroxietil Almidón/efectos adversos , Soluciones IsotónicasRESUMEN
Succinylcholine is still used in clinical practice. Its duration is highly variable and neuromuscular monitoring is recommended to assess its recovery. Unfortunately, depolarizing neuromuscular block cannot be evaluated by train-of-four (TOF) as no fade occurs. Only single twitch (ST) allows to monitor depolarizing block. The TOFScan monitor proposes a modified TOF ratio (T4/Tref) not referring to fade within a TOF series. We hypothesized that the T4/Tref allows to assess recovery from succinylcholine. This observational study aims to compare recovery from depolarizing block simultaneously assessed with T4/Tref and ST. After Ethics Committee approval and written informed consent 45 patients receiving a single dose of succinylcholine were included. ST recovery, measured with TOF-Watch SX, and T4/Tref recovery, measured by TOFScan, were assessed simultaneously. Difference between measurements was compared using Mann-Whitney U test and overall concordance with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The ICC was 0.85 [95% CI 0.82-0.87]. The first T4/Tref ratio ≥ 90% was 97% [95% CI 93-101%] the corresponding ST value was 91% [95% CI 87-97%]. The first T4/Tref ratio ≥ 100% was 103% [95% CI 102-107%], the corresponding ST value was 104% [95% CI 100-106%]; median [95% confidence interval of the median]. Time to recovery to 90% and 100% of baseline did not differ between ST or T4/Tref. It was10.0 [8.0-13.0] min vs 10.0 [8.0-12.0] min, P = 0.307 and 10.0 [9.0-15.0] min vs 10.0 [8.0-15.0] min, P = 0.546; respectively; median [IQR]. Agreement between both parameters was excellent. The T4/Tref can be used accurately to measure recovery from depolarizing neuromuscular block.
Asunto(s)
Anestésicos , Bloqueo Neuromuscular , Humanos , Monitoreo Fisiológico , Monitoreo Neuromuscular , SuccinilcolinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) based on dynamic indicators of fluid responsiveness has been shown to decrease postoperative complications and hospital length of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. The usefulness of this approach still needs to be clarified in low-to-moderate risk abdominal surgery. Both pulse-pressure variation (PPV) and pleth variability index (PVI) can be used to guide GDFT strategies. The objective of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to determine if the use of PVI guided GDFT, when compared to PPV guided GDFT, would lead to similar hospital LOS in patients undergoing low-to-moderate risk surgery. Secondary outcomes included amount of fluid administered and incidence of postoperative complications. METHODS: Patients were randomized into either PVI or PPV guided GDFT groups. Both received a baseline 2 ml kg- 1 h- 1 Lactated Ringer infusion. Additional fluid boluses consisted of 250 mL of colloid that was infused over a 10 min period if PVI was > 15% or PPV was > 13% for at least five minutes. The primary outcome was to determine if hospital LOS, which was defined as the number of days from surgery up to the day the surgeon authorized hospital discharge, was equivalent between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were included and they were randomized into two groups of 38 patients. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Both PVI and PPV guided GDFT strategies were equivalent for the primary outcome of LOS (median [interquartile range]) (days) 2.5 [2.0-3.3] vs. 3.0 [2.0-5.0], p = 0.230, respectively. Fluids infused, postoperative complications, and all other outcomes were not different between groups. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing low-to-moderate risk abdominal surgery, PVI seems to guide GDFT similarly to PPV in regards to hospital LOS, amount of fluid, and incidence of postoperative complications. However, in low-risk patients undergoing these surgical procedures optimizing stroke volume may have limited impact on outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02908256 , September 2016, retrospectively registered.
Asunto(s)
Abdomen/cirugía , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adulto , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Coloides/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Volumen Sistólico/fisiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is a controversy in the literature whether deep compared with moderate neuromuscular block (NMB) improves surgical conditions for laparoscopic surgery. OBJECTIVES: The primary outcome measure was to examine whether switching from moderate to deep NMB improves surgical conditions for laparoscopic surgery in the obese; secondary outcome measures were changes in intra-abdominal pressure, time required to perform the gastrojejunal anastomosis and peri-operative surgical complications. DESIGN: A single-centre, randomised controlled study. Each patient was taken as their own control and examined twice: at the first evaluation (E1), all patients had a moderate NMB, thereafter patients were randomised to deep or moderate block and a second evaluation (E2) was performed within 10âmin. Patients with excellent rating at E1 were excluded from E2, as their surgical condition could not be further improved. SETTING: University Hospital France. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery under general anaesthesia were included. Main exclusion criteria were hypersensitivity to the drugs used and absence of written informed consent. INTERVENTIONS: According to the group assignment, patients received bolus doses of rocuronium or 0.9% saline. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surgical conditions were assessed with a 4-point rating scale. Intra-operative adverse events were assessed with the Kaafarani-classification and postoperative complications with the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were initially included and data from 85 could be assessed at E1; surgical rating was excellent in 20, good in 35, acceptable in 18, poor in 12. After excluding those with an excellent rating, the remaining 65 patients were randomly assigned to deep or moderate block. At E2, an improvement of surgical conditions was observed in 29 out of 34 patients with deep block and in four out of 31 with moderate block; Pâ<â0.0001. Poor surgical conditions were more frequently associated with surgical complications (61.5 versus 15.3%; Pâ<â0.001). CONCLUSION: Switching from moderate to deep block improves surgical conditions. Poor surgical conditions were associated with a higher incidence of surgical complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02118844.
Asunto(s)
Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Bloqueo Neuromuscular/métodos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Rocuronio/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anestesia General , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fármacos Neuromusculares no Despolarizantes/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of neuromuscular blocking agents may affect intraoperative neuromonitoring during thyroid surgery. A selective neuromuscular recovery protocol was evaluated in a retrospective cohort study during human thyroid neural monitoring surgery. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-five consecutive patients undergoing thyroidectomy with intraoperative neuromonitoring followed a selective neuromuscular block recovery protocol-single intubating dose of rocuronium followed by sugammadex if needed at the first vagal stimulation (V1). RESULTS: Data from 120 of 125 patients could be analysed. Fifteen (12.5%) patients needed sugammadex reversal to obtain an EMG response at the first vagal stimulation (V1). In the remaining 105 patients, spontaneous recovery of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block was sufficient for a successful first vagal stimulation (V1). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing thyroid surgery, routine reversal of rocuronium block with sugammadex is not mandatory for reliable intraoperative neuromonitoring. A selective neuromuscular block recovery approach may be a valuable and more cost-efficient alternative to routine reversal.
Asunto(s)
Androstanoles , Antídotos/uso terapéutico , Bloqueo Neuromuscular , Fármacos Neuromusculares no Despolarizantes , Nervio Laríngeo Recurrente/fisiopatología , gamma-Ciclodextrinas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Electromiografía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio , Bloqueo Neuromuscular/métodos , Recuperación de la Función/efectos de los fármacos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rocuronio , Sugammadex , TiroidectomíaAsunto(s)
Monitoreo Neuromuscular , Succinilcolina , Hospitales , Humanos , Sistema de Registros , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To revise the current literature on concepts for neuromuscular block management. Moreover, consequences of incomplete neuromuscular recovery on patients' postoperative pulmonary outcome are evaluated as well. RECENT FINDINGS: The incidence of residual paralysis may be as high as 70% and even small degrees of residual paralysis may have clinical consequences. Neostigmine should not be given before return of the fourth response of the train-of-four-stimulation and no more than 40-50âµg/kg should be given. Sugammadex acts more rapidly and more predictably than neostigmine. Finally, there is convincing evidence in the literature that incomplete neuromuscular recovery may lead to a poor postoperative pulmonary outcome. SUMMARY: New evidence has emerged about the pathophysiological implications of incomplete neuromuscular recovery. Not only are the pulmonary muscles functionally impaired, but respiratory control is also affected. Residual paralysis endangers the coordination of the pharyngeal muscles and the integrity of the upper airway. However, neuromuscular monitoring and whenever needed pharmacological reversal prevent residual paralysis.
Asunto(s)
Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas/etiología , Inhibidores de la Colinesterasa/uso terapéutico , Retraso en el Despertar Posanestésico/tratamiento farmacológico , Neostigmina/uso terapéutico , Bloqueo Neuromuscular/efectos adversos , Respiración/efectos de los fármacos , Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas/epidemiología , Periodo de Recuperación de la Anestesia , Inhibidores de la Colinesterasa/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Colinesterasa/efectos adversos , Retraso en el Despertar Posanestésico/complicaciones , Retraso en el Despertar Posanestésico/epidemiología , Retraso en el Despertar Posanestésico/fisiopatología , Humanos , Incidencia , Neostigmina/administración & dosificación , Neostigmina/efectos adversos , Monitoreo Neuromuscular/instrumentación , Músculos Respiratorios/efectos de los fármacos , Sugammadex , Resultado del Tratamiento , gamma-Ciclodextrinas/efectos adversos , gamma-Ciclodextrinas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Vaso-inotropic agents are frequently used to prevent and/or treat low cardiac output syndrome in infants undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease. Due to the lack of comparative studies, their use is largely dependent on physician- and center preferences. The aim was to assess the impact of two different inotropic regimens, milrinone-epinephrine versus dobutamine on postoperative morbi-mortality in young children undergoing complex cardiac surgery. METHODS: All consecutive children younger than one year of age admitted for complex cardiac surgery (Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery-1 [RACHS-1] score ≥3) with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) from January 2008 to December 2018 were included. Children received either milrinone in association with low dose epinephrine (milrinone-epinephrine group) or dobutamine (dobutamine group) groups were matched and compared using a propensity score. Our primary outcome was a composite measure including either hospital death and/or the presence of at least two of the following events: respiratory failure, prolonged inotropic support, or renal failure. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty patients were included in the analysis. Children in the milrinone-epinephrine group (N.=184) suffered more frequently from a cyanotic heart disease and had longer surgery, CPB, and aortic cross clamp times than those in the dobutamine group (N.=66). After matching, children in the milrinone-epinephrine group had a higher incidence of severe postoperative morbidity or mortality compared to those in the dobutamine group (27.4 versus 13.9%; P=0.016). Respiratory failure (28% vs. 12%), prolonged inotropic support (71% vs. 35%) and in-hospital death (3 vs. 0%) were more frequent in the milrinone-epinephrine group. CONCLUSIONS: In young infants undergoing complex cardiac surgery, milrinone combined with epinephrine is associated with a higher incidence of postoperative morbidity or mortality compared to dobutamine for perioperative inotropic support. Further prospective randomized studies are required to confirm this finding.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Milrinona , Niño , Humanos , Lactante , Preescolar , Milrinona/uso terapéutico , Dobutamina/uso terapéutico , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Epinefrina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: One of the reasons that high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) is used is due to the near immobility of thoracic structures. However, no study has quantified the movements of cardiac structures during HFJV compared with normal mechanical ventilation. METHODS: After ethical approval and written informed consent, we included 21 patients scheduled for atrial fibrillation ablation in this prospective crossover study. Each patient was ventilated with both normal mechanical ventilation and HFJV. During each ventilation mode, displacements of the cardiac structure were measured by the EnSite Precision mapping system using a catheter placed in the coronary sinus. RESULTS: The median [Q1-Q4] displacement was 2.0 [0.6-2.8] mm during HFJV and 10.5 [9.3-13.0] mm during conventional ventilation (p < 0.000001). CONCLUSION: This study quantifies the minimal movement of cardiac structures during HFJV compared to standard mechanical ventilation.