Cross-sectional increase of adherence to multidisciplinary tumor board decisions.

BACKGROUND: Cancer research has made great progress in the recent years. With the increasing number of options in diagnosis and therapy the implementation of tumorboards (TUBs) has become standard procedure in the treatment of cancer patients. Adherence tests on tumor board decisions are intended to enable quality assurance and enhancement for work in tumor boards in order to continuously optimize treatment options for cancer patients. METHODS: Subject of this study was the adherence of the recommendations made in three of 14 tumorboards, which take place weekly in the Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO) at the University Hospital Bonn. In total, therapy recommendations of 3815 patient cases were checked on their implementation. A classification into four groups has been made according to the degree of implementation. A second classification followed regarding the reasons for differences between the recommendation and the therapy which the patient actually received. RESULTS: The study showed that 80.1% of all recommendations in the three TUBs were implemented. 8.3% of all recommendations showed a deviance. Most important reasons for the deviances were patient wish (36.5%), patient death (26%) and doctoral decision, due to the patient's comorbidities or side effects of the treatment (24.1%).Interestingly, deviance in all three tumor boards in total significantly decreased over time. CONCLUSIONS: Aim of the study was to clarify the use of tumor boards and find approaches to make them more efficient. Based on the results efficiency might be optimized by increased consideration of patients` preferences, improved presentation of patient-related data, more detailed documentation and further structuring of the tumor board meetings.

Long-term outcome of total hip arthroplasty in patients with haemophilia.

INTRODUCTION: Besides the target joints (elbow, knee and ankle), the hip is one of the commonly affected joints in haemophilic arthropathy. Hip arthroplasty is the therapy of choice after failure of conservative treatment. There are only limited data on long-term results after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). AIM: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse clinical outcome and complication rate after total hip replacement in patients with severe haemophilic arthropathy. METHODS: Forty-three patients with haemophilia (PWH), one patient with von Willebrand disease and one patient with a Factor-VII-deficiency undergoing 49 total hip arthroplasties, were evaluated in a retrospective study. Harris hip score (HHS), range of motion (ROM), pain status (visual analogue scale, VAS) complication rate and patient satisfaction were assessed at a mean follow-up of 11.5 years (range: 3-32). RESULTS: HSS, ROM and VAS improved significantly combined with high patient satisfaction. In total, three (6.1%) periprosthetic infections and five (10.2%) aseptic implant loosenings occurred after THA leading to revision arthroplasty. In two (4.1%) cases, a pseudotumour and one (2.0%) periarticular ossification had to be resected after THA. CONCLUSION: Total hip replacement in PWH leads to a significant increase of function, reduction of pain and a high satisfaction. Due to the relatively high complication rate (infections and aseptic loosening) compared to patients without haemophilia, an individual assessment of the risk-benefit ratio from surgical and haemostaseological point of view is needed.

Lower limb reconstruction in tumor patients using modular silver-coated megaprostheses with regard to perimegaprosthetic joint infection: a case series, including 100 patients and review of the literature.

PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE: Bone resection regarding adequate surgical margins is the treatment of choice for malignant bone tumors. In the case of metastasis-related complications, so-called skeletal-related events, it is highly important to achieve pain relief and a stable joint situation to re-mobilize the patients immediately following surgery. To bridge the often large osseous defect zones after tumor resection, both cemented and uncemented modular endoprosthetic systems are widely used. Patients undergoing tumor-related endoprosthetic orthopedic surgery are facing high risk for developing a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The immunocompromised condition due to anti-neoplastic treatment and long operation time with large exposure of tissue contributes to a high risk of infection. METHODS: The authors present a case series of 100 patients (31% primary bone tumor and 69% metastasis-related surgery) undergoing tumor-related lower limb salvage surgery with special regard to periprosthetic joint infection and the management of this "difficult to treat" situation. Furthermore, a review of the current literature regarding infection following bone tumor resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction is performed and discussed. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 24 months (range 12-108 months). Ten patients (10%) suffered from a periprosthetic joint infection. We recorded six acute infections (type I) <4 weeks after surgery, one infection >4 weeks after surgery (type II), and three late infections (type III). According to the definition of Laffer et al., three of our patients (30%) are probably free of infection, one patient died of PJI-associated sepsis, and five patients were free of infection, but without restoration of the affected joint. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our own results show that perimegaprosthetic joint infection among silver-coated implants, in patients undergoing tumor-related surgery of the lower limb, is lower compared to non-silver-coated implants. Due to heterogeneity of patients and potential treatment options, the treatment regime should be tailored for the patients' individual situation.

Perioperative management and outcome of fracture treatment in patients with haemophilia without inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: Fractures in persons with haemophilia (PWH) are not uncommon and require an interdisciplinary approach to maintain haemostasis during surgical treatment. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the perioperative management and outcome in PWH following fracture fixation compared to a matched non-haemophilic control group. METHODS: A cohort of 44 PWH who underwent 46 surgical fracture fixations was retrospectively compared to 46 non-haemophilic patients (matched-pair controls). Patients were classified according to the fracture localization: (i) proximal upper extremity (PrUEx; n = 7), (ii) distal upper extremity (DiUEx; n = 12), (iii) proximal lower extremity (PrLEx; n = 13) and (iv) distal lower extremity (DiLEx; n = 14). Both groups were assessed for length of hospital stay, duration of surgery, drainage use and complication rates. RESULTS: There was no significant difference regarding the duration of the preoperative hospital stay between PWH and controls. Only PWH who were operated at the DiUEx stayed significantly longer in hospital (4.8 ± 3.7 days) than controls (2.2 ± 2.3 days; P = 0.039). Operation time was significantly longer in PWH with fractures treated at the DiLEx (64.9 ± 26.6 min) compared to the controls (49.8 ± 37.9 min; P = 0.035). Neither frequency nor duration of surgical drainage placement differed significantly between the two groups. The overall complication rate in both groups was low without a statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: An optimal interdisciplinary perioperative management provided the surgical treatment of fractures in PWH can be performed safely with a low complication rate.

Outcome after total knee arthroplasty in haemophilic patients with stiff knees.

INTRODUCTION: Advanced haemophilic arthropathy of the knee is associated with progressive joint stiffness. Results after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in stiff knees are considered to be inferior compared to those with less restricted preoperative range of motion (ROM). There is only very limited data on the results of primary TKA in haemophilic patients with stiff knees. AIM: The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical outcome after TKA performed in haemophilic patients with preoperative ROM of 50° or less. METHODS: Twenty one patients (23 knees) undergoing TKA with stiff knees were retrospectively evaluated. Mean follow-up was 8.3 years (range, 2-25). Clinical assessment included ROM, degree of flexion contracture and complication rate. Functional evaluation and pain status were assessed using the Knee Society's Scoring System (KSS). RESULTS: Range of motion improved from 26.7° preoperatively to 73.0° postoperatively. Flexion contracture decreased from 21.7° to 8.3°. KSS increased from 22.9 to 72.9 points. Evaluation of pain revealed a decrease from 8.4 points preoperatively to 2.1 points postoperatively. All these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.005). The complication rate was 8.7% including one late periprosthetic infection, and one aseptic implant loosening. Nine patients who required VY-quadricepsplasty for knee exposure developed a mean postoperative extensor lag of 7°. CONCLUSION: Total knee arthroplasty in haemophilic patients presenting with stiff knees results in significant improvement of function and reduction in pain. Although the clinical outcome is inferior compared to nonstiff knees reported in the literature, joint replacement surgery can be successfully performed in this particular group of patients.

[Modular arthrodesis system TITAN (KAM-TITAN) after failed revision total knee arthroplasty : Operative technique and clinical experience]. / Modulares Kniearthrodesesystem TITAN (KAM-TITAN) nach fehlgeschlagener Knieendoprothetik : Operative Technik und klinische Ergebnisse.

OBJECTIVE: Restoration of a painless, weight-bearing extremity with a modular knee arthrodesis system based on a cementless modular revision stem for rotationally stable, diaphyseal anchorage. INDICATIONS: Severe bone loss and compromised soft tissue after failed total knee arthroplasty, two-stage revisions and non-reconstructible knee extensor mechanism deficiency. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Extensive osteolysis preventing diaphyseal anchorage of the prosthesis. Contralateral arthrodesis of the knee joint and/or ipsilateral arthrodesis of the hip joint and contralateral lower extremity amputation. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: In revision cases, removal of the total knee arthroplasty, spacer, the bone cement and all intramedullary granulation tissue. Reaming the medullary cavity with intramedullary reamers to cortical contact. Restoring leg length and rotation with trial implants. After implantation of the femoral and tibial stems, placing and tensioning of the rotationally aligned coupling elements. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Mobilization on two forearm crutches from postoperative day 1. Removal of the Redon drains after 48 h. Partial weight bearing of 20 kg for 6 weeks postoperatively. If plain radiographs show unchanged seating of the prosthesis after 6 weeks, loading can be increased by 10 kg per week until full weight bearing is achieved. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2012 clinical data were collected and analyzed retrospectively. A total of 27 patients had been treated within a two-stage exchange procedure with implantation of a modular intramedullary arthodesis nail TITAN (KAM-TITAN). The mean follow-up was 30.9 ± 12.0 months. A functional evaluation was performed using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). The analyzed patients showed a mean score of 39.2 ± 8.3. To determine the pain level the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain was used and showed a mean score of 2.9 ± 1.3. The rate of definitely free of infection (using Laffer criteria) at last follow-up was 85.2%.

[Systematic planning of surgery for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities]. / Systematik in der Operationsplanung bei Weichgewebesarkomen der Extremitäten.

Soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities are rarely malignant tumors. They are best treated by an experienced interdisciplinary sarcoma team. A preoperative biopsy and imaging are prerequisites for successful sarcoma treatment. Before surgery the multimodal treatment and the extent of resection and, if necessary, plastic reconstruction should be discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board. The aim is always a complete R0 resection with optimal preservation of function. The preservation of critical structures (e. g. sciatic nerve) by a planned focal marginal resection along the critical structure can be performed by an experienced team in a multidisciplinary treatment setting.

[Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus in revision shoulder arthroplasty]. / Der proximale Humerusersatz in der Revisionssituation.

OBJECTIVE: Reconstruction of proximal humeral bone defects in the setting of shoulder revision arthroplasty by implantation of a modular humeral component. INDICATIONS: Severe segmental humeral bone defects in revision total shoulder arthroplasty, after tumor resection, trauma, pathological fractures, post-infectious or after failed osteosynthesis. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Acute or chronic local infections, large diaphyseal bone defects preventing adequate anchorage of the prosthesis, very short life expectancy (<3 months). SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Removal of the implant using an extended deltopectoral approach. Periarticular arthrolysis with preservation of neurovascular structures. Resection of the meta-diaphyseal bone and reconstruction of the humeral length with the help of different extension sleeves and a modular humeral component. Soft tissue management is crucial, especially with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Three weeks postoperatively immobilization in a shoulder sling, active assisted movement therapy by gradual pain-adapted increase of movement, muscle coordination, and strength. RESULTS: The results of 11 consecutive patients treated with a modular humeral component due to a failed shoulder arthroplasty between 2008 and 2016 were evaluated retrospectively. Mean length of reconstruction was 100 mm. Due to recurrent dislocations one patient required revision and conversion to a reverse component. No cases of aseptic loosening or periprosthetic infection were observed.

Less favorable clinical outcome after diagnostic and interventional double balloon enteroscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding?

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Double balloon enteroscopy (DBE) is a new endoscopic technique that allows diagnosis and therapeutic interventions of small-bowel lesions. One of the main indications for DBE is suspected small-bowel bleeding (SSBB). Data about clinical outcome after DBE are limited. The aim of the present study was to prospectively assess the short-term clinical outcome of this procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of all consecutive patients undergoing DBE for various indications, follow-up results in patients with SSBB were analyzed. Standardized questionnaires were used, including assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms, especially signs of gastrointestinal bleeding, blood transfusions, demand for re-intervention, and hospitalization. RESULTS: Of a total of 180 DBEs performed in 124 patients during a 2-year period, SSBB was the indication in 84 patients (M/F = 46/38; mean age 63 years) who underwent a total of 111 DBEs. Of these patients 52 could be followed (mean follow-up 2 months, range 1-5 months). In this subgroup, positive findings were obtained in 30 (mostly angiodysplasia), with therapeutic interventions being performed in 18 of these patients. At follow-up, the rate of re-bleeding in patients who had undergone interventions (20%) was similar to that in patients who had not (18%). CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, DBE did not seem to have a major effect on re-bleeding. Better patient selection or modification of therapeutic regimens appears to be necessary to better utilize DBE in SSBB.

Temporary epiphysiodesis using the FlexTack™ implant (tension band) featuring a modified explantation technique.

OBJECTIVE: Presenting the implantation of the PediatrOS™ FlexTack™ (Merete, Berlin, Germany) for growth guidance and a modified explantation procedure to facilitate explantation and prevent bone and soft tissue damage. INDICATIONS: Implantation: Genua vara and valga, coxa vara, varus and valgus deviation of the ankle joint, the elbow joint and the wrist Modified Explantation: Removal of the implant after successful limb correction or dislocation of the implant. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Implantation: Closed growth plates, insufficient remaining growth potential, acute or chronic infection, insufficient osseous structures, severe muscular, nervous or vessel diseases endangering the respective limb Explantation: General inoperability of the patient. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Implantation: Localization of the growth plate. Insertion of K­wire parallel to joint line on the joint side. Setting of the implant. Insertion of second K­wire and insertion with the implantation instrument and hammer. Modified Explantation: Cutting of the implant bridging part. Both ends of the bridging part are bent vertically to prevent soft tissue damage. Dissection of both implant arms from the bone with the chisel. Extraction in 360° motion using tooth extraction pliers. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Implantation: Full weight bearing. X­ray controls every 3 months to control growth correction. Explantation: Full weight bearing. RESULTS: Complications such as breaking of the k­wires, breaking of the chisel or extraction of adhering bone tissue occurred in 14 of the 64 (21.9%) explanted FlexTack implants. Complication-free removal using the original instruments provided by the manufacturer was possible for five implants. The modified explantation procedure as described above was applied in 45 explanted implants (70.3%) with complete removal of the implant without further complications within the follow up period.

[The Role of a Modular Universal Tumour and Revision System (MUTARS®) in Lower Limb Endoprosthetic Revision Surgery - Outcome Analysis of 25 Patients]. / Tumorprothesen in der endoprothetischen Revisionschirurgie der unteren Extremität ­ Ergebnisse von 25 Patienten nach Versorgung mit einem modularen Tumor- und Revisionssystem (MUTARS®).

Introduction/Background: With extended life expectancy, the number of primary joint arthroplasties has also increased. Revision surgery is also more often necessary, due to aseptic or septic loosening of the prosthesis or periprosthetic fracture. Large bone defects often occur in these patients and several non-modular, conventional implants are available to handle this difficult situation. Custom made implants offer an individually designed and defect-adapted shape with perfect covering of the lesion, but may delay the operation. The Modular Universal Tumor And Revision System (MUTARS®) offers the possibility to vary the length and angle of the femoral neck and the antetorsion angle. Thus, it permits intraoperative adaption to the individual patient's defect. The aim of our study is to present clinical, functional results and the rate of complications in a cohort of patients undergoing revision surgery for failed endoprosthetic replacement or failed trauma surgery, using the Modular Universal Tumor And Revision System with short-to midterm follow-up. Patients and Methods: Between August 2005 and September 2014, 25 patients (17 female, 8 male) with an average age of 72 years (min. 56, max. 92 years) were included in a retrospective study using the MUTARS® system. The patients underwent surgical revision of osseous defects that were not susceptible to conventional care. The mean follow-up was 16 months (min. 12, max. 72 months). The indications which led to revision surgery were as follows: loosened metal-on-metal prosthesis with an acetabular defect caused by a metal-induced granuloma (n = 1), pseudoarthrosis after implantation of femur nail (n = 2), cut-out of a femur nail (n = 1), aseptic loosening of an implanted endoprosthesis (n = 4), septic loosening of an implanted endoprosthesis (n = 1), periprosthetic fracture (n = 6) and periprosthetic infection after two stage revision surgery (infection consolidated Girdlestone situation) (n = 10). All patients were followed up at regular intervals, both clinically and radiologically. Apart from comorbidities, clinical and functional parameters were measured, including the Harris Hip Score. An outcome analysis was also performed with respect to peri- and postoperative complications. Serial plain X-rays were followed-up. Results: In all patients, stable reconstruction without the use of an allograft was possible. In total, 23 patients underwent surgery by using a proximal femur prosthesis; three patients also received a custom made acetabular component. One patient was treated by using a distal femur and one patient was treated by implantation of a total femur prosthesis. The average length of hospital stay was 25 days (min.11, max. 47 days). The Harris Hip Score improved from 28 points preoperatively to 81 points after surgery.In total we recorded 24 % of complications after surgery. Two patients suffered recurrent periprosthetic infection and the prosthesis had to be revised in a further two stage exchange; one patient had a tractus gap and was revised by surgery. Two patients suffered periprosthetic fracture due to trauma and the patient with the total femur prosthesis suffered recurrent periprosthetic infection of the silver - coated mega-prosthesis and committed suicide triggered by an episode of major depression. Conclusion: Because of its modular nature, the Modular Tumor And Revision System (MUTARS®) can be used for highly variable intraoperative defect adaption. Good clinical and functional results were achieved in patients with excessive bone defects. However, the high rate of infection, even with silver coated mega-implants, is still a problem and should be studied further.

[Bilateral Dislocation Fracture of the Humeral Head (Right AO 11C3.3; Left AO 11A1.3) without Direct Trauma Due to First Clinical Manifestation of Seizure - a Case Report and Review of the Literature]. / Beidseitige Humeruskopfluxationsfraktur (rechts AO 11C3.3; links AO 11A1.3) ohne direktes Trauma im Rahmen der primären Manifestation eines Grand-Mal-Anfalls - Fallbericht und Literaturübersicht.

The incidence of fractures among epileptics is frequent and mostly occurs by direct trauma due to falls caused by seizures. The risk of fractures is estimated to be 50 % higher in epileptics than in the general population. Most of the fractures affect the proximal femora and the hip joint. Dorsal shoulder dislocations occur frequently in epileptics. If they occur bilaterally, this is pathognomonic for seizuring. Besides this, shoulder dislocation and bilateral dislocation fractures of the humeral head, however, are far more rare even among epileptics but pathognomonic for seizure. In this case report we present a female patient with bilateral dislocation fracture of the humeral head due to first clinical manifestation of a tonic-clonic seizure without direct trauma.

[Impact of Preoperative Knee Stiffness on the Postoperative Outcome after Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Haemophilia]. / Einfluss der präoperativen Kniesteife auf das postoperative Ergebnis nach Knieendoprothetik bei Patienten mit Hämophilie.

INTRODUCTION: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment option for patients with end-stage haemophilic arthropathy of the knee. However, the procedure is technically challenging, as knee motion is often restricted before the operation and complication rates are then thought to be higher than for patients with a normal range of motion (ROM). There is very limited information on the outcome of TKA in haemophilic patients presenting with stiff knees. The objective of the present study was to retrospectively analyse and compare the clinical results after TKA in haemophiliacs with stiff and non-stiff knees. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The results of 50 TKA procedures in 41 haemophilic patients were retrospectively evaluated at a mean follow-up of 7.2 ± 4.9 years (range 2-25 years). 20 patients presenting with 23 stiff knees - defined by a preoperative ROM of 50° or less - were compared with 21 patients with 27 non-stiff knees. Knee motion (ROM, flexion, extension), Knee Society Score (KSS/KSS function), pain status (visual analogue scale, VAS), number of bleedings and patient satisfaction were evaluated. RESULTS: The complication rate was 12 %, including two haematomas, one aseptic loosening, and three periprosthetic infections. The overall mean ROM increased from 58.6 ± 34.2° (range 0-120°) preoperatively to 85.9 ± 23.4 (35-130°) postoperatively (p < 0.005). Mean KSS and KSS function improved from 30.6 ± 11.0 points (range 10-49) and 43.4 ± 9.3 points (range 15-65) to 79.3 ± 9.6 points (range 49-95) and 68.9 ± 11.0 points (45-90), respectively (p < 0.005). The mean VAS score decreased significantly from 7.9 ± 0.8 points (range 6-9) to 1.8 ± 1.1 points (range 0-4; p < 0.005). In comparison to the non-stiff group, patients with stiff knees showed a significantly greater mean improvement in ROM (46.3 ± 21.8° [range - 10-85°] vs. 9.4 ± 16.9° [range - 30-35°]), flexion (32.8 ± 19.6° [range - 10-85°] vs. 5.2 ± 16.2° [range - 40-35°]), and flexion contracture (13.5 ± 9.6° [range 5-30°] vs. 5.9 ± 6.7° [range 5-20°]). Both KSS and KSS function were significantly inferior in stiff knees than with non-stiff knees. Nine patients with knee stiffness who underwent additional v-y quadricepsplasty to lengthen the extensor mechanism developed a mean extensor lag of 7-0° ± 4-8° (range 5-15°). At final follow-up, 37/41 patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the surgical result. CONCLUSION: TKA in haemophilic patients presenting with haemophilic arthropathy of the knee results in significant improvements in function and reduced pain. Although the ultimate clinical outcome in stiff knees is inferior to that with non-stiff knees, joint replacement surgery can be successfully performed in patients with restricted preoperative range of motion. Vy-quadricepsplasty for to facilitate exposure is associated with the development of a postoperative extensor lag and should therefore be performed restrictively. Patient satisfaction after TKA was equally high in the two groups.

[Intercalary reconstruction for diaphyseal bone defects with a modular replacement system: Clinical results]. / Interkalare Rekonstruktion diaphysärer Knochendefekte mit einem modularen Diapyhsenersatzsystem: Klinische Ergebnisse.

OBJECTIVE: Reconstruction and long-term stabilization of segmental diaphyseal bone defects of the humerus, femur, and tibia. INDICATIONS: Segmental bone defects due to aggressive benign or primary malignant bone tumors, trauma, pathological fractures, osteomyelitis, or failed osteosynthesis. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Acute or chronic local infections, large metadiaphyseal bone defects preventing adequate anchorage of the prosthesis, very short life expectancy (<3 months). SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Exposure and resection of the bony defect according to the preoperative planning. Reaming of the intramedullary canals proximally and distally followed by implantation of the stems (cemented or noncemented). Reducing sleeves can be used to bridge the difference in diameter between the nail and the spacer. Mounting of the spacer half shell with the threaded holes from underneath after adjusting for alignment and rotation. Assembling of the other half shell by guided pins to ensure proper alignment. Tightening of the clamping screws using a torque screwdriver. Connection of two spacers is possible. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Active physiotherapy and full weight bearing; antibiotic prophylaxis. RESULTS: The results of 14 consecutive patients treated with 15 modular intercalary endoprostheses (Osteobridge™, Merete, Berlin, Germany) between January 2007 and January 2012 with a mean follow up of 24 ± 12 months (range 12-51 months) were evaluated retrospectively. One patient had a primary malignant bone tumor, while all the other patients underwent resection for metastatic disease. The mean age at surgery was 65.9 ± 15.7 years (range 25-83 years). The mean diaphyseal reconstruction length was 110 ± 50 mm (range 50-190 mm). Three patients (20%) required revision of the distal stem due to aseptic loosening. Evaluation of the functional outcome using the MSTS score by Enneking revealed 3 very good (22%), 7 good (50%), 4 fair (28%), and no poor results.

[Significance of Minimally Invasive Approaches during Primary Hip Arthroplasty - an Update]. / Stellenwert minimalinvasiver Zugangswege bei der primären Hüftendoprothetik - ein Update.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive approaches to the hip joint during primary endoprosthetics have been for many years the focus of controversial discussion. Minimally invasive approaches offer soft tissue protecting implantations clear advantages regarding early postoperative functional results and reduced intraoperative blood loss. METHOD: On the basis of comprising literary research the available primary and secondary literature is evaluated - the advantages and disadvantages of minimally invasive approaches at the hip joint are discussed in relation to traditional approaches. RESULTS: The available primary and secondary literature verifies that the advantages of minimally invasive approaches at the hip joint include functional outcome in the early postoperative phase. In comparison to standard approaches there are no differences in the functional outcome after 12 months follow-up. Additionally, reduced length of operation, reduced blood loss and shorter stationary stay are confirmed. Studies relating to degrees of evidence I and II, which concern the medium- and long-term results of minimally invasive approaches in comparison to the established standard approaches, are not available. The available systematic reviews and meta-analyses merely allow a global evaluation of the primary literature on minimally invasive approaches, without thereby differentiating between the established standard approaches and the modified pendant according to minimally invasive criteria. There is a lack of knowledge with regard to in-vivo imaging data (MRI) as a potential evidence for reduction of muscular trauma by using minimally invasive approaches. CONCLUSION: Presently, the available literature does not allow definitive assessment regarding the significance of minimally invasive approaches at the hip joint. Future, random-controlled studies are necessary in order to compare the reliable (long-term) results of the established standard approaches with the hip approaches according to minimally invasive criteria. As long as sufficient long-term results regarding the complication and revision rates of minimally invasive approaches are not available, the method cannot be recommended as "gold standard."

[Biological acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty using impaction bone grafting and an acetabular reconstruction ring]. / Biologisch azetabuläre Defektrekonstruktion beim Hüftendoprothesenwechsel mittels "Impaction Grafting" und azetabulärem Rekonstruktionsring.

OBJECTIVE: Management of acetabular bone defects Paprosky types IIa and IIb in revision hip arthroplasty by rebuilding the bone stock using impaction bone grafting, primary stable reconstruction with an acetabular reconstruction ring, and restoring the hip center of rotation to its anatomical position. INDICATIONS: Acetabular segmental or combined structural defects in the superior acetabular dome with superior/lateral hip center migration with intact anterior and posterior columns (Paprosky types IIa, IIb). CONTRAINDICATIONS: Acute or chronic infections, severe acetabular bone defects preventing adequate anchorage of the prosthesis-particularly destruction of the posterior column. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Modified transgluteal, lateral approach to the hip joint. Removal of the loose acetabular component. Complete circumferential exposure of the acetabular rim, while maintaining mechanical stability of the remaining bone. Preparation of the homologous spongiosa chips and reconstruction of the acetabular defect in impaction grafting technique. Implantation of the acetabular reconstruction ring and primary stable fixation with cancellous screws in the acetabular dome. Cemented fixation of a polyethylene inlay. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Mobilization on 2 underarm crutches from postoperative day 1. Partial weight bearing with 20 kg for 6 weeks postoperatively. If plain radiographs show unchanged seating of the prosthesis after 6 weeks, loading can be increased by 10 kg/week until full weight bearing is achieved; thrombosis prophylaxis is continued throughout. Limitation of hip flexion to 90° during the first 6 weeks, and no adduction and forced external rotation to avoid dislocation. Avoidance of sports involving jumping and axial impact loading for 12 months. Radiologic checkups after 3, 6, and 12 months and, thereafter, every 2 years. RESULTS: Analysis between 2008 and 2011 involved 22 consecutive patients with a total of 23 prostheses; the mean follow-up was 38 ± 11 months. Compared to the preoperative evaluation, follow-up yielded a significant improvement in the average Harris Hip Score (82.2 ± 8.7 vs. 44.7 ± 10.7) and the Merle d'Aubigné Score (14.6 ± 1.9 vs. 7.5 ± 1.3). Radiological solid osseointegration of the cup was observed in 21 cases; partial radiolucent lines were seen in 2 cases (9 %) in the zones I-III delineated by DeLee and Charnley. In 21 cases (91 %) radiographs confirmed no measurable migration or displacement of the acetabular component and the bone graft was determined to be incorporated on the basis of osseous consolidation within the grafted area in 20 cases (87 %). During follow-up 3 prosthesis (13 %) required revision.

[Soft tissue tumor near the joint: hibernoma]. / Weichgewebstumor in der Nähe von Gelenken: Hibernom.

Joint associated tumors must undergo histological analysis, since not only inflammatory, but also benign and malign tumors exist in this location. We report a well circumscribed tumor, located in the elbow that histologically turned out to be a hibernoma. Complete surgical excision is the therapy of choice and recurrences are rare. To rule out liposarcoma with hibernoma like changes, fluorescence in-situ hybridisation has been performed and showed no MDM-2 amplification. Hibernomas are tumors of brown adipose tissue that may be localized next to joints.