Manifestations of intraocular inflammation over time in patients on brolucizumab for neovascular AMD.

PURPOSE: To describe the adverse events associated with brolucizumab, in particular the sequence of intraocular inflammation (IOI), retinal vasculitis (RV), and/or retinal vascular occlusion (RO). METHODS: This was an unmasked post hoc analysis of the randomized HAWK/HARRIER clinical trials. Patients with neovascular AMD in the brolucizumab arms of the trials were included. IOI-related adverse events reported by study investigators were analyzed to determine early signs and the time course of IOI-related adverse events, using a subgroup of patients with definite/probable IOI cases identified in an independent unmasked post hoc review by an external safety review committee. A limited literature review on IOI following anti-VEGF therapy was also conducted. RESULTS: Among 50 patients with definite/probable IOI cases identified by the safety review committee, 12 had RV or RO adverse events reported by the investigators. For 6 of 12, IOI (other than RV) was reported before RV or RO. The duration from the first IOI adverse event to the first RV or RO adverse event ranged from 16 to 171 days for 5 patients and was 553 days for 1 patient. Four of the 6 patients received ≥ 1 brolucizumab injection on or after the date of the first IOI adverse event and before the first RV or RO adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: IOI may precede RV or RO in some patients treated with brolucizumab.

Pharmacokinetics of fingolimod and metabolites in subjects with severe renal impairment: An open-label, single-dose, parallel-group study.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of fingolimod and its metabolites in severe renal impairment and healthy subjects. METHODS: In this single-dose, open-label study, 9 severe renal impairment subjects and 9 demographically matched healthy subjects were included. Each subject received a single oral dose of fingolimod 1.25 mg, and their blood and urine samples were assessed. The pharmacokinetics of fingolimod and its metabolites, fingolimod-phosphate (active metabolite, fingolimod-P), M2, and M3, were compared in both groups. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: In severe renal impairment subjects, mean±standard deviation values of Cmax (ng/mL) of fingolimod and fingolimod-P were 0.878±0.256 and 1.13±0.293 vs. 0.653±0.138 and 0.904±0.229 in healthy subjects, respectively. The overall drug exposures (AUCinf (ngxh/mL)) for fingolimod and fingolimod-P were 131±90.7 and 75.5±33.6 in severe renal impairment subjects vs. 82.3±36.9 and 65.9±30.6 in healthy subjects, respectively. t1/2 (hours) for fingolimod and fingolimod-P was comparable in severe renal impairment subjects (94±53 and 95±50) and healthy subjects (85±25 and 101±46). All adverse events were as expected for fingolimod 1.25 mg. CONCLUSIONS: The exposure to fingolimod and fingolimod-P was moderately increased (90% CI, 0.94-2.18) in severe renal impairment subjects, while half-lives and protein binding were similar to those in healthy subjects. Given that these changes are not clinically meaningful, fingolimod dose adjustment is considered unnecessary in patients with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment.

Effect of fingolimod (FTY720) on cerebral blood flow, platelet function and macular thickness in healthy volunteers.

AIM: Fingolimod, a sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator, is the first oral disease modifying therapy approved for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis. The aim of this double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the effect of fingolimod on cerebral blood flow, platelet function and macular thickness in healthy volunteers. METHODS: The study included 88 healthy volunteers who received fingolimod 0.5 mg or 1.25 mg or matched placebo over a period of 4 weeks. Transcranial colour coded sonography was performed to measure mean blood flow velocities, the platelet function was measured by the PFA-100® assay using a collagen/epinephrine cartridge and macular thickness was measured using optical coherence tomography. An assessment of non-inferiority of fingolimod vs. placebo was performed against a reference value (20% of the overall baseline value). RESULTS: All 88 randomized participants completed the study. At day 28 compared with baseline value, for 0.5 mg, 1.25 mg and placebo treatments, the mean middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity decreased by 4, 1 and 3.7 cm s(-1), respectively. The platelet function analyzer closure time increase was not significant (7.8, 7.5 and 10.4 s, respectively). The mean percentage change in the central foveal thickness from baseline for both eyes was below 3% for all groups. The safety profile of fingolimod in this study was found consistent with the previous reports. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy volunteers, the changes seen with both fingolimod doses were found to be within normal variability, non-inferior and comparable with those observed with placebo for all the pharmacodynamic parameters assessed.

Anti-brolucizumab immune response as one prerequisite for rare retinal vasculitis/retinal vascular occlusion adverse events.

In October 2019, Novartis launched brolucizumab, a single-chain variable fragment molecule targeting vascular endothelial growth factor A, for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. In 2020, rare cases of retinal vasculitis and/or retinal vascular occlusion (RV/RO) were reported, often during the first few months after treatment initiation, consistent with a possible immunologic pathobiology. This finding was inconsistent with preclinical studies in cynomolgus monkeys that demonstrated no drug-related intraocular inflammation, or RV/RO, despite the presence of preexisting and treatment-emergent antidrug antibodies (ADAs) in some animals. In this study, the immune response against brolucizumab in humans was assessed using samples from clinical trials and clinical practice. In the brolucizumab-naïve population, anti-brolucizumab ADA responses were detected before any treatment, which was supported by the finding that healthy donors can harbor brolucizumab-specific B cells. This suggested prior exposure of the immune system to proteins with structural similarity. Experiments on samples showed that naïve and brolucizumab-treated ADA-positive patients developed a class-switched, high-affinity immune response, with several linear epitopes being recognized by ADAs. Only patients with RV/RO showed a meaningful T cell response upon recall with brolucizumab. Further studies in cynomolgus monkeys preimmunized against brolucizumab with adjuvant followed by intravitreal brolucizumab challenge demonstrated that high ADA titers were required to generate ocular inflammation and vasculitis/vascular thrombosis, comparable to RV/RO in humans. Immunogenicity therefore seems to be a prerequisite to develop RV/RO. However, because only 2.1% of patients with ADA develop RV/RO, additional factors must play a role in the development of RV/RO.

A root cause analysis to identify the mechanistic drivers of immunogenicity against the anti-VEGF biotherapeutic brolucizumab.

Immunogenicity against intravitreally administered brolucizumab has been previously described and associated with cases of severe intraocular inflammation, including retinal vasculitis/retinal vascular occlusion (RV/RO). The presence of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) in these patients led to the initial hypothesis that immune complexes could be key mediators. Although the formation of ADAs and immune complexes may be a prerequisite, other factors likely contribute to some patients having RV/RO, whereas the vast majority do not. To identify and characterize the mechanistic drivers underlying the immunogenicity of brolucizumab and the consequence of subsequent ADA-induced immune complex formation, a translational approach was performed to bridge physicochemical characterization, structural modeling, sequence analysis, immunological assays, and a quantitative systems pharmacology model that mimics physiological conditions within the eye. This approach revealed that multiple factors contributed to the increased immunogenic potential of brolucizumab, including a linear epitope shared with bacteria, non-natural surfaces due to the single-chain variable fragment format, and non-native drug species that may form over prolonged time in the eye. Consideration of intraocular drug pharmacology and disease state in a quantitative systems pharmacology model suggested that immune complexes could form at immunologically relevant concentrations modulated by dose intensity. Assays using circulating immune cells from treated patients or treatment-naïve healthy volunteers revealed the capacity of immune complexes to trigger cellular responses such as enhanced antigen presentation, platelet aggregation, endothelial cell activation, and cytokine release. Together, these studies informed a mechanistic understanding of the clinically observed immunogenicity of brolucizumab and associated cases of RV/RO.

Chronopharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide and acyl glucuronide metabolites in kidney transplant recipients converted from cyclosporine to everolimus.

BACKGROUND: The influence of the conversion from cyclosporine (CsA) to everolimus (EVR) on the chronopharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA) and its glucuronide (MPAG) and acyl glucuronide (acyl-MPAG) metabolites in patients receiving enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) has not been studied. METHODS: We evaluated daytime and nighttime steady-state MPA, MPAG, and acyl-MPAG pharmacokinetics in 24 stable kidney transplant recipients while receiving cyclosporine and 28 days after conversion from CsA to EVR. The effect of concomitant treatment and the circadian difference on AUC(t,ss) and C(max,ss) were assessed using a linear mixed model. RESULTS: After conversion from CsA to EVR, MPA AUC(t,ss) was 43% higher (29% daytime and 58% during nighttime), whereas MPAG AUC(t,ss) was 33% lower (35% daytime and 30% during nighttime) and acyl-MPAG AUC(t,ss) was 31% lower (36% during daytime and 26% nighttime). Compared with daytime, MPA AUC(t,ss) was 25% lower (32% with CsA and 17% with EVR), MPAG AUC(t,ss) was 24% lower (26% with CsA and 21% with EVR), and acyl-MPAG AUC(t,ss) was 26% lower (32% with CsA and 21% with EVR) during nighttime. After conversion from CsA to EVR, MPAG:MPA and acyl-MPAG:MPA AUC(t,ss) ratios were 50% lower but were not different during daytime compared with nighttime EC-MPS administration. There was no correlation between CsA or EVR concentrations with MPA, MPAG, and acyl-MPAG exposures during daytime and nighttime. At least 1 adverse event was reported in 70.8% of patients receiving EC-MPS and CsA and in 91.7% receiving EC-MPS and EVR. CONCLUSION: In stable kidney transplant recipients receiving EC-MPS and steroids, exposures to MPA, MPAG, and acyl-MPAG were lower during nighttime compared with daytime, both with CsA or EVR. This circadian effect on MPA exposure did not correlate with CsA or EVR concentrations or with altered MPAG and acyl-MPAG formation.

Placebo-controlled study of the effects of fingolimod on cardiac rate and rhythm and pulmonary function in healthy volunteers.

PURPOSE: Fingolimod (FTY720) is a sphingosine-1 phosphate-receptor (S1PR) modulator recently approved as a once-daily oral therapy for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) in many countries. As S1PRs are widely expressed, including in heart and lung tissues, this study investigated the possible effects of fingolimod on heart-rate circadian rhythm and pulmonary function. METHODS: Healthy volunteers (n = 39) were randomized to receive fingolimod 0.5 mg, 1.25 mg, or placebo for 14 days. Heart rate and measures of cardiac and pulmonary function were assessed during the study. RESULTS: Mean heart rate for the first 12 h postdose was lower for both fingolimod than for placebo groups (p < 0.001) and remained 10-15 bpm lower than placebo until day 14 (p < 0.05). Heart rate circadian rhythm, cardiac output, stroke volume, and systemic vascular resistance were similar among treatment groups throughout the study. There was no evidence of an effect of fingolimod on pulmonary function. Absolute lymphocyte counts decreased by approximately 70% from baseline in both fingolimod groups (day 14) and began to increase within 14 days of stopping treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy volunteers treated for 14 days, once-daily fingolimod doses of 0.5 mg and 1.25 mg had no effect on cardiac or pulmonary function beyond a transient decrease in heart rate at treatment initiation.

Pharmacokinetics of fingolimod (FTY720) and a combined oral contraceptive coadministered in healthy women: drug-drug interaction study results.

BACKGROUND: Fingolimod has a novel mechanism of action in multiple sclerosis, being a first-in-class sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator. Because of a potential risk of fetal toxicity based on animal studies, women of childbearing potential are advised to take effective contraceptive measures during and for 2 months after stopping fingolimod therapy. To assess whether the efficacy of a combined oral contraceptive (OC) could be compromised during fingolimod therapy, a steady-state, drug-drug interaction study of fingolimod with ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel was performed in healthy female volunteers. OBJECTIVE: To assess the interaction between fingolimod 0.5 mg once daily and ethinylestradiol 30 µg/ levonorgestrel 150 µg once daily at a steady state. METHODS: 31 healthy women received the combined OC only on Days 1 - 14, followed by OC plus fingolimod on Days 15 - 28. RESULTS: In the presence of fingolimod, ethinylestradiol pharmacokinetics were unchanged, and levonorgestrel maximum plasma concentration at steady state and area under the concentration-time curve during a dosing interval increased by factors of 1.10 (90% CI 1.05 - 1.16) and 1.22 (90% CI 1.18 - 1.27), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Fingolimod therapy does not alter the pharmacokinetics of the combined OC ethinylestradiol/ levonorgestrel to a clinically significant degree. Ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel does not alter the pharmacokinetics of fingolimod. Women receiving fingolimod therapy are able to use a combined OC as a means of effective birth control.

Randomized crossover study to assess the inter- and intrasubject variability of morning mycophenolic acid concentrations from enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium and mycophenolate mofetil in stable renal transplant recipients.

The delayed release of mycophenolic acid (MPA) from enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS, myfortic®) may have an impact on the variability of MPA trough (C0 h) levels. A randomized, two-period crossover study was performed in 24 maintenance renal transplants to evaluate the inter- and intrasubject variability of MPA predose levels from EC-MPS and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, CellCept®), both in combination with cyclosporine. Patients received EC-MPS (720 mg b.i.d.) and MMF (1000 mg b.i.d.) for a period of 21 d each. MPA plasma levels were measured over the final seven consecutive days at -1, 0, 1, 2, and 3 h after the morning MPA dose. Intersubject coefficients of variation (%CV) for MPA troughs were 47.5% (95% CI, 34.1-80.3) and 54.4% (40.0-86.8) for EC-MPS and MMF, respectively; intrasubject %CVs were 62.7% (55.1-72.9) and 42.8% (37.9-49.2). High MPA C0 h levels>10 µg/mL were rarely observed with both EC-MPS (1.8%) and MMF (0.6%). Mean MPA area under the curve (AUC)0-3 h was comparable between treatments, while MPA C0 h was on average 46% higher with EC-MPS. In conclusion, predose MPA trough level monitoring appears of limited value during EC-MPS and MMF therapy given the large intrasubject variability in MPA C0 h levels with both treatments.

Ketoconazole increases fingolimod blood levels in a drug interaction via CYP4F2 inhibition.

The sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator fingolimod is predominantly hydroxylated by cytochrome CYP4F2. In vitro experiments showed that ketoconazole significantly inhibited the oxidative metabolism of fingolimod by human liver microsomes and by recombinant CYP4F2. The authors used ketoconazole as a putative CYP4F2 inhibitor to quantify its influence on fingolimod pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects. In a 2-period, single-sequence, crossover study, 22 healthy subjects received a single 5-mg dose of fingolimod in period 1. In period 2, subjects received ketoconazole 200 mg twice daily for 9 days and a single 5-mg dose of fingolimod coadministered on the 4th day of ketoconazole treatment. Ketoconazole did not affect fingolimod t(max) or half-life, but there was a weak average increase in C(max) of 1.22-fold (90% confidence interval, 1.15-1.30). The AUC over the 5 days of ketoconazole coadministration increased 1.40-fold (1.31-1.50), and the full AUC to infinity increased 1.71-fold (1.53-1.91). The AUC of the active metabolite fingolimod-phosphate was increased to a similar extent by 1.67-fold (1.50-1.85). Ketoconazole predose plasma levels were not altered by fingolimod. The magnitude of this interaction suggests that a proactive dose reduction of fingolimod is not necessary when adding ketoconazole to a fingolimod regimen. The clinician, however, should be aware of this interaction and bear in mind the possibility of a fingolimod dose reduction based on clinical monitoring.

A mechanistic study to assess whether isoproterenol can reverse the negative chronotropic effect of fingolimod.

The sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator fingolimod (FTY720) elicits a negative chronotropic effect at treatment initiation that attenuates thereafter. The authors determined whether isoproterenol can counteract this effect. In this randomized, crossover study, 14 healthy subjects received 5 infusions of isoproterenol (titrated to increase heart rate to 100-120 bpm) or intravenous placebo. The first infusion was 2 hours before and the other 4 infusions were between 3 and 6 hours after a 5-mg oral dose of fingolimod. Telemetry and pharmacokinetic data were collected for 24 hours. During isoproterenol infusion 1 (before fingolimod administration), heart rate was increased 80% from preinfusion 68 +/- 9 bpm to a maximum 122 +/- 15 bpm. Administration of fingolimod decreased heart rate from 73 +/- 11 bpm predose to a nadir of 57 +/- 8 bpm. The subsequent isoproterenol infusion 2 in the presence of fingolimod increased mean heart rate by 85% to a maximum 105 +/- 21 bpm. A 41% higher total isoproterenol dose was needed to increase heart rate to the target range with fingolimod (97 +/- 6 mcg) compared with isoproterenol alone (69 +/- 27 mcg). Isoproterenol infusions 3 to 5 had similar effects on heart rate as infusion 2. Fingolimod had no significant influence on blood pressure responses to isoproterenol. Isoproterenol did not alter the pharmacokinetics of fingolimod. The pure beta-agonist isoproterenol can reverse the heart rate reduction that occurs transiently after initiating fingolimod treatment.

The ability of atropine to prevent and reverse the negative chronotropic effect of fingolimod in healthy subjects.

AIMS: The authors determined whether intravenous atropine can prevent or counteract the negative chronotropic effect of the immunomodulator fingolimod. METHODS: In this randomized, placebo-controlled, two-period, crossover study, 12 healthy subjects received 5 mg fingolimod orally concurrently with intravenous atropine (titrated to a heart rate of 110-120 beats min(-1)) or intravenous placebo. A second group of 12 subjects received atropine/placebo 4 h after the fingolimod dose. Continuous telemetry measurements were made for 24 h after each fingolimod dose. RESULTS: Fingolimod administration alone yielded a heart rate nadir of 51 +/- 5 beats min(-1) at a median 4 h postdose with heart rate remaining depressed at 51-64 beats min(-1) over the rest of the day. Concurrent administration of fingolimod and atropine yielded a nadir of 66 +/- 6 beats min(-1) resulting in an atropine: placebo ratio (90% confidence interval) of 1.30 (1.22, 1.36). When atropine was administered at the time of the nadir, it was able to reverse the negative chronotropic effect of fingolimod from a heart rate of 56 +/- 9 beats min(-1) (placebo) to 64 +/- 8 beats min(-1) (atropine) resulting in an atropine: placebo ratio of 1.15 (1.04, 1.26). Atropine had no influence on the pharmacokinetics of fingolimod. CONCLUSIONS: Atropine administered concurrently with fingolimod prevented the heart rate nadir that typically occurs 4 h postdose. Atropine administered at the time of the heart rate nadir was able to reverse the negative chronotropic effect of fingolimod.

The effect on heart rate of combining single-dose fingolimod with steady-state atenolol or diltiazem in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: The sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator fingolimod (FTY720) is known to elicit a negative chronotropic effect at treatment initiation that attenuates over time with continued dosing. The authors determined the effect of combining a single dose of fingolimod with steady-state atenolol or diltiazem on heart rate and mean arterial pressure. METHODS: In a partially randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, three-period, crossover study, 25 healthy subjects received (1) a single oral 5-mg dose of fingolimod, (2) either 50 mg atenolol or 240 mg diltiazem once daily for 5 days, and (3) the antihypertensive for 5 days and a single dose of fingolimod on day 5. Telemetry and pharmacokinetic data were collected. RESULTS: The daytime mean heart rate nadir was 15% lower when fingolimod was combined with atenolol (42 +/- 7 bpm) compared with fingolimod alone (51 +/- 9 bpm) yielding a combination/monotherapy ratio of 0.85 (90%CI, 0.79-0.92). The daytime mean heart rate nadir from fingolimod alone (55 +/- 5 bpm) was not altered when combined with diltiazem (56 +/- 8 bpm) yielding a ratio of 0.99 (0.94-1.05). There was no clinically relevant change in mean arterial pressure when fingolimod was administered with atenolol or diltiazem compared with administration of the drugs alone in normotensive subjects. The pharmacokinetics of the drugs were not altered during coadministration. CONCLUSION: Adding fingolimod to a beta-blocker such as atenolol resulted in a moderately lower mean heart rate nadir compared with fingolimod alone. However, subjects who had a stronger negative chronotropic response to fingolimod alone (nadir < 50 bpm) had minimal or no further reduction in heart rate with the drug combination. Adding fingolimod to a calcium channel blocker such as diltiazem did not further lower the heart rate compared to fingolimod alone.

Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Fingolimod and Carbamazepine in Healthy Subjects.

This open-label, single-sequence study in healthy subjects investigated the effects of steady-state carbamazepine on the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of a single 2-mg dose of fingolimod. In period 1, a single oral dose of fingolimod 2 mg (day 1) was followed by PK and safety assessments up to 36 days. In period 2, carbamazepine was administered in flexible, up-titrated doses (600 mg twice daily maximum) for 49 days. Fingolimod was administered on day 35, followed by a study completion evaluation (day 71). The PK analysis included 23 of 26 of the enrolled subjects (88.5%). Coadministration of fingolimod at steady-state carbamazepine concentrations resulted in increased fingolimod CL/F by 67% through the induction of CYP3A4, a cytochrome with negligible involvement in fingolimod clearance in an uninduced state. Fingolimod Cmax was reduced by 18% and AUCinf by 40%, as was T1/2 (106 vs 163 hours). A similar trend was observed for fingolimod-P. Models linking fingolimod-P blood concentrations to lymphocyte count or annual relapse rate suggest that such a decrease would have a low impact on the treatment effect. However, in the absence of efficacy data of fingolimod at doses lower than the therapeutic dose, their coadministration should be used with caution.

Determination of Seminal Concentration of Fingolimod and Fingolimod-Phosphate in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Receiving Chronic Treatment With Fingolimod.

The safety profile of fingolimod 0.5 mg, approved therapy for relapsing multiple sclerosis, is well established in clinical and real-world studies. As fingolimod is teratogenic in rats, it was considered important to assess the concentrations of fingolimod and its active metabolite, fingolimod-phosphate, in the semen of male patients on treatment and the risk of harming a fetus in a pregnant partner. In this multicenter open-label study, 13 male patients receiving fingolimod for at least 6 months provided 1 semen and 1 blood sample for analyte concentration measurements. The steady-state seminal concentrations of fingolimod and fingolimod-phosphate were close to those simultaneously observed in blood. The amount of fingolimod-related material in 10 mL of ejaculate was estimated to be 47.5 ng. The estimated fingolimod and fingolimod-phosphate blood Cmax values in a woman having regular sexual intercourse with a male patient treated with fingolimod 0.5 mg were approximately 400 and 2400 times smaller than the estimated values in the embryo-fetal development study in rats at the no-observed-adverse-event level. Consequently, the risk of harming a fetus in a pregnant woman is considered extremely unlikely.

Can Disproportionality Analysis of Post-marketing Case Reports be Used for Comparison of Drug Safety Profiles?

Clinical trials usually do not have the power to detect rare adverse drug reactions. Spontaneous adverse reaction reports as for example available in post-marketing safety databases such as the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) are therefore a valuable source of information to detect new safety signals early. To screen such large data-volumes for safety signals, data-mining algorithms based on the concept of disproportionality have been developed. Because disproportionality analysis is based on spontaneous reports submitted for a large number of drugs and adverse event types, one might consider using these data to compare safety profiles across drugs. In fact, recent publications have promoted this practice, claiming to provide guidance on treatment decisions to healthcare decision makers. In this article we investigate the validity of this approach. We argue that disproportionality cannot be used for comparative drug safety analysis beyond basic hypothesis generation because measures of disproportionality are: (1) missing the incidence denominators, (2) subject to severe reporting bias, and (3) not adjusted for confounding. Hypotheses generated by disproportionality analyses must be investigated by more robust methods before they can be allowed to influence clinical decisions.

FTY720: placebo-controlled study of the effect on cardiac rate and rhythm in healthy subjects.

The purpose of this double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to measure the effects of FTY720, a novel immunomodulator, on heart rate and rhythm in healthy volunteers. Subjects (n = 66) were randomized to FTY720 1.25 mg or 5 mg or placebo administered once daily for 7 days. Continuous telemetry revealed an acute, dose-dependent decrease in mean heart rate (10-bpm decrease vs placebo) following the first dose of FTY720, with a nadir generally 4 hours postdose. Although a persistent FTY720-related decrease in heart rate was measured from day 2 to day 7, additional doses of FTY720 after day 2 resulted in no further incremental decreases. Mean PR interval increased by approximately 8 to 10 msec in FTY720-treated subjects on day 1. FTY720 did not increase the QRS or QT interval. These results confirm that the first dose of FTY720 has a mild to moderate negative chronotropic effect.

Fingolimod (FTY720) in severe hepatic impairment: pharmacokinetics and relationship to markers of liver function.

The authors assessed the impact of severe hepatic impairment on the disposition of fingolimod--a sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor immunomodulator primarily metabolized by CYP4F2--in 6 patients and 6 matched healthy controls who received a single 5-mg oral dose. Compared with healthy controls, severe hepatic-impaired subjects had a doubled area under the concentration time curve (AUC) and 50% prolonged elimination half-life but a similar peak blood concentration. When these data were combined with those from a previous study in mild and moderate hepatic-impaired subjects, there were significant positive correlations between fingolimod AUC versus bilirubin (r = 0.683) and prothrombin time (r = 0.777) and a significant negative correlation versus albumin (r = 0.578), confirming the importance of liver function for fingolimod clearance. For patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class C), a standard first dose of fingolimod could be given followed by a maintenance dose that is reduced by half from the normal maintenance dose.

FTY720, a novel immunomodulator in de novo kidney transplant patients: pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationship.

The pharmacokinetics, safety, and preliminary efficacy of FTY720, a novel immunomodulator, were examined in de novo renal transplant patients. Both noncompartmental and population methods were used to estimate pharmacokinetic estimates in the patients. The steady-state plasma concentrations of FTY720 increased in accordance with maintenance dose level, indicating linearity in clearance and volume of distribution over the 0.25- to 2.5-mg dose range. The pharmacokinetics of FTY720 in de novo renal transplant patients were characterized by the long terminal phase half-life of approximately 200 hours across doses, high volume of distribution (>3000 L), and low clearance (10.8 L/h). The intersubject variation of clearance was 55%, and the intrasubject variation of FTY720 concentrations was 28%. The population analysis revealed significant positive relationships between baseline alkaline phosphatase and clearance, as well as between baseline body weight on apparent volume of distribution. There was no relationship between FTY720 concentrations within a given FTY720 dose cohort and the rate of allograft rejection.

Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety of multiple doses of FTY720 in stable renal transplant patients: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase I study.

BACKGROUND: FTY720, a novel immunomodulator, displays potent immunosuppressive activity in a variety of preclinical transplant models. This study examined the safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of multiple doses of FTY720 in stable renal transplant patients. METHODS: This randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase I study included adults who had been maintained on a regimen of cyclosporine A (CsA) microemulsion and prednisone (or its equivalent) for at least 1 year after renal transplantation. Patients received once-daily doses of 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, or 5.0 mg FTY720, or placebo for 28 days. After completion of study drug administration, the patients were monitored until day 56 by serial laboratory tests, clinical examinations, and recording of adverse events. The study includes 76 treatment courses (61 FTY720 and 15 placebo), with 65 patients enrolled once and 11 reenrolled. RESULTS: FTY720 doses greater than or equal to 1.0 mg/day produced a significant reduction in peripheral blood lymphocyte count by up to 85%, which reversed within 3 days after discontinuation of study medication. Compared with placebo-treated patients, FTY720 subjects did not show a major increase in adverse events or a change in renal function. Pharmacokinetic measurements revealed that FTY720 displayed linear relations of doses and concentrations over a wide range, but had no effect on CsA exposure. CONCLUSIONS: At doses up to 5.0 mg/day for 28 days, stable renal transplant patients treated with FTY720 in combination with CsA and prednisone displayed a dose-dependent, reversible decline in peripheral blood lymphocytes without an enhanced incidence of collateral toxicities, except possibly bradycardia.