[Hidradenitis suppurativa /acne inversa-surgical options, reconstruction and combinations with drug therapies-an update]. / Hidradenitis suppurativa/Acne inversa ­ operative Optionen, Rekonstruktionen und Kombinationen mit medikamentösen Therapien ­ Ein Update.

Hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (HS/AI) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease whose treatment includes both conservative and surgical treatment options. In Hurley stages II and III, surgical resection of irreversibly destroyed tissue should be the objective. For this purpose several resection techniques exist, which differ primarily with regard to their invasiveness and tendency to recur. To date, there is no generally accepted consensus on the use of different resection and reconstruction techniques or the inclusion of drug therapies in the overall therapeutic concept.

Current and future treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa.

This scholarly review on the current and future treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) focuses on medical and surgical treatment options, while novel pipeline drugs are also discussed. Treatment goals are to limit the incidence and duration of flares, reducing inflammation and suppuration, achieving local cure after surgery and, most importantly, to improve the quality of life of patients with HS. The type of medication and/or surgery should be chosen based on the stage of the disease and the degree of inflammation. However, the lack of a simple scoring system and the lack of clear surgical outcome definitions hamper the interpretation of treatment efficacy and the comparison between different treatment strategies. The therapeutic pipeline for HS is gradually expanding, and will probably lead to a broader panel of more effective therapeutic options.

[Drug therapy of acne inversa]. / Medikamentöse Therapie der Acne inversa.

Acne inversa is a chronic inflammatory destructive skin disease that affects about 1% of the population. The therapy should be personalized and consists of surgical and conservative procedures. Antibiotics are administered either topically or systemically. Combination therapy with clindamycin and rifampicin for 10-12 weeks can be very effective. Furthermore, TNF-α inhibitors show adequate efficacy and can be recommended. Adalimumab is the only approved drug product for systemic treatment of acne inversa. The efficacy of retinoids is controversial. Isotretinoin cannot be recommended for the treatment of acne inversa; however, acitretin has been proven to be more effective. Immune-modulating substances, like dapsone, cyclosporine A, methotrexate, colchicine, or corticosteroids, can be considered; however, the study data are insufficient for recommendation. Hormonal therapies can influence the course of the disease. Antiseptics are applied independent of the stage of disease. Patients should be informed about triggering factors.

Lipocalin-2 is expressed by activated granulocytes and keratinocytes in affected skin and reflects disease activity in acne inversa/hidradenitis suppurativa.

BACKGROUND: Acne inversa (AI)/hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by painful axillary, inguinal and perianal skin lesions with deep-seated nodules, abscesses and fistulae. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify and characterize the key players in AI pathogenesis. METHODS: Epidemiological and anamnestic data for patients with AI were collected, and blood and skin samples were also taken. Healthy participants and patients with psoriasis served as controls. Assessment of samples and cultures of primary cells was performed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, quantitative polymerase chain reaction on reverse transcribed mRNA, and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Of 35 mediators quantified in the blood of patients with AI, lipocalin-2 (LCN2) appeared as one of the most significantly upregulated parameters compared with healthy participants [85·8 ± 12·2 (n = 18) vs. 41·8 ± 4·2 (n = 15); P < 0·001]. Strongly elevated LCN2 expression was present in AI lesions, with granulocytes and keratinocytes being sources of this expression. In vitro, these cells upregulated LCN2 production in response to tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and a positive relationship between systemic TNF-α and LCN2 levels (rs = 0·55, P = 0·011; n = 20) was evident for AI. LCN2 blood levels correlated with AI disease severity (rs = 0·65, P < 0·001; n = 29), but not with disease duration, age, sex, body mass index or smoking habit. Detailed analyses revealed a link with the number of skin regions containing nodules and fistulae, but not scars. CONCLUSIONS: LCN2 might serve as a blood biomarker for the objective assessment of inflammatory activity in AI. We suggest a self-amplification loop comprising TNF-α, neutrophilic granulocytes and LCN2, which contributes to the recurrent skin neutrophil infiltration in AI, clinically evident as pus.

Development and validation of the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4), a novel dynamic scoring system to assess HS severity.

BACKGROUND: A validated tool for the dynamic severity assessment of hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (HS) is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a novel dynamic scoring system to assess the severity of HS. METHODS: A Delphi voting procedure was conducted among the members of the European Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation (EHSF) to achieve consensus towards an initial HS Severity Score System (HS4). Strengths and weaknesses of HS4 were examined by a multicentre prospective study. Multivariate logistic regression, discriminant analysis and receiver operating characteristic curves, as well as examination for correlation (Spearman's rho) and agreement (Cohen's kappa) with existing scores, were engaged to recognize the variables for a new International HS4 (IHS4) that was established by a second Delphi round. RESULTS: Consensus HS4 was based on number of skin lesions, number of skin areas involved and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and was evaluated by a sample of 236 patients from 11 centres. Subsequently, a multivariate regression model calculated adjusted odds ratios for several clinical signs. Nodules, abscesses and draining tunnels resulted as the scoring variables. Three candidate scores were presented to the second Delphi round. The resulting IHS4 score is arrived at by the number of nodules (multiplied by 1) plus the number of abscesses (multiplied by 2) plus the number of draining tunnels (multiplied by 4). A total score of 3 or less signifies mild, 4-10 signifies moderate and 11 or higher signifies severe disease. Cohen's kappa was fair (κ = 0·32) compared with Hurley classification, and moderate (κ = 0·49) compared with Expert Opinion. Correlation was good (ρ > 0·6) with Hurley classification, Expert Opinion, Physician's Global Assessment and Modified Sartorius score, and moderate for DLQI (ρ = 0·36). CONCLUSIONS: The novel IHS4 is a validated tool to dynamically assess HS severity and can be used both in real-life and the clinical trials setting.

[Acne inversa/hidradenitis suppurativa: An update]. / Acne inversa/Hidradenitis suppurativa: Ein Update.

Acne inversa (AI)/hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic, recurrent, immune-mediated dermatosis characterized by deep inflammatory nodules, abscesses, fistulas, and undermined scars in skin areas bearing apocrine glands. In addition to the cutaneous manifestation, numerous AI patients show metabolic changes, spondyloarthritis, and depression. AI leads to a strong reduction in the quality of life and an impairment of the sexual life of affected individuals and often culminates in social withdrawal, stigmatization, unemployment, and suicidal thoughts. In this overview, we summarized the most important facts about AI and propose a simple algorithm for therapy.

European S1 guideline for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa.

Hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory, recurrent, debilitating skin disease of the hair follicle that usually presents after puberty with painful, deep-seated, inflamed lesions in the apocrine gland-bearing areas of the body, most commonly the axillae, inguinal and anogenital regions. A mean disease incidence of 6.0 per 100,000 person-years and an average prevalence of 1% has been reported in Europe. HS has the highest impact on patients' quality of life among all assessed dermatological diseases. HS is associated with a variety of concomitant and secondary diseases, such as obesity, metabolic syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, e.g. Crohn's disease, spondyloarthropathy, follicular occlusion syndrome and other hyperergic diseases. The central pathogenic event in HS is believed to be the occlusion of the upper part of the hair follicle leading to a perifollicular lympho-histiocytic inflammation. A highly significant association between the prevalence of HS and current smoking (Odds ratio 12.55) and overweight (Odds ratio 1.1 for each body mass index unit) has been documented. The European S1 HS guideline suggests that the disease should be treated based on its individual subjective impact and objective severity. Locally recurring lesions can be treated by classical surgery or LASER techniques, whereas medical treatment either as monotherapy or in combination with radical surgery is more appropriate for widely spread lesions. Medical therapy may include antibiotics (clindamycin plus rifampicine, tetracyclines), acitretin and biologics (adalimumab, infliximab). A Hurley severity grade-relevant treatment of HS is recommended by the expert group following a treatment algorithm. Adjuvant measurements, such as pain management, treatment of superinfections, weight loss and tobacco abstinence have to be considered.